User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203   > >>
9. November 2007, 21:51:52
alanback 
Subject: Re: Random game teams
WellyWales:  I have to confess I am totally befuddled about the uproar over this issue.  Seems to me some folks with a lot of time on their hands are making a huge fuss over nothing.  Think of directing all that reforming energy out into the real world where it could actually do some good ...

Having said that, this is a user-supported site, and I would expect Fencer to take the users' wishes into account.  What I would prefer not to see is the same people posting the same complaint over and over again.

9. November 2007, 21:48:09
WellyWales 
Subject: Random game teams
All this does not seem right to me, we all want this to be a fair game site equal to all.

I propose that Fencer scrap all Random Game teams, there should not be a way of building up teams before it is open to every fellowship, I can see this being abused,
I think we all want a level playing field here

9. November 2007, 21:08:49
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
alanback:

9. November 2007, 21:07:50
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
alanback:

9. November 2007, 21:05:12
alanback 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
TarantinoFan:  You could call the testing fellowship the "Beta Blockers" 

9. November 2007, 21:04:49
Andersp 
Subject: Re:

TarantinoFan:   Whatever we call it  "certain user" / "Troll" / "Tester" doesnt really matter :)   but to divide members into "we" and "they" is never  good .


I think my fellowship idea should minimize the risque that something goes "public" before it was meant to.


9. November 2007, 21:03:53
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Snoopy: And these things need to be tried out. As I said with the current feeling on BK at the moment, releasing a new thing that doesn't work would only cause more problems.

I think Andersp idea of a testing f/s is a good one. I would be part of that to try out things and work out bugs and help tweak the games to make them right before they are realeased

9. November 2007, 21:00:20
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re:
Andersp: I am not one of Fencer's Testers. In fact just the other day I was a "certain user".

Your idea has merit though. Because I thought of exactly the same thing.

9. November 2007, 20:58:55
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
pauloaguia:
i might well of missed the point of the very first post on this and im sorry to anyone if i did
but i saw another case of cloning gammon happening again where ppl got to play that game before the masses

9. November 2007, 20:57:43
Andersp 

Maybe its better to create a fellowship where Fencer and his "testers" can discuss "not public" features.


I think it should be better than sending Pms..or?


9. November 2007, 20:53:30
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Snoopy: We know GOD and he gave us the down low on upcoming creations!

9. November 2007, 20:53:12
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Modified by pauloaguia (9. November 2007, 20:53:22)
Snoopy: they aren't trying... they're just exploring bugs... but if you want to try it to, just add the string tp=255 to the end of your fellowship page URL and you'll find a "random game" team you can join to... but that you can do nothing with :P

9. November 2007, 20:52:40
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Snoopy: I'm sure if you had done what Nirvana and I both did, ie PM Mad Monkey, he would have told you the exact same thing he told us. It doesn't work yet but here's how to do it anyway.

9. November 2007, 20:48:54
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Modified by ScrambledEggs (9. November 2007, 20:50:34)
TarantinoFan:
and the point im making and will keep making it
however it was found why should one fellowship or now 3 have an advantage over every other fellowship
and has Madmonkey said earlier it dosnt actually exist on BK yet how can you try out something that dosnt exist

9. November 2007, 20:48:09
alanback 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Snoopy:  I'll give ya $5 for it!

9. November 2007, 20:43:41
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Snoopy: Please stop shouting.

This random team was found by accident when Mad Monkey was doing a completely different thing.

He started his team as an experiment to see what would happen.

Nirvana and I both found the concept interesting so we PM'd Mad Monkey to ask about it.

Mad Monkey and I set up a team to see if the challenge would even start yet. As you know by reading the original message that has caused all this drama, nothing has happened with that challenge as yet.

My message to Mad Monkey on the subject was to leave it and wait and see. All great things come from trial and error. If we have it ready to go we can test it and let Fencer know of any bugs etc so that he can release it to the paying members in good order and without a lot of bugs etc.

I'm sorry that you find our experiments so detrimental to the other f/s but I think releasing an untested, untried new thing on the site at the moment would be a lot more detrimental, not only to your f/s but also to the site as a whole. With the recent upset over BK being down quite a lot a new thing that doesn't work properly wouldn't go down very well with the frustrated paying customer.

9. November 2007, 20:41:39
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Andersp:
i swap my black rook for anything right now

9. November 2007, 20:39:56
Andersp 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
MadMonkey:   I would rather be a computer engineer than a Black Rook, so i absolutely dont consider myself better than you!

9. November 2007, 20:33:17
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
MadMonkey:
i was not trying to create trouble and i was not butting in
i was asking why one fellowship should have a very clear advantage of building up a team on what is NOT AVAILABLE TO EVERY PAYING CUSTOMER

9. November 2007, 20:30:19
alanback 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey:  You are quite correct to conclude that messages intended only for one person should not be posted publicly.  (With the possible exception of Thoughts and Prayers.)  Message boards are intended for everyone to read and comment on anything posted here.

9. November 2007, 20:25:42
Mousetrap 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Modified by Mousetrap (9. November 2007, 20:26:08)
MadMonkey: I do not agree. I did not reply to cause conflit. If someone does not agree with what I say as you don,t. That is not conflit to me. That is your right as is Snoppy,s or anyone elses.

9. November 2007, 20:24:43
Andersp 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
MadMonkey:  Even we "Certain users" / Trolls appreciate that you are helping Fencer build Brain King, please accept our sincere THANK YOU!

9. November 2007, 20:10:29
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Mousetrap: If i address this to you (as i have), i expect you to read it and reply if you wish, as i would any form of communication addressed to anyone individually.

Some just reply to things to create problems & conflict as this has just proved

9. November 2007, 20:04:31
Mousetrap 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
MadMonkey: Everyone is alowed their say. Just because someone does not agree with you does not mean they are butting in. It would not pay for all trees to be privots.

9. November 2007, 19:40:44
MadMonkey 
Fencer: Sorry about this post earlier that was addressed to you

In future i will PM you about everything as others can not help butting in with trivial comments

The idea of this board is for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future or is it not

OR is it about sulking because others are trying to help build BrainKing and others are not, they find more fun in moaning rather than trying to improve things

Well according to some, JUST because they have a Black Rook it makes them better than everyone else, well let them think that.

I know personally what do for the site

If there are issues that need addressing by yourself or just need mentioning, i will do it if i think it is necessary.

Try to think constructive, then things may happen


9. November 2007, 18:44:13
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re:
Andersp:
yep
being a black rook sucks big time

9. November 2007, 18:26:30
Andersp 
Subject: Re:
Snoopy: Remember there are "Certain users" 

9. November 2007, 07:42:00
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re:
Modified by ScrambledEggs (9. November 2007, 08:10:13)
MadMonkey:
so if it hasnt been introduced at all why are you asking
why your team challenge match hasnt started
because surely something that hasnt been introduced cant possible start

9. November 2007, 07:32:59
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Snoopy: It has not been introduced at all

Its a bug that i found after creating a Random Tournament. It is something i guess Fencer is working on !!

9. November 2007, 07:23:48
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re:
Modified by ScrambledEggs (9. November 2007, 07:32:13)
MadMonkey:
but has i said before it should be introduced at the same time for everyone
why should a few in the know gets things
after all we are all paying members
brings to mind when cloning backgammon was first introduced some players in the know got to play it ages before everyone else did

9. November 2007, 07:19:45
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Snoopy: You have to change the URL to team 255, and there is the random Team, but as Fencer said last week, it is not finished yet, but you can build a Team ready

9. November 2007, 07:10:51
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re:
Modified by ScrambledEggs (9. November 2007, 07:19:19)
MadMonkey:
so where are they
hardly seems fair when some are gaven a chance to create teams when most dont even have that option

9. November 2007, 07:09:08
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Snoopy: all Fellowships have them, well Nirvana & Tarantino asked me where they were and they have them

9. November 2007, 07:04:00
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey:
might be more helpfull if all fellowships got these options at the same time

9. November 2007, 06:30:02
MadMonkey 
Modified by MadMonkey (9. November 2007, 06:41:40)
Fencer: Set up a challenge match last night for random game. It set up fine, but just stays in waiting.

Is that because you have not finished it yet ?

8. November 2007, 01:39:22
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Rose: Funny you should say that

I Archive all Tournament winners for a week to post them at the same time, as i run so many. When i tried at the weekend to go through all last weeks, several of them would not open OR were just blank

I do not know if this is the same message problem as a couple of weeks ago i reported to Fencer, when trying to reply to a message from someone it would not give me a box to write in. He fixed that though but i had to tell him who the message was for

8. November 2007, 01:31:23
Rose 
I'm having issues with archived messages.. I scroll  down to reread
what I had written and only half the message is there.. the 'rest' is sort of
cut off to the far right... Wonder if anyone else has had that happen?

7. November 2007, 14:11:35
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Screen Layout
tonyh: Sorry, seems like Paulo had the right idea for you...

7. November 2007, 13:34:17
tonyh 
Subject: Re: Screen Layout
Czuch: I want to get rid of the message thing on the top left of the screen. I've tried 'no fonts' but that does not remove the three titles.

7. November 2007, 12:42:41
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Screen Layout
tonyh: I use the no fonts, try it.

7. November 2007, 10:39:49
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: Screen Layout
tonyh: for now, with a custom stylesheet where you set the visibility of "style-switcher" to none

7. November 2007, 10:35:45
tonyh 
Subject: Screen Layout
How may I get rid of the 'Castle - Simple - No fonts' at the top?

7. November 2007, 09:44:52
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: Pupaphobia
alanback: thanks :)

7. November 2007, 02:23:33
Purple 
Subject: Re: Pupaphobia
alanback: Good. It's getting too close to Purplephobia. lol

7. November 2007, 02:09:06
alanback 
Subject: Re: Pupaphobia
Tuesday:  I think I'd better declare us before we get into trouble!

7. November 2007, 02:01:51
alanback 
Subject: Re: Pupaphobia
Tuesday:  How about this one?  It's on the Wikipedia page for Pupa ... the pupa of another insect I hope never to meet, the "cockchafer" ...

Cockchafer pupa

<img>

7. November 2007, 01:54:09
alanback 
Subject: Pupaphobia
    An irrational fear of pupae?  pupils? puptents? 

<< <   194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top