User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: rod03801 
 Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

6. June 2006, 07:24:54
coan.net 
If you copy "Scrabble" exactly, then you may be in tradmark trouble - but it's so simple to change it just a little and make it your own "game" to get around the trouble, and that is what you see on many other sites - while a few do try to copy scrabble but fly under the radar.

I'm not sure if Fencer's ideas have changed, but if I remember when the idea was brought up before (years ago), Fencer did not like the idea of a word game on this site..... Again, maybe I have a bad memory but I think I remember him giving that opinion.

6. June 2006, 09:21:19
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: A word game will be created but due to the Scrabble licence, the name must be changed. Scrabrain, for example. And the rules must be slightly modified as well.

6. June 2006, 12:22:18
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: .
.
.
Does anybody knows the line that divides to legal and not legal(due to Scrabble licence) two Scrabble variations....?
I mean how many modificitions does someone has to make to the default Scrabble in order this to be different from a point of view that no one can sue you.....?
Is a small change enough, does it have to be 3 major changes, etc, and generally when the violation of the licence stops? Is the quantity of
changes that matters is the ......what?

6. June 2006, 13:09:26
Sarah 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: thats way cool Fencer

6. June 2006, 14:08:02
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: Have you tried to contact the owners? Not all owners are Eds. Maybe a reasonable arrangement can be negociated, for example ads in exchange for use. I'm sure people here wouldn't mind ads under such circumstances.

6. June 2006, 16:19:02
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
rabbitoid: Yes, I did, many times (Mattel). No response at all.

6. June 2006, 20:27:36
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: Too bad. Maybe Ed bought some shares.

Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top