User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Vikings 
 Run around the Pond

Discuss about this new multiplayer game or comment current runs. (includes all versions of the game)

Game link..... Ponds
Ratings link..... Regular Pond Ratings -and- Dark Pond Ratings -and- Run in the Rain Ratings
Winners link..... All Winners - (Regular Ponds Only) - (Dark Ponds Only) - (Run in the Rain Only)


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   1 2 3   > >>
15. October 2018, 08:12:25
Fencer 
Subject: Re: pond's trouble
TAROU: is it better now?

17. January 2008, 07:22:32
Fencer 
Subject: Re: world record?
rabbitoid: It might be worth a new tab at the Statistics page.

17. January 2008, 07:14:18
Fencer 
Subject: Re: world record?

25. October 2007, 19:53:25
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
joshi tm: Nobody can do that.

11. October 2007, 21:46:10
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Reversal of removal of a player from a pond?
rod03801: Only me.

1. February 2007, 08:36:37
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
BerniceC: That's easy because Evásek announced that she is leaving BK, so he could deduct she won't play ponds anymore.

4. July 2005, 21:12:52
Fencer 
Subject: Re: NOT at all
Walter Montego: Every game is "flawed" in some way. You cannot find a perfect one. Btw, I don't think there is a significant flaw. Every aspect can be considered as a part of the strategy.

1. July 2005, 07:03:06
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Not legalized. But you cannot banish people only because it "looks like" cheating.

25. June 2005, 23:08:16
Fencer 
Subject: Re: what if....
Nothingness: You must finish it with default moves.

13. June 2005, 13:42:38
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Eriisa: Of course it didn't, it needs 16 players.

13. June 2005, 13:15:38
Fencer 
Subject: Re: this rain is weird
Mike UK: Absolutely.

13. June 2005, 12:43:03
Fencer 
Subject: Re: this rain is weird
rabbitoid: More than 2 players can fall in a round.

13. June 2005, 12:22:55
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Fencer (13. June 2005, 12:23:40)
Andre Faria: Why don't you click on show rules?

22. May 2005, 15:49:26
Fencer 
Subject: Re: This is weird
Pedro Martínez: Can you give me the pond ID?

18. May 2005, 20:12:37
Fencer 
What bug?

17. May 2005, 07:26:15
Fencer 
Subject: Re: question
Nothingness: Sorry! My bad. Ponds are counted, of course.

10. May 2005, 12:55:53
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Dark Ponds
Mike UK: Only names and BKRs of running players are hidden. Points left and bids are visible, so are all information about fallen players.

9. May 2005, 16:23:24
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Dark Ponds
BIG BAD WOLF: Yes.

9. May 2005, 15:18:01
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
rod03801: Add a wolf smiley after every comment and nobody can recognize you.

9. May 2005, 15:15:08
Fencer 
I call you a pesimist. The names of fallen players show up.

9. May 2005, 15:06:17
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Dark
rod03801: The names will be replaced by question marks even in the discussion.

9. May 2005, 14:22:28
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Fencer....
Czuch Chuckers: Yes.

2. May 2005, 21:36:22
Fencer 
I'll have a look at it.

2. May 2005, 21:20:01
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Pond 352
tonyh: I see nothing "whacky". What do you mean?

2. May 2005, 09:03:55
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Re:
Hrqls: It's calculated only when the pond is finished :-)
Statistics - not yet.

2. May 2005, 08:55:28
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Re:
Hrqls: You cannot count it as "win" or "loss". The formula has some input parameters - your current BKR, average BKR of all opponents, current BKR of each opponent, number of "wins" [players with lower final order], number of "draws" [players on the same level as you], number of "losses" [players with higher final order]. It takes all of this, makes some creepy things with them and spits out the result as your new BKR :-)

1. May 2005, 19:13:42
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
rod03801: This one. Yes, the same is applied on normal games but in a simplified way.

1. May 2005, 17:54:59
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Re:
Cathy1: 16 players might be a little better because what really matters is the average BKR of all your opponents. But not only this, of course.

1. May 2005, 17:47:02
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: You are guessing right.

1. May 2005, 17:24:08
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Not always, it depends on your opponents' BKR. Falling in the pond with low rated players is worse.

1. May 2005, 17:17:29
Fencer 
Not exactly. The formula is more complex in this case but the basic idea is the same.

1. May 2005, 08:03:05
Fencer 
Well, the ratings are based on final positions of the particular pond players. When you have the last round of a finished pond, consider players behind you as your wins, players on the same position as draws and the rest as your losses. And, of course, their current BKR is significant for the BKR result.

22. April 2005, 09:40:04
Fencer 
Subject: Re: winners
Hrqls: Me neither :-)

22. April 2005, 06:40:45
Fencer 
I will add it to Profiles as well.

21. April 2005, 21:01:09
Fencer 
Who wanted the winners?

21. April 2005, 18:13:20
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: Is it better now?

15. April 2005, 10:03:07
Fencer 
Shortly, what is your request?

27. March 2005, 18:15:36
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Fencer
Czuch Chuckers: 6 players, not 3. Carry on.

27. March 2005, 17:14:34
Fencer 
Subject: Re: BKR
Mely: Nothing, as you can see.

27. March 2005, 17:04:56
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Fencer
Czuch Chuckers: Yes if you give me pond ID and player ID.

16. March 2005, 16:27:26
Fencer 
And the result is?
Complaining is useless. New server is needed.

15. March 2005, 20:45:20
Fencer 
Subject: Re: question
rabbitoid: Because the server was down for two hours, maybe more.

19. February 2005, 12:38:38
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Fencer
redsales: It's worth thinking about.

10. February 2005, 08:36:24
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Maxxina: Sounds like a goat.

6. February 2005, 23:30:03
Fencer 
What's the point of this endless discussion? I already have a rating system for pond games, it's just not activated yet. The goal is to keep the things easy and simple, which is the fact certain people still refuse to accept.

4. February 2005, 19:55:39
Fencer 
I disagree.

4. February 2005, 18:45:28
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Bry: I won't.

2. February 2005, 15:32:08
Fencer 
Yes, Londo came with this proposal, I am aware of it. However, the only list of forbidden things can be found on the User Agreement page.

2. February 2005, 15:09:31
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Not forbidden, only non-recommended. But there are situations which don't allow to leave some posts on boards, even if somebody already responded to them.

2. February 2005, 08:51:33
Fencer 
Sure thing.

<< <   1 2 3   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2019 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top