User Name: Password:
New User Registration
 Checkers

Discuss about checkers game or find new opponents. No insulting, baiting or flaming other players. Off topic posts are subject to deletion and if it persists the poster faces sanctions. This board is for checkers.


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18   > >>
18. June 2006, 21:10:51
Droppo Wong 
Subject: Re:
Andre Faria: Does it matter? Why would anyone care?

7. June 2006, 09:48:27
City 
Alex Moiseyev plays at Kurnik

6. June 2006, 11:05:49
Gabriel Almeida 

Does anyone knows if Moiseyev plays here? I would really like to play a game with him!


Another question, does anyone knows the history of Gothik Checkers? It looks to me a more evoluted game, but the name suggests it should be an older game.


25. May 2006, 21:54:10
gooner 
Subject: Re:
Socrates: I was in Philly the other year and offered tp play Ed while I was there, he was reluctant, so it never came off.

25. May 2006, 10:38:35
BlitzMe 
I read in earlier posts from last year about Ed Trice. He said Alex Moiseyev went to his house and they played some checkers. This is true. It sounds to me that Ed Trice is thought of as a Master player. That's ironic because, when I talked to Alex Moiseyev recently, he told me that Ed Trice was no better than "an advanced novice". He also had no doubt in his mind that Ed Trice used WCC in his online games at various websites - most frequently, zone.com, from 1997-2001. I guess this solves any argument of this kind from the past.

22. May 2006, 21:03:45
Purple 
Subject: Re:
Andre Faria: The mentioned name was deleted along with the poster. "Cheating", programs, KM etc is not checkers. It's flaming and there is zero tolerance for it. This is not something we are going to take up space debating...people come here to read about checkers. Nuff said.

22. May 2006, 19:34:15
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re: Checkers
Purple: If those stories are true, it will be a plaisure to be banned... I don't want to belong to something like it...

22. May 2006, 19:25:08
Purple 
Subject: Checkers
This DB is for discussion of checkers and not peripheral inflammatory subjects and especially where people are mentioned by name. We will not debate, argue or discuss this..we will just delete the post and if it continues ban the poster. Checkers only please.

22. May 2006, 18:41:39
Gabriel Almeida 
Did someone get hurted with my "erased words"?
I'm just looking for some answers!
I want to know if some "stories" I've been heard are true or false. It looks like they are true!

22. May 2006, 13:19:41
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re:
gooner: And how about some "km" members? What does it means, that km that a lot of players use?

19. May 2006, 14:59:23
gooner 
Subject: Re:
PT_Gabriel: I try not to get involved in that arguement.

19. May 2006, 14:57:53
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re:
gooner: Oh, I see! What's your opinion, do you think there are people, here, using them?

19. May 2006, 14:56:26
gooner 
Subject: Re:
PT_Gabriel: Whether people use them or not depends on who you talk to. WCC, nemisis, sage, nexsus and chinnook to name but a few.

19. May 2006, 14:53:35
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re:
gooner: Can you tell me names? Do you know if someone had already used some?

19. May 2006, 14:50:27
gooner 
Subject: Re:
PT_Gabriel: There are numerious programs available for checkers for all different levels.

19. May 2006, 14:44:40
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re:
gooner: That's exactly what I wanted to know!

19. May 2006, 14:41:17
gooner 
what program?

19. May 2006, 14:29:51
Gabriel Almeida 
Subject: Re: Tiger Checkers Club
Purple: I've heard about a program to checkers. Can anyone told me about it? It exists? Anyone used it?

18. May 2006, 02:48:11
Purple 
Subject: Tiger Checkers Club
We are accepting applications. All skill levels welcome.

17. May 2006, 09:42:36
rednaz23 
Subject: crazy checkers variation video
This is some sort of checkers variation. It is interesting, check it out, this game was so lopsided! But wait...

Here is the link:

http://www.guzer.com/videos/surprise_winner.php

Anyone know what game that is?

7. May 2006, 22:16:57
gooner 
Subject: Re: Recommended By Purple
Purple km: A great site purple :o)

7. May 2006, 17:56:40
Purple 
Subject: Recommended By Purple

21. April 2006, 22:48:21
"GERRY" 
Subject: Re: Keep in mind...
Purple: LOL:) me to But i'am on my way up ,lol maybe some day.I love this game:)

21. April 2006, 21:52:22
gooner 
Subject: Re: Keep in mind...
Purple: Point taken

21. April 2006, 21:45:02
Purple 
Subject: Re: Keep in mind...
gooner: I am way under 2000. LOL

21. April 2006, 21:40:31
gooner 
Subject: Re: Keep in mind...
Purple: That wasn't a hint. lol

21. April 2006, 21:38:39
Purple 
Subject: Re: Keep in mind...
gooner: Quite right! But we can't afford to finance everyone. :)

21. April 2006, 21:36:03
gooner 
Subject: Re: Keep in mind...
The Usurper: Save one for me :o)

Being rated 2000+ dosen't always mean the best though purple

21. April 2006, 17:31:16
Purple 
Subject: Tiger Checker Club
If you are highly skilled at checkers the Tiger club would like to talk to you. We have the most awesome collection of talent on the internet assembled there since the days of the Killing Machine. If you are rated over 2000 and can not afford a membership we may be able to provide confidential financial assistance. Join the best! Send in your application today.

18. April 2006, 21:38:50
The Usurper 
Subject: Re: Keep in mind...
gooner: I'll smoke & think about that.

18. April 2006, 19:12:20
gooner 
Subject: Re: Keep in mind...
The Usurper: Except if you change it :o)

18. April 2006, 15:50:42
John Baker 
Subject: Re:
Socrates: Huh... It's amazing how many retail board game companies sell checkers sets that aren't regulation. You'd think they'd want to be authentic. Oh well, such is life. :-)

17. April 2006, 21:52:48
BlitzMe 
Subject: Re:
John Baker: If one side has Red and the other has Black then it's not regulation! Pogo.com checkers has these colors and has Red moving first, Black moving second. BK uses Black and White so Black moves first in Checkers here in BK. You can go to checkers settings and make this possible.

17. April 2006, 16:13:54
John Baker 
Subject: Re:
Socrates: Given red and black pieces, which moves first?

17. April 2006, 10:08:27
BlitzMe 
Modified by BlitzMe (17. April 2006, 10:12:47)
OK...let me straighten this out.

All Draughts variants except for English Checkers: White moves first. Black/Red moves first in English Checkers, then white moves.

Black/Red moves first in Anti-Checkers too.

Italian Checkers, Czech Checkers, Spanish Checkers, 10x10 checkers, Brazilian, White moves first.

17. April 2006, 05:30:59
The Usurper 
Subject: Keep in mind...
Everything is the opposite of what it is.

16. April 2006, 20:08:50
Purple 
Subject: Re: Colours
gooner: Everywhere except Brainking.

16. April 2006, 17:44:43
gooner 
Subject: Re: Colours
Ferjo: Am I missing something here red or black always moves first.

16. April 2006, 17:35:59
Ferjo 
Subject: Re: Colours
Fencer:
The answer to that question its of course White!

15. April 2006, 05:26:11
draughts 
Subject: Re: Colours
Fencer: If you start with standard chess colors, then white moves first. But in most checkers literature, the first side is called Black or (officially) Red.

13. April 2006, 13:43:07
Purple 
white

13. April 2006, 12:45:43
patch 
Subject: Re: Colours
Fencer: black

13. April 2006, 09:52:37
Fencer 
Subject: Colours
Please, before I make a mistake, which player starts in checkers? White or black?

9. April 2006, 23:45:26
Purple 
Subject: Tiger Checker Club
We are assembling the very best players on BK to form the top checker team. While we like anyone to join the fellowship, chat about checkers and learn the game the team itself is to consist of highly skilled players. Apply if interested. Thank you.

<< <   9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top