User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net ,  rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372   > >>
25. December 2005, 02:04:51
Czuch 
Thanks!
Merry christmas all!

25. December 2005, 02:03:35
Vikings 
shortly after midnight I believe, but don't forget about auto vacation

25. December 2005, 01:58:02
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Vikings: so that game will time out at midnight czech time if there is no move?

25. December 2005, 01:53:32
Vikings 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: correct

25. December 2005, 01:50:30
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Eriisa: oh... so doesnt it put more time on a game intead of going negative?

25. December 2005, 00:42:52
Eriisa 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Today is a site holiday.

25. December 2005, 00:18:04
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Tis the Season.. I think This will be the last time we can count on Christmas.. ;)

25. December 2005, 00:00:50
Czuch 
Is there a reason that someone has -3 hours on a game they are playing with me? Has game time been suspended or something?

24. December 2005, 11:15:41
oldhamgirl 
Subject: Christmas
Just want to say a Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year to you all and your families.
Have a great time

23. December 2005, 03:12:23
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Sorted? No, not yet, mate.
Vikings: LOL. And I'd like to order all sort sof things in a less than random (database id) fashion.

Fencer and sorting things... there's something awry there that I don't understand.

23. December 2005, 02:58:35
Vikings 
I'd like to organise my favorite boards in the order of say..............................................
...........my favorite boards

23. December 2005, 00:14:12
whatdidyousay 
Yaaaay. It worked.

23. December 2005, 00:07:13
whatdidyousay 
Subject: Re:
Stevie: Thanks. That makes sense. Runs to go make Debate Club bold.

22. December 2005, 23:46:31
Stevie 
Modified by Stevie (22. December 2005, 23:46:54)
Its cos it has an arrow at the start of it to make it bold

22. December 2005, 23:45:35
Andre Faria 
Subject: Re: Favourite Boards question
whatdidyousay: mine too...

22. December 2005, 23:43:57
whatdidyousay 
Subject: Favourite Boards question
Why is my Favourite Boards list in alphabetical order with one glaring exception? "Flame Pit" does not come before "Debate Club" alphabetically, but it is in my favourite boards list that way.

21. December 2005, 04:05:58
NOT a floosie 
Ok, let us get back to the reasons for this board please rather than discussing an individual. Thanks.

21. December 2005, 03:41:22
Vikings 
Subject: Re:
playBunny: you can call it poor sportsmanship but it is within the rules, unfortunatly, therefore it is not cheating,

21. December 2005, 03:38:24
Vikings 
Subject: Re: player in question
emmett: he will put you on hide and ignore your request.

21. December 2005, 03:21:00
playBunny 
Czuch Chuckers: Nope. In this instance it means sick in the head. But the result of his pathology is cheating behaviour, at least as far as I'm concerned.

21. December 2005, 03:18:33
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
playBunny: Pathalogical = cheating?

21. December 2005, 03:12:10
playBunny 
Czuch Chuckers: So if you invited 20 people to an 11-hour match and 19 of them timed out, would you continue to issue that sort of invitation or would you be dissatisfied with that kind of "victory"?

We're talking about someone who is consistent is using this method. This is not a normal person but someone with a pathology of some sort. How can you say it's not cheating?

21. December 2005, 03:06:28
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
playBunny: That its not cheating, and it is just a couple of the problems with a turn based game site.

21. December 2005, 02:34:22
playBunny 
Czuch Chuckers: And what you are saying is....?

21. December 2005, 02:29:51
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
playBunny: Im not saying that....

21. December 2005, 02:00:55
playBunny 
Czuch Chuckers: Are you saying you'd be happy to accept this guy's invitation and have him wait until you went to bed or work and then suck your points though a timeout?

21. December 2005, 01:44:55
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Andre Faria: Problems with a turn based site...

21. December 2005, 01:41:31
Andre Faria 
Subject: Re:
Czuch Chuckers: Like talking about bets at the ponds is not cheating...

21. December 2005, 01:38:52
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: It surley isnt cheating, and should not upset anyone anymore than playing a 21 day game to the full 21 days every move is completely acceptable....

21. December 2005, 01:36:08
LuckyCat9 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: Want some beans? :P

21. December 2005, 00:11:40
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re:
Andre Faria: Good!

21. December 2005, 00:04:11
Andre Faria 
We could have associated to every players profile, some rankings given by other players in such attributes like kindness, sportmanship, quicknes, and so on...

20. December 2005, 23:40:59
playBunny 
Emmett, Pythagoras: Wise words but they're heading down the path of off-topic,

20. December 2005, 23:38:11
Chicago Bulls 
Modified by Chicago Bulls (20. December 2005, 23:38:30)
One of his best is:
"Numbers inevitably will lead a person down the path of reason"

20. December 2005, 23:34:37
goodbyebking 
Subject: Re: players
Pythagoras: "Write in the sand the flaws of your friend."
-Pythagoras of Samos

20. December 2005, 22:36:17
Rose 
Subject: Re: Time-out ploy
playBunny: Gotcha. I didn't look at it all. I got caught by taking a game under 12 hours per move once an timed out on it, getting a loss. Im more careful on the games I take now.

20. December 2005, 22:29:52
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Time-out ploy
Modified by playBunny (20. December 2005, 22:30:17)
Rose: No, it's unfortunate but there are many innocents caught by his scam... and many more yet to be caught. Have a look at his Battleboats, for instance. Far too many different names against the low number of moves matches.

20. December 2005, 22:24:08
Stevie 
Subject: Re:winning
emmett: Id say its sorta cheating, cos they are cheating themselves as much as their opponents.. Id rather win by merits not by cack handed tactics

20. December 2005, 22:24:06
Rose 
Subject: Re:winning
emmett: Here is a thought. If he won so many on time outs would that indicate all the other ID's he won from are made up pawns he setup in order to win?

20. December 2005, 21:11:24
alanback 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: I would hardly call it winning.

20. December 2005, 21:00:04
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re:
Pythagoras: I'd hardly call this a "clever" way of winning.

20. December 2005, 20:45:25
playBunny 
Pythagoras: Yes, there's something sad and pathetic about someone who makes such cheating** their priority (even if they are 80, lol).

(** "cheating" defined in a vaguer, more human and less "ruley" sense )

20. December 2005, 19:57:31
Chicago Bulls 
Modified by Chicago Bulls (20. December 2005, 19:58:00)
Since a legal thing is a legal thing and i am as pedantic as it goes, i call it fair!
Clever way of winning, yet i would not put him on my friends or approve his behaviour.....
I could call him a moron but i won't, since the moderators silently spy everything from above
He thinks he does something clever and he admires himself believeing that he is a superior brain that is fooling everyone, but the only thing he does is to spend his time on stupid things while he isn't realising that his time is coming to an end. The day that he will realise this, would be too late.....
On the other hand he may be an 80 years old man, that did everything in his life and wants to try something new!

20. December 2005, 19:42:11
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Voodoo at Brainking:-)
Modified by playBunny (20. December 2005, 19:42:30)
Pythagoras: We discussed him on the backgammon board, too (Top 9 messages from the link). Some of his opponents don't realise the implications of the 11-hour-zero-bonus clock that he uses. Others think he's using that clock because he wants a fast game but discover that he stalls until they cannot stay at their computer. Then he moves and their clock runs out while they're asleep or at work. Strictly speaking it's legal but I consider him a cheat.

20. December 2005, 19:41:21
Chicago Bulls 
Oh, so he is a player that is based on winning on time? LOL! That is quite new way of winning.....

20. December 2005, 19:35:11
Andre Faria 
Subject: Re: Voodoo at Brainking:-)
Pythagoras: if you go to the backgammon board you´ll find the reason for it...

20. December 2005, 19:33:50
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Voodoo at Brainking:-)
Modified by Chicago Bulls (20. December 2005, 19:34:07)
I've seen the statistics of robtoo for Battleboats and he has 87 wins and 2 loses.

That can't be real since battleboats is a game of mainly luck! But i've discovered the reason. From his 87 wins the 79 were wins by time out of the opponent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So i wonder what kind of voodoo makes to his opponents and they run out of time?

Just kidding about the voodoo-part but i still wonder......

20. December 2005, 16:22:40
harley 
Subject: Re: Interview
pauloaguia & Emmett: The next interview is with Pedro Martinez and should be soonish

20. December 2005, 15:37:02
Expired 
Subject: Re: Interview
emmett: Mine will be on its way to you soon! I just sent harley my answers.

20. December 2005, 14:20:12
pauloaguia 
Subject: Interview
harley When's the next interview coming up?

<< <   363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top