User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: rod03801 
 Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28   > >>
15. November 2010, 02:14:40
El Cid 
Subject: Re:
Modified by El Cid (15. November 2010, 02:17:15)
Vikings: By the way, would you mind if the other person could use auto-pass, even if you don't want to use it (like I think it still does not happen at the moment)?

15. November 2010, 02:09:41
Vikings 
Subject: Re:
Carl: you asked for one, I gave you two

15. November 2010, 02:08:29
rod03801 
Subject: Re:
Carl: Um, you asked for a reason, and he gave you one.

15. November 2010, 02:06:07
Carl 
Subject: Re:
Vikings: Your point is?

15. November 2010, 01:59:43
Vikings 
Subject: Re:
Carl: because I've paid to actually. you know, play the game.
seriously, I have played with auto pass and I do not like it when a game comes back to me after 20 passed moves and I don't recognize it

15. November 2010, 01:30:26
tyyy 
Subject: Re:
Carl: It would have to be someone like "Dunbar" from the book "Catch 22"

14. November 2010, 23:45:05
Carl 
Would someone who chooses not to use auto pass please explain the reason for there choice as i just cannot understand it.Thanks.

14. November 2010, 23:01:25
diogenysos 
Subject: Re: auto-pass for Ludo
plaintiger: yesssssssssssssss!

13. November 2010, 21:54:24
plaintiger 
Subject: auto-pass for Ludo
i'd like to see Ludo added to the list of auto-passable games. thanks, Filip.

13. November 2010, 09:50:15
fukuhara 
Subject: Re: Game Type Addition
Fencer: Maybe the best way to get this answer is from Mongolians. It will take some time to get it, I am afraid.

13. November 2010, 09:18:58
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Game Type Addition
fukuhara: Can you confirm that this page contains full and exact rules, which means that if this game is added, nobody would complain "hey, you forgot about this and that rule, and this is all wrong, you must delete all running games and rewrite the model"? I have bad experiences with variants that are not well known in Europe.

13. November 2010, 09:06:40
fukuhara 
Subject: Game Type Addition
As an Asian player, I would like more of Asian board games. I think Shatar, Mongolian chess could be an interesting game to add. What do you say?


9. November 2010, 02:41:49
plaintiger 
Subject: making idle stairs glow
that's a figure of speech, but what i mean is that i'd like for finished Stairs matches to be made to stand out somehow...the results notices flagged in some way in the Events box, maybe?...so that when a stairs match ends i'll know to go to those stairs and start another match. the red text in the stairs' game lists that shows me which stairs i'm enrolled in is great, and that's the kind of thing i'm talking about; but what i'd like is some way of easily seeing which stairs games i'm signed up for but not currently playing in, so i can go straight to them and start a new match without having to periodically look through all the stairs i'm playing to make sure none of them is lying idle without my knowledge.

thanks!

27. October 2010, 22:27:37
KJ 
Subject: Re: Missing feature
rod03801:
Thank you, I didn't realize it was moved.

27. October 2010, 21:40:06
rod03801 
Subject: Re: Missing feature
Modified by rod03801 (27. October 2010, 21:40:40)
KJ: Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but in the message you get, when you win/lose (now in the "Events" box), there is still an offer to invite to a new game. It is all the way at the bottom of the message.

(Though, perhaps not, if it is a person who has invitations turned off, that I'm not sure of)

27. October 2010, 21:14:16
KJ 
Subject: Missing feature
I miss the line on the main page that says when you win or lose the game and gives you the option to re-invite that person to another game.

25. October 2010, 21:52:29
joshi tm 
The Events feature is great, but is it possible to preview the last event when the mouse hovers over the number next to Events, like the mailbox?

20. October 2010, 19:00:27
ellieoop 
Subject: Re: Official Brainking Tournaments
talen314:
i would love to see official bk all games site run tournaments monthly, or preferably as they fill up.

20. October 2010, 08:17:09
talen314 
Subject: Official Brainking Tournaments
Hi all,
I'd like to see official Brainking Tournaments, perhaps quarterly, that would include all games at the site.  There could also be one tournament of each general type.  (i.e. one elimination, one where players all play one game with other players and one where players play two games with every other player. There might also be fast tournaments without vacation or only weekends and slow tournaments which allow vacations so players of all time preferences would be able to find tournaments to their liking. 
The players' main pages could show icons (gold, silver and bronze) for official Brainking tournaments next to specific games.  Achievements could be tied to winning these tournaments.
Ideas?
Talen

19. October 2010, 18:44:28
Orlandu 
Subject: New achievements
New achievements for Ludo

100 wins
500 wins
1000 wins
2000 wins
5000 wins
win with 1 opponent at home
win with 2 opponents at home
win with 3 opponents at home
win with all 4 opponents at home
capture 2 opponent in one turn
capture 3 opponents in one turn
capture all 4 opponents in one turn

7. October 2010, 15:47:01
coan.net 
Subject: Re: Opinion Polls
nodnarbo: Lets use an example: 10 people vote on a poll - 3 different options:

Option #1 - 8 of the 10 people vote for this one (so 80% of voters picked this one)
Option #2 - 5 of the 10 people vote for this one (so 50% of voters picked this one)
Option #3 - 7 of the 10 people vote for this one (so 70% of voters picked this one)

Once I pictured that example, it was more clear to me what you were talking about (hopefully help others & Fencer if he decides to add something like this.)

7. October 2010, 15:44:34
rod03801 
Subject: Re: Opinion Polls
coan.net: I would also like to see a reminder of how I voted, when the results are tabulated. Once in a while, I can't remember! I guess that sounds dumb, though. But it's true!

7. October 2010, 15:38:59
nodnarbo 
Subject: Re: Opinion Polls
coan.net: I wasn't sure how to explain it any clearer, if you can, please do.

7. October 2010, 15:34:26
coan.net 
Subject: Re: Opinion Polls
nodnarbo: It took me reading your message a few time to understand what you are saying, and now I do - AND AGREE.... maybe a link to toggle back and forth between the current way and the way you propose to take the percentage from the number of voters (and not number of votes).

I would also like to see Opinion Polls be sortable so the top vote winner will be sortable - so when there are polls with 20+ options, it will be easier to see the top voted option.

7. October 2010, 07:33:32
nodnarbo 
Subject: Opinion Polls
For checkbox opinion polls where you can choose more than one option I feel like it would be more helpful for the percent listed after the option to be the percent of voters that voted for that option than it is to have the percent of the total votes it got. With polls with 20+ options you could easily have an option that only got 15% of the total votes, but had 80+% of the voters vote for that option. It wouldn't change how the votes are counted, it would just make the popular options stand out more.

5. October 2010, 00:57:58
grenv 
Subject: Re: autopass
Thom27: Give up, there is no logical reason, nor can there be. It is not mandatory because it's not mandatory.

2. October 2010, 18:53:34
Thom27 
Subject: autopass
I just can't understand why it is not mandatory.

29. September 2010, 21:10:59
Orlandu 
There should be an option... Instead of having a black or white pick but a 2 game both sides...

28. September 2010, 19:52:24
rod03801 
Subject: Re:
Orlandu: The easiest way would be to look at your profile, click on the Fellowships tab, and scroll down, and it shows you what teams you are on in any fellowship.

28. September 2010, 19:44:40
Orlandu 
Is there any way to show what teams we have signed up for in our fellowships?

28. September 2010, 09:50:52
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Tournament Page Features
talen314: The current system does not allow to make more sophisticated filtering.
It might be possible in the future.

28. September 2010, 05:30:56
talen314 
Subject: Tournament Page Features
Hi all,
I would like to see greater ability to filter tournament searches.
Examples include:
Search for tournaments that need just one more player.
Allow players to filter out tournaments for games that are not of interest. (Allow the list of tournament games to show only the games desired by the player.)
Filter out tournaments that have undesired time limits.
Highlight the names of players that a member has no wins against to help in going after some of the achievements.  Or allow a search for tournaments that include players that a member has not faced.
Talen314


31. August 2010, 14:54:38
"GERRY" 
Subject: Re:
Snoopy: Thank you very much

31. August 2010, 14:51:29
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
"GERRY": you just click to disable wall button on your wall page

31. August 2010, 14:47:31
"GERRY" 
How do you remove your wall on your profile as i see on others don;t have it?

13. August 2010, 03:25:12
Thad 
Subject: Re: move-number of a message
Thom27: Yes, this is a much needed feature.

13. August 2010, 03:24:46
Orlandu 
Subject: Re: move-number of a message
Thom27: This is a great idea... When someone has alot games of one type... it is really needed... I had a frog finder game that I kept guessing the same move 10 times before I noticed...

12. August 2010, 16:48:22
Thom27 
Subject: move-number of a message
to a message sent to the opponent in a game, not only date and time should be given in the list of messages, but also the move number.

Sometimes a message refers to a move, and afterwards it can be difficult to find out which move it was.

8. August 2010, 13:20:33
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
El Cid: It does, in the way aaru understood it. :)

8. August 2010, 13:14:52
El Cid 
Ok, now I got it..., then it seems that I will have much more trouble than I thought in getting to the 10 public tournaments in some gametypes (even so, I think the feature request makes sense anyway)

8. August 2010, 12:55:29
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re: Public tournaments won
El Cid: But it's an Achievement awarded for team tournament wins, not fellowship tournament wins. :)

8. August 2010, 01:24:27
El Cid 
Subject: Re: Public tournaments won
Pedro Martínez: http://brainking.com/en/Achievements?aid=93&submit=Submit&p=1 This is the fifth of them (1 tournament; 10x; 25x; 50x and 100x)

8. August 2010, 01:19:28
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re: Public tournaments won
El Cid: I am afraid you are wrong, there is no Achievement for fellowship tournaments.

8. August 2010, 00:57:49
El Cid 
Subject: Re: Public tournaments won
Pedro Martínez: In that case, I should have 3 or 4 game types marked in the achievements page and I only have one. I have always understood that the ones that count for the achievements, and are considered as public (and when counting them it usually makes sense) were only non private tournaments, and of course no-fellowship, because those are on a different achievement (which is also being bug counted)

7. August 2010, 21:28:11
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re: Public tournaments won
El Cid: Public tournaments = non-fellowship tournaments, irrespective of whether they are open to everybody or invitation-only.

7. August 2010, 21:21:50
El Cid 
Subject: Re: Public tournaments won
aaru: It's more like public+private. The fellowship are on another tab..., but for that you can go to the finish games tab, and you won't have to filter by game type, because you have all the information there

7. August 2010, 20:47:35
aaru 
Subject: Re: Public tournaments won
rod03801: Yeah but public+fellowship. El Cid (& me) want to see only public.

7. August 2010, 20:20:06
rod03801 
Subject: Re: Public tournaments won
El Cid: Unless I'm misunderstanding, (which isn't unusual, lately ) You can already do that.

On your profile page, at the top, click on Won tournaments.

On that page, at the top, you can filter by game type.

7. August 2010, 17:49:09
El Cid 
Subject: Public tournaments won
Could there be a quick indication of how many public tournaments have we won for a certain gametype (I think I have won 10 public tournaments on 2 game types, but in my achievement page it only shows 1). This could be useful when only one tournament is missing for a game type to count for an achievement, so instead of having to enter the won tournaments page (especially if you are trying 50 or 100 tournaments per game type) you could simply watch the number and choose the one(s) that would be easier or faster to do so

7. August 2010, 17:28:48
alilsassy 
Subject: Re:I was going to mention the "Who is online" link in the "Statistics"
rod03801: & Pedro Martínez: I meant that I'd like to see an option that would allow us to see what members actually click on the fellowship (i.e.The ORIGINAL Flame Pit) to read, as on the Chat board.
Besides most members I find are in a cloak mode when looking at "Who's on-line" so there is no way to tell what members are actually involved in a fellowship.

<< <   19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top