 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 13. August 2008, 16:48:40 Subject: Re:  Czuch: Unfortunately Fencer's favourite features are 'actions" and payment options. Im sure he would get more money if he added features who makes it more fun to play...yes im thinking about a REAL auto-pass and not this "joke" :) 3. April 2008, 15:30:07 Subject: Re: Show/Hide list mctrivia: i didnt know that..thanks 3. April 2008, 15:24:34 Subject: Re: Show/Hide list AlliumCepa: Im banned on a Glob mods wall after i wrote "Hello" lol Maybe a "ban all" option if you dont want anyone to write on your wall? :) 24. March 2008, 20:27:59 Subject: Re: MadMonkey: Dont worry, noone will stop you from having fun :) 24. March 2008, 20:18:09 an old request: could you add a feature so we dont need to see (1 new) if someone we have on "ignore" has posted. its rather annoying to click (2 new) on BrainKing.com and only see nonsence posts thanks 9. February 2008, 23:48:53 Subject: Blog comments Another repeated request: Since blog comments now are not allowed at the BrainKing.com board and people struggle to post a comment at the blog site. Shouldnt a board "Blog Comments" make life easier for those brave people who still dare to comment about the site's annoying bad performance and other topics they (the rattlebrained blog trolls) feel important. Should also give job for one or two mods. 25. January 2008, 20:07:40 Subject: Re: Fencer: Perfect!!  ..Thanks!25. January 2008, 19:11:43 Subject: Re: Fencer: I love autopass so i prefer to challenge players who does tha same (in stairs). Same as when people with hig BKR avoid players with a lot lower BKR. They can see a players BKR, so why shouldnt we autopass lovers be able to see if a player is using autopass? 25. January 2008, 18:56:42 Fencer: I repeat my old question: Is it possible to have a "dot" showing if a player has autopass in his settings? 25. January 2008, 05:35:05 Subject: Re: rook colors? Puckish: Not autopass...its "a good compromise" 26. December 2007, 19:34:34 Subject: Re: MadMonkey: I second that...i love any kind of information! 23. July 2007, 16:05:05 Subject: Re: Blogcomments pauloaguia: I know, but you dont see many comments there, im sure it should be easier for people to post and read their comments on a board here. 23. July 2007, 15:56:06 Subject: Blogcomments Fencer: Why not a public board "Blogcomments"? I think you should get more feedback to your blog then 11. July 2007, 17:24:00 Subject: Re:  Fencer: Ok..well "Yes" is good enough11. July 2007, 17:14:49 Subject: Re:  Fencer: I take that as "Yes, sure"11. July 2007, 15:37:05 Fencer: Do you think you could fix so we dont need to get (1 new) if anyone we have on hide has posted on a board? 26. April 2007, 21:26:13 Subject: or even better In settings: 1. "Yes i want to use autopass in all games where it is possible and i dont care if my opponent uses it or not" 2. "No i dont want to use autopass in any game but i dont care if my opponent uses it or not" 2 is the default option
25. March 2007, 21:25:41 Subject: Re:Family Members Modified by Andersp (25. March 2007, 21:26:21) TarantinoFan: My suggestion was a joke since i consider this "family member request" as a big joke :) I second your opinion about the people who change their names frequently, thats a pain in the... too, but i suppose thats something we have to live with :( 25. March 2007, 14:05:19 Subject: Re: Family members emmett: I think it would be a better idea that we add the family members names to our name i.e "Andersp married to Antje", "Emmet boyfriend to Ultramarine"...then you dont need to click any profiles
16. March 2007, 14:52:20 Subject: Re: AutoPass Fencer: When you gave me your "promise" to add autopass, there was no restrictions such as "only if your opponent agrees". Autopass should be my choice as well as no autopass is my opponents choice. Now you dont give us autopass lovers any choice, if the opponent says no then so be it. So, again, If this is the only way you can make autopass work, then forget it completely. This rule will only create a mess!
2. March 2007, 18:50:04 Subject: Re: Autopass Fencer: Well...as you can see im not the only one you "cant please"..but ok..ill do as you say...at least you are pleased then. 2. March 2007, 18:45:26 Subject: Re: Autopass Fencer: I rather have no autopass at all than have to "ask for my opponents permission" to use it ..understand? :) 2. March 2007, 18:37:41 Subject: Re: Autopass Fencer: I dont think you shall waste more time on autopass, its better to have no autopass at all than this "agreement mix" 2. March 2007, 14:10:27 Subject: Re: Autopass AbigailII: I cant understand why both players must agree to autopass. I dont care if my opponent is a "clicklover" so why should he/she have any objections if im using autopass alone? 28. February 2007, 23:45:20 Subject: Re: Auto pass question Fencer: just challenged a person in Stairs, was no autopass option there?...was this our deal? 28. February 2007, 23:38:39 Subject: Auto pass question Fencer I just read your autopasspost in your blog. Did i understand correct: If one player offers autopass and the other doesnt accept = no autopass for any of the players? 27. February 2007, 21:15:59 Subject: Re: Browser Fencer: Yes, ive read that post in "computers". Not sure why he (and you) are so "anti Microsoft" tho. IE has never been a pain 'anywhere" for me. 27. February 2007, 14:16:31 Subject: Re: Browser Modified by Andersp (27. February 2007, 14:23:04) Fencer: sorry...havent read it yet :) Think that post answered my question  27. February 2007, 14:13:59 Subject: Browser Fencer Im well aware of how you prefer Firefox and often tells people "It works best in Firefox". But...question: Some people like IE and Netscape and have used them for years so, do you plan in the future to "adjust" BrainKing so it works as good in IE and Netscape as Firefox or must we change to FF to be able to use all features at 100% ? 24. January 2006, 22:29:29 Subject: Re: Fencer: I can still not understand how you could say yes to that silly cloakfeature and NO to autopass 16. November 2005, 23:56:46 Subject: Re: Random dices Modified by Andersp (17. November 2005, 00:04:38) Czuch Chuckers: i suppose you thought that more people and I needed the correction since you corrected me in a public "LOL-message" instead of a pm...i have noone blocked 11. November 2005, 19:33:00 Subject: Re: Czuch Chuckers: Why dont you suggest that your games against higher rated players are rated and the games against lower (not worth) players are not rated...then you dont risk anything?  18. October 2005, 20:47:42 Subject: Klingon Fencer: ..looks easier than Norweigian  18. October 2005, 18:01:28 Subject: Re: How about Fencer: Havent finished my Georgian class yet :(
easier to start a collection...10000 players x 100 Euro ..then we can buy autopass!!  18. October 2005, 17:55:08 Subject: Re: How about Fencer: Ok..i do the Norweigian translation for autopass..deal?  18. October 2005, 17:52:31 Subject: Re: How about ColonelCrockett: dont forget Liquid 18. October 2005, 17:50:31 Subject: How about Lots of "how about" and "wouldnt it be nice" here..how about you sell features Fencer..let people pay for all their "fancy features"...you could buy a new server within a month 3. October 2005, 16:56:28 Subject: Re: Modified by Andersp (3. October 2005, 16:57:07) AbigailII: To me it proves that Backgammon is 4 times more popular than chess...and 817 ranked backgammonplayers compared to 354 chessplayers proves a lot too.
Im sure youll find a lot of paying members among those 817 bgplayers too? 3. October 2005, 16:16:33 Subject: Re: Modified by Andersp (3. October 2005, 16:17:19) Fencer:
http://brainking.com/en/Statistics?p=2 9553 running Backgammongames compared to 2117 Chessgames I dont think you should ignore backgammon too much 27. August 2005, 13:50:45 Subject: Re: Tournamentlist Fencer: Excellent!! ..you made my day 26. August 2005, 13:25:25 Subject: Re: Tournamentlist Fencer: Maybe it would be a good idea if you gave a short reply to peoples requests to avoid starting discussions on this board? Then your moderators dont need to jump in and show their power. 26. August 2005, 13:16:51 Subject: Re: Tournamentlist Fencer: did i ask for a date...takes 5 seconds to type yes or no...sorry for being impatient..i can see that you are busy 26. August 2005, 13:13:22 Subject: Re: Tournamentlist Fencer Is it so difficult to give an answer? 26. August 2005, 00:30:02 Subject: Tournamentlist Fencer Would it be possible to sort the tournamentlist after the names of the creators...A-ö?...Takes forever to find a running tournament now 1. August 2005, 02:19:34 Subject: Re: 1st move pass fungame: I had the same "silly feeling" some minutes ago..clicked and didnt make a move in 5 games..but i think your request is too related to autopass so dont even think about it 1. July 2005, 14:10:02 Subject: Re: Players list / countries Hrqls: Yes..i think you are right, no big deal ..it will be easier to find Sweden when we have most members 1. July 2005, 13:28:20 Subject: Re: Players list / countries Andersp: i guess its not possible 29. June 2005, 14:40:17 Subject: Players list / countries Could it be an option to see the countries in alphabetic order too? << < 1 2 3 4 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |