User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Vikings 
 Run around the Pond

Discuss about this new multiplayer game or comment current runs. (includes all versions of the game)

Game link..... Ponds
Ratings link..... Regular Pond Ratings -and- Dark Pond Ratings -and- Run in the Rain Ratings
Winners link..... All Winners - (Regular Ponds Only) - (Dark Ponds Only) - (Run in the Rain Only)


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

25. March 2006, 20:29:04
Nothingness 
Subject: hmmm
Modified by Nothingness (25. March 2006, 20:29:25)
so basically if the people in front of me average lower than the peopel in back of me when i finish high i will not gain as many points. if the opposite was the case id prolly gain many more points? So i guess its averaged in some way. Impossibel to really research since peopel are constantly running in ponds. Thanks for the explaination peeps.

25. March 2006, 23:07:26
Vikings 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Nothingness: the exact formula has never been shown but it is something like that

25. March 2006, 23:11:06
Czuch 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Nothingness: Although I dont think the BKR of the people who finish ahead of you matters at all? Its not a strength of the field type calculation, but more the strength of the people you beat, Ithink?

25. March 2006, 23:17:45
Vikings 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Czuch Chuckers: I am certain that it does matter the same as it matters in any other game

25. March 2006, 23:18:59
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Czuch Chuckers: As I always understood the game it is about winning. Any system that gives anything to a second place goes against the spirit of the game. When you're splashing, it doesn't matter if you fell in on the first round or the last - youu're just as wet!

25. March 2006, 23:28:03
Czuch 
Subject: Re: hmmm
rabbitoid: I think this was discussed a long time ago... That would surely change the strategy from where it is now. I quit playing for a long while after the first ratings came out, because I had played for wins in the begining and had quite a few of them, then the ratings came out and I was discouraged to find out that people who had no wins yet placed 4th or 5th a lot had better ratings than I did! Now that I am playing again, I have only one win, but I am top 5 in every game so far, and my rating is climbing steadily. I guess if you can learn how to do both, get wins and be in the top 5 when you lose, you will be top ranked BKR for sure!


Vikes I gues you are correct, I am always happy if I finish and everyone who beats me is higher ranked than myself...

It would be nice if we could set games for BKR ratings!

25. March 2006, 23:36:22
Vikings 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Czuch Chuckers: I think that you can achieve top ratings and wins, there will be dips in the ratings however for agressive play, but the #1'S AND #2'S help the bkr recover quickly

25. March 2006, 23:46:19
Czuch 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Vikings: My point is that, when I played that way, my BKR was lower than people who never won but had a nice high averge.


Why would you want to use the reply instead of the box? Is there a reason for both?

25. March 2006, 23:51:08
Thad 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Czuch Chuckers: The box automatically sets the subject for you, which the top message area does not. People who reply without entering a subject are on my list of pet peeves. ;-)

25. March 2006, 23:52:16
coan.net 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Thad: The "Box" brings up a reply box right under the message. It may not work for people on WebTV, not sure.

25. March 2006, 23:54:59
Czuch 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Thad: I think they both work the same dont they?

26. March 2006, 00:00:08
Czuch 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Thad: When i first came to this site I was on about subject headers, but it went nowhere...

26. March 2006, 00:04:05
Thad 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Czuch Chuckers: Now there's a surprise. ;-)

Nothingness, I suggest sending a PM to Fencer asking about the calculations for Pond ratings. Also, you could go waaaaaay back in this DB. There may be some useful info there.

25. March 2006, 23:57:05
Vikings 
Subject: Re: hmmm
Czuch Chuckers: I dont see the need for the reply anymore,
I know what you mean about the ratings but I don't think it is as bad as it was at first

Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top