 |
|
 ChessChess Discussion For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or go straight to the Chess Invitation) - information about upcoming tournaments - discussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> 25. May 2005, 00:47:44 Subject: Re: greeting what up colonel crockett. 24. May 2005, 21:33:57 Subject: Re: greeting Lone star: ummm . . . hello?! 24. May 2005, 00:25:15 Subject: Dano I received your reply and i think you got a kick out of mine?  Returning to chess now.....23. May 2005, 23:18:08 Subject: Re: CindyInTN: grrrrr it's nothing naughty ... 
I replied more extensively in private so my pleasance toward your ladyship is not decreased too much I hope by returning to chess here.  ~*~23. May 2005, 18:45:07 Subject: Re: Modified by Grim Reaper (23. May 2005, 18:46:15) CindyInTN: I just checked, 3rd weekend in June is the next event in Knoxville, but I am scheduled to be in Harrisonburg at the James Madison Univeristy tournament that weekend. I can see if someone will switch with me, I will direct the tournament in Knoxville if they direct the one in Virginia. 23. May 2005, 18:36:29 Subject: Re: CindyInTN: please be fascinated on the 10x8 discussion board ...
btw I play 12 blind simultane against chess beginners and win all too. seems without vortex (or did you see a bushbox on his back ?) he's a bit timorous. ~*~ 23. May 2005, 18:31:38 Subject: oh no now I remember right ... 0:) Modified by danoschek (23. May 2005, 18:34:10) I apologized to fencer that I am no buttkisser hence have to correct his statement.
the average mod of course got into position by buttkissing only, not by social skills so I can't even fix it to who of the embarrassed dweebs urged to an intervention ... ~*~ 23. May 2005, 18:27:18 You were playing that chess simul thingy, so I couldn't just walk up and say hello. I'm too shy! ROFL!! I was there for maybe an hour. It was such a nice day I just wanted to get back outside and enjoy it. I'll come to the next event if you'll let me know when the next one is, or will you advertise it on the radio again? 23. May 2005, 18:24:28 Subject: Re: Re: Modified by danoschek (23. May 2005, 18:25:41) chessmec: yes - I was called insulting ... guess I used the word intelligence which
might of course be insulting for very stupid people who should not be mods though. like on the gothic board in earlier times when the word honesty was not welcome ... ~*~ 23. May 2005, 17:56:32 And i forgot to add:
Too many endless games.............  23. May 2005, 17:54:21 So there would be no points...........
Too many zeroes.....  23. May 2005, 17:46:06 But there are no draws, points are only awarded for wins. 23. May 2005, 17:12:56 Subject: Re: Re:Re: Re:Re: Re: Walter Montego:
Again with your additions, two good players would draw 95%+++ of times............ 23. May 2005, 15:52:27 Subject: Re: Re:  Chessmaster1000: The rule could be that a Rook may only be captured if it it throwing a check or if the capturing move throws a check. Plus regular checkmates could win. Besides, a Pawn can be promoted to a Rook, so instead of going for a Queen, it might go a lot differently in the ending. A Queen might still be your choice, but only because it'll help you get two Rooks with your remaining Pawns. Especially if a regular checkmate is not a win.
Yes, ughaibu, give it some thought. You might be onto a variant of a sort here. :) 23. May 2005, 13:20:45 Subject: Re: ughaibu: I'm going to post a thematic chess tournament, winners will be those to first double rooks on the 7th, no draws. The tournament'll be entitled "blind pigs" and'll be co-dedicated to the global moderators and the cloak facility.
If there is no checkmate and winners will be only that would have both Rooks at 7th rank, then i think ALL games will be draw! Because it's impossible to prevent an opponent from capturing at least one of our Rook........ The game would become interesting if only 1 Rook would have to reach 7th rank..........  23. May 2005, 08:56:40 Subject: Re: Re: danoschek: a new feature should be enabled - removing postings belonging to another board to that, isn't it (yes, this is OT but when in "Feature request" danoschek can not discuss i post it here) 23. May 2005, 08:07:50 Subject: Re: CindyInTN: nobody is jealous about
a busted cheater. facts are just not negotiatable. ~*~ 23. May 2005, 08:05:07 Subject: Re: CindyInTN: You were there? Why didn't you say hello! I think it was only a 10-board simul, those other 2 boards on the side I was going over a game with 2 people while I was doing part of the simul.
How long were you there? Will you be there next month for the June tournament?? 23. May 2005, 05:48:28 Subject: Re: CindyInTN: interesting story, but wrong board. Chess variants (10x8) is next door ;-) 23. May 2005, 03:06:26 Last weekend there was a Gothic Chess tournament at the University of Tennessee. I had heard about it on the radio and in the paper and it's only 40 minutes from my house, so I drove by to have a look. Nicely organized event with lots of friendly people playing Gothic Chess (i'd say 100 or more). I did catch a glimpse of Ed Trice walking around playing what people were telling me was a "simul". There were 12 people playing Gothic Chess against him at the same time and he won all of the games. Quite a cutie too if I must say so!! I am not the biggest chess fan, but I think you all have some strange sort of jealous thing going on. Lighten up! 22. May 2005, 23:55:36 Subject: Alex Go here http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessplayer?pid=82147 scroll down and you'll find a link to your game. 22. May 2005, 23:31:18 Subject: Re ughaibu: Modified by danoschek (22. May 2005, 23:33:19) last time he prevailed as we know ... his lost game vs caissus vanished under
mysterious circumstances not only from the backup after a server crash, but also from the why so bad memory of that hopelessly busted representant of infidelity ... ~*~ 22. May 2005, 23:27:35 Subject: Matarilevich But will I still be married by the time that game finishes? 22. May 2005, 23:23:47 Modified by Kili (22. May 2005, 23:28:53) I bet you a coffe that Alex will win this game against Ed Trice :) 22. May 2005, 23:15:21 The game with Trice? Of course it's a joke. I'm publishing that game at http://www.chessgames.com/index.html do as you like. 22. May 2005, 23:15:06 Subject: Re: Alex: Modified by danoschek (22. May 2005, 23:16:00) if some of the really pity occurances here would
be marked as joke after all, many of their naturally misleading self-defintions could indeed be funny yet. ~*~ 22. May 2005, 22:59:17 Subject: Re: Alex: nobody will tell it you ... you will have to check it out yourself ... come on! or is it too difficult? ;-) 22. May 2005, 22:57:37 Subject: Re: why no comment Modified by danoschek (22. May 2005, 23:03:50) Alex: well I repeat it slowly for you:
no I won't comment - the game is still in progress and only cheaters or less serious players would interfer now apart of technical statements. - As soon as you have won . ~*~ . it though, respectively were bored to death by that staller/spammer, I shall have my say. 22. May 2005, 22:49:26 Subject: Alex I am a part of this game playing community as are you and Trice, our behaviour reflects upon each other. 22. May 2005, 22:48:00 I´m not understand why nobody no comment this game? 22. May 2005, 22:44:39 Subject: Re: ughaibu: no I won't comment - the game is still in progress.
as we know only pertinent cheaters would offer their services at analysis during a running game to sabotate serious players on gameservers ... ~*~ 22. May 2005, 22:25:40 Subject: Re: Alex ughaibu: Muzio gambit 49 move. 22. May 2005, 22:10:02 Subject: ughaibu Do you think, game between me and EdTrice will be draw? 22. May 2005, 22:00:11 Okay. Chess players have to suffer draws in any case. 22. May 2005, 21:58:03 Subject: Re: ughaibu: The game Trice-Alex does not affect that what I wrote when I offer a draw.
Well, in the game Trice-Alex a draw offer all three moves wuould be strange enough, yes ... but this can not be prohibited in my opinion. draw offer every move should be only prohibited. but maybe worth to look at: a checkbox such as "i do not accept draw offers" ... 22. May 2005, 21:51:38 Subject: Re: ughaibu: when i offer a draw, then it i do it because
a) i mean the position is in my opinion equal and a1) the tournament can be done with the draw (depends on my rank) a2) i am playing against a strong player and it is such as a "leading question" ... just to know a little bit more what the opponent want ;-) b) i am in a better position bt in the tournament/match this is enough 22. May 2005, 21:40:07 Generally it's bad manners to offer a draw in an inferior position, in effect this means that if a draw offer is refused the opponent thinks that their position is better, ie no consecutive draw offers by either player. 22. May 2005, 21:37:52 Subject: Re: Re: danoschek: in my opinion 10 moves are too long - maybe 3-5 is worth to look at ... 22. May 2005, 21:34:15 Subject: Re: Re: chessmec: not a bad idea either ... I would suggest TEN moves distance though. ~*~ 22. May 2005, 21:32:56 Subject: Re: Re: danoschek: that is worth to look at ... draw offering privileg alternating between the players, but what about a simple draw offer privilege only two moves after then you offered a draw? << < 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Moderator: 
@ D! What the heck is a bushbox?
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |