User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Chaos 
 Espionage

For all Espionage fans


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33   > >>
17. June 2009, 17:44:29
Chaos 
Subject: Re: achievements
Nothingness: No, if you already earned the achievements you 'll get them. Like capturing mines undetected pieces. But if the achievement requires you win the game ('rear of secrets' and 'first line hero') you won't earn the achievement if your opponent resigns... :(

17. June 2009, 15:00:59
Nothingness 
im unsure what you mean about resigning? so if i achieve 5 things in a certain game and at the end my opp resigns i lose the ones i have already achieved? That makes no sense?

17. June 2009, 14:29:33
Chaos 
Subject: Re: Achivements
AbigailII: Don't expect me to continue a lost game just so my opponent can gain an archievement.

Exactly, that's why it's disappointing to me. I don't want to ask others to drag along agame just for the amusement I get of gaining an achievement.

17. June 2009, 11:02:02
AbigailII 
Subject: Re: Achivements
dAGGER: do you really play to gain achievements?

I don't. I don't compromise my playing style in order to be able to gain an achievement. Or will I play games I otherwise wouldn't play.

Chaos: What is disappointing was that a game resigned by the opponent doesn't count as a win for an achievement.

Don't expect me to continue a lost game just so my opponent can gain an archievement.

17. June 2009, 08:37:26
aaru 
Subject: Re: Achivements
Chaos: If you needs achievements, please write about it in the game.

16. June 2009, 15:49:31
Chaos 
Subject: Re: Achivements
dAGGER: I see the achievements as challenges. It's fun to try to win with a difficult set up.

What is disappointing was that a game resigned by the opponent doesn't count as a win for an achievement...

16. June 2009, 14:01:39
dAGGER 
Subject: Re: Achivements
Guys,
do you really play to gain achievements?
I play to win, if I gain achievements, that's OK, but I don't mind much about them.

13. June 2009, 11:02:25
Sandoz 
Subject: Achivements
I found it. Thank you Nothingness & Chaos!

12. June 2009, 16:54:16
Chaos 
Subject: Re: Achievements
Sandoz: You can also go there by clicking on 'Achievements' behind your name (where it says how many you have), go to 'games' then 'espionage'. Then you'll see at once which ones you already have and what you have to do for the others.

12. June 2009, 15:19:29
Nothingness 
go to achievements on the left then click the tab that says achievements then scroll down and Espionage is at the bottom.

12. June 2009, 15:05:50
Sandoz 
Subject: Re:
Nothingness:

where did you find them??

11. June 2009, 22:37:07
Nothingness 
i found them

11. June 2009, 22:23:26
Nothingness 
how can i find the achievements? i cant find them until i have achieved them. so i dont know what to go for....

11. June 2009, 20:59:38
SL-Mark 
Subject: Re: Achievements
Chaos: Yes, I think the espionage achievements are good.

Notably the 'First Line Defence' and ' Rear of Secrets' are excellent, both encouraging a different line up and increased risk. Yes going for them, but won't tell you which games ;)

It will take time to get 100 mines, and like you, never target them (unless desperate ). Even now, I still have to get the 'Successful Sapper.'

Have a count of 7 out of 100 on capturing undetected pieces, so nearly a tenth of the way there!

11. June 2009, 18:56:24
Chaos 
Subject: Games
I have a few games in the waiting room. Anyone in for a game?

11. June 2009, 18:55:38
Chaos 
Subject: Achievements
anyone else working hard to earn all espionage achievements? The 100 undetected pieces,and especially the 100 mines are quite a lot! Usually I don't go for the mines.

30. May 2009, 23:56:59
Nothingness 
Subject: Stratego
Modified by Nothingness (30. May 2009, 23:57:19)
I found out that they have stratego on facebook. just pick a user name and play in less than 15 seconds. im on under gould55

17. May 2009, 17:37:11
Celticjim 
ah,thx rod I didn't realise that.I'm sure monkey would welcome any new members

17. May 2009, 17:29:30
rod03801 
Subject: Re: open fast tourny
Celticjim: Just a reminder, only people in that fellowship can sign up for that tourney.

