 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com When brainking is down, you can try some games at : https://www.brettspielnetz.de/ Néni tě dovoleny datlovat do toďteho klobo. Abes mohl datlovat do toďteho klobo, mosiš mit némiň členstvi Brain šiml. Mód: Každé može datlovat
<< < 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 > >> 26. března 2006, 20:04:33 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Number of games playing Fencer: shouldnt my post at 12:13 on the 26th then be directly beneath silkwoods post instead of at the bottom ? 26. března 2006, 19:19:32 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Number of games playing  Hrqls: Timestamps are not important in the thread view. The tree structure of roots and leaves is shown. 26. března 2006, 19:14:14 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Number of games playing Fencer: although it shows some weird sorting as the post from mook53lhd shows above my previous 2 posts, while those were made earlier on the day :) 26. března 2006, 19:07:33 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Number of games playing Fencer: very good. i like the way you incorporated .in other words if you`re browsing & a post catches your eye.you can find all posts relating to it.thats much better than some of the so called pro message boards .not complicated at all. you can find something old & buried & look it over & even ressurect the old subj. good show. as if you`re not a regular its ezy to get disgusted when cliques are just shooting the breeze ,but not saying anything + making it virtually impossible to just enter a msg without feeling like an unwanted interloper tyvm mook53lhd 26. března 2006, 12:13:41 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Number of games playing Hrqls: hah! that enwidened (?) the box again :) 26. března 2006, 12:13:02 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Number of games playing Silkwood: another test :) 26. března 2006, 04:29:16 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!!  Hrqls: testing .. testing.. one .. two.. 3 26. března 2006, 01:54:27 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!! Fencer: Judging from the posts concerning this change, I hope it shows you how important the discussion boards and posting are to this site. 25. března 2006, 21:10:21 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!!  Eriisa: I like it!!!! 25. března 2006, 21:05:18 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!!  Eriisa: awesome! hats off to fencer! :) 25. března 2006, 20:18:13 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!!  Hrqls: hey, this box is so much easier too! 25. března 2006, 20:01:54 25. března 2006, 20:00:10 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!! Fencer: ah nice!
hehe i just noticed the boxes dont get smaller anymore .. i guess we reached the minimum size (width) :) 25. března 2006, 19:59:31 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!! Hrqls: lol .. the most-new posts in the thread are at the bottom though :( ... and they are getting smaller and smaller .. so as long as enough people answer to this thread their replies will disappear before shown :) 25. března 2006, 19:59:01 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!! Hrqls: Works only for those with enabled JavaScript.  25. března 2006, 19:58:23 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!! wow! nice! and a small box-link is also added next to the reply button :) 25. března 2006, 19:12:07 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!! volant:  25. března 2006, 18:11:24 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!!  Groucho: and a raise! 25. března 2006, 07:07:00 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!! Eriisa Fencer needs to keep that programmer! 25. března 2006, 03:57:49 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Now I get it!! Vikings: *whispers* Its a conspiracy, you know! 25. března 2006, 02:15:44 O čem je toďten plk: Now I get it!! Pedro Martínez: 
thanks 25. března 2006, 01:05:44 O čem je toďten plk: Exactly!  Vikings:  25. března 2006, 01:03:18 O čem je toďten plk: Re: show thread Vikings: but you can change it! 25. března 2006, 01:00:48 O čem je toďten plk: Re: show thread Pedro Martínez: maybe there is something that I am missing, if the reply button was hit, wouldn't the header in this case say re: show thread unless someone erased it and changed it? 25. března 2006, 00:51:18 O čem je toďten plk: Re: show thread Vikings: The header is not necessarily important. The "Reply" button is. 25. března 2006, 00:41:42 O čem je toďten plk: Re: show thread BIG BAD WOLF: I must be thick in the head tonight, shouldn't they be different treads since they have different headers 24. března 2006, 23:32:21 O čem je toďten plk: Re: show thread  Vikings: That was me - I actually replied to those 2 very old post (from 2002) just to see if it worked with post from way back then. (one of the first on the board) :-) 24. března 2006, 23:28:37 O čem je toďten plk: Re: show thread I wonder if it has a small bug, I just clicked on this tread and it showed two more post that weren't related 24. března 2006, 23:14:44 O čem je toďten plk: Re: show thread BIG BAD WOLF: now that is AWESOME!!!!
 24. března 2006, 21:50:02 O čem je toďten plk: Re: show thread BIG BAD WOLF: Yes, I've used it too. Pretty cool addition! 24. března 2006, 21:40:43 O čem je toďten plk: Re: show thread  BIG BAD WOLF: I just did now thats kewl. 24. března 2006, 21:31:47 O čem je toďten plk: show thread Did anyone else notice the new "show thread" feature? I replied to a post from 2002 to see how well it works.
Way to go Fencer! It's hard to follow some threads! 21. března 2006, 00:30:15 O čem je toďten plk: Re: posts  emmett:I agree with you that Harley is a very good moderator, but I also disagree that she is the only one. There are a lot of very good moderators on this site as well as some that might be questionable. I do hate to see them all lumped together as not good in your post. 21. března 2006, 00:13:16 O čem je toďten plk: Re: posts emmett: toodles 21. března 2006, 00:10:06 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Tuesday: As for creating my own fellowship, I'll have to think about it. Since Pawns can't join and some people won't for a variety of reasons, I see little use in doing so. Perhaps I could create a general discussion fellowship and let all join that wish to and have the topic change from time to time or just let any subject be discussed. 21. března 2006, 00:07:30 O čem je toďten plk: Re: posts Přetvořeny oževatelem Walter Montego (21. března 2006, 00:28:35) emmett: It is in most ways not worth my trouble. So I'm not going to bother with it any more until I see some changes or am actively sought out for my help or opinion.
I've said enough and it should be apparent as to where my sentiments lie. I am talking about moderation issues, not multi nics and handles. Why this keeps getting confused is beyond me. The two can be related. The multi-nics thing is just one of many subjects that have shown to me what is wrong with the moderation system. As I can't go to where I can post about it, that's the end of it unless things change. 20. března 2006, 23:52:04 O čem je toďten plk: Re: posts emmett: I agree with alot of what you have just said, along with alot of what others have said on the subject.....I don't think your post should be deleted either!
I wish multi nics were an impossiblility!! I hate to see people abusing peoples emotions, even on a game site! 20. března 2006, 23:27:13 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Walter Montego: well yes, for paying members because only paying members can have or be in fellowships. It's a priviledge for paying members. But anyone who is a paying member can create their own fellowship for anything they want. There have been many made for moderating issues. In fact, Kipling may still have one. I'm not sure. But you can create a fellowship for anything you want. 20. března 2006, 23:24:53 O čem je toďten plk: Re:  Walter Montego: Invite them! I'd join, if I'd be welcome. I'm sure many others would too. 20. března 2006, 23:23:24 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Tuesday: It is an idea, but what's the point? Just how am I going to get those that I want to talk to to join? 20. března 2006, 23:22:03 O čem je toďten plk: Re: baddessi: You mean paying members, right? Perhaps you and Harley can use your pull with the Big Boss and get me in. It obviously isn't without precedent having a non-moderator as a member. Even if let in, it will only be this group and not the whole of the membership. For those of us that like to post and have issues with how the moderation system is set up on this site there's nowhere to air our thoughts on it to a general audience of all of us. 20. března 2006, 23:18:24 I haven't had a look through fellowships in a long time.
I'm sorry you feel that way, Walter. Maybe Tuesday has the answer, start your own fellowship. 20. března 2006, 23:16:08 O čem je toďten plk: Re: harley: actually, I think there used to be a couple of them.(fellowships about Mods open to all members)...
Clay had one, Thad had one and so did Taz. If I'm not mistaken, those are all gone now. 20. března 2006, 23:09:39 O čem je toďten plk: Re: harley: I understand that fellowships can have whatever members they want. Some fellowships are organized for other reasons. What it amounts to is I have no place to post to a general audience, nor do I have access to the one group of people that might want to hear me out or sound some of their own ideas off me and others. 20. března 2006, 23:08:03 Actually, now I think on it some more, Medic's isn't the only fellowship dedicated to the issue of moderating. Maybe if you ask on the fellowships board someone will know one thats open to all.
http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=24 20. března 2006, 23:05:19 O čem je toďten plk: Re: Walter Montego: Fellowships can be run however the big boss wants. Some are open to all, some are very select. It depends entirely on the individual running it. I don't think this is a reflection on BrainKing itself. 20. března 2006, 23:03:20 O čem je toďten plk: Re: posts emmett: I disagree with you saying the posts are meaningless or irrelevant. Perhaps you have tired of the subjects or whatever. You're entitled to your opinion of what is posted, as am I.
What's with all this favorite board stuff? Anyone can still access a board whether or not you have the link on your main page. The ones I choose to have on my main page are ones I commonly read or post to. Who cares if you remove a board from your main page. Is this supposed to enlighten us in some way? << < 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 > >> |
Datom a hodine
Kamoši, co só toť
Oblébeny klobe na mloveni
Spolke
Vechetávka dňa
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachůnek, šecke nároke vehrazeny. Zpátke do vrcho |