 |
|
  Chinese ChessXiangqi - Chinese Chess Knights and Rooks may join the Xiangqi Fellowship which has additional boards for discussion and resources (links to other sites). Pawns may not join the fellowships, but links from the Xiangqi resources board are have been copied to a Resources message. Create a New game of Xiangqi, Established ratings, Provisional ratings, The Rules of Xiangqi. ___________________________ You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
26. March 2011, 16:37:59 Subject: Re: RE:GETTING SICK OF PLAYING computeropponen: Sorry to hear this. But on this site we basically play correspondence chess, not OTB. So it is perfectly normally to set up the position on your board at home and play through a few ideas before you decide on a move. It is also normal to look at the board and decide you have no idea how to proceed, so wait and see if you feel more inspired the next day. At least for me anyway! 18. March 2011, 22:37:11 Subject: Re: REVIWING YOUR OLD GAME computeropponen: Thanks. Maybe this game against mangue, because he seems to be a better player than me: Chinese Chess (Beren the 32nd vs. mangue) 17. March 2011, 23:12:25 Subject: Re: re: my games vs the top 3 players computeropponen: Any particular reason why you are using this discussion board to talk so much about yourself, and not the game and rules of Xiangqi? How about finding one of my old games and reviewing it for me? I am not that good, but willing to learn - just a suggestion. 20. June 2007, 20:40:07 Subject: nice chariot Just finished this game. It has a nice chariot sacrifice to finish: Chinese Chess (Waterfall vs. Beren the 32nd) But were my tactics good throughout? 31. July 2006, 19:34:12 Subject: 50 move rule? I see mention of a 50 move rule below (by Chicago Bulls). However, I don't see it mentioned in the BK rules. Is there such a rule in chinese chess, and if so under what conditions does it apply? 1. May 2006, 00:31:02 Subject: Re: Enough to win? Matarilevich: Thanks. That sounds pretty definite. But I guess having an extra soldier, elephant or advisor is not normally enough to get a win is it? 29. April 2006, 23:49:19 Subject: Enough to win? Can anyone share their experience on this question? If I win a chariot for a horse or cannon early on in the game, should this normally be enough to win the game (if I play well) or does my opponent often have chances to draw (if he plays well)? 12. November 2005, 18:30:46 Subject: Re: bigger pieces available now Fwiffo: Were these traditional characters? I prefer them to simplified. If so, yes I'd still like to play with these. 21. September 2005, 13:14:30 Subject: Re: Xiangqi pieces Marfitalu: Thanks. I did not know that before.
Fwiffo: Ok, thanks anyway. 21. September 2005, 11:44:18 Subject: Re: Xiangqi pieces Fwiffo: Nice character set, thanks. I would like to use them for games, but bigger might be better. If Fencer would be happy to give us the option of a bigger board, like in western chess, then do you have some bigger pieces available?
Also, some colour options would be good. |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |