User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141   > >>
13. July 2009, 05:11:02
Bernice 
Subject: Re:
Czuch: whats wrong with clicking on "show this users posts" on the right hand side by your own name???

13. July 2009, 05:09:35
Czuch 
Subject: Re: discussion boards
Fencer: You cannot mean that seriously.

hahahah... just searching through the archives, and you wouldnt believe how many times you have replied to me like that in the past 6 years!

13. July 2009, 05:07:29
Czuch 
Seems like I can search for old posts with my name referenced in them, but not posts that i have written myself?

13. July 2009, 04:49:45
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Czuch (13. July 2009, 04:50:16)
pauloaguia:

17. January 2005, 03:02:59
[pauloaguia, Portugal, Brain Rook (forever), Male] pauloaguia (hide)
show this user posts | link
Subject: Re:
Czuch Chuckers:Some time ago there was a talk about limiting autovacation to 5 consecutive days. Maybe it's already implemented?
Reply (box)



LMAO! I was on this posting kick, and I looked back a bit at some of the old posts with my name in it... somethings never change, as the debate about vacation days usage was on at least 4 years ago!!

12. July 2009, 23:38:18
Fencer 
Subject: Re: discussion boards
Gouwe gozer: That's more like it.

12. July 2009, 23:18:43
baddessi 
Subject: Re: discussion boards
Gouwe gozer: Good idea!

12. July 2009, 23:15:27
Gouwe gozer 
Subject: discussion boards
Modified by Gouwe gozer (12. July 2009, 23:16:02)
Fencer: It's a very good idea If you receive such an achievement it lowers your achievementpoints

12. July 2009, 22:42:25
Fencer 
Subject: Re: discussion boards
Czuch: You cannot mean that seriously.

12. July 2009, 21:19:19
Czuch 
Subject: discussion boards
Are there any achievements geared towards how many posts someone has made on a discussion board, or anything along that line?

12. July 2009, 21:13:03
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
rabbitoid: Probable not

12. July 2009, 20:36:52
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
Czuch: Then you probably never will, either :)

12. July 2009, 19:20:46
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
coan.net: 6 years... and I still cant teach you to say probably

12. July 2009, 16:41:54
coan.net 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
El Cid: I actually thought that known "loop hole" was one of the things recently fixed. I also would be interested in what Fencer says. (of course it will probable be don't worry about it, it will all change with the newer version of the system he is currently working with.)

12. July 2009, 13:00:28
El Cid 
Subject: Re: Timeouts


Hexis: My point is exactly that, there is no such rule, and I understand that one should be able to remove vacation days, if you happen to regain access to the internet earlier than you expected.

What I'm trying to say is that there should be a way to prevent such an "abuse" with the vacation days (which I admit is a little better since the new "only buy 10 or 5 days of vacation"). However since there is no rule, and it's kind of an original way to protest, the only thing I can say is, at least increase the number of your games, since you don't have many problems with the "low" time controls



12. July 2009, 12:50:29
Hexis 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
El Cid: Bruno, you needn't have hesitated to name me - I have no problem with it ;-)

As far as I know there is currently no rule that I have been breaking ... If there is any such rule, let me know and I will change my "moving policy" - it is only a kind of a protest to the current vacation rules! :D

12. July 2009, 12:17:55
El Cid 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
Modified by El Cid (12. July 2009, 12:19:36)
Czuch: I've noticed at least a player (that has two games of a team tournament against me), that has about 15 vacation days set up, and everyday he removes the nearest one, and adds another about three weeks ahead. This way, when he moves, instead of having 5 days per move, he has 25 days per move (and he has less than 50 games...).
I already sent Fencer a message telling him who the player is, but since there has been some problems with naming,players, here in the forum, I won't do it.
That message was sent yesterday when he had the days between 13th july and 31st july has vacation (and 17 vacation days left). He now has the days between 17th july and 4th august (and the same 17 vacation days left)

Unfortunately it is still possible to take advantage of the vacation system...

11. July 2009, 18:58:27
Hrqls 
Subject: Re:
Roberto Silva: hmm personally i dont mind if a tournament takes a bit longer .. but i can understand some people do .. it might change their planned time schedule .. which might be inconvenient during the holidays :)

11. July 2009, 15:55:21
Roberto Silva 
Subject: Re:
Hrqls: But a lot of those games are putting tournaments on hold

11. July 2009, 10:59:49
Hrqls 
Subject: Re:
Bernice: i guess a rook member can wait 35 days .. the games dont get in the way for a rook .. especially not when you know it will time out eventually

if there are any pawns who have a problem with it .. they can always ask it themselves

11. July 2009, 08:11:49
Bernice 
Subject: Re:
ScarletRose: Good point SR, but Fencer made a good job of LJ and surely he can do the same here ROFL..........

besides he would give himself away, he couldnt help himself.LOL

11. July 2009, 06:11:37
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
Bernice: How do we know he is not going to come back?

11. July 2009, 04:30:01
Bernice 
so now that we have gotten rid of the"pest" of the site....do all the people with games have to wait until he times out or can Fencer do something to finish the games? Some of his games have 35 days left for him to move....ridiculous

10. July 2009, 03:36:15
tinksbell 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
Czuch: I also don't like it when people play with their vacation because they have "way too many games". If it is because of the few bad apples then I understand completely why it happened. Of course, I think I have too many with over 200. I try to keep it around 100 normally...

10. July 2009, 01:36:36
wetware 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
rabbitoid: LOL...OpenOffice.org 3.1 is available now.

9. July 2009, 21:03:30
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
Czuch: hear hear

9. July 2009, 20:27:22
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
tinksbell: The thing that really gets to me, is that it is because of a few rotten apples that spoil things for the majority of players. My guess is that you had a legit reason to be doing what you did, but there are a few who use that as a tactic to purposely slow down the pace of their games?

9. July 2009, 15:02:15
tinksbell 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
Czuch: It seems I learned that the hard way, but I was trying to get a little more time since the past week has been too hectic for me to keep up with everything... I would still think that adding vacation would not take away time... I think I would have been happier if all that time had not been added last week with the server down...

9. July 2009, 14:39:12
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
tinksbell: Like fencer said... it is always recommended to make changes after competing your moves, not before

9. July 2009, 14:27:20
tinksbell 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
pauloaguia: I added vacation days. I did not take any away. And that is when they changed. It should have added time to games not taken it away...

9. July 2009, 13:41:13
AbigailII 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: I haven't seen anything strange with my clocks. I did notice that in quite a number of games my opponent timed out the last few days. But in all those cases, they are players who make it a habit to only move if they have a few hours left to move. The past hour, 3 games where I made the last move in June 29. And earlier this week, a handful of games against a famous player who was spending a fortune buying vacation days. So, *I*'m not complaining. If the side effect of a few hours of down time is that snails are timing out, I can only wish for more down time.

9. July 2009, 12:11:04
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
rabbitoid: More features always goes along with more bugs.
I am not superstitious.

9. July 2009, 11:41:57
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
Fencer: Better not name it 3.0, all releases named 3.0 tend to have so many bugs in them they have to be followed up by a 3.1 soon after. Notable examples are MS word, MS windows, Firefox. If I were a release manager I'd treat a 3.0 as a 13th floor, something to be jumped over

9. July 2009, 11:40:03
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Modified by MadMonkey (9. July 2009, 11:40:38)
Fencer: Yep, connection and site flying at present , just glad i noticed it then and not in half hour lol

OH, and i am using Prism rather than a web browser

9. July 2009, 11:39:31
Snoopy 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: yes weve all been thou the same problem
i had over 500 games all with the same time other day over 200 this morning but now ive moved on them they should go back to normal timings

9. July 2009, 11:37:48
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: Only 38 games to play at this moment. It should not be a problem. After that, all times should be synchronized.

9. July 2009, 11:27:34
MadMonkey 
And again, i come across a batch of games (only about 70 this time) all with 54 minutes before timout.

Hope connection speed is ok today

9. July 2009, 09:56:10
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
pauloaguia: I think the one that caused your problem is already fixed. This one is probably a consequence of the recent short downtime and BrainKing's automatic attempt to compensate the time loss.
Well, it's another thing to improve for the 3.0 version.
Anyway, it is always recommended to change vacation days after playing all games, not before.

9. July 2009, 09:51:38
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
tinksbell: Did you happen to change your vacation days?
I got that, some time ago when I removed a vacation day from the end of my vacations. Many games of mine (the non Fischer clock ones) went suddenly from 3 days left to -8 or -9 days left. Since that day was already marked as a vacation day I ended up not timing up on any of those games, but I got quite a scare.

8. July 2009, 22:37:10
tinksbell 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
MadMonkey: Its particularly depressing as I was going to finally win some of those hard to win Pente & Keryo Pente games, they were in tournaments.
:-(

8. July 2009, 22:33:28
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
tinksbell: Yesterday (or was it the day before) i got here to find i had 120 games ALL with the same time on and they were all timing out 35 minutes after i got here. I tried my best, but still had time outs

I presume this was something to do when the site was down the other day, i can not see any other way to end up with all those games having the same time

8. July 2009, 22:28:11
tinksbell 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
Bernice: I am not sure if any of them were, but it should not have changed from 14 hours to move to -4day. It is impossible to fix that on the users end...

8. July 2009, 22:20:14
Bernice 
Subject: Re: Timeouts
Modified by Bernice (8. July 2009, 22:20:39)
tinksbell: now I dont know about fischers clock but are you playing games using that? might be the answer...............

8. July 2009, 22:12:47
tinksbell 
Subject: Timeouts
I just got timed out on 6 games, an hour ago I had 14 hours on all the games. Very confused on what is happening to the system... & disappointed. Not sure what to do about it...

5. July 2009, 19:14:08
Fencer 
Subject: Re: BrainKing on Facebook
Czuch: I don't like Twitter.

5. July 2009, 19:01:06
Czuch 
Subject: Re: BrainKing on Facebook
Fencer: Why not Twitter?

5. July 2009, 16:29:39
Fencer 
Subject: BrainKing on Facebook
For those who do not read BrainKing.info blog. I have started a BrainKing page at Facebook and it is the recommended place to join our discussion about the upcoming new version of BrainKing. Everybody is welcome to add own suggestions or opinions.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/BrainKing/113831815814

5. July 2009, 00:04:09
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Firefox 3.5
Fencer: And by the way, if you use Mozilla's Prism brainking is loadssssss faster

(one sad drawback is though you can not have any add-ons)

2. July 2009, 23:38:00
beach 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: thanks for the explanation

2. July 2009, 18:32:17
Fencer 
Subject: Firefox 3.5
By the way, BrainKing works fine with Firefox 3.5. I would say it is even a little faster.

2. July 2009, 16:18:18
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
beach: It's a side effect of the recovery system in case of temporarily disabled timeouts. It tries to balance the time left but does not count with weekend and vacation days.
It will be self-fixed when you make a move.

I think that I will announce the BrainKing Facebook page soon, because I want to use it for instant and quick messages of this kind.

<< <   132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top