17. May 2009, 12:12:04
Celticjim 
Subject: open fast tourny
monkeys swinging madhouse tourny.
2 day limit-standard vacation
come sign up for a game of open fast
Madhouse 2009 - Week 19

6. May 2009, 04:04:02
happy hermit 
Subject: Re: this is quiet man / Eric Hanson
dAGGER:

Good to hear from you. Let me know when you have time and I promise not to time-out. :)

Have fun,

Eric

5. May 2009, 14:23:03
dAGGER 
Subject: Re: this is quiet man / Eric Hanson
happy hermit:
Sorry quiet man, I have too many games running at the moment. But I'd like to challenge you as soon as possible.
Please don't forget about this site!!!!
If you follow the thread of this board, you will see that the League is born again!
I hope to see you in next event......

1. May 2009, 17:28:56
happy hermit 
Subject: this is quiet man / Eric Hanson
Someone please send me a game invite before I forget about this site again. :)

19. April 2009, 06:21:08
redfrog 
Subject: moderator
Modified by redfrog (19. April 2009, 06:21:27)
anyone want to be moderator of this board? please send me a PM....

16. April 2009, 14:17:29
Varazslo 
Hi. I made a tournament Easter Egg which includes Espionage games and so far it's half fill. It is an elimination for 16. 3 days + vacation. I would by glad if somebody sign up please. Thank you

10. April 2009, 13:20:36
ca119 
Subject: Playing all day long ;)
I`m just a little disapointed! You see them online, but they don`t move (as they have so many other games to play).

Since its a tournament they should prefer OUR SABOTAGE GAME and not wait until the timelimit (3 day`s+VAC) is almost zero before they move.

Soon 2 of 4 tournament games are finished, while the others are on move 3. It`s there a round 2 and 3? Perhaps NEXT YEAR with this speed!

10. April 2009, 12:57:00
AbigailII 
Subject: Re: Slow players
Chaos: Note that this is only an issue if you play with a Fisher clock setting if there's no (or a small) increment on each move. If you gain 24 hours or more on each move, the risk is much smaller (it still can give one player some advantage as one player may build up "spare time" more rapidly than the other though - but even this is a solved problem).

10. April 2009, 12:44:28
lukulus 
Subject: Re: Slow players
ca119: everyone can play 200 simultaneously

10. April 2009, 11:08:19
Chaos 
Subject: Re: Slow players
Modified by Chaos (10. April 2009, 11:11:34)
ca119: Earlier Abigaill expressed my feelings about the Fisher's clock very well: IMO, such a move pace is totally out of place in BK - unless players play at the same times, it's very likely to give one player a huge advantage clock wise. (Say you always play between 12AM and 9PM, dedicating 9 hours a day playing BK. I only play 10 minutes a day, from 10PM till 10:10PM (time adjusted to your timezone). You will then have a serious risk of losing our game on time, while I will not. Simply because there will be 14 hours between my move and your first opportunity to move, and only 10 hours between your move and my move. I will gain 4 hours/move on the clock - even if you are a much more dedicated player than I am).


 


We shouldn't have people lose tournament games because of timezones or situations as described above!!!

10. April 2009, 10:55:38
ca119 
Subject: Slow players
There are at least 2 players who play rather slow/when there close to the timelimit, as they play 200 and more games simultary. Thats pretty sad as others play fast (several moves a day). This will have an affect on the following games. Perhaps Fischer's clock with a timelimit of 2 months for a game would bee the thing?

31. March 2009, 14:06:02
dAGGER 
Subject: Re:
Thank you to Chaos and Bosse for making this big tournament real.
Am I forgetting someone else?

31. March 2009, 14:03:44
dAGGER 
Wow, it has started!
Everybody have fun!

31. March 2009, 13:28:28
Chaos 
You're welcome Bosse, it's thanks to you we've got this tournament in the firts place! It's great to see we've made such a good start straight away Can't wait to get my games started

31. March 2009, 12:44:17
SL-Bosse 
Subject: Re: Sabotage Leauge's first tournament

So now it has started. 25 players!!!


A big thanks to Chaos for all help with getting players. 
Good luck to all!


22. March 2009, 00:44:47
Nothingness 
Subject: very nice!
Wow thats a lot of people!

18. March 2009, 08:09:36
SL-Bosse 
Modified by SL-Bosse (19. March 2009, 06:16:43)
Already 7 12 16 21 players have signed this tournament


Sabotage Leauge - Small Fast Espionage - #1


17. March 2009, 13:00:38
Chaos 
Subject: Advertise for the tournament!
SL-Bosse: Yes, it's English now :) Oh, and we should all urge espionage players to join this tourney! notify all your (former) espionage opponents!

17. March 2009, 12:33:34
SL-Bosse 
Subject: Re: Help!
Chaos: I saw that the "sign-up" time was wrong. So I have deleted the first one, and have set up a new one.

17. March 2009, 12:28:12
SL-Bosse 
Is it English now?

17. March 2009, 12:15:21
Chaos 
Subject: Help!
I joined the tournament, though I had to guess which link to click b/c my Swedish isn't that good. But since that click all content on the site is shown in Swedis to me!!! Are you trying to get us all into learning your language, Bosse? ;)

17. March 2009, 12:09:10
SL-Bosse 
Modified by SL-Bosse (17. March 2009, 12:32:33)

So let us see if we can get a tournament

Sabotage Leauge - Small Fast Espionage - #1

16. March 2009, 16:06:38
Chaos 
Subject: Re: Tournament?
The Other Me: I like group play as well

16. March 2009, 14:45:46
Dry Martini 
Subject: Re: Tournament?
SL-Bosse: I would prefer group play. At least I get to play a few games instead of just one. The 3 day limit with vacations seems fair. I am ok with any variant .

15. March 2009, 05:39:05
Nothingness 
Subject: ...
i never could understand that setting either!

15. March 2009, 00:29:07
Chaos 
Subject: Re:
Tian-Xian: I couldn't agree more!

14. March 2009, 16:26:54
Tian-Xian 
Subject: Re:
I had lost in a tornament & asked Fencer but got no reply & so am stuck waiting for tournie to finish. I think it should be automatic that if you are out of a tournie you can join another.

10. March 2009, 11:06:47
Chaos 
Subject: Re: Tournament?
SL-Bosse: small fast please?

10. March 2009, 06:54:48
SL-Bosse 
Subject: Tournament?
OK so lets start a new tournament with 3-days limit and normal vaccation. Should it be round-robin/groups or elimination? Which type of game should we start with?

9. March 2009, 14:04:45
dAGGER 
Subject: Re:
Nothingness: I agree with you.
I usually make more than 1 move per day, but sometimes it may happen to lose some days or even 1 week.
On IYT you can change your time limit, but only out of a tournament: this is one of the reasons that made the League successful.
I believe a 3-days limit with vacations on may work: the game would be fast enough and you can avoid problems depending on weekend days or holidays.
I think this is a good compromise for the first "gran slam" tournaments.

9. March 2009, 06:28:43
Dry Martini 
Subject: about time limit
Several months ago I invited to a game all the high rated players I could see. To my suprise all gladly accepeted my challenge!. Many of these turned out to be very educational and I believe will make me a better player. Most of these good games lasted over two months. I currenty have a game , played at what I consider a reasonable pace, that has lasted over 5 months. Good game too. I would hate to have such a game in progress only to have one player time out.
I realize that a tournament may last for a long time, however I prefer completed games instead of games decided on a time limit or deadline for the game.

<< <   24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top