(back)
User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368   > >>
18. January 2006, 22:31:47
plaintiger 
Subject: Re:
Modified by plaintiger (18. January 2006, 22:33:57)
harley: oh. i see. i'm one of those people who's never managed to fully internalize the "it's just a game" sentiment...i agree with those who think the behavior we're discussing is rude, and while i wouldn't say it *hurts* me, i do find it very annoying. and i think it's interesting (in an annoyed kind of way) to try to figure out why someone would do that. but i can see Your point of view too...not everybody cares about such things.

and maybe that's our reason why right there.

18. January 2006, 22:09:15
harley 
Subject: Re:
plaintiger: Avoiding conflict? Not at all, man. I just live and let live. It doesn't hurt me if someone resigns, its just a game.

18. January 2006, 21:47:24
plaintiger 
Subject: Re:
Eriisa: oh-ho! good point! i did forget about that little aspect of it.

it's still downright rude to one's opponent though, at least when no attempt is made to explain the resignation.

still, the ratings hit is a consolation. thank You for reminding me about that.

18. January 2006, 21:29:23
Eriisa 
Subject: Re:
plaintiger: If they resign halfway through a game, doesn't that ruin their BKR? They are only hurting themself in that case....

At least, that's how I see it.

18. January 2006, 21:27:10
plaintiger 
harley: of people putting a lot of games in the waiting room and then resigning halfway through them, You say, Why try to make sense of it?! It takes all kinds, I'm sure they had their reasons even if we can't understand them.

You're advocating complacency. You're saying, "the hell with etiquette, polite behavior, principles...people should be allowed to do anything they please, and no-one should ever complain about it, because the perpetrators must have their reasons."

that's a blanket excuse for any behavior at all. Hitler, Qadaffi, Jeffrey Dahmer...they all had their reasons. i'm not equating the behavior of game-bailers with the behavior of those three, but the principle is the same. if certain codes of behavior are simply ignored, a civilization, be it that of a country or of a gaming site, falls apart.

it's possible to go too far in one's efforts to avoid conflict, Lady, and i think that's what You're doing here.

18. January 2006, 00:24:25
WhisperzQ 
Subject: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
wetware: And to complete the set there are:

6x6: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=106
10x10: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=96
Other Variants: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=45
Chinese: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=92
Japanese: http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=94

There are also some German speaking boards and maybe other languages too.

Cheers ... WQ:)

17. January 2006, 20:45:17
wetware 
Subject: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
harley: Great recommendation. That 8x8 discussion board will suit me perfectly! Thank you.

16. January 2006, 18:09:25
harley 
Subject: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
wetware: If you like three checks chess yu might find this chess variants 8x8 discussion board interesting;

http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=6

Or maybe the chess variants 10x8;

http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=34

16. January 2006, 17:25:25
wetware 
Subject: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
Matarilevich: Thanks so much for the prompt reply! ww

16. January 2006, 17:22:09
Kili 
Subject: Re: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
wetware: The board fot this question is chess variants.
A double check counts as one check in the global sum of checks in a game of three checks chess

16. January 2006, 17:16:31
wetware 
Subject: Three Checks Chess Rule Interpretation
Feel free to move this question to another area, if there's a more appropriate place. Does a double check count as one check or two, according to the BrainKing software? My guess (and preference) is "one", but I need to know in order to choose the proper continuation in a current game. Thanks in advance!

14. January 2006, 16:40:04
ScarletRose 
doing good here as well

14. January 2006, 16:22:46
baddessi 
everything seems fine on this side of the pond

14. January 2006, 14:23:50
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Im having big probs
Stevie: Likewise. For me the problem is highly intermittent and most accesses are behaving. Then a big hesitation or several little one occur. UK problem, I guesss. [shrug]

14. January 2006, 14:08:21
Stevie 
Subject: Re: Im having big probs
playBunny: what are you on? Im on 2.2Meg broadband dsl

14. January 2006, 14:06:13
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Im having big probs
Stevie: Reeeeeeaalllly slow response times here as well.

14. January 2006, 14:04:23
Stevie 
Subject: Im having big probs
with page loading speeds etc etc especially when using messages..

Is it just me?

13. January 2006, 02:06:54
Bwild 
good people like baddessi make BrainKing a pleasure to visit.
Congrats young lady.

13. January 2006, 01:01:57
baddessi 
Subject: Re:
alanback: thanks
now back on topic everyone!

13. January 2006, 01:00:22
alanback 
Subject: Re:
baddessi: At the risk of being ruled off topic, let me say you are a welcome feature :-)

13. January 2006, 00:58:30
baddessi 
Subject: Re:
harley: I always thought of myself more as a feature : )
Thanks Eriisa(the flake) and harley

13. January 2006, 00:55:09
skipinnz 
Subject: Re:
alanback: S no W

12. January 2006, 23:54:29
alanback 
Subject: Re:
Eriisa: So, are you trying to tell us your a flake?

12. January 2006, 23:53:15
Eriisa 
Subject: Re:
alanback: lol

12. January 2006, 23:51:20
harley 
Subject: Re:
Eriisa: I think he was joking, theres a winking face there!
I always knew baddy was a structure

12. January 2006, 23:51:02
alanback 
Subject: Re:
Eriisa: Who pays attention to moderators anyway??? ;-)

12. January 2006, 23:50:00
Eriisa 
LOL, I guess I just assumed everyone would see her name up there.

12. January 2006, 23:49:48
alanback 
Subject: Re:
Eriisa: Absolutely. This is a board to discuss BrainKing, not to discuss this board

12. January 2006, 23:43:31
furbster 
Subject: Re:
Modified by furbster (12. January 2006, 23:43:41)
Eriisa: Woulda perhaps been useful if you mentioned it with your message.

12. January 2006, 23:41:57
Eriisa 
Subject: Re:
alanback: Congrats to the new moderator of the board is off topic????

since when? A moderator is a part of the structure and feature..........

12. January 2006, 23:35:40
alanback 
Subject: Re:
Eriisa:

12. January 2006, 23:32:13
Eriisa 
congrats Baddy!!!!


12. January 2006, 20:31:47
Adaptable Ali 
Subject: Re: Zero points awarded in Sphere Froglet
prettymama:

12. January 2006, 19:20:29
prettymama 
Subject: Re: Zero points awarded in Sphere Froglet
playBunny: Thank You

12. January 2006, 19:18:20
playBunny 
Subject: Re: Zero points awarded in Sphere Froglet
prettymama: Lol. It does seem strange but it makes sense. It's due to the fact that Sphere froglet is so new.

Blackviper's ranked #2 in Sphere Froglet but that's because he's the second of only 2 players who have an established rating! Everyone else, including yourself, is provisionally rated and ranked. On that ranking you're at #41 whereas blackviper is #72. And his rating is 895 to your 1368. That difference of 473 explains, as Steve said, why you get no points for a win.

12. January 2006, 19:11:43
prettymama 
Subject: Re: points
ScarletRose: thanks to you n stevie but I think his answer may be right we r playing single games n if I lose the game I lose 100 points go figure n i'm playing someone with a 4 ranking lol

12. January 2006, 19:06:03
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re: points
prettymama: That is due to it being a set match.. meaning there are multiple games under one match.. perhaps when the invite was set up it said 7 matches.. ?? don't know the exact number it was set for.. but, non the less when the last game is complete you will get points.. or your opponent will.. whichever one satisfy's the contract of the game..

12. January 2006, 18:52:22
Stevie 
Subject: Re: points
prettymama: It may be because your opponent has a low BKR

12. January 2006, 18:48:55
prettymama 
Subject: points
Hi my question is about winning points I've been playing spere froglet new game for me but sense i got my bk ratings I have not won any points again this game is show 0 points if I win why is this

11. January 2006, 05:10:31
Stevie 
Subject: Re: If you put someone on block..
frolind: ok thanks :o)

11. January 2006, 05:09:23
frolind 
Subject: Re: If you put someone on block..
Stevie: No, they can't.

11. January 2006, 05:04:38
Stevie 
Subject: If you put someone on block..
I know they can not invite you to a game...
But can they pick one of your games up from in the waiting room?

11. January 2006, 02:43:19
NOT a floosie 
Subject: Re:
Fwiffo: I agree, please stay on topic.

Chatty posts will be deleted.

11. January 2006, 02:37:49
Fwiffo 
I'm sorry to bring this up - but why are people so often using the brainking.com board as a chatroom? Sometimes I have to scroll through dozens of these kind of messages in just one day... totally irrelevant to "brainking itself, its structure, features and future."
It is very time-consuming and it frustrates me a lot, up to the point I decided to remove Brainking.com from my "favourite boards".

I don't know, maybe I'm the only one feeling this way... but I hope people can restrain themselves a bit more.

11. January 2006, 00:05:07
Skyking 
Subject: Re: Draughts
saii: Did you advertise in the waiting room

11. January 2006, 00:01:05
Bwild 
Subject: Re: Draughts
saii: you may try the checkers discussion board. good luck.

10. January 2006, 23:48:26
saii 
Subject: Draughts
To sophisticated contestants,

Please send me a message to my inbox, invite me to a match (public/private) or email me: yahooexcite@hoshmail.com to arrange faster games.

P.S. No cheating!

Happy New Year,

10. January 2006, 13:39:57
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
Modified by Chicago Bulls (10. January 2006, 14:00:55)
WhisperzQ: "i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all)......"

When someone says as a welcome message instead of "Hi" or "good luck to you too", the "gvdl* you too".
I just noticed that and i asked what is his problem and as he has some hours to play i will soon find out the answer to this question!
While you, you'll never find the answer to your question of draws....

*= -1

10. January 2006, 13:31:56
WhisperzQ 
Subject: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
WhisperzQ: No, there are some who offer from about move 3 or 4 (although it may true that there is game is indeed lost even at this stage, they just don't know it yet ... LOL j/k :)

10. January 2006, 13:28:24
Andre Faria 
Subject: Re: i'd be interested to hear what explanation the person gives (if they give one at all).
WhisperzQ: eheh, only when their game is already lost... :)

<< <   359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top