User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363   > >>
5. February 2006, 02:40:27
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Eternal memberships
Fencer: So can we pass these on to our children as well, in our will?

4. February 2006, 18:25:08
furbster 
i didn't read it properly and thought the bonus was 3 days and not 3 hours lol

4. February 2006, 18:12:11
Mary Jo 
Subject: Re: question about time outs...
Thank you playBunny, Vikings, Pedro Martinez, Pythagoras, and fubster! I have had trouble understanding this but with all your versions of explaning it, I think I finally get it! :) I appreciate your help! I have to do some reevaluating of those tournaments I sign up for when I'm needing to do silly things like SLEEP! lol

4. February 2006, 18:00:54
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Time controls - Time per Game
Mary Jo: In that kind of game the 1 day is the total amount of time in which you can play moves. Let's ignore the bonuses for now and just imagine a couple of those sand-filled timers. There's one for each player. If the sand runs out then that player lose the match. Unlike the ordinary sand timers, though, these ones don't get turned over. Rather they get switched on and off. Yours is losing sand all the time that it's your turn. When you move yours stops and your opponent's starts losing sand. So, there's not a heap of sand per move but for the whole game.

Now let's consider the bonuses. This has the efect of topping up your sand each time you move, by 3 hours-worth in this case.

Looking at your game it says that you played 9 moves. Your timer will have lost the sand between each move - the period from when your opponent moved to when you did. If you add all that time up then that's more sand than there was available.

So how much sand did you have? 24 hours (the initial 1 day) plus 9 bonuses of 3 hours, giving 51 hours in total. At the point that your opponent made his last move you must have had only 4.5 hours of sand left .. and hence the timeout.

4. February 2006, 17:52:15
Vikings 
Subject: Re: question about time outs...
Mary Jo: it is using a fisher clock which means that you have 1 day total to play the whole game with a 3 hour bonus, to make it simple for example if you wait 8 hours to make your move you would have 16 hours left plus 3 hours for your bonus for a total of 19 hours to make your next move, if you wait 5 hours when it is your next turn to move you ould have 14 hours left plus 3 for a total of 17 hours to make your next turn,. these games can catch up with you when you have to work or sleep so its a good idea to play these games first when you are on-line to add up the bonus time

4. February 2006, 17:50:22
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re: question about time outs...
Mary Jo: If you moved 1.5 hours before the "deadline" on your last move, you had only 4.5 hours left after your opponent moved. If you moved in the last second before you'd time out, you'd have only 3 hours for your next move. I think it's quite simple.

4. February 2006, 17:48:01
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re: question about time outs...
Modified by Chicago Bulls (4. February 2006, 17:49:31)
Mary Jo:
When a game has:
Time for game : Time: 1 day, Bonus: 3 hours, Limit: 10 days, no days off

Then it means that:
You have 1 day = 24hours to play the whole game and not the move.
That means: if your opponent plays a move and then 2 hours later you play your response, you will then have 24-2 = 22 hours to play the game.
If your opponent makes another move later and you play after 8 hours(from his response), then you will have 22-8 = 14 hours left to play the whole game.

But that with bonus = 0. With bonus = 3 hours like here, after your move you will have 3 hours added to your time left for the whole game....

Limit = 10 days, just declares that if you play many moves quickly and the bonus is not 0, so your time for the whole game increases, this value can't go above 10 days....

The same exists for your opponent of course.

4. February 2006, 17:44:28
furbster 
Subject: Re: question about time outs...
Mary Jo: I'm finding it difficult to keep up in this set of tournements too. You have one day to start with and 3 hours gets added on if you move within a certain time. but its not necessarily one day a move as i found out lol.

4. February 2006, 17:36:21
Mary Jo 
Subject: question about time outs...
Modified by Mary Jo (4. February 2006, 17:36:49)
Hi, I can't seem to understand the whole time out thing on games.... in this game....

http://brainking.com/en/ArchivedGame?g=1363114

it's a game that has a 1 day time limit. I last played on 2/3 @ 1748 and my opponent played 2/4 @ 0237....then I got a message that I lost my game and timed out on 2/4 @ 0709. That was only about 13.5 hours since my last move and only 4.5 hours since my opponents last move. What am I not understanding here? lol Help!

4. February 2006, 12:12:05
Fencer 
Subject: Eternal memberships
... have been added to the Paid Membership page.

4. February 2006, 01:56:00
Eriisa 
Subject: Re:
Stevie: ROFL!!!!

I was thinking that as I posted it.

4. February 2006, 01:53:02
Stevie 
Subject: Re:
Eriisa: Sorry Globlady, I cant say,, harley will tell me off for being off topic hehe

4. February 2006, 01:52:24
alanback 
Subject: Re:
Eriisa: I understood "bottoms"

4. February 2006, 01:50:38
harley 
Subject: Re:
Stevie: You wish

4. February 2006, 01:50:24
Eriisa 
botties......... hmmmmmm


somebody care to translate that into American English...

bottles or booty

4. February 2006, 01:48:12
Stevie 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: I think we had our wrists slapped hehe we better dissapear afore we get our botties smacked next

4. February 2006, 01:47:13
harley 
Subject: Re:
Stevie:

4. February 2006, 01:47:01
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
harley: I didn't start it but i continue it.....
Sorry Harley

4. February 2006, 01:46:04
Stevie 
Subject: Re:
harley: hands up... "sorry miss" i stopped

4. February 2006, 01:44:16
harley 
Pythagoras & Stevie:

4. February 2006, 01:39:05
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Chicago Bulls (4. February 2006, 01:39:33)
Stevie: It was just the Reversi games! If you have another case or even sign or even any other small evidence then just give it or stop throwing things in the air....! But i don't care anyway if you accuse me or not because i know the truth and i only care about non-weakies statements....

4. February 2006, 01:33:34
Stevie 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: its ok, was just checking who you were.... wasnt just the reversi games was it LOL

Anyways,, back to the subject in question now please

4. February 2006, 01:31:32
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Chicago Bulls (4. February 2006, 01:32:20)
Stevie: No, i used my program at Reversi 8x8 because i was beta testing it.....You can't just understand/believe it right?

After the game you said: Do you use Zebra?
I replied: No i use my own written program that is trying to solve the game with 28, bla,bla,bla....
Do you think that, i would tell you that if i wanted to cheat? Also i proposed you and Fencer to delete my game against you and actually against all my other opponents.....
Once again my honesty(by telling you the truth) had the opposite result as i expected.....

4. February 2006, 01:29:21
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Oh well.. now you are just like us lowly's of the site..

We can all talk to you again.. haha

4. February 2006, 01:27:37
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
ScarletRose: Nah, just 4.5 months...:)

4. February 2006, 01:24:41
Stevie 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: for sure, and Im sure Filip would get more people willing to fork out 280euro for that black/gold topped rook than would fork out for a maharajah..... especially as neither gives you anything extra other than a diferent iconic status..

BTW, aint you the guy who used programmes cos you didnt like to lose?

4. February 2006, 01:21:10
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Wow.. you went back to just a rook.. I thought you had a full year??

4. February 2006, 01:19:01
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Chicago Bulls (4. February 2006, 01:19:33)
Stevie: Yes it would be interesting if the dark people tell us how did they come up with being dark..... Did Fencer proposed that or it was them....? And how they knew it.....?
Too many questions.....

4. February 2006, 01:13:49
Stevie 
surely something should have been announced to everyone?
that was a tad selective and sneaky if you ask me :o(

4. February 2006, 00:17:30
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
furbster: I'm sure there are more people than 4 who know about it.

pauloaguia: You apparently haven't had a chance to taste the glory of Brain Maharajah.

3. February 2006, 23:51:49
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: So... it means that for 28% of the value of a Maharajah membership for one year, you get a lifetime Rook membership? Which has exactly the same benefits... So who'd want to pay for a Maharajah then?

3. February 2006, 23:39:46
furbster 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: How come only 4 people know about this then?

3. February 2006, 23:00:11
playBunny 
BIG BAD WOLF:

3. February 2006, 22:37:44
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: Exactly! What a deal, huh?

3. February 2006, 22:36:38
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: I saw a post on the Czech general chat board where Venuše said you'd have to pay a least a 10-year rook membership in order to get a life-long one.

3. February 2006, 22:35:27
coan.net 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: If you do that now, and get the February bonus - does that make it lifetime+ 1/2 of your next life?

3. February 2006, 22:32:41
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Are you sure.....? And where did you see that......?

3. February 2006, 22:29:17
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
pepu: Možeš, ale raději tady:
http://brainking.com/cz/Board?bc=23

3. February 2006, 22:28:10
pepu 
MOŽU SE ZEPTAT: JAK VYTVOŘIT TURNAJ

3. February 2006, 22:24:27
Pedro Martínez 
Buy 10 years of Rook membership and you'll get this Black Rook.

3. February 2006, 20:27:37
playBunny 
Fencer (hide) 3. February 2006, 19:25:28 link
- browsing player list -

reply


Even Fencer's curious about who these Rooks are and what it means!

3. February 2006, 20:27:32
furbster 
I've now got to go offline hopefully by the time i get back it'll have been foudn out lol, bye for now all

3. February 2006, 20:26:55
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: LOL! But madPhilip you didn't answer how do they have Brainking Rook "forever"....?

3. February 2006, 20:26:21
furbster 
Im talked my self through some made up reasons, and im dying to know the real one lol

3. February 2006, 20:26:05
playBunny 
alanback, Fencer:

3. February 2006, 20:25:28
Fencer 

3. February 2006, 20:24:46
alanback 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: Maybe they have sold their souls to Fencer!

3. February 2006, 20:13:04
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
ScarletRose Mainly, but also to have on your profile a reminder that you are immortal and then realise that this is not true then....

3. February 2006, 20:09:27
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: Maybe.. Til death do us Part??

3. February 2006, 20:08:43
furbster 
They've been around for ages alanback! Price on thsoe are negotiated monthly or something

<< <   354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top