 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 3. December 2004, 03:32:28  Just change it. A long as it's not obscene or taken it goes right through. 30. November 2004, 01:09:55 OK Flooz but it's fairly good natured up to now. :) 26. November 2004, 03:13:35 When someone is in trouble there are always people who fancy themselves a Roman Emperor to give thumbs up or thumbs down. Maybe it inflates their own self-importance. This seems like a Brainking related topic Flooz..enforcement of site guidelines. If you think it isn't then I will drop it. 26. November 2004, 01:32:13 Subject: Re: Only Fencer knows how long the ban is for. He can re-instate him tomorrow and no one will think he was over lenient. 25. November 2004, 18:27:05 I would like to suggest and request than Slam be re-instated on the grounds that one..he is really sorry and won't do it again and two..others have done similar or worse and not suffered the same consequences. I think the deterrant effect has been served. Just my opinion. 25. November 2004, 00:36:52 Subject: Re: Go to membership on your main page. It explains it. I think a 6 months Rook is $20..could be wrong because that Euro is too damned complicated. 25. November 2004, 00:29:06 Subject: Re: Rook or Knight? Rook is much the best bargain IMHO 17. November 2004, 17:09:18 Subject: Re: bad words Ok Bwild..I assume you used lighter fluid. Now step two. Light up a cigar. 17. November 2004, 16:52:48 Subject: Re: bad words I recommend gargling with lighter fluid or bleach for Bwildman. :0) 17. November 2004, 16:44:30 Subject: Re: I don't think Fencer banned Slam for bad language and now is going to turn around and let others start using it. 16. November 2004, 13:43:47 Bad try. Fencer is able to check everything anyone sends including me. Think of something else. 4. November 2004, 21:31:58 I notice some Halma players have drawn games. How can a game of Halma possibly draw? 4. November 2004, 00:13:19 Subject: Re: Hmmmm?...board moderating? RANTS and RAVES 2. November 2004, 17:13:50 Subject: Re: Sure but it hasn't gotten Slam restored yet. 2. November 2004, 17:10:06 Subject: Re: These are attempted posts by hidden users. They are hidden for extreme pornography an are still trying to post. 31. October 2004, 21:24:24 Subject: Re: Jokes Look again. My webtv is very slow 31. October 2004, 18:08:03 Subject: Re: Re: In the Navy at Officer's Candidate School during brigade drill many of us were told we were slower than Hogan's Goat. Everybody pretended like they knew what it meant. It has to mean something. :) 31. October 2004, 18:01:34 Subject: Re: Old people know it. LOL. (American saying) 31. October 2004, 17:57:15 Subject: Re: My webtv is slower than Hogan's goat. All three sites. 30. October 2004, 16:30:01 Subject: Re: Happy Halloween I was thinking of dressing up as a cowboy but that is so lame. :P 30. October 2004, 16:17:24 Subject: Happy Halloween The 120 members of Purple World wish a Happy Halloween to all those who celebrate it. 27. October 2004, 17:40:29 Subject: Re: Interview with.... 23. October 2004, 16:14:21 Subject: Re: IMupChucKing Kevin is solid and has been all along. 21. October 2004, 21:44:06 Subject: Re: But now Brainking has a new generation of bad boys which gives meaning to the empty lives of the bullies who love to have someone to use to get the attention off of themselves. LOL 21. October 2004, 21:37:53 Subject: Re: 21. October 2004, 21:25:31 Subject: Re: Hey the KM only did that to predators, programmers and pedophiles. And only then when we saw one of those going in for the kill. 17. October 2004, 00:16:01 Subject: Re: You are right Red. It doesn't matter too much. Thanks. 17. October 2004, 00:09:03 Subject: Re: There isn't much consistancy. Purple World is listed in Fav's and Fellowship columns but Politics R Us only in fellowship column. I never checked or unchecked anything ever. 12. October 2004, 22:36:06 More than just them. Besides they haven't left the site. 12. October 2004, 19:22:33 Subject: Re: Some are so obvious there are fingerprints all over them. And they are all screened by some lonely people to see if lost love has somehow reappeared. Leads to paranoia and illusions and the best advice is to get other obsessions. 12. October 2004, 18:08:15 Subject: Re: multiple ID's Fencer could just delete them and that would also end groundless speculation and false accusations. 11. October 2004, 16:44:19 Subject: Re: You can make someone go away by using the hide feature and there is no need to call them out unless you get some pleasure by piling on. 28. September 2004, 03:47:50 Subject: Very Widespread A checker player just complained of the same red X's. Has to be an internal problem. 23. September 2004, 01:02:31 The KM did not authorize Glenda's cybering. Strictly a stevie idea. The reason is known to him alone. :) 22. September 2004, 21:57:10 Subject: Re: Re: BBW Yes, stevie's memory seems accurate. LOL 22. September 2004, 21:53:38 Subject: Re: Modified by Purple (22. September 2004, 21:55:25) Some of our auxilliaries didn't have a KM tag so if you played much checkers there was probably a report on you but it may have been just a one liner..i.e. "likes to chat," "plays single corner" or "weak end game" etc. If you had much of a rating we took a closer look. 22. September 2004, 21:39:50 Subject: Re: Oh my..these were the bad old days of course..Public Relations, Recruiting, Game Analysis, Opposition Research (500 names in the database) Top Guns Task Force, Ratings Monitor Detachment, plus our Pervert Busting Team where someone would disguise as a female and play known cyber guys..then reveal themelves at games end. Some cyber dudes were never heard from again. I can't remember everything. That was a year ago. 22. September 2004, 21:28:30 Subject: Ratings Fallacy Modified by Purple (22. September 2004, 21:29:32) Not proud of this but The KM Covert Operations Dept. would occasionally torpedo some arogant hi rated dude by sending in a suicide bomber (often rigged up with a program) who would start a game with say a 2000 rating and..before finishing the game with the target..would tank 7-8 games in a row so the rating would be more like 1400. Then arrogant guy would lose to a 1400 player and take a major ratings hit. This was only done to predatory players but it didn't make it right. It is one example however of how ratings should be taken with a grain of salt. << < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |