 |
|
 ChessChess Discussion For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
13. October 2006, 21:46:55 Subject: Re: the players are not treated equally 435152: I don't see how you can claim that the better player did not win. Kramnik won despite the fact that he forfeited a game. I think he deserved to win. 6. October 2006, 02:54:08 Subject: Re: bengood24: That's probably the best argument against cheating. He could have lost the first game and should have done no better than drawn it and in game two, he was just dead lost. 5. October 2006, 05:06:11 Subject: Re: world chess championship crisis mctrivia: Ok. But if I read discussion correctly, the issue was over outside help that he could have received in the bathroom (cell phone). However, it really doesn't make much sense. They have refreshments at the events and that could cause the problem. 4. October 2006, 14:31:01 Subject: Re: world chess championship crisis 435152: athletes usually take drugs to enhance physical performance. I don't see how this would help Kramnik. 2. October 2006, 00:57:19 Subject: Re: world chess championship crisis 435152: Why would Kramnik take drugs? 1. October 2006, 01:45:27 Subject: Re: naughtypawn: I think it is pretty stupid and trivial to delay a world championship. |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |