BrainKing - Discussion boards (BrainKing.com)

Moderator: Hrqls

, coan.net

, rod03801

BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com

List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.

Mode: Everyone can post

20. February 2004, 17:08:11

ughaibu

show this user posts | show thread | link

What's the point? People dont play to get a rating, they play because it's fun. If pawns dont have ratings how are we meant to judge their suitability as opponents unless we trawl through all their finished games. I think it's a looney idea, you might just as well get rid of ratings all together.

20. February 2004, 17:32:03

Caissus

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

Playing only unrated games after some time for non-paying members is the most used restricton on other chessservers..

20. February 2004, 17:57:49

Caissus

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re:

..and they mostly must have the opinion to get more paying members with this mode.

20. February 2004, 18:03:40

Pioneer54

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re: of ratings, and....

Caissus writes:
"Playing only unrated games after some time for non-paying members is the most used restricton on other chessservers"

But how, assuming it's factual, does this translate in net revenue production? What chess playing pawn is going to be compelled to buy a membership here because of the simple prospect of losing his rating status? Rather, it seems more likely he'd just go find another of the hundreds of free chess sites already on the internet.

20. February 2004, 18:17:16

Caissus

show this user posts | show thread | link

Subject: Re: of ratings, and....

Ughaibu : the remarkable feature of this site is especially,that it is often down and it needs more money for a new server.
Pioneer: I am sure some pawns will leave, but I am sure too that some others will buy a small membership and than the site has more money to buy a new server and we,the paying members have a site with a better technique.
Other ideas are welcome too, I think.