BrainKing - Discussion boards (Chess)

Moderator:

Chess

Chess Discussion

For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)

List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.

Mode: Everyone can post

6. October 2006, 13:32:40

Kiry

show this user posts | show thread | link

One point of view.
1. Topalov is playing better than Kramnik.
a. Begin of the game Topalov > Kramnik
b. Middle of the game Topalov >= Kramnik
c. End of the game Topalov <= Kramnik
2. Does Kramnik use drugs or cheating nobody knows.
3. Does Topalov use drugs or cheating nobody knows.
4. Topalov(his team) uses unfair methods.

Results:
1 Kramnik - very strong player with rating 2743.
2 Topalov - very strong unfair player with rating 2813.
Make Your choice.

6. October 2006, 13:55:11

cheating up up

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

Kiry:
1. if Topalov lost this match he would be the challenger the next time.
2. if Kramnik lost he will never be the challenger again because of his playing style.
3. the next world chese championship should be played as classical or under FIDE world champion system?

6. October 2006, 14:27:28

Kiry

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

435152:
1,2. I would say that chances of Topalov are better.
3. As for me, I prefer classical match under
FIDE control.
4. I prefer fair strong play, and don't like unfair very strong play.

6. October 2006, 14:24:49

cheating up up

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re: rating

Kiry:
my choice: Topalov 2813>2743
how you get your rating? is your rating unfair?

6. October 2006, 14:37:54

Kiry

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re: rating

435152:
1. Topalov(with his team) stronger than Kramnik(with his team). The team is the result of the player's work and so on... Once more:
Topalov little bit stronger than Kramnik.
2. Happened so that in this match Kramnik was leader.
3. Topalov uses unfair methods.
4. I don't like it.