 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 > >> 21. May 2004, 19:22:39 Subject: Re:  I vote for Princess. :) 21. May 2004, 19:20:28 We are getting somewhere now :o)
Do we get to vote using the poll link, as to wether we agree with your choice of person before hand? I already know who it will be and am not happy about it 21. May 2004, 19:18:48  Stevie: I don't say it will never happen. But not immediately after the launch. There are more important things to do. 21. May 2004, 19:17:56 Subject: Antje Icky the fire bobby from down the street ;oÞ 21. May 2004, 19:17:28 I seem to remember something about not being able to start new tournaments, wondering if that applies??? 21. May 2004, 19:14:13 "Antje: Yes. Yes. No. :-)" oooohhh :o), aaaaahh:oD, *pphew* LOL
I thought the mentioned power of sorting every single board was already organised for someone else to help you, and allocated to that person already. I wont say where i get info :o) 21. May 2004, 19:11:59  thanks Fencer... it will be nice, im sure we're all excited, but you must be especially excited, all your hard work will soon be scrutinized! are you worried? :) 21. May 2004, 19:09:16 Who said there will be some "all boards arch moderator"? Nothing like that is planned for the big bang date.
Antje: Yes. Yes. No. :-) 21. May 2004, 19:05:23 when June 5 is upon us, will we note changes immediately? will they be subtle? will we need a tutorial? :) 21. May 2004, 18:56:24 Subject: come on guys surely not just me wanting to know things ;oÞ The "all boards arch moderator" What can they do? is it just public and fellowship boards they can access to edit/delete/ban, or profile alterations also? 21. May 2004, 18:50:25 Subject: me, cos you are answering questions LOL Will it be any more friendly to the webtv users? or are the white pages something you can not prevent? 21. May 2004, 18:49:03 Subject: Who said I am in a talkative mood? It should be. 21. May 2004, 18:39:17 big bang!!!... I was hoping for inter-fellowship matches, not the end of the universe as we know it!!! 21. May 2004, 18:26:37 Subject: While you are in talkative mood :o) Right so there is a problem, will BK2 be any less strain on the server? 21. May 2004, 18:24:19 It is a normal behaviour of overloaded servers.
Do you want an absolutely reliable 24/7 service? Give us, for example, 30,000 EUR and you will have it :-) High-performance hardware costs some money, as well as their maintenance. 21. May 2004, 18:21:04 well it chucked me and others off around 11am BST today 21. May 2004, 18:19:28 Nothing unusual is happening to the site at the moment. 21. May 2004, 18:12:26 Can you tell us what is happening to the site at the moment? the last few days weve had blips and time warps etc. Will this be sorted at the same time or before hand etc? 21. May 2004, 18:10:12 The date of big bang is 5th June 2004. 21. May 2004, 18:09:19 Subject: Re: Hello lets see if someone else asking will get an answer LOL
Fairy....Its Customer services testing its games etc at the moment and testing the new arch moderator admin out 21. May 2004, 18:00:26 Subject: Hello I was wondering when we are going to get the newer version of BK, as it seems that some people already have it???? 21. May 2004, 17:55:41 Subject: cheating at Backgammon it's impossible to cheat at Backgammon here by controling the roll of the dice.
That said, however, it is possible to increase your chances of rolling more doubles. It's all in the wrist. :) 21. May 2004, 17:08:50  mrloupcity, I thought we were answering your question. 21. May 2004, 16:34:36 Subject: Sorry harley guess I will just go back to my corner and keep my mouth shut. I see enought fighting going on here to start up anything more. So later everyone. If you care to find out what I was asking feel free to send me a messare to my box...
:o{P`````` 21. May 2004, 15:35:22 Subject: Re: Thanks Bumble... I guess I never did read the rules before :)
LOL @ Harley, This discussion should move to the Backgammon board...Then posts again on the subject... Cracked me up!... 21. May 2004, 15:25:13 That's it, harley. You must use the higher of the two if you can. 21. May 2004, 15:24:24 So the rule not supported here is that a player should use the higher number, if either dice can be used, but not both..? 21. May 2004, 15:22:08 I still don't know that rule properly. I've probably broken it a few dozen times at least without realising. I know theres more information about it at the backgammon board, this discussion should move over there really. 21. May 2004, 15:21:21 A player must use both numbers of a roll if this is legally possible (or all four numbers of a double). When only one number can be played, the player must play that number. Or if either number can be played but not both, the player must play the larger one. When neither number can be used, the player loses his turn. In the case of doubles, when all four numbers cannot be played, the player must play as many numbers as he can. 21. May 2004, 15:18:12 Subject: Re: Just to make sure I am not familiar with that rule....what does it state?
Thanks :) 21. May 2004, 15:11:28 Subject: Re: Just to make sure  the dice here do not support one of the basic rules in backgammon about use of the dice when only one can be moved... some people consider it cheating.. others consider it legal because this site supports it... i try to play according to the rules... 21. May 2004, 15:05:14 Subject: Re: Just to make sure I dont get the cheating question iou...
There is no way to cheat in backgammon, as there are no moves 'in poor taste" as Sharon contends... What am I missing here? Are you trying to say that "swapping the dice" is somehow cheating or in poor taste? 21. May 2004, 14:49:44 This time it makes a change, they are also a Rook now, so they can no longer say its a member privaledge to get better die. LMAO 21. May 2004, 14:45:14 Lets hope thats a good enough answer for them anyway 21. May 2004, 14:41:16 I've commented this ridiculous issue many times and I'm not going to do it again. 21. May 2004, 14:40:24 Subject: Re: FENCER I think its only Fencer they will listen to though 21. May 2004, 14:35:07 Subject: Re: FENCER Steve, I don't know how many times a day I get accused of this! It is impossible to change the dice at backgammon, they are completely random and theres no way to alter that. 21. May 2004, 14:28:03 Subject: Re: Just to make sure if you were able to move the 6 and moved the 3 instead .. than that move would be in poor taste.... but since there was no move available for the 6 then only thing you could do is move the 3 .. which is a legal move... 21. May 2004, 14:25:17 Subject: FENCER I need you to inform the players here that there is no way that I can cheat by arranging the dice to roll what I need in backgammon.
I am fed up with one going on and on about me cheating 21. May 2004, 11:25:30 Thanks, Fencer...now about those 40 games that timed-out. Do you want to get the numbers from my message box?
And I assume my membership time will be extended accordingly? 21. May 2004, 11:19:50 bumble: Here ya go.
I wonder how you managed to insert vacation days with 0000 year ... ;-) 21. May 2004, 09:09:42 Subject: Just to make sure I understand this right. In 1 of my games I have all but 2 of my men in home. My last two are close but on same spot. I roll a 3-6. I could have moves the 3 with 1 of my men in home but then would not have been able to move the 6 cause my oppent has that spot covered. If I would have done it that way it would have been said that I was cheating for not using both dice right? If that is so then I'm glad I did not do it that way... 20. May 2004, 11:36:07 Subject: Apologies I apologise to the following members of whom whose games I've timed out due to circumstances beyond my control.
These games will be reinstated one day and the tournaments may progress normally. Erika, munwest, gasper, Antje, sissie44, Stinger, Stingers Girl, zetes, myfanwy, DesertStarr, BBW, StarOfDarkness, rhiannon, Watson, Ophelia, TIGER0005, Merrily Watkins, harley, pawnme, Nightstorm, Molly, cattallac1962, WizardII, NOT a floosie, faith, loggerhead, mrbugs001, Goonerg, Stratman71, DrRobinson, Goldame. 20. May 2004, 11:12:55 Golden Maharajah? Hah! I'm the first BrainGhost. I can go everywhere and see everything but I can do naff all! 20. May 2004, 10:58:30 Perhaps the configuration of bumble's Golden Maharajah symbol is conflicting with something? LOL << < 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |