 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 22. May 2006, 01:37:49 Subject: Re: Czuch Chuckers: Google toolbar is evil. 4. May 2006, 15:29:40 Subject: Re: Highest Rating mctrivia: Should be more like 100 though, problem is that the population of the site is small and many people are not that established, so 25 games here doesn't show as much as 25 games at a chess club against well established players. 2. May 2006, 15:27:45 Subject: Re: New chess variant nabla: Hostage Chess looks like fun, and it can be played on a regular board (unlike loop et al where the pieces change color). 8. April 2006, 21:13:09 Subject: Re: Statistics mctrivia: if the original number (0-1) was random then it wouldn't have that effect, unless 0 and 1 are not possible or something like that.
Would the result be less random than a real dice I wonder? 8. April 2006, 19:43:37 Subject: Re: Statistics mctrivia: Sounds like a bug in the algorithm to me, why would they program it like that? 6. April 2006, 22:15:50 Subject: Match Score Could we have the match score for a points/wins match above the game, the same way we do in a cube match?
Thanks. 6. April 2006, 04:02:15 Subject: Re: mctrivia: It's as silly as the whole "family values" nonsense the republicans keep driveling about. My family swears as well by the way. ;) 6. April 2006, 03:13:21 Subject: Re: ScarletRose: My family argues, so i'm not sure what "family oriented" is supposed to mean ;) 5. April 2006, 23:26:10 Subject: Re: Discussion Boards ScarletRose: Yes, wouldn't it be nice if there was a religion that practiced tolerance, or better yet respect, for other points of view. Sadly such a religion doesn't exist.
Therefore we should certainly have a religion board! What fun to see the arguments/fights/slurs etc by all the silly zealots. My vote is Aye!  3. April 2006, 07:04:51 Subject: Re: Autovacation mctrivia: I never quite understood the need for weekends at all. If you are working surely there's less time to spend making moves. 3. April 2006, 00:23:11 Subject: Re: Autovacation BIG BAD WOLF: I'll go along with the 5 day maximum, it would at least prevent people ignoring games for weeks on end. 2. April 2006, 23:53:09 Subject: Re: Autovacation andreas: autovac is silly. If you have a vacation you can set it up, no need for it to be automatic. Also, the game in question is a tournament. 2. April 2006, 23:33:16 Subject: Re: Autovacation Deceased: That's ridiculous. Since you can have 6 month memberships, that effectively doubles the vacation, which is too much already! 2. April 2006, 23:22:29 Subject: Re: Autovacation What's more it was 15 before and after timing out yesterday. If it's still 15 in 4 hours when he times out again then that would surely prove it? 2. April 2006, 23:21:34 Subject: Re: Autovacation Deceased: It was 15 about a month ago, and it's still 15. Maybe it went down and back up? 2. April 2006, 19:05:31 Subject: Re: Autovacation mctrivia: Well I have one particular opponent (you can probably figure out who - i only have 25 games going) who has been stuck on 15 vacation days for weeks despite timing out in our game almost every day. 2. April 2006, 04:08:22 Subject: Autovacation Ok, I'm totally confused by the autovacation feature. I'm playing someone who continues to time out against me every single day in a couple of games, yet his vacation days don't come down at all and haven't for weeks. Can someone explain how this is possible.
aarg. <feature request> Can we get rid of this useless feature please? Particularly since it seems to not be working. </feature request> 1. April 2006, 19:56:25 Subject: Re: close but not actually autopass mctrivia: Better implementation too, all the moves happen with one click, instead of having to cycle through the games. 1. April 2006, 19:49:49 Subject: Re: close but not actually autopass mctrivia: How about a button that says "Move now in all games I where I can't move" ? 13. March 2006, 02:18:20 Subject: Re: “practice board” mctrivia: I disagree, this is "play by mail" where it is common practise to play scenarios on a board before moving. I don't think that is cheating at all. 20. February 2006, 17:33:35 Subject: Re: Statistics ColonelCrockett: Also, the country I put up is my country of origin, not the country I presently live. 10. February 2006, 16:55:01 Subject: Re: The game GO Blackadder Mr K: I would start by beating your head against a wall. I've read several "rules" and am none the wiser. I second the question: Where can you get understandable rules on how to score? 2. February 2006, 01:45:49 I'm glad you guys cleared it up, i was beginning to really think the north and south poles were adjacent. 1. February 2006, 19:46:59 Subject: Re: playBunny:
Rule 1: Pedantic mathematicians have to make a saving throw each turn to avoid being sucked into a vortex. Rule 2: When there are no pedantic mathematicians left alive the game ends and we go to the pub for a drink. 29. January 2006, 00:52:29 Subject: Re: alanback: I'm not convinced, after all there are other games (all the chess variations) where this should also hold true but doesn't seem to. 24. January 2006, 22:42:09 Subject: Re: plaintiger: Do you have black curtains on the windows? What makes you think anybody actually cares a whit which pages you are currently viewing? What if they do? What mischief could I get up to just by knowing which game you're playing.
aarg. Privacy? Give me a break. 24. January 2006, 21:51:21 Subject: Re: plaintiger: Fencer got it, I was just trying to feed the paranoia that leads to people choosing cloak mode.
and, by the way, when did * become the universal symbol for emphasis? 24. January 2006, 16:50:29 I'd like a "stealth" mode, where I can see other people's bank account numbers but they can't tell until the money starts coming out.
Or maybe I could see exactly where people are physically so I can stalk them. 5. January 2006, 21:08:37 Subject: Re: Language playBunny: Nobody speaks like BBC english except BBC reporters. It sounds terrible to my ears. 28. December 2005, 15:46:55 Subject: Re: App mctrivia: Even so, it can't log in if you're not online!!!
Myabe you meant "logged in" rather than online? 28. December 2005, 04:26:40 Subject: Re: App mctrivia: If you're not online how would the application know about your games? 21. December 2005, 22:03:23 Subject: Re: Pedro Martínez: "not unambiguous" is close to not being an unambiguous phrase in itself in fact. 21. December 2005, 18:31:47 hmmm. After some searching it seems that as long as gambling is not your actual business it may be ok to gamble on line against other players who are also not profiting from the business.
Not really tested in court though, but that seems to be the best guess of several web sites i looked at. 21. December 2005, 18:10:51 Subject: Re: Brainbank - money for matches.... mctrivia: Maybe it's ok if you can't cash out and the money is used to pay for membership, and if the amounts are kept small it probably wouldn't be targetted.
The site itself would fall under Czeck law, so Fencer would be ok. It would be technically illegal for U.S residents to use it from inside the U.S however. 19. December 2005, 23:46:48 Subject: Re: In-game notes reza: I second (or third) the suggestion to have a single in game note and be able to edit it.
And you did good finding the grammatical error. Some of us english speakers should've went to class more often. 12. December 2005, 02:23:33 Subject: Re: a simple but fun strategy game would be fun pgt: Shmexagon 12. December 2005, 02:14:55 Subject: Re: a simple but fun strategy game would be fun WhiteTower: In the end it's just a system of accepting mouse clicks on certain images. The hard part is not the image map itself, but the fact that every possible board layout would need to be implemented, instead of every combination for a particular square. For this reason I think we need a board that can be drawn by joining parts.
Perhaps turning the board slightly to align the hexigons, and then making the "active" part of each square in the middle? Or something like that. 12. December 2005, 02:02:28 Subject: Re: a simple but fun strategy game would be fun mctrivia: you mean coordinate mapping. I was about to say the same thing :) 12. December 2005, 01:39:37 Subject: Re: a simple but fun strategy game would be fun nobleheart: I've played slay many times. Very good game, a lot of strategy, but simple to learn.
While you're at it try dino-football. Very addictive. :) 10. December 2005, 19:03:08 Subject: Re: Fencer: You should have underlined tha reply for emphasis. 5. December 2005, 23:14:37 Subject: Re: Logout link wellywales: That's what I meant by shared computer, but again: closing the browser does the same thing doesn't it? 5. December 2005, 23:10:35 Subject: Re: Logout link rod03801: I still don't get it. Unless you're on a shared computer I guess. Even then you just need to shut the browser, why bother clicking logout? 5. December 2005, 22:56:37 Subject: Re: Logout link playBunny: There's a logout link? 4. December 2005, 04:03:06 I agree, good luck at the start of the match is enough. It is one match, no need to keep saying good luck each time.
I'm not really bothered by it, but if I don't return the "gl" mid match you'll know why. 30. November 2005, 15:25:07 Subject: Re: While I'm on the subject alanback: I agree, I hate getting all those messages in the middle of a match. It's ONE match. Send me a message at the end saying I won or lost and that's it. 29. November 2005, 23:32:42 I don't get it, there is no information on the site to worry about, and as mctrivia correctly says, there is clearly no attempt to encrypt anything anyway. Haven't we had this discussion? << < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |