 |
|
 CheckersDiscuss about checkers game or find new opponents. No insulting, baiting or flaming other players. Off topic posts are subject to deletion and if it persists the poster faces sanctions. This board is for checkers. You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 > >> 4. December 2006, 20:32:42 Subject: NOMAD Isn't Nomad co-moderator, anymore? I hope is everything allright with him! Anyway... I'm still available to be co-mod in this board. As it looks that a lot of people agrees with that... 4. December 2006, 12:33:20 Subject: Re: Top 10 players from then to now. B L I T Z M E: Unfortunatelly, I only know Moseyev. And some portuguese players, but they play Portuguese (Spanish? Classic?) Checkers. Anyway, I believe that, in general, it's difficult to compare players from different centuries / decades. And, usually, youngsters are better than the eldest, because they have all the background that was builded for the others! 8. November 2006, 23:13:59 Subject: Re: Purple: I would be honoured... if everybody agrees with that! 8. November 2006, 23:08:09 Subject: Re: Purple: You're doing a great job, my good friend! 8. November 2006, 22:45:25 Subject: Re: Stardust: I agree with you. Purple doesn't... ;) 8. November 2006, 22:38:34 Subject: Re: Stardust: Oups... that's not a Checker's deal... Purple will not like it! ;) 8. November 2006, 17:36:25 Subject: Re: Moderator Purple: Ok, thank you for the explanation, my good friend! 8. November 2006, 17:12:28 Subject: Moderator Hey, this is not about checkers, but it's about this board. Can any of our moderators explain me how can someone be moderator of this board? I think it would be nice if we could vote for our moderators... Of course, Purple is a very active moderator, but I think Ustica or nomad aren't so useful, like moderators. Maybe we could vote for another checker player to moderate this board. What do you think about it? 8. November 2006, 11:03:47 Subject: Re: Andre Faria: Indeed! I've seen a few games of some of the best checkers players here (purple, ustica, pinchitos...) and they used that technic in their games! I still don't know exactly how it works, besides I've readen carefully undertaker's article! 4. November 2006, 18:35:20 Does anybody needs me to translate it? It would be a pleasure! ;) 6. October 2006, 16:09:03 Subject: Re: Game 1931566 Purple: link it! 6. October 2006, 15:51:19 Subject: Re: Draws "Have Fun": Eheh... I remember that. It needs pacience, but it's possible! Gothik checkers have much more possibilities than any other variants, so it's always hard to say it is a draw. I think it is only a draw in a 1-1 situation.Well, there are another possibility, in a 2-2 situation, but it's not fair to tell you wich, since the game is not finished yet. ;) 6. October 2006, 15:48:02 Subject: Re: Draws Purple: That's right... in IYT, they had the rule (a fair rule, indeed) of the same board for the 3rd move, gives a draw. We could suggest it to Fencer! 6. October 2006, 15:34:12 Subject: Re: Draws Andre Faria: It happenned to me too, and Fencer have done the same. I think it depends on the knowledge of Fencer about the game. For players who really know, for example, anti-checkers game, it's easy to know when it is a draw. To people who doesn't know so much the game, they might think it is not a draw. I'm thinking in a 4-2 situation, that it's clearly a draw, if the 2 pieces are together (and the defender s a good player)... 28. September 2006, 16:36:06 Subject: Re: http://brainking.com/en/ShowFellowship?fid=525 Andre Faria: We both know 3 of them... I don't know if you can recognize them, Andre! You haven't been so many years in IYT as I've been, but I'm sure you've already played against them! 28. September 2006, 13:11:19 Subject: Re: http://brainking.com/en/ShowFellowship?fid=525 Purple: Yes, GST are still there. And here... 27. September 2006, 15:01:52 Subject: Re: Classic (or Portuguese) Checkers !Undertaker!: It is great! Congrats, Undertaker! I believe Fencer will accept it, I see no reasons to forget this variant. 18. September 2006, 13:09:23 Subject: Re: Andre Faria: Oh, but I've no doubts about that...! 18. September 2006, 12:58:29 Subject: Re: Andre Faria: Eheheh, I believe we'll be silenced... Well, I'll find you "out there"... eheheh 18. September 2006, 12:44:18 Subject: Re: !Undertaker!: I don't know, but maybe you'll find some answers here. A lot of people knows a lot about "programs" here... 3. August 2006, 13:02:48 Subject: Tourney Checkers 1800+, 4 fast players For really fast players, something like a "live tournament". 28. June 2006, 12:28:34 Subject: Re: Come Grow With Us Purple: May I make some advertisement to my fellowship too? Or it's a privilege of the moderator, only? 19. June 2006, 16:37:58 Subject: Re: Bruno Jesus: Take care with your considerations... they use to ban people that makes questions/considerations or other types of thaughts... as I said before, Mr. Purple is not an European, and we must forgive him... USA has less than 300 years, europe more than 3000 years of civilization... 19. June 2006, 16:26:58 Subject: Re: Bruno Jesus: You are used to Euopean democracys...Mr. Purple is not european, Bruno! 19. June 2006, 11:35:00 Subject: Re: Andre Faria: I would love it too...! Excelent choice! 6. June 2006, 11:05:49 Does anyone knows if Moiseyev plays here? I would really like to play a game with him! Another question, does anyone knows the history of Gothik Checkers? It looks to me a more evoluted game, but the name suggests it should be an older game. 22. May 2006, 19:34:15 Subject: Re: Checkers Purple: If those stories are true, it will be a plaisure to be banned... I don't want to belong to something like it... 22. May 2006, 18:41:39 Did someone get hurted with my "erased words"?
I'm just looking for some answers! I want to know if some "stories" I've been heard are true or false. It looks like they are true! 22. May 2006, 13:19:41 Subject: Re: gooner: And how about some "km" members? What does it means, that km that a lot of players use? 19. May 2006, 14:57:53 Subject: Re: gooner: Oh, I see! What's your opinion, do you think there are people, here, using them? 19. May 2006, 14:53:35 Subject: Re: gooner: Can you tell me names? Do you know if someone had already used some? 19. May 2006, 14:44:40 Subject: Re: gooner: That's exactly what I wanted to know! 19. May 2006, 14:29:51 Subject: Re: Tiger Checkers Club Purple: I've heard about a program to checkers. Can anyone told me about it? It exists? Anyone used it? << < 1 2 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |