 |
|
 CheckersDiscuss about checkers game or find new opponents. No insulting, baiting or flaming other players. Off topic posts are subject to deletion and if it persists the poster faces sanctions. This board is for checkers. You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 20. June 2004, 18:20:11 Subject: Re: Paper I have the Reader but my computer is misbehaving. Wish there was some other way to see it. 20. June 2004, 18:31:03 Subject: Re: Paper I was able to download it & it looks intact, pictures and all. I'll check it out. Thanks. :o) 20. June 2004, 18:38:52 Subject: Re: Gooner's GAYP BK Championship. Invitational (Checkers)  Gothic how do you figure George Miller was able to defeat programs..at least at one time? His play jammed them up from a one down position. Of course that was some time ago. 20. June 2004, 20:05:28 Subject: Re: Gooner's GAYP BK Championship. Invitational (Checkers) Absolutely amazing..but it seems to leave little margin for error. 20. June 2004, 20:17:03 Subject: Re: Gooner's GAYP BK Championship. Invitational (Checkers) Yes, which is what makes George Miller a cut above (most of) the rest. 20. June 2004, 20:36:10 Subject: Re: Gooner's GAYP BK Championship. Invitational (Checkers) Thanks for the reminder Ed :o) 20. June 2004, 20:42:50 Was Banks using a program? Was Miller? Were both of them? Or neither? 20. June 2004, 20:45:52 I have played George, he is a very good player he wouldn't need a program. Sadly his wife died recently so is taking a back seat. :o( 20. June 2004, 20:51:48 Subject: Re: What were the results of those games? I once got a King against an old world champ. 20. June 2004, 21:07:34 Program vs Program matches are interesting but over the board face to face matches determines the real champ in my opinion. Looking at some of the old Wylie games of the 19th century before anyone could even spell program I saw some marvelous defensive play. I think he would have a good chance today. 21. June 2004, 14:43:54 Subject: Re: Not against programs but against any human he would IMHO 22. June 2004, 19:05:58 Subject: Gooner's GAYP BK Championship. Invitational (Checkers) There is only one day to sign up for the prize tourney. We have 34 players already. If anyone else cares to play please message me. :o) 26. June 2004, 19:04:27 Subject: Usurper's Golden Heart Checkers Open Congratulations to Nomad, who has just been announced as winner this of this tournament, with all sections completed. Congrats James!
Also congrats to Pat (gooner), who was a very close runner up. Great job Pat! Well done, Immortals :o) 28. June 2004, 18:08:55 Subject: Hello to all! I'm a fairly new player to this wonderful site but after reading some of the posts here, I might be losing alot more games of checkers! LOL 29. June 2004, 02:18:29 Subject: Re: Hello to all! I'm going to try and post some clickable links to checkers websites here. 5. July 2004, 23:34:16 Subject: Re: Hello to all! That would be great! It is quite hard to play checkers in person & your the opposing player as well. Boring! LOL 5. July 2004, 23:38:45 Subject: Re: Hello to all! I don't remember the formula for making links clickable. 5. July 2004, 23:41:37 Subject: Re: Hello to all! If you remember Bill, let me know how to do it. :o) 5. July 2004, 23:44:28 Subject: Re: Hello to all! Maybe somebody reading this will help. I wanted to start with Triplejump.com. 5. July 2004, 23:52:17 This is a good checkers discussion board.
http://checkersolutions.co.uk/scgi-bin/bbmat.cgi/index.html 6. July 2004, 00:00:12 I knew it Ed, You declined the invitation to go to Manchester though. Why???
Thanks for the link. :o) 6. July 2004, 00:14:41 Subject: Re: What about against the new nemisis??? 6. July 2004, 00:35:05 Subject: Re: Re: Thanks for the links. It has been a year since I looked at programs but Cake and Nemesis were the top of the line then. WCC had just come out with a platinum but the highest database I remember was an 8..which was awesome enough. 6. July 2004, 00:55:34 Modified by gooner (6. July 2004, 00:58:59) Then my question would be... What's the point of it?? Buying it would be worth it as a substitute for books only. Playing it would be a waste of time.
Why haven't you ever decided to play in the big events Ed?? 6. July 2004, 02:38:53 Subject: Re: Its not a case then of trying to master the game of checkers then?? It's money which motivates you?? I certainly don't dispute you and Gil's dedication to this program but are you not interested in showing your skills face to face, either on a competive nature or otherwise. I will be in Vegas to view some of the play in August, we could have got together for a game.
BTW..How long do you think it will be before you master the game of checkers???? 6. July 2004, 02:48:36 Subject: Re: Maybe I missed your point but I don't see how they are linked. The patent is for a program, I was refering to you taking part in a tourney yourself.
So how long before checkers is mastered then??? 6. July 2004, 03:04:01 Modified by gooner (6. July 2004, 03:04:41) How about the 2004 American championship in Las Vegas between 2nd August and the 6th or 7th August Ed? This is what I am referring to. Mainly because I am going to visit the event to view some of the action.
Wouldn't you like to pit your WCC against the top programs in the world? It would be a proud achievement to walk away as the best and give you some free promotion for your product. BTW......You never said how long it would take you and Gil to master the game of checkers??? 6. July 2004, 03:14:48 I was just wondering how long it will take before a computer masters checkers? Thats all. i can't think of a better person to ask that question to. 6. July 2004, 11:58:35 Thanks Ed, a very fasinating insight you have given me. It shows quite clearly what most average checker players (like myself) don't realise and thats the sheer scale of this great game.
It reminds me of the Tinsley V Chinook match, when Tinsley worked out that the computer could "only" see 26 moves ahead in all variations (millions of moves). So in order to win he was looking 27 moves ahead. A genius. 6. July 2004, 13:26:22 Subject: Re: Many of the top players on the gamesites use programs and the average player has zero chance against them. The chances seem to be slightly increased in Pro Checkers but it is still very very daunting. I knew a grizzled old vetran named Richard Fortman who could pretty much hold his own against programs but he had like about 50 years experience. Nice, great old guy. 6. July 2004, 13:30:31 Subject: Re: Re: I have heard of him. One of the greats. I think what Ed failed to realise is that programs are flawed, its just finding the weak spot in them. 12. July 2004, 23:06:38 Subject: Good Checker Site 15. July 2004, 21:19:55 Subject: Check Out Checkers I have created a new fellowship for people interested in learning this great game. If you want to join please pm me. :o) 22. July 2004, 18:48:56 Subject: checkers i have never played like this before so i want a quick game to see how you play this way 22. July 2004, 19:27:41 Subject: Re: checkers You can send me an invite for an unrated game if you like. 24. July 2004, 03:56:19 Subject: WCC In your opinion Ed can WCC be jammed by the one down gambit? Has any human beaten or drawn the new version? 24. July 2004, 05:01:55 Subject: Re: Just one more question. What skills, if any, does the operator require? Does a superior, more experienced operator with a slightly inferior program have any advantage over a better program with a relatively unskilled operator? 24. July 2004, 13:00:23 Subject: Re: Nemesis Modified by Purple (24. July 2004, 13:02:51) I mentioned this because I have seen cases where Nemesis gives false positives. In theory if you are +40 it is a win but I have seen Nemesis give a +40 and then take it away after the opponents next move. And this was after Nemesis recommendation was followed to the letter. 24. July 2004, 19:06:40 Subject: Re: Mark Pharoah I played this bright young programmer on IYT and used book..on the 9th move I still had 8 checkers left and none of them could move wothout losing the piece. Everything looked fine but I was sandbagged. He has played in Vegas so he has great natural ability. In our second game he resigned with the board even so he just wanted to try out his program. Still in his teens I think. Awesome player. 27. July 2004, 23:53:42 Subject: Fellowship Tournament Purple World is having an in-house checker tournament. Come for the tournament and stay for the fellowship. Request an invite if interested. 4. August 2004, 02:26:17 Subject: Re: Solving checkers Very impressive. I wish Chinook woud update it's Wall of Honor which hasn't been done since 02. 4. August 2004, 18:15:38 Subject: Real Checkers board its 2 years and still no real Checkers board.:(( 5. August 2004, 07:27:39 like Fencer has said - if you can draw graphics for pawns, kings, queens, and parachutists in the four sizes and send them to him, he will add them :-) 5. August 2004, 18:40:53 Subject: Re: Real Checkers board I tied that. I guess about a year ago or so. I either did a very poor job or Fencer never got those images. 6. August 2004, 06:10:26 You could ask him if he received them - and if he did, you could ask him why he didn't want to use them so maybe you (or someone else) could make better ones. 6. August 2004, 16:43:46 Why can't fencer use the pieces used for backgammon or five in a line??? << < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |