User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Walter Montego 
 Chess variants (10x8)

Sam has closed his piano and gone to bed ... now we can talk about the real stuff of life ... love, liberty and games such as
Janus, Capablanca Random, Embassy Chess & the odd mention of other 10x8 variants is welcome too


For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or for particular games: Janus; Capablanca Random; or Embassy)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- disussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position
... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted while that particular game is in progress)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27   > >>
2. September 2005, 16:55:06
Grim Reaper 
Subject: Re:
andreas: Yes there is Andreas. We need to reorganize the database a bit to handle this, but it can be done. Essentially we will just set the "timer" to 2880 minutes per move (instead of time per game) and keep your "table" open, just not visible to others until you log in.

It won't be ready for a while, but it is planned.

2. September 2005, 13:01:21
WhiteTower 
Subject: Re:
Grim Reaper: Yes, maybe in CowPlay you were right, but you see, in both cases, the owner of the site removed it because you somehow leveraged them to do so, not because they didn't like Gothic Chess or something... Whatever the reason in each case, you don't make friends like that... Surely there could be a compromise somehow...

2. September 2005, 08:39:12
andreas 
Subject: Re:
Grim Reaper: Any plans to introduce turn-based option on GothicChessLive?

2. September 2005, 07:19:46
Grim Reaper 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Grim Reaper (2. September 2005, 07:20:05)
WhiteTower:

I took Gothic Chess off of CowPlay after they did not pay their licensing fee.

The situation here is different.

If you fail to see the difference, talk to someone who is interested in explaining it to you.

2. September 2005, 06:11:52
redsales 
Subject: Re:
WhiteTower: which one was that?

2. September 2005, 06:03:25
WhiteTower 
Subject: Re:
tedbarber: The answer is no. There was another site with this setup that was proud to introduce Gothic Chess to its members, but [coughs and stares at Ed] it was also removed by the site owner...

2. September 2005, 03:54:24
Grim Reaper 
You need java to play at http://www.GothicChessLive.com

2. September 2005, 02:00:23
tedbarber 
Subject: Re:
I mean sites with a set up like this one.

2. September 2005, 01:58:51
tedbarber 
Grim Reaper:Is there some other site I can go to to play Gothic Chess since I am unable to continue playing here;or to create new games.

1. September 2005, 22:30:05
Grim Reaper 
So Java parses out the pages after making a database layer connection, then generates an indexed list of straight html pages?

1. September 2005, 22:06:11
WhiteTower 
Subject: Re:
Grim Reaper: It doesn't. But under the hood, BrainKing uses Java to generate all these nice pages we love so much :)

1. September 2005, 21:55:31
Grim Reaper 
I didnt know WebTV could access java.

1. September 2005, 21:52:58
WhiteTower 
Subject: Re:
Grim Reaper: Errr... yes, it does.

1. September 2005, 21:49:13
Grim Reaper 
BrainKing does not use Java.

1. September 2005, 21:43:31
WhiteTower 
Subject: Implementation date for CRC
Fencer: BTW can "soon" become a bit less vague, please? Isn't it like a patch of the BrainKing Java code for FRC on the Gothic Chess setup?

Yes, I know it's never THAT easy, but...

1. September 2005, 21:38:26
Grim Reaper 
Subject: Re: 25% oversized
Sumerian:

Reinhard, that is truly very, very funny :) I will tell Alexis you said that :)

1. September 2005, 20:37:58
SMIRF Engine 
Subject: Re: 25% oversized
Grim Reaper:

Ed, I have thought a while of the reason you have selected that lady to represent Gothic Chess. Finally I found out, that both, Alexis and GC, seems to be 25% oversized ;-) compared to traditional 'versions'.

Reinhard.

1. September 2005, 01:11:47
Grim Reaper 
Somebody has won a game in the "win a date with Alexis" tournament...

http://brainking.com/en/Tournaments?tri=54818#1

31. August 2005, 14:06:24
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re:
ColonelCrockett: Subtlety is something that I'm not often accused of, that's for sure.

redsales: Considering that with the exception of Dark Chess you've handily defeated me in every game we've played, I'm kind of curious as to when I might have said as much about your poor position during a game. As for Dark Chess, I rarely talk about an opponent's position during a game as it might tip him off as to where my pieces are or what my plans are. About the only time in Dark Chess that I might even say something would be after a move is made and it is obvious to both players that the game is about to end. I generally will type to my opponent during a game if said opponent types back and we have a conversation going. Backgammon in a lot of ways seems to be a game more conductive to conversation while its going on, but I'll chat in any game. I do agree with you about the playing with someone new, and will normally not comment on a Chess type game while it is progress unless my opponent initiates it or something extraordinary has happened during the game.

31. August 2005, 13:29:10
WhiteTower 
Subject: Last day for new Gothic Chess games!
So, please, no 30 days/move silliness, OK? :)

30. August 2005, 23:09:38
ColonelCrockett 
Subject: Re:
redsales: then again I've never known Walter to be subtle. :)

30. August 2005, 19:07:35
Grim Reaper 
Subject: Re:
tedbarber:

Just so you (and everyone else) knows, it is purely up to Fencer. I have not called for Gothic Chess to be removed, nor suggested it in any way.

30. August 2005, 18:29:33
redsales 
Subject: Re:
tedbarber: bad etiquette to point out how "bad" an opponent's position is midgame..if you're strangers. Walter has pointed it out to me in some of our games, but we've played each other about 50 times!

30. August 2005, 18:11:36
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re:
tedbarber: You'll be sorely missed. Don't let the door hit you on the way out. Whatever the deal is between them, I have asked to get a game added that is almost identical to Gothic Chess. It's called Embassy Chess. The only difference of the two games is the starting position of the Chancellors and Kings and names of the Chancellor and Archbishop, which are Marshall and Cardinal as in Grand Chess. Would you stay to play that game if the Gothic Chess is eliminated? Or even play it if Gothic Chess by some chance stays on the site? In the meantime, you ought to try Grand Chess. It is very similair to both games. The pieces are identical, but the Rooks start out with lots more mobility. From the few games of Grand Chess that I've started it seems to be a fast paced game with lots of traps and trouble from the very beginning of the game.

30. August 2005, 16:39:00
tedbarber 
One of my opponants said Gothic Chess is being dropped; if this is so I intend to leave this site as soon as my present games are completed. Gothic Chess is my one and only reason for playing anything on this site. Sure I play other games;but Gothic is my one and reason for coming to and staying on any Site.

30. August 2005, 16:24:42
tedbarber 
Subject: Re: Game # 950868
ColonelCrockett: I apologized for that; plus I did not demand your Resignation. I just pointed out that I had a won game and asked if you wanted to resign. I apologized,not because I thought I was rude;but because you thought I was. I see nothing wrong with pointing out a won game and giving my opponant a chance to resign. I consider it polite.

30. August 2005, 02:52:56
ColonelCrockett 
Subject: Re: Game # 950868
andreas: I agree with the assessment of my move 15 (part of the opening mistakes I was talking about). I would like to point out that tedbarber was rather rude in demanding my resignation in the later portion of this game and thus my comments (which he quotes accurately) were in response to his rudeness. He failed, however, to quote my praise of his taking advantage of my mistakes. As a side note it is gratifying to hear better players than myself ( and more experienced) agree with my assessment.

29. August 2005, 23:46:31
andreas 
Subject: Re: Game # 950868
tedbarber: Mistake was 15....g5? The move 14...Cg7 was also not especially good. Why move chancellor away from a nice opened line?

In position after 14. Nc3 black should think about how to develop knight b8. Immediate 14...Nc6 doesn't work because of 15. Ad7. I would first check move 14.... Nf5 with idea 15...Ne3. Looks like 15. e4 dxe4 16. fxe4 Qxd4 17. Cd3 Qxd3 18. Qxd3 Ce5 fine for black. After 15. Cd3 Nc6 position of black also seems to be fine.

29. August 2005, 23:18:58
Grim Reaper 
http://brainking.com/en/ArchivedGame?g=950868

I would like to believe, as white, I could win every time after black played 2..e5?

When a game is lost, the losing player may make any excuse, as all are equally valid

I used to tell people I lost because I had a sore thumb. :)

29. August 2005, 23:02:40
tedbarber 
Subject: Game # 950868
Check out this game between Colonel Crockett and myself. He says he lost because he made opening mistakes;I contend his mistake was in the Middle game. He also said that I did not beat him;but he beat himself. I say this is not totally true; that my moves were fairly good ones;this is a opening system I invented myself long before I ever heard of Brainking.com. I have had very good success with it.

27. August 2005, 14:49:14
bwildman 
Subject: Re:
fungame: unfortunatly....bad press, is still press.
I will be glad to see the bad press,finally come to an end.

27. August 2005, 13:44:37
Harassed 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Harassed (27. August 2005, 14:01:00)
Grim Reaper: Descriptions? plural? I cannot see a word ALL in front of the word DESCRIPTIONS in the contract. Some descriptions honor that, afaik at least once = some = descriptions

I bet this site added a lot to the popularity of your game, you make a lot of advertisements about your sites, programs, tournaments here. In your place I would give Fencer ultimate licence forever and send him at least $1000 (edited to be realistic) every year

27. August 2005, 11:15:34
votacommunista 
Subject: gothic chess removal
at first: it is sadly that gothic chess will be removed here.

however you have to look at two things in my opinion.
1) Gothic Chess will be replaced by Capablanca Random Chess
2) The problems which caused the removal are not the game itself, but the inventor.

So I can understand Filips decision (he is right in my opinion) and I myself will not prolong gothicchess.at after the one-year period. If somebody wants to take the domain earlier please contact me.

27. August 2005, 07:09:42
Grim Reaper 
Vortex VI

A new version of Gothic Vortex is being prepared. I am including a PGN archive of games played on BrainKing.

If you would like your games to be made available on CD, download all of your games, and send them to me at GothicChessInfo@aol.com

Please make a zip archive of your games.

Thanks to all who participate!

27. August 2005, 03:43:08
Grim Reaper 
Anyone who has won their sections in this tournament should contact me for their prizes:

http://brainking.com/en/Tournaments?trg=6703&tri=25674&trnst=2&tp=41

I am up for suggestions on how to determine a winner. Perhaps on http://www.GothicChessLive.com one evening?

27. August 2005, 03:36:36
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
Grim Reaper: I agree that there is no need for any further public discussion. It is an issue between you and Fencer.

27. August 2005, 03:32:29
Grim Reaper 
Like I said, the legal term is Ipse Idem, which translates as "the terms are the same" or "the meanings are equal" depending on the application. There should really be no further public discussion of this, do you not agree?

27. August 2005, 03:29:11
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
Grim Reaper: Hum... well I don't see those as "descriptions of the rules". Well, good luck with that.

27. August 2005, 03:27:03
Grim Reaper 
If you do a new game, you will see ". (read all rules)" next to every description.

This implies what you are reading are rules, or a subset of the rules.

Ipse idem, in legal terms.

27. August 2005, 03:25:22
coan.net 
"...following text in the descriptions of the rules.."

Where else are the RULES of Gothic Chess at?

27. August 2005, 03:24:16
Grim Reaper 
"descriptions" is plural -- everywhere rules are described, the description is required.

I asked Filip to make this change to be in full compliance, and he has elected to challenge it.

It is no longer up to me to help him, he has to help himself, or abide by a ruling by a 3rd party arbitrator.

Since this involves nobody other than Filip and myself, no other comments will be given on this matter.

27. August 2005, 03:22:41
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
BuilderQ: Yup, it looks like it is in the game description. Does not say that exact thing in the game overview, but in the description of the game, I see it.

27. August 2005, 03:13:41
BuilderQ 
Subject: Re:
Grim Reaper: The text you want is here, is it not?

27. August 2005, 03:09:56
Grim Reaper 
Modified by Grim Reaper (27. August 2005, 03:29:21)
I have a contract with Filip's signature on it. Paragraph 6 states:

6. ADDITIONAL STIPULATIONS - In addition, the Licensee will host the domain of GothicChess.org at no cost to the Licenser for the same duration. The Licensee will also include the following text in the descriptions of the rules of the game as they appear on BrainKing.com:

Gothic Chess is an 80-square variation of chess that adds two ne pieces to the board: an Archbishop, and a Chancellor. This game is most closely related to Capablanca's Chess and Bird's Chess, invented by Ed Trice in the year 2000.


You can see that the current description does not come close to matching this:

Gothic Chess is a variant of Bird's or Capablanca's Chess that has the Archbishop (Knight + Bishop) and Chancellor (Knight + Rook) set up slightly different. It is played on an 8 x 10 chessboard.

This license is also in effect until March 31, 2007.

I have given Filip every opportunity to honor the contract.

It will take some time, but BrainKing.com will honor the contract.

26. August 2005, 23:52:10
WhiteTower 
Subject: Gothic Chess removal
Quite brave of Fencer to go that far. At least Ed's live site might get more traffic this way :)

26. August 2005, 04:53:52
Grim Reaper 
Yeah I need to publish the spec for the automated play. I have it maybe 98% done.

26. August 2005, 03:59:46
SMIRF Engine 
Subject: Re: interfaces and online playing programs
Modified by SMIRF Engine (26. August 2005, 04:00:03)
Grim Reaper:

Well I remember that there seems to be a concept for that move exchange between computers. I neither have the latest information on that useful concept nor a working counterpart for testing. Using SMIRF with a second SMIRF would merely test the compatibility to itself.

If that concept would be working, the live playing online server could act as an in between information broker.

But having a program play online there, this will of course be andvantageous for the GC live server and the GC site, but hardly for the always there accessible programs.

26. August 2005, 03:16:03
Grim Reaper 
Maybe we can have the programs play on GothicChessLive.com and have an interface for them to send moves to it?

What do you think?

26. August 2005, 03:10:53
SMIRF Engine 
Subject: Re: hardware competition ?
Grim Reaper:

Well, I have no comparable hardware at hands. Thus I am only able to compete by brain. If such an event would that way mutating you will simply find out, that better hardware mostly would have better results.

26. August 2005, 03:00:07
Grim Reaper 
By the way, Gothic Vortex now has the SMP code turned on, so it takes advantage of multiprocessor machines. I have also finished the code to have it probe the 5-piece tablebases in RAM. And I converted it to 64-bit native code.

On a 4x Opteron, it searches at 3.5 million positions per second.

The Vortex in the next World Championship will be very, very different :)

<< <   18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top