 |
|
 CheckersDiscuss about checkers game or find new opponents. No insulting, baiting or flaming other players. Off topic posts are subject to deletion and if it persists the poster faces sanctions. This board is for checkers. You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> 15. April 2006, 05:26:11 Subject: Re: Colours Fencer: If you start with standard chess colors, then white moves first. But in most checkers literature, the first side is called Black or (officially) Red. 13. April 2006, 12:45:43 Subject: Re: Colours Fencer: black 13. April 2006, 09:52:37 Subject: Colours  Please, before I make a mistake, which player starts in checkers? White or black? 9. April 2006, 23:45:26 Subject: Tiger Checker Club  We are assembling the very best players on BK to form the top checker team. While we like anyone to join the fellowship, chat about checkers and learn the game the team itself is to consist of highly skilled players. Apply if interested. Thank you.  6. April 2006, 03:19:50 Subject: Extra Money? I Recommend... 5. April 2006, 15:03:41 Subject: historical fragment, recently discovered "You should watch Wyllie."
"Why, Lee?" "Wyllie is wily." "Why, Lee!" 5. April 2006, 06:18:16 Subject: Re: Playing site Mister Suicide: Kurnik has the best features and has the best players. Kurnik.org. 3. April 2006, 09:49:21 Subject: Re: Playing site Mister Suicide: I enjoy MSN Gaming Zone, in the Kings Room: http://zone.msn.com/en/checkers/rooms_compete.htm .
Kurnik (http://www.kurnik.org/intl/en/checkers/) is also popular among blitz players and teenagers, as is Yahoo (http://games.yahoo.com). 2. April 2006, 12:09:13 Subject: Playing site Hi!
Can someone tell me a good live playing checker site for free? Thanks! 29. March 2006, 04:10:24 Subject: New Checkers Fellowship 28. March 2006, 04:03:40 Subject: Open Sign Ups- Fun Tourny 14. March 2006, 18:08:22 Subject: Re: gooner: The checkers BBS is down right now. George Miller is making a new one I believe. You can check www.usacheckers.com for another checkers forum. 14. March 2006, 07:50:24 gooner: I am sorry, but I don't understand Your Idea. :-( 13. March 2006, 21:55:57 Subject: Re: sobek: Any idea what has happened to checker solutions? your comments on there were always worth reading. If your the same person I am thinking of. 13. March 2006, 21:10:02 socrates: please, it is new rating, from tournaments only from 2000. Rating is statistic method, more games, better ratings. example ACF has rating 20 Years and it is not absolutly correct for all players. (same different will be everytime). We need more games, more tournaments. Will be more accuratelly, more and more :-)) 13. March 2006, 19:45:46 Subject: Re: sobek: There are some players rated 2200-2300 that are not as strong as some 1700 rated players. That's a big difference. 13. March 2006, 07:44:21 Socrates: Why? We calculate no all tournaments as national federation. You must understand, We calculate from tournaments, if we receive. Send me example cross table from Barbados championship from 2000. 13. March 2006, 02:24:15 Subject: Re: sobek: Those ratings are very innaccurate. 13. March 2006, 02:23:51 Subject: Re: Droppo Wong: Yes I have about 4-5 checker programs on my hard drive. So what? 12. March 2006, 18:29:43 gooner and all:
will be more db for different style (10x10, spainish, russian-shashki, brasil, italian etx) :-)))) please wait, max. 1-2 mounth :-) 12. March 2006, 15:01:46 Subject: Re: sobek: It's an interesting site. 12. March 2006, 14:55:18 Gooner:
in this page http://www.checkers.wz.cz/checkers_rating.html is free games database too. :-) Socrates: I like real tournaments, no online, becouse in online (in Brainking is nord :-( )played more player with program. 12. March 2006, 14:44:38 Subject: Re: Socrates: You say the proof is you checked with a program. That only proves you have a program. Not Ustica. 12. March 2006, 12:21:53 Subject: Re: Socrates: Its not a good thing no if "Proved" but it can't, so we may aswell get on with it. 12. March 2006, 07:36:25 Subject: Re:  Socrates: well.. I don't condone anyone cheating.. all I would be able to do is avoid playing with them.. it isn't like I can go around the table and just boink them on their head! LOL 12. March 2006, 07:32:06 Sigh. You make it sound that his program using is a good thing. He will continue to do this while he gets "support" from you all. 11. March 2006, 22:06:22 Subject: Re: Nomad: I don't have a problem either and will accept invites from anyone. For it is and always will be fun for me, besides whether your playing a good human player or a computer you can only learn more and aspire to a greater level. 11. March 2006, 20:13:28 Subject: Re: Nomad: I think real checker players are a brotherhood that rises above individual dislikes. 11. March 2006, 19:57:22 Subject: Re: Purple: Program or not I will play them makes no differeance to me, It's just a game. Most have always been nice to me either way 11. March 2006, 17:16:44 Subject: Re: gooner: Well said. And Old 14 has been part of published play for so long that many people move it like book but have no connection to computer programs. I don't like the openning myself. 11. March 2006, 16:43:20 Its a subject that rears its ugly head all to often but can never be 100% prooved. So any doubts, people should not play opponents who they think are cheating. 11. March 2006, 14:35:18 Subject: Re: Socrates: It aounds like poor sportsmanship to make an accusation like that without proof. I was just congratulating the top BKR checker player. 11. March 2006, 01:24:48 Subject: Re: Number One Purple: I would have to agree with that one 10. March 2006, 19:41:20 The proper ratings are available for viewing all though not quite finished yet of proper players who play year in and year out in tournaments face to face.
http://www.checkers.wz.cz/checkers_rating.html 9. March 2006, 13:54:21 Subject: Re: Number One Andre Faria: Besdies having played him for years there is a
"Best Player" list by BKR and Fencer has Ustica as number one. 9. March 2006, 07:29:33 Subject: Re: Number One Purple: Yes he is probably the best with the aid of a program. 8. March 2006, 01:17:11 Subject: Number One Quite some time ago I gave my opinion as to who was the very best checker player on Brainking..based on years of experience. It was then and is now none other than Ustica. Congrats on the BKR. 10. February 2006, 06:40:57 Subject: devil's triangle Could anyone tell me anything about the devil's triangle stragty in checkers..Linwood X 21. January 2006, 15:33:02 21. January 2006, 15:29:01 Subject: TOP GUN New checker tournament ready for sign up. Good luck. 21. January 2006, 02:04:53 Subject: Draughts Happy New Year,
Sophisticated contestants please message me to arrange faster matches. No cheating! 11. January 2006, 23:22:16 Subject: Re: ustica: Well but it´s not obvious. Jump side by side it´s like for example jump to right and left and this is allowed. By this reason the official rules says : "Within a multicapture turning 180 degrees between two captures is illegal." It´s logic because in this way all captures are ortoghonals but this norm must be included into the rules or in other case it should not be applied. << < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |