(back)
User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: WhisperzQ , Mort , Bwild 
 Chess variants (8x8)

including Amazon, Anti, Atomic, Berolina, Corner, Crazy Screen, Cylinder, Dark, Extinction, Fischer Random, Fortress, Horde, Knight Relay, Legan, Loop, Maharajah, Screen, Three Checks

For posting:
- invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu)
- information about upcoming tournaments
- discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted)
- links to interesting related sites (non-promotional)

Community Announcements:
- Nasmichael is helping to co-ordinate the Fischer Random Chess Email Chess (FRCEC) Club and can set up quad or trio games if you send him a PM here.


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   1 2   > >>
22. November 2012, 22:58:02
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Three-check chess
rabbitoid: One.

6. July 2009, 17:14:05
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
volant: "When a king moves for the first time, it can move as a queen (it also means that there is no castling in this game)." - from the rules.
Black king never moved, so it attacks both mentioned squares.

19. May 2008, 18:56:53
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Cheshire Cats Chess rules question.
AbigailII: Ah, of course you are right, this kind of giving a check is allowed. What I meant was a situation when both kings (none of them made the first move) give a check each other - that would not be allowed.

19. May 2008, 16:09:21
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Cheshire Cats Chess rules question.
AbigailII: No and no. The only difference between normal and cheshire cat chess (regarding king moves) is in the king's ability to make the first move as a queen. Only to make a move, nothing else. It still cannot move to an attacked square, cannot give a check, cannot capture opponent's king etc.

17. July 2007, 08:07:49
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Rules of Behemoth Chess
Kili: Right.

16. July 2007, 20:15:33
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Rules of Behemoth Chess
Kili: Yes. The Behemoth always finishes the move, even if a king has been captured by another piece.

14. July 2007, 17:42:53
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Behemoth Chess
AbigailII: A side effect.

20. January 2007, 12:13:50
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Recycle Chess
joshi tm: My favorite move is 1. Kxd1

15. January 2007, 22:26:43
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Rules of Dice Chess
Matarilevich: 1) No. 2) Yes.

11. January 2007, 09:26:05
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Dice Chess
joshi tm: I like it at the bottom.

14. July 2006, 17:26:22
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Bug in ambigious chess
BlueJ: A move must be finished by marking a square for your own piece.

24. May 2006, 22:57:44
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Ambiguous Chess
Marfitalu: That's how it works. After the second bugfix.

16. May 2006, 18:07:23
Fencer 
Subject: Re: I protest!
Walter Montego: Somebody complained it should have a colored border. But I can revert it to the former transparent one, of course :-)

16. May 2006, 10:27:49
Fencer 
Subject: Re: I protest!
Walter Montego: There was no border color before.

16. May 2006, 08:22:35
Fencer 
Subject: Re: I protest!
Pythagoras: What colour do you propose?

3. February 2006, 13:50:17
Fencer 
Subject: Random games

3. February 2006, 13:49:47
Fencer 
Yes.

29. November 2005, 21:22:45
Fencer 
Subject: Re: bishop in los alamos
mangue: It should not be possible. Did it happen in a game on BrainKing?

6. September 2005, 19:17:52
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Knight relay question
grenv: Should be fixed for future games.

6. September 2005, 18:33:16
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Knight relay question
grenv: Definitely a bug. Thanks for finding that.

2. September 2005, 07:36:03
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Anencephal: Heh :-) A small bug.

22. August 2005, 19:28:34
Fencer 
Subject: Re: R in after move in Knight Relay Chess.
AbigailII: That means a move relayed by a knight.

1. July 2005, 13:13:12
Fencer 
Subject: Re: thai chess
danoschek: Makruk?

24. January 2005, 10:38:28
Fencer 
Subject: Re: FRC
bwildman: What problems?

18. November 2004, 14:53:38
Fencer 
It should be fixed now.

9. November 2004, 09:41:02
Fencer 
Then I recommend to play it unfixed. I still have no time for it.

3. November 2004, 09:35:38
Fencer 
I'll fix it soon.

30. October 2004, 20:29:57
Fencer 
Please post it to the Bug Tracker if it's not already there.

28. October 2004, 13:31:34
Fencer 
Blizzards fellowship has the same request :-D

27. October 2004, 08:07:08
Fencer 
Aha. A bug.

27. October 2004, 08:06:57
Fencer 
Hell, does it work or not?

http://brainking.com/game/ShowGame?g=4906
65

9. October 2004, 08:44:46
Fencer 
Nothing will be changed.

8. October 2004, 09:53:43
Fencer 
Why not?

8. October 2004, 09:52:11
Fencer 
No.

4. October 2004, 12:13:12
Fencer 
Is it better now?

1. October 2004, 10:40:53
Fencer 
Eeeew, it should be something else. A, maybe?

30. August 2004, 14:17:38
Fencer 
No castling is allowed in this game. I will fix the rules ASAP.

10. July 2004, 18:29:38
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Black pawn moves
I would leave it as it is in the current status. It seems to be logical to me.

19. November 2003, 11:27:26
Fencer 
That's right.

19. November 2003, 10:41:11
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Draw by 3 repitions
No draw is created automatically. If you think that some draw rule should be applied to your game, give me its ID and I will declare a draw.

3. September 2003, 10:05:21
Fencer 
truckman: Try, for example, this tournament.

15. August 2003, 22:03:28
Fencer 
Use &lt; and &gt; instead of < and > :-)

15. August 2003, 07:39:26
Fencer 
Don't use absolute URLs. Something like this works for everyone:
<a href=/game/ArchivedGame?g=134248>THIS LINK</a>

14. August 2003, 18:45:43
Fencer 
Subject: Re: 3 knights mate
Nice cavalry :-)

27. March 2003, 08:59:06
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Double Check
Double check counts as one check.

19. March 2003, 12:12:44
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Loop Team chess
Hmmm, it would be pretty difficult to synchronize four players.

18. March 2003, 09:00:04
Fencer 
I think that the second suggestion (more move abilities to maharajah) is definitely worth trying.

3. March 2003, 10:10:48
Fencer 
Okay, I will remove checks and checkmates completely. It should solve all problems.

1. March 2003, 11:24:22
Fencer 
So what about to try to add two or four extra black pawns?

28. February 2003, 16:01:45
Fencer 
That's interesting idea. So when black captures a white piece (not a pawn), he can immediately make the second move?

<< <   1 2   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top