 |
|
 BackgammonBackgammon and variants. Backgammon Links You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 > >> 3. January 2009, 18:12:14 Subject: Re:  Constellation36: Nice analysis. Would you mind if I post it to BrainRook.com site? 15. December 2008, 07:36:20 Subject: Re: be careful with Draw offers AlliumCepa: I think Pedro's point is that spirit_66 suggests that all Romanian players are cheaters (which is how it really sounds like it). And such remarks should not be posted anywhere. 26. February 2008, 17:34:49 Subject: Re: Plakato images not working? dresali: The images are not available in the bigger size yet. 26. February 2008, 09:13:35 Subject: Re: Fevga fakar10: Yes, it does. 25. February 2008, 18:27:53 Subject: Re: Portes AbigailII: It is almost correct.  What I mean is that there will be no standalone game called Portes.1. June 2007, 16:11:30 Subject: Re: New Tournament Type coan.net: The same system as for doubling cube games. 1. June 2007, 14:36:54 Subject: Re: Triple gammon Hrqls: No, it's not possible. You must wait. 1. June 2007, 13:53:49 Subject: Re: Triple gammon Hrqls: No because the tournament system hasn't been changed yet. After the triple gammon is tested, I can add an option to make bigger sections. 1. June 2007, 11:24:16 Subject: Re: Triple gammon AbigailII: That's a visual bug. The final game will be a normal one too. 1. June 2007, 11:23:46 Subject: Re: Triple gammon skipinnz: Nowhere, of course. You can set up a tournament. 1. June 2007, 10:32:16 Subject: Triple gammon All right, test it. 1. June 2007, 07:32:56 Subject: Re: Scoring nabla:  0, 1, 3, 5 is the final approved version.31. May 2007, 12:57:06 Subject: Re: Scoring AbigailII: That seems to be a good solution. I don't like fractions, 99% of BrainKing code is based on integers, not floats. 31. May 2007, 07:55:13 Subject: Scoring And I don't like the idea of giving 0.5 points for a loss. Is there a logical reason for that? 30. May 2007, 17:39:33 Subject: Re: TTT Hrqls: By the way, have a look at BrainKing in Turkish, backgammon is translated to tavla and I am sure there are more languages which don't keep the English name.  30. May 2007, 17:37:22 Subject: Re: TTT nabla: That's much better. 30. May 2007, 17:35:56 Subject: Re: TTT AlliumCepa: Don't scare me again.  30. May 2007, 17:34:24 Subject: Re: TTT Hrqls: But I don't like it. And I don't want to work on something I don't like. 30. May 2007, 17:29:15 Subject: Re: TTT playBunny: TTT might be handy in English but not in other languages. What if I say that it would be implemented only with our own name or I don't see a reason to do it? Unlike some other site owners, I always think multilingual. 30. May 2007, 14:11:49 Subject: Re: TTT Hrqls: I think "gammon tournament" would be good enough.  30. May 2007, 13:30:10 Subject: Re: TTT Hrqls: I don't like "TTT". Find a better name. 16. January 2007, 12:52:56 Subject: Re: Runners skipinnz: Thanks, that's what I needed to know. 16. January 2007, 12:49:24 Subject: Re: Runners Marfitalu: So I am right, am I not? 16. January 2007, 12:41:38 Subject: Re: Runners skipinnz, Marfitalu: Two white pieces on point 1 and two black pieces on point 24? 16. January 2007, 11:49:31 Subject: Runners Can someone please tell me which checkers refer to "back men (runners)" in the standard Backgammon start position? 14. January 2007, 13:10:13 Subject: Re: joshi tm: Since there are no dice, there is no doubling cube. 14. January 2007, 12:22:42 Subject: Re: Czuch Czuckers: Try Grasshopper (just added), there are no dice to kill you.  20. December 2006, 12:43:59 Subject: Re: Images fakarten: I plan to do it. 1. December 2006, 14:38:13 Subject: Re: An announcement of a new BG game grenv: Before the implementation is finished, the rules can be finetuned, of course. I am not a backgammon expert, I've just got a proposal. 2. February 2006, 07:44:07 Subject: Re: Czuch Chuckers: Are you sure this is the correct board for this question? 28. January 2006, 13:39:19 Subject: Re: Pythagoras: All right, since I plan to add 20-30 chess variants, I could add 10 backgammon variants as well. 22. November 2005, 15:33:06 Subject: Re: Feature request Czuch Chuckers: Are you kidding? I recommend to read twice before clicking. 16. November 2005, 13:20:13 Subject: Re: Hrqls: How dare you to move the board to the page top? Wait a minute.16. November 2005, 12:59:44 Subject: Re: Hrqls: On top of the board. Look again. 16. November 2005, 12:54:58 Subject: Re: Most moves in anti-backgammon 14. November 2005, 10:44:10 Subject: Re: plaintiger: Ah, now I understand. Will be done.13. November 2005, 09:40:11 Subject: Re: plaintiger: I still don't understand what should be changed and how. 13. November 2005, 08:32:29 Subject: Re: grenv: It is not recommended to use the browser's Back button on a site like this one where all pages are dynamic. 6. November 2005, 20:03:47 Subject: Re: Resignation warning... playBunny: I've just made it in red font. But I must also kind of agree with Pedro. 2. November 2005, 08:05:09 Subject: Grasshopper pgt: Cool, let me know if you were successful.
Something different - does anybody play Grasshopper? Would it be interesting to implement it here? 2. November 2005, 07:11:27 Subject: Re: Autopass in some form is needed here alanback: You are absolutely right. 2. November 2005, 07:10:25 Subject: Re: Autopass in some form is needed here pgt: Absolutely wrong. My time is best spent on making myself happy.  Which makes any kind of autopass impossible to be here.26. October 2005, 19:02:14 Subject: Re: match vs game etiquette etc grenv: I don't want to change the system only because of the cube. 20. October 2005, 18:13:24 Subject: Re: The warning... playBunny: 1) I am the only one who specifies my own responsibilities.
2) Reposting someone else's posts or private messages without his permission is against the user agreement. << < 1 2 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |