 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 30. August 2004, 20:03:38 Subject: Andersp This is a public board, as a member of said public I would like an explanation of that post. 30. August 2004, 19:54:56 Subject: Stevie Nothing to do with blame, you're here, I dont want you to go. In an international community of several thousand members each member tolerates some things for the sake of enjoying the community. 30. August 2004, 16:27:05 Subject: MidnightMcMedic In the case you gave one game could be agreed drawn. 30. August 2004, 16:26:06 Subject: Purple In such a case the player putting up the game would be doing the deleting, it still sounds irresponsible to me but preferable to the case of a player accepting games from the waiting games page and then deleting them. If your point is a valid one the use of "delete" could be confined to the game's proposer and denied to it's acceptor. 30. August 2004, 16:15:58 If we're on such good terms what's wrong with playing two at once? 30. August 2004, 16:07:46 I request the removal of the "delete game" facility. I cant understand what on Earth it's for apart from to increase the scope for annoying behaviour. There are even games in which a player can have a lost position after their first move yet they can delete on the second. If a player doesn't want to play what are they accepting games for? The delete games facility encourages irresponsibility, it's meaningless nonsense. 29. August 2004, 11:35:15 You want to spend another day beating this particular dead horse?? 29. August 2004, 05:09:48 Here's one for kokusaisannin shogi: http://www.ne.jp/asahi/tetsu/toybox/kapitan/kp040.htm 29. August 2004, 05:07:16 Here's a link for yonnin shogi: http://www.ffortune.net/play/bgame/syogi2/4syogi.htm 29. August 2004, 05:04:01 Okay, that site's chaturanga looks different from my memory of it. I'll see if I can find Murray's entry. 29. August 2004, 04:37:37 That's that then. What about dice chaturanga, same rules as dice chess? 29. August 2004, 04:13:04 You think it's better for BrainKing to have this interminable insistence that Fencer do something that he's already said he will not do? 29. August 2004, 04:04:06 Any reason to assert that I might think I'm "cool"? 29. August 2004, 04:00:16 It's already 11am here, I dont know what it is for Andersp, what odds are you offering that I dont outlast him? 29. August 2004, 03:48:47 Kindly express your sympathy practically, stop subjecting me to your trivial insistence that you be accomodated regardless. 29. August 2004, 03:35:27 I suppose you will too, that's insufficient by which to arbitrate the worth of my post's content. I see the point of auto-pass, I also recognise Fencer's groundbreaking acheivement with this site is membership involvement and you as a member are reducing my enjoyment of the site with this crap. Fencer has said "no", it's an easy word/concept to understand, you must've been familiar with it since your pre-speech era, why are you still going on about it? 29. August 2004, 03:16:57 Subject: Andersp Thanks for making the site more fun by continually harping on about AUTO-PASS!! 29. August 2004, 03:05:03 Subject: Danoschek Good one with the Chaturanga, there are also shogi variants for three and four people which would be nice to eventually have available. 29. August 2004, 02:13:24 Sure, the possibilities exist. In the waiting games area do we need half a dozen different species for any passable game? Tell me why it's worth the fuss. I prefer simplicity, if I have to decide all sorts of this and that everytime I play a game, I'll end up?playing atomic chess or something. 29. August 2004, 01:55:13 I'm not harrassing anyone, as a site member I'm the one under attack. 29. August 2004, 01:54:04 Subject: BigBadWolf As I said, the player with no move may want to exercise an option such as offering a draw. Even though they have no move, in the case of backgammon, probability may be strongly in their favour, accordingly the player able to move might accept a draw (are there agreed draws in backgammon?) anyway, you get my drift. 29. August 2004, 01:39:23 It's not about diffuse puberty rituals of fixative proving whatever, it's about, inter alia, football chess. The trivialisation of this board on the "question" of auto-pass means that the majority will not see the posts of either you or me that made genuine suggestions to improve the site. I hope that Bumble or Red Dragon have the patience and dilligence to delete all the auto-pass crap and leave just those pertinent posts. 29. August 2004, 01:30:09 Subject: Danoschek By "no" I take it you meant A+S were the bitches. 29. August 2004, 00:58:13 Subject: Danoschek If you mean me, I'm not bitching, that characterises the behaviour of AndersP and Stevie. I'm quite tired of coming to this board to read about this nonsense so I'd like to kill it today. 29. August 2004, 00:40:31 Subject: Stevie It's a question of manners, this is a social site, I dont want people deciding what I do, I might be contemplating resignation or the offer of a draw. 29. August 2004, 00:38:21 It really doesn't matter to me either way, I dont understand why it's so crucial for you(?) If you're short of games to move in you can stick with shorter time limits or stick another 90 challenges in the waiting games, it's just not a big problem, is it? 29. August 2004, 00:30:54 Subject: Stevie Never knew you felt like that about me! I think it's absurd to imagine that you decide when your opponent moves, the height of bad manners, the only way I can see to do it is to have two versions of all games that have pass situations, auto-pass on or off. 28. August 2004, 23:59:25 Fine, I dont usually bother answering but this time it was persistent and not new members. 28. August 2004, 23:20:23 Apart from football chess, I'd like to see dice-chess, that should be fairly easy to add(?) 28. August 2004, 23:14:51 I'm bored enough to engage in an otherwise boring activity. 28. August 2004, 23:13:10 You cant expect to auto-pass your opponent's moves, can you? So it won't speed the game up any further than the 3-4 seconds it takes you yourself to pass. Are you people really serious about this? So much talk about something so completely unimportant, incredible, "read a book". 28. August 2004, 22:27:20 http://www.chessvariants.org/crossover.dir/football.html 28. August 2004, 22:01:41 There is no reason to believe the majority want auto-pass, it's the same few who bring it up. As a feature request I'd like to ask for no more posts on this trivial and boring subject. 28. August 2004, 08:52:15 How about a BrainKing social archives page? Detailing developments good and bad, for the amusement of future members. For example the rise and fall of KM with details of it's structure and the roles of it's officers would be fascinating, no real ids need be used. 26. August 2004, 18:27:46 I dont want my opponents auto-passing for me and that was Summertop's suggestion. 19. August 2004, 23:43:42 I hope Fencer doesn't care but it's not my problem. Bush or Kerry are also not my problem. 19. August 2004, 23:32:49 Subject: Fencer How about making a board for discussion of "political" topics? But make it czech only. << < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |