 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 23. June 2006, 13:20:08 Subject: Re: Automatic for removing of tournaments  grenv: You can only take advantage of autovacation a few times a year. If they are constantly timing out they will run out quickly. 21. June 2006, 13:27:08 Subject: Re: RTE Modified by mctrivia (21. June 2006, 13:27:31) Marfitalu: use the code to make an extra space. 21. June 2006, 04:40:01 Subject: Re: Rules rod03801: Thanks. I never noticed it. My sugestion now is make it biger and easier to notice. 21. June 2006, 03:45:59 Subject: Rules I would like to see a printer friendly option for the rules pages. So I can read the rules to games I would like to learn on my free time. 17. June 2006, 01:12:18 Subject: Re: Bug in URL display headius: If you use <a href="Address">Address or Message</a> It will work. 16. June 2006, 02:02:05 Subject: Re: Ludo.... grenv: Having 4 players would make it beter 16. June 2006, 00:01:37 Subject: Re: Email notification of moves Summertop: Ya I have a friend like that to. WOuld be good if there was an option with an e-mail when you reach 24 hours left. 14. June 2006, 04:11:31 Subject: Re: Rankings issue Nothingness: Not really I don't think you can force people to play. 14. June 2006, 00:48:58 Subject: Re: Past ratings nabla: I think this should be just for past games. Any currently running game should show there current BKR not what they had when they started the game. 13. June 2006, 01:58:18 Subject: Re: Voluntary time extension tonyh: Time extensions are good and this option has been proposed before. Our conclusion the last time it was sugested was that in the case of a tournament the time could only be mutually shortened not mutually extended. The reason mutuall shortening was sugested as being allowed was to allow friends that play often to move there games to the begining of the game list sorted by time left. The reason this featur should not be allowed to extend game time is perfectly shown by this game which was started in 2005 and is still going. 8. June 2006, 23:55:30 Subject: Re: grenv: I agrea with that. At the minimum unrated players should have no effect. If Fencer is fealing generus then there should be a ramp in effect from playing players from rated to established. 8. June 2006, 06:05:33 Subject: Re: grenv: I though of another reason to why the BK rating score should be ajust. I am now in a rated game with an unrated player becouse of a team match. I can't refuse the game because the team leadet makes the games but it will effect my BKR. Now in this particular game my BKR is so low that I don't care but it is just another reason why BKR in a rated vs unrated game should only affect the unrated player. 6. June 2006, 03:10:45 Subject: Re: alanback: I don't know if this means much but I found a freeware version of Scrabble called NetWordz at http://www.freewarefind.com/archives/board_games.html 6. June 2006, 02:43:08 Subject: Re: gogul: Not sure but I think copyright is good for 50 years.(again I am not a lawyer) 6. June 2006, 02:37:36 Subject: Re: wetware: Not a lawyer but I know patents are only good for 20 years. Not sure about anything else. 6. June 2006, 01:40:20 Subject: Re: Rated players vs. Unrated players alanback: But that is even more of a reason to why games against unrated players should not effect the rated players rating. They may not notice when signing up for a tournament that some newbie to Brainking with an IQ of 1000 signed up for the rournament. 4. June 2006, 21:12:12 Subject: Re: player pictures Fencer: Sorry my programing expertice is C and Assembly. 4. June 2006, 21:07:27 Subject: Re: player pictures Modified by mctrivia (4. June 2006, 21:11:38) SafariGal: Hard for me to say I have been programing for most of my life(18 years). You would need to learn Java. We(mostly hex kid) have been developing a script for users of Brainking to do a lot of things in user scripting but only paying members can get into fellowships. Not sure if hexkid wants to make this script available for all. This may help. Dive into Grease Monkey 4. June 2006, 20:16:57 Subject: Re: player pictures SafariGal: At present the only way to remove smileys and pictures is to use grease monkey and write a script to do it. As a paying member you have the option to turn off smileys. I do think there should be a minimal bandwidth option available to all players. This would allow people to turn off all pictures and save bandwidth for both BrainKing and for those people that turn this feature on. I would like this because when I am on a wrieless connection I don't always get a very fast connection to this site. 1. June 2006, 01:19:04 Subject: Re: Smileys KotDB: Buy a membership. Black rook is only 150 Euro for today only. Well it is 2 for 1 so you need to find someone to split it with. 1. June 2006, 01:06:15 Subject: Re: Smileys KotDB: Are you kiding.  I can see it being usefull to have a minimal bandwidth option for those people on limited or pay per byte connections.31. May 2006, 00:38:49 Subject: Re: BK Store Nickel: Not a coffie drinker but I will take a set of 6 if they look good and are reasonably priced. 28. May 2006, 04:16:42 Subject: Re: Immediate move option buda_30: That is fine. Just pointing out it has some downfalls that people need to think about if it does get installed. 27. May 2006, 21:02:11 Subject: Re: Immediate move option buda_30: If you did that you would not be able to take it back if you relised that was not what you wanted. Also would not work for some games like froglet. 26. May 2006, 03:15:26 Subject: Re: two am lazy request grant: Put your other messages in the notepad. 26. May 2006, 03:14:55 Subject: Re: two am lazy request Skittles: or even faster holing ctrl and pressing v will past the message you copied on any windows computer. 6. May 2006, 03:29:24 Subject: Re: Vacation pauloaguia: I can see that though I think most paying members use autovacation instead of scheduling there vacation time. 4. May 2006, 05:47:32 Subject: Re: Highest Rating Vikings: Sorry my bad. I didn't actually look it up to verify. 4. May 2006, 02:36:13 Subject: Re: Highest Rating alanback: I chose 20 because I beleive that is when your BKR becomes established. But I agrea games of high chance should have a higher BKR establish point. 3. May 2006, 05:16:01 Subject: Re: Highest Rating gambler104: However it would be nice to see a list of the top 10 ever bkr games for each game. Though only BKRs after the first 20 games should be counted. 1. May 2006, 03:38:32 Subject: Re: Game time limit redfrog: I admit few would want to decrease the time limit. Just figured that in tournaments that option does not need to be restricted. Some may want to do it just so it pushes the game with a friend to the front of your game list while keeping your games sorted by time left. 1. May 2006, 02:45:27 Subject: Re: Game time limit BIG BAD WOLF: Or atleast make it so in tournaments you can only decrease the time limit not increase. 26. April 2006, 04:44:26 Subject: Re: Multiple Winners gambler104: I was in a tournament were all 4 of us tied for first. I just emedietly created a new one and invited all the first place winners. Would however be nice if the system would keep playing off untill there is only 1. 8. April 2006, 20:33:41 Subject: Re: Statistics grenv: not usually done on perpose. It just depends what kind of rounding formula is used on the random table. Most random formulas generate a number between 0 and 1 you then multiply that up to get a number between say 0 and 5. Add 1 and you 1 to 6 but if you round the numbers to the nearest whole number you will get 2 to 5 being more likely and 1 and 6 being not as often. 8. April 2006, 18:24:58 Subject: Re: Statistics Fencer: Because I am currious. I have seen many random number generater algeritherms that have lower probability on the extreme values. I.E. 1 and 6. Ideally after several million roles they should be pretty close to falling 16% of the time. If they don't a simple fix to the lower odds of falling on the extremes is to randomly chose between 0 and 7 and re role if 0 or 7 comes up. 8. April 2006, 15:47:50 Subject: Statistics 7. April 2006, 12:56:05 Subject: Hall of fame/shame Would be nice if there was a feature that could be used in fellowships and message boards to make a hall of fame. People can submit there entries and a moderater can aprove the entry and it is automatically added in the right place.
For example in Ludo we started a hall of fame for most consecutive passes would be nice if people could just enter number of passes, the game and hit submit. 6. April 2006, 05:23:46 Subject: Re: anastasia: no ticking rod off. If you are going to keep the conversation going atleast make a feature request per post.
I would like to see an online version that is easier to see on my palm t/x 6. April 2006, 03:44:01 Subject: Re: grenv: My interpritation would be no swearing or sexual conduct. 6. April 2006, 00:13:51 Subject: Re: Discussion Boards grenv: Actually every religion I know any details about including islam beleive in peace. The problem is there are always people that missinterpret things and people willing to break there own religious beleives to show that there religion is correct. 3. April 2006, 07:28:40 Subject: Re: Autovacation grenv: I think the reason is that people do things on the weekend. During the summer people that have cotages will often go to them on the weekend and presumably they would not have internet there. During the week I am on my computer atleast once every day but come the weekend if I am not supper busy I may spend an entire day out. 3. April 2006, 05:29:24 Subject: Re: Autovacation Modified by mctrivia (3. April 2006, 05:31:15) emmett: But the weekend is 2 days for most people. I know I work a 6 day 56 hour week but this is not the norm. At least not in North America I am not sure about the rest of the world.
If you have a problem with people taking weekends off and using up vacation days create tournaments and games without vacation days or weekends only. 3. April 2006, 02:59:30 Subject: Re: Membership Statistics Modified by mctrivia (3. April 2006, 03:00:57) francescolr: Yes an option to play all games at once that have only 0 or 1 possible move would be good. Preferable if just a single button but a seperate category with them grouped together is almost just as good. This feature would be especially usefull for crazy people like you that play several thousand moves a day. Might help you move up from 32 place in the most finished games catagory. 3. April 2006, 02:18:08 Subject: Re: Membership Statistics Universal Eyes: The price is the equivelent of a 10 year membership but the Eternal Rook Membership is still a life time membership. Originaly it had the same icon. I think it was after francescolr became an Eternal Rook that we goot a seperate icon to distinguish us. 3. April 2006, 00:10:29 Subject: Re: Autovacation gambler104: What if you go on a 2 week vacation? Auto vacation is nice since often I can get access to the internet even if I am away so I don't need to book off my vacations on the site. It is more usefull for if life gets to busy to come online. 2. April 2006, 23:21:04 Subject: Re: Autovacation Deceased: You mean vacation days are not renewed yearly? If that is the case that is a big problem for people that pay for multiple years at once. 2. April 2006, 05:08:10 Subject: Re: Autovacation grenv: It definetly does work. My girlfrind is down to only 5 days left because she kept forgeting to come online. 1. April 2006, 21:32:53 Subject: Re: Ads Fwiffo: I want to use the feature to promot my fellowship. Others may chose to promote there products. You think the option should be available to be turned off I disagrea. It is out of the way, small and does not use up bandwidth as it is text. I think Fencer diserves the extra revenue and I think those willing to pay to use it should have everyone see it. 1. April 2006, 20:26:36 Subject: Re: close but not actually autopass Modified by mctrivia (1. April 2006, 20:28:36) grenv: Ah I see one button on the main page. That would be good. Question is will fencer go for it. If not atleast having them grouped together allows games to play faster as hopefully everyone will play all those games first. Would also be nice if all the games that have only 1 possible move were grouped in with them but this may be pushing it. 1. April 2006, 19:51:14 Subject: Re: close but not actually autopass grenv: same idea better wording << < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |