 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 4. June 2005, 14:10:59 Subject: Re: cloak?  Walter Montego: Do you think it could work to ask an opponent to "uncloak" while we are playing a game?  I agree 100% with you, who cares what people are doing but while i play a game and he/she is online its nice to know if i can expect moves back (checking opponents on line).
I support this new feature 100% but i think its very sad that it was needed...in Sweden kloak smells like this  19. May 2005, 13:58:00 Subject: Re: Advertsing on BrainKing Walter Montego: The serious people here know Trice so let him spread his "news".
Since the top moderator says that advertising is allowed you can start advertising tomatoes in "gardening" now!! I'll post an ad for my golf clubs in "World of sports"
Pedro good moderating :) 14. May 2005, 02:41:08 Subject: Re: The Cloaked Ones Walter Montego: I agree with you Walter..i dont care what "monkey business" people have but its nice to know if someone is "shooting back" moves in a game with me, especially if i am ready to log off :) 6. May 2005, 21:25:12 Subject: Re: harley: my fault Harley...i should have known better :) 6. May 2005, 20:00:53 Subject: Re: Andre Faria: Well..words means different things to different people..im sure at least one soccer coach does NOT mean it...but thats another board 6. May 2005, 19:51:18 2 defenders of "good sportsmanship" so far ..dont worry SF ill get over it!6. May 2005, 19:41:48 Subject: Re: Game messages Fencer: the World doesnt need to be cruel if we learn to avoid unpolite people  6. May 2005, 19:37:03 Subject: Re: Game messages Angee: What is most annoying are those players who dont say a word..no good luck, no gl, not even u2..but if they win they all of the sudden can speak/type "good game" 21. April 2005, 14:57:49 Subject: Re: Re: OptimistMB: Nope ..i prefer games where i must use both my braincells, like backgammon and "hyper" ..ok Harley..i know  21. April 2005, 14:37:57 Subject: Re: Re: ClayNashvilleTn: I've only signed up for 3 (takes more than 50 bucks to make me play battleboats) 20. April 2005, 22:43:37 Subject: Re: thank you brainking for your good member service ClayNashvilleTn: I could have picked up the money when i come down to Nashville  16. April 2005, 20:29:57 Subject: Re: Modified by Andersp (16. April 2005, 20:30:17) Eriisa: Read again Glob mod ..the complaint was Fencers' about all the emails people have sent him about the passwords.
sheesh 16. April 2005, 19:31:54 Subject: Re: Re: Stevie: and its about 7 hrs since Fencer started this topic, slow connection Harley? 16. April 2005, 19:23:50 Subject: Re: harley: You need to improve Glob Harley...took you 7 minutes!!! 16. April 2005, 19:15:40 Subject: Re: Fencer: I thought freedom to speech was allowed even i your country now...i didnt complain YOU the site owner complained because people have asked you questions. Feel free to check my games and read the support ive got from other players and what they think about your attitude! 16. April 2005, 14:14:29 Modified by Andersp (16. April 2005, 14:15:16) "However, who follows this instructions now, will not be surprised if his password suddenly stops working after the upgrade is performed."
maybe some users thought that if means that it doesnt must happen 16. April 2005, 13:49:51 Subject: Re: Re: reza: 14760 registred users and Fencer complains because some havent changed their password. If he is so busy he can use his valuable time to better things than posting arrogant messages...thats my point. 16. April 2005, 13:40:53 Subject: Re: Fencer: wonder how long i can keep my job if i start calling the customers "ignorant" 24. February 2005, 20:07:22 Subject: Re: Sumerian harley: (As you might have seen from my earlier posts) Every engine has to be allowed if one is, doesnt matter who created them.
You lose a game mostly because you make a mistake when making a move..if you use a "robot" you eliminate the risk of making mistakes. If Trice wants a "robottourney" let him have it..but please dont fill BK with cheats! 24. February 2005, 16:15:06 Subject: Re: Re: Stevie: Its more fun to lose than cheat :) 24. February 2005, 16:09:08 Subject: Re: Chessmaster1000: I asked Sumerian why he didnt invite Trice to testgames instead of testing his robot in a 500-dollar tourney with a lot of low rated players..no answwer yet. 24. February 2005, 15:33:47 Subject: Re: Chessmaster1000: So you think its non-logical that every player should have the same right to use a "robot"? ....not sure i share your "logic" 24. February 2005, 15:17:09 Subject: Re: Re:Can't we have exceptions on a tournament by tournament basis? Purple: I dont think anything, just because i dont understand what you mean  24. February 2005, 14:27:04 Subject: Re: Re:Can't we have exceptions on a tournament by tournament basis? EdTrice: Sure...start as many "test tourneys" you want who cares.
BUT AGAIN If one "engine" is allowed all "engines" must be allowed, doesnt matter who created them. 23. February 2005, 23:27:13 Subject: Re: harley: I agree ..the problem is not if Chessmaster or Trice can beat a chesscomputer or if Trice wants to pay money if a computer wins his tourney.
The problem is that IF Fencer says OK to one engine he has to say OK to all. 21. February 2005, 03:30:56  ,,but the anser is that i have declined every invite not only from you..nothing personal..until now when you said  to my intelligent posts
..kidding...have to find "Dancing Queen" for my daughter now...take care 21. February 2005, 03:22:37 Subject: Re: Re: sLaMdAnCe: You have noooooo idea how nice Antje is
Purple Im not saying im right..just curious about Fencer's opinion 21. February 2005, 03:16:54 Subject: Re: Purple: Is there an engine to make "smileys" so Slam could increase his word supply? 21. February 2005, 03:13:32 Subject: Re: engines sLaMdAnCe: another honest person 21. February 2005, 03:11:01 Subject: Re: engines Purple and Walter: ..little i know about 21. February 2005, 03:05:26 Subject: Re: engines Sumerian: Vielleicht sollen wir Deutch sprechen? kidding :) Dont misunderstand me please..i told you that you absolutely should test your engine..BUT,,isnt there a risk that BK soon is full of "engines" if Fencer allows one? 21. February 2005, 02:40:43 Subject: Re: engines Walter Montego: I dont know...maybe i chould create one  21. February 2005, 02:36:51 Subject: Re: engines Sumerian: LOL..Is my english so poor. You have missed my point completely.
So again...IF Fencer says OK to this engine i suppose he has to say OK to all "followers". Think i said somewhere that i am no chessplayer so i havent signed up for the tourney you link to..but im sure there can be engines in other games too and i can tell you that IF i know that i play a computer then i would resign the game at once. 21. February 2005, 02:19:17 Subject: Re: Re: Purple: Its ALWAYS good to be honest..and NEVER good to cheat :) 21. February 2005, 02:15:24 Subject: Re: engines Sumerian: Correct..i have no clue how it works...but if you really want to test it why dont you invite Trice to a 5 win game instead of testing it in a prize tourney? 21. February 2005, 02:10:20 Subject: Re: Purple: Conclusion..as long as you tell the world that you cheat it is ok..right Purple? 21. February 2005, 02:06:51 Subject: Re: engines Sumerian: As far as i know is Ed Trice the #1 rated in Gotic Chess. Do you (Smirf) win against him? 21. February 2005, 01:58:09 Subject: Re: engines Sumerian: Does it really matter if you or someone else created the engine? When you sit there and let the engine do the job..all you have to do is click a button (i guess) while your opponent has to "wrinkle his brain" for each move.
Doesnt seem fair to me. 21. February 2005, 01:35:25 Subject: Re: whoever created it Sumerian: But you must see my point?..If Fencer approves your engine he has to say 'OK" to mine too...if was smart enough to create one :) 21. February 2005, 01:19:45 Subject: Re: whoever created it Sumerian: If im not wrong you (Smirf) have already won $25. Im no chessplayer so i dont suffer
but if an engine is allowed in one tourney i guess Fencer has to allow them in other games too...is that fun? 21. February 2005, 00:57:52 Subject: Re: whoever created it Sumerian: Of course you should test your "product" but to test it in a prizetourney..hmmmm?...well enjoy the money :) 20. February 2005, 23:15:54 Cheaters only fool themselves...how can anyone think its fun to win and know he has cheated?..The defense "He has created the programme himself" is not so smart imo(apologizes to you who said it) A "robot" is a robot doesnt matter if Bill Gates/Ed Trice or whoever created it. If this "robot" is allowed then i think Fencer has a problem..then any kind of cheating must be allowed..right? 20. February 2005, 03:11:00 Subject: Re: why Stevie: How can you think so?!!!..behave!! 11. February 2005, 00:10:06 Subject: Re: harley: I use to post on the computer board when I have a problem 10. February 2005, 23:36:32 Subject: Re: Re: Radiant 36 9: Happens now and then that everything is slow here because of the provider or that 3 people are downloading at the same time ;) but yesterday evening (wed) ET all sites (those i checked) worked as usual, only BK was slow. I doubt that my provider has anything against BK :) 10. February 2005, 20:27:38 Subject: Re: Fencer: ..nonsense or not...every site i tried anyway. If you think i lie you can ask my wife :) 10. February 2005, 20:05:45 Subject: Re: Re: harley: But if every site but BK are working fine using all possible browsers. Why cant we then tell Fencer? If he isnt aware of his problems how can he then improve his site? Swiping the problems under the carpet doesnt make him or us happier. << < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |