User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203   > >>
12. November 2007, 11:59:04
pauloaguia 
Subject: Interviews
I'll be sending Pbarb her interview later today. So you can stop sending questions for her now.
A big "Thank you" to all who sent their questions so far, it turned up to be quite a lot bigger than it was just last week. I'm sure PBarb will appreciate all the questions, I know I like how it turned out.


And now it's time to announce the next nominee.


The guy you should be very courious to know even more about.

Someone well known to these boards and to the site.

The reason why I'm probably going to have my MessageBox floaded with questions in the next few weeks.

The person who will get an interview as a Christmas present (all questions to be sent until December 23rd, please)


[Oh, in the meantime don't forget you can cast a vote for the next person to be interviewed at anytime - the next person to be interviewed will be selected from the ones with more votes - all the votes cast so far are still valid and will move on to the other interviews]

[Oh, and about the questions - don't leave it to the last minute. If you want questions to have your name start sending them now. I've had to turn down quite a few questions these past few days because people kept asking the same things over and over again, so whoever comes first (or has the best version of a question) will be the one the question is authored to.]


So, back on toppic:


By popular demand (and PBarb's decision), the next person to be interviewed will be:


... brace yourselves...




MadMonkey ! !


So, start sending me messages with suggestions for other persons to be interviewed and questions for MadMonkey 's interview.
You have until December 23rd to send questions for this interview but you can start sending them now

10. November 2007, 23:09:15
rod03801 
Subject: Re: random game teams
coan.net: Unfair?? People aren't chained to a team once they join it. If they want to go to another one, when there are more, they can easily do it. I think it would be a big pain in the neck to have them all deleted, to be started over. And needless. (And possibly difficult to re-get those people, especially since there wouldn't be any record of who already (willingly) joined.)

So, I hope that DOESN'T happen! You may as well say "Stop it! Don't be doing this now!" When there really is no good reason to do that.

10. November 2007, 23:01:58
coan.net 
Subject: Re: random game teams
redfrog: Not everyone can make the team - first they have to know about it - which includes reading this board, which there are many that do not - plus there are others who possible don't understand how to mess with the URL of a page. So to make it sound like "well since I heard about it - everyone must have heard about it" does not really work.

Plus I'm not arguing about it - I was just adding my input that I hope Fencer clears it out before it is officially put out... that is all. What people want to do is of course up to them, I was just adding my suggestion on what I would like to see done.

10. November 2007, 22:48:24
redfrog 
Subject: Re: random game teams
I think anyone who wants to make one of these random teams can do it now - so thats not really unfair - are we all so upset because we think the rules of the classic school yard pick are being messed with? Are we afraid we will only be left with losers to play on our teams? Im pretty sure the people joining up on these random teams did so out of choice - not because they were picked out of a lineup and had no choice but to comply - isnt that they way all teams are formed? Everyone can make this team if they want to - and everyone can pick what team they want to be on - geeeezzz - why all the drama?

10. November 2007, 22:14:56
coan.net 
Subject: Re: random game teams
Hrqls:Well hopefully when a random team is added, Fencer will just erase all current ones to make it fair to all fellowships in the chance to get people to join theirs - without having a few fellowship get a big head start in getting players to join - and in turn putting other fellowships at a disadvantage to get players to join their team.

10. November 2007, 19:41:39
Hrqls 
Subject: Re: random game teams
some people (including me) asked for random teams as it seemed a nice addition to the team of single game types .. this would make it possible to create team tournaments in which the teams would play random games .. fun! ;)

it was suggested this to fencer only a few weeks ago .. so i was positively amazed that it was in the progress of being implemented already .. its great when a site owner listens to suggestions from its members and implements some of them
(some of my suggestions havent been implemented, its up to fencer to decide what would be a nice addition :))

madmonkey found the random teams by accident and shared it on this board .. which is a nice thing to do .. that way the random team isnt only accessable for a few members, but every fellowship can create his random team
(go to a team of your fellowship and in the url change the number of the team to 255 .. you can see which number when you compare the urls of 2 teams of the same fellowships) .. i joined a random team as well .. after i read madmonkeys post (in which he explained how to do it)

the random teams are still in the progress of being created though and isnt completely active yet .. thats why fencer probably didnt announce it in public yet

any member is free to explore the site .. and it would be nice if (s)he finds anything (s)he would post it on a board (if its a bug it would be best to post it in the bug tracker) if its something which can be abues dont post it on a public board though but send in a pm .. if its something nice (like this random teams .. which gives a little insight in the future :)) .. post it here (or somewhere else)

i think its great that this site is still developing and new things are being added

10. November 2007, 11:42:48
pauloaguia 
Subject: Interviews
It's still not a huge interview but I think I have enough questions for Bubbles Pbarb2 . Anybody still wanting to contribute, please send me your questions during this weekend...

I'll be announcing the next person next week.

10. November 2007, 00:33:22
Nirvana 
Subject: Re: random game teams
This issue seems to me to have been blown a tad out of proportion.

I saw Mad Monkey's post to do with it and thought it an interesting idea. With his help I set up one team in each of my fellowships to see if the members wanted them. Judging from the way people have joined the teams it appeals to quite a few.

9. November 2007, 21:51:52
alanback 
Subject: Re: Random game teams
WellyWales:  I have to confess I am totally befuddled about the uproar over this issue.  Seems to me some folks with a lot of time on their hands are making a huge fuss over nothing.  Think of directing all that reforming energy out into the real world where it could actually do some good ...

Having said that, this is a user-supported site, and I would expect Fencer to take the users' wishes into account.  What I would prefer not to see is the same people posting the same complaint over and over again.

9. November 2007, 21:48:09
WellyWales 
Subject: Random game teams
All this does not seem right to me, we all want this to be a fair game site equal to all.

I propose that Fencer scrap all Random Game teams, there should not be a way of building up teams before it is open to every fellowship, I can see this being abused,
I think we all want a level playing field here

9. November 2007, 21:08:49
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
alanback:

9. November 2007, 21:07:50
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
alanback:

9. November 2007, 21:05:12
alanback 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
TarantinoFan:  You could call the testing fellowship the "Beta Blockers" 

9. November 2007, 21:04:49
Andersp 
Subject: Re:

TarantinoFan:   Whatever we call it  "certain user" / "Troll" / "Tester" doesnt really matter :)   but to divide members into "we" and "they" is never  good .


I think my fellowship idea should minimize the risque that something goes "public" before it was meant to.


9. November 2007, 21:03:53
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Snoopy: And these things need to be tried out. As I said with the current feeling on BK at the moment, releasing a new thing that doesn't work would only cause more problems.

I think Andersp idea of a testing f/s is a good one. I would be part of that to try out things and work out bugs and help tweak the games to make them right before they are realeased

9. November 2007, 21:00:20
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re:
Andersp: I am not one of Fencer's Testers. In fact just the other day I was a "certain user".

Your idea has merit though. Because I thought of exactly the same thing.

9. November 2007, 20:58:55
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
pauloaguia:
i might well of missed the point of the very first post on this and im sorry to anyone if i did
but i saw another case of cloning gammon happening again where ppl got to play that game before the masses

9. November 2007, 20:57:43
Andersp 

Maybe its better to create a fellowship where Fencer and his "testers" can discuss "not public" features.


I think it should be better than sending Pms..or?


9. November 2007, 20:53:30
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Snoopy: We know GOD and he gave us the down low on upcoming creations!

9. November 2007, 20:53:12
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Modified by pauloaguia (9. November 2007, 20:53:22)
Snoopy: they aren't trying... they're just exploring bugs... but if you want to try it to, just add the string tp=255 to the end of your fellowship page URL and you'll find a "random game" team you can join to... but that you can do nothing with :P

9. November 2007, 20:52:40
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Snoopy: I'm sure if you had done what Nirvana and I both did, ie PM Mad Monkey, he would have told you the exact same thing he told us. It doesn't work yet but here's how to do it anyway.

9. November 2007, 20:48:54
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Modified by ScrambledEggs (9. November 2007, 20:50:34)
TarantinoFan:
and the point im making and will keep making it
however it was found why should one fellowship or now 3 have an advantage over every other fellowship
and has Madmonkey said earlier it dosnt actually exist on BK yet how can you try out something that dosnt exist

9. November 2007, 20:48:09
alanback 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Snoopy:  I'll give ya $5 for it!

9. November 2007, 20:43:41
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Snoopy: Please stop shouting.

This random team was found by accident when Mad Monkey was doing a completely different thing.

He started his team as an experiment to see what would happen.

Nirvana and I both found the concept interesting so we PM'd Mad Monkey to ask about it.

Mad Monkey and I set up a team to see if the challenge would even start yet. As you know by reading the original message that has caused all this drama, nothing has happened with that challenge as yet.

My message to Mad Monkey on the subject was to leave it and wait and see. All great things come from trial and error. If we have it ready to go we can test it and let Fencer know of any bugs etc so that he can release it to the paying members in good order and without a lot of bugs etc.

I'm sorry that you find our experiments so detrimental to the other f/s but I think releasing an untested, untried new thing on the site at the moment would be a lot more detrimental, not only to your f/s but also to the site as a whole. With the recent upset over BK being down quite a lot a new thing that doesn't work properly wouldn't go down very well with the frustrated paying customer.

9. November 2007, 20:41:39
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Andersp:
i swap my black rook for anything right now

9. November 2007, 20:39:56
Andersp 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
MadMonkey:   I would rather be a computer engineer than a Black Rook, so i absolutely dont consider myself better than you!

9. November 2007, 20:33:17
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
MadMonkey:
i was not trying to create trouble and i was not butting in
i was asking why one fellowship should have a very clear advantage of building up a team on what is NOT AVAILABLE TO EVERY PAYING CUSTOMER

9. November 2007, 20:30:19
alanback 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey:  You are quite correct to conclude that messages intended only for one person should not be posted publicly.  (With the possible exception of Thoughts and Prayers.)  Message boards are intended for everyone to read and comment on anything posted here.

9. November 2007, 20:25:42
Mousetrap 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Modified by Mousetrap (9. November 2007, 20:26:08)
MadMonkey: I do not agree. I did not reply to cause conflit. If someone does not agree with what I say as you don,t. That is not conflit to me. That is your right as is Snoppy,s or anyone elses.

9. November 2007, 20:24:43
Andersp 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
MadMonkey:  Even we "Certain users" / Trolls appreciate that you are helping Fencer build Brain King, please accept our sincere THANK YOU!

9. November 2007, 20:10:29
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
Mousetrap: If i address this to you (as i have), i expect you to read it and reply if you wish, as i would any form of communication addressed to anyone individually.

Some just reply to things to create problems & conflict as this has just proved

9. November 2007, 20:04:31
Mousetrap 
Subject: Re: Pming and butting in with trivial comments
MadMonkey: Everyone is alowed their say. Just because someone does not agree with you does not mean they are butting in. It would not pay for all trees to be privots.

9. November 2007, 19:40:44
MadMonkey 
Fencer: Sorry about this post earlier that was addressed to you

In future i will PM you about everything as others can not help butting in with trivial comments

The idea of this board is for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future or is it not

OR is it about sulking because others are trying to help build BrainKing and others are not, they find more fun in moaning rather than trying to improve things

Well according to some, JUST because they have a Black Rook it makes them better than everyone else, well let them think that.

I know personally what do for the site

If there are issues that need addressing by yourself or just need mentioning, i will do it if i think it is necessary.

Try to think constructive, then things may happen


9. November 2007, 18:44:13
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re:
Andersp:
yep
being a black rook sucks big time

9. November 2007, 18:26:30
Andersp 
Subject: Re:
Snoopy: Remember there are "Certain users" 

9. November 2007, 07:42:00
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re:
Modified by ScrambledEggs (9. November 2007, 08:10:13)
MadMonkey:
so if it hasnt been introduced at all why are you asking
why your team challenge match hasnt started
because surely something that hasnt been introduced cant possible start

9. November 2007, 07:32:59
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Snoopy: It has not been introduced at all

Its a bug that i found after creating a Random Tournament. It is something i guess Fencer is working on !!

9. November 2007, 07:23:48
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re:
Modified by ScrambledEggs (9. November 2007, 07:32:13)
MadMonkey:
but has i said before it should be introduced at the same time for everyone
why should a few in the know gets things
after all we are all paying members
brings to mind when cloning backgammon was first introduced some players in the know got to play it ages before everyone else did

9. November 2007, 07:19:45
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Snoopy: You have to change the URL to team 255, and there is the random Team, but as Fencer said last week, it is not finished yet, but you can build a Team ready

9. November 2007, 07:10:51
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re:
Modified by ScrambledEggs (9. November 2007, 07:19:19)
MadMonkey:
so where are they
hardly seems fair when some are gaven a chance to create teams when most dont even have that option

9. November 2007, 07:09:08
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Snoopy: all Fellowships have them, well Nirvana & Tarantino asked me where they were and they have them

9. November 2007, 07:04:00
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey:
might be more helpfull if all fellowships got these options at the same time

9. November 2007, 06:30:02
MadMonkey 
Modified by MadMonkey (9. November 2007, 06:41:40)
Fencer: Set up a challenge match last night for random game. It set up fine, but just stays in waiting.

Is that because you have not finished it yet ?

8. November 2007, 01:39:22
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Rose: Funny you should say that

I Archive all Tournament winners for a week to post them at the same time, as i run so many. When i tried at the weekend to go through all last weeks, several of them would not open OR were just blank

I do not know if this is the same message problem as a couple of weeks ago i reported to Fencer, when trying to reply to a message from someone it would not give me a box to write in. He fixed that though but i had to tell him who the message was for

8. November 2007, 01:31:23
Rose 
I'm having issues with archived messages.. I scroll  down to reread
what I had written and only half the message is there.. the 'rest' is sort of
cut off to the far right... Wonder if anyone else has had that happen?

7. November 2007, 14:11:35
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Screen Layout
tonyh: Sorry, seems like Paulo had the right idea for you...

7. November 2007, 13:34:17
tonyh 
Subject: Re: Screen Layout
Czuch: I want to get rid of the message thing on the top left of the screen. I've tried 'no fonts' but that does not remove the three titles.

7. November 2007, 12:42:41
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Screen Layout
tonyh: I use the no fonts, try it.

7. November 2007, 10:39:49
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: Screen Layout
tonyh: for now, with a custom stylesheet where you set the visibility of "style-switcher" to none

7. November 2007, 10:35:45
tonyh 
Subject: Screen Layout
How may I get rid of the 'Castle - Simple - No fonts' at the top?

<< <   194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top