User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Vikings 
 Politics

Forum for discussing local and world politics and issues. All views are welcomed. Let your opinions be heard on current news and politics.


All standard guidelines apply to this board, No Flaming, No Taunting, No Foul Language,No sexual innuendos,etc..

As politics can be a volatile subject, please consider how you would feel if your comment were directed toward yourself.

Any post deemed to be in violation of guidelines will be deleted or edited without warning or notification. Any continued misbehavior will result in a ban or hidden status, so please play nice!!!


*"Moderators are here for a reason. If a moderator (or Global Moderator or Fencer) requests that a discussion on a certain subject to cease - for whatever reason - please respect these wishes. Failure to do so may result in being hidden, or banned."


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310   > >>
15. May 2009, 22:29:50
Czuch 
Subject: Re: the first of many ppl to resign
(V): And the way some are answering about their expenses.... they've made it so they won't get elected.


Thats one of the frustrating problems over here..... some are so influential, they dont get voted out no matter what, really.

Take a look at ted kennedy for example.... that guy has been through so many scandals over the years, even drove a woman off a bridge while drunk, and left her to drown, and because of his influence and power, he keeps getting voted back in anyway

...and many more like him too, there has got to be some way to keep them from becoming power hungry , look out for number one types, once they get in there?

15. May 2009, 16:52:30
Mort 
Subject: Re: the first of many ppl to resign
Czuch: Not all, there are some mentioned who claimed very little or nothing at all. Thank God we still do have some honest politicians.

And this year I believe there are elections this year (or next) and they are all up for re-election.

And the way some are answering about their expenses.... they've made it so they won't get elected.

.... I hope the private prosecutions go ahead!! Or Gordon Brown gets it through his thick head that the only way to clean up this mess so we trust our MP's again and our democracy is to prosecute all those who took advantage of a lax system.

15. May 2009, 15:23:45
Czuch 
Subject: Re: the first of many ppl to resign
(V): Do you all have term limits? What is the solution? They all go in saying they are different, they want to change the way politics works, but before long, they start to like the benefits (both monetary and power) and they all end up the same.

Problem is, once they are established, they carry a lot of clout and influence, and all they have to do is give their constituents a little gravy now and again, and they get voted right back in

15. May 2009, 13:11:18
Snoopy 
Subject: another one bites the dust

15. May 2009, 10:34:38
Snoopy 
Subject: Re: the first of many ppl to resign
Modified by Snoopy (15. May 2009, 13:06:56)
(V): i cant believe how aggrogant Margaret Beckett came across on http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8051222.stm


Gordon Brown needs to do something now
he needs to get of the fence and stop wishing it all go away because it WONT!!!

we now have a near bankrupt country we have a government that is a joke and the longer it goes on
the more Joe Public suffers

the public voted for Tony Blair to be PM not him and he needs to be ousted
what is he afraid of theres only 2 choices he wins or loses

15. May 2009, 09:00:51
Mort 
Subject: Re: the first of many ppl to resign
Czuch: One paper over here is starting a fund for the private prosecution of MP's!!

And if it's getting to your side of the pond... GOOD!! .... Maybe it'll cause a revamp of your system and how your reps sit on the gravy train.

15. May 2009, 08:58:53
Mort 
Subject: Re: the rush for the cheque books starts
gogul: Because they are part of the House of Lords. And their expenses and pay is paid for from public money.

15. May 2009, 08:02:47
Snoopy 
Subject: Re: the first of many ppl to resign
Pedro Martínez:

15. May 2009, 03:59:27
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re: the first of many ppl to resign
Czuch: That was Snoopy!

15. May 2009, 00:55:13
Czuch 
Subject: Re: the first of many ppl to resign
Modified by Czuch (15. May 2009, 00:56:02)
TheCrazyPuppy: You Brits are doing something correctly.... seems what you have been bickering about in here lately has made our national nightly news on this side of the pond

Said one of your bloke MPs has gotten money to upkeep his moat

Some are paying money back and one woman on the street who was interviewed said they should all be sacked!!!

15. May 2009, 00:09:45
gogul 
Subject: Re: the rush for the cheque books starts
(V): Why worry about some Lords. A jobless banker could get 6000$ unemployment. Bankers forgot their own risks lmao.

14. May 2009, 13:42:11
Snoopy 
Subject: the first of many ppl to resign
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8049614.stm


i hope that many many more heads will roll

13. May 2009, 21:11:04
Mort 
Subject: Re: the rush for the cheque books starts
Artful Dodger: The system is not perfect... Too much is now razzle dazzle rather then governing. Proportional representation is supposed to be a better system, yet it so long since I looked at the subject I've forgotten the pro's and con's.

And I hope your guys get to fear your people as well. Too many deals done where your reps line their pockets through various systems... or get jobs paying big bucks after they leave the world of politics.

It's no good for democracy.

13. May 2009, 20:41:19
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: the rush for the cheque books starts
(V):   I hope our Reps will start to fear the people as well.  Too many politicans are in it for themselves IMO.   Both sides of the isle.  I hate our two party system. 

13. May 2009, 20:31:42
Mort 
Subject: Re: the rush for the cheque books starts
TheCrazyPuppy: Too right!! They are all getting afraid of losing their jobs. The MP's are starting to fear the people, and quite rightly too

13. May 2009, 19:34:58
Snoopy 
Subject: the rush for the cheque books starts

10. May 2009, 04:31:20
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
GTCharlie:  PU on the environmentalists too.  ;)  May they all have a breakdown in their septic systems. 

10. May 2009, 03:11:21
tyyy 
Subject: Re:
Artful Dodger: What about the greens??

9. May 2009, 21:08:36
Papa Zoom 
PU on the Republicans. Double PU on the Dems!

9. May 2009, 21:06:35
Papa Zoom 
I'm a Libertarian now.

9. May 2009, 19:12:02
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses
(V): or maybe masters of perniciousness ;)

9. May 2009, 10:31:21
Mort 
Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses
Artful Dodger: !!!! one hundred lines... "MP = Member of Parliament"


9. May 2009, 01:25:19
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses
Pedro Martínez:Thanks, I gotta start paying attention  ;) 

9. May 2009, 00:40:12
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses
Artful Dodger: Member of Parliament

9. May 2009, 00:39:05
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses
(V):   Could you explain again the MPs?  Im too lazy at the moment to look it up but to me MP means military police? 

8. May 2009, 23:03:56
Mort 
Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses
TheCrazyPuppy: Why the police... because they are having a tantrum.

I recon the papers should all start petitions for a full audit for all MP's!!

8. May 2009, 22:36:25
Snoopy 
Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses
(V): if i made claims like this in a job i be shown door very quickly

but this goes to the very top of goverment the Prime Minister himself abusing the system so what confidence does the normal Joe public have in him now


lastest news is http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1178516/Police-called-investigate-leak-MPs-expenses-dossier.html


it dosnt matter how it was leaked we have has tax payers the right to know
so why waste even more tax payers money by calling in the police

8. May 2009, 22:29:45
Mort 
Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses
TheCrazyPuppy: Should be out of their own pocket!! It's taking the mickey!!!!!!

8. May 2009, 22:15:10
Snoopy 
Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses
(V): it beggars belief what some of the claims have been

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5293320/MPs-expenses-A-Z.html


on the day up in my area 3000 are to lose there jobs because Chorus lost a major contract and are moth balling one of there blast furnaces
this news hasnt gone down well at all here

8. May 2009, 22:07:29
Mort 
Subject: Re: UK goverment expenses
TheCrazyPuppy: Yes, they are... But it's gonna happen for all parties thank EL!!

Because in truth, this scandal has been going on for decades. Really it's UK MP expenses. Also, the simple fact remains... how can we have faith in any MP that has abused the system of expenses, or uses that now boring cry "I acted within the rules".. The rules were slack.

In a company, the person cheating the company would get sacked... But MP's are a different breed!!

8. May 2009, 19:39:51
Snoopy 
Subject: UK goverment expenses
are a disgrace
some of the things leaked are crazy
horse manure
tampons for a male mp
broken toilet seat

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8039273.stm

7. May 2009, 21:56:25
Bernice 
HUH???

7. May 2009, 19:19:55
gogul 
Was a bit rude the obscene Delaware trust, wasn't it? Seems interesting these Anglo-Saxon trust thing anyway. Is or should a Delaware Trust be reserved to (wealthy) Americans btw?

Ok let's try a voyaging coffee bean from South America to London. The passport of the bean gets stamped on several different sweet tax havens, cool islands under British control. It makes your cup of coffee cost about awful 70pc more. You know it can be traded differently, and your first thought is that you'd be willing to pay your taxes with these unjustified 70pc. Ever somebody asked Gordon Brown about? But hey, ok, I have nothing to do with it! I even don't know if you ever saw fair traded coffee. It costs about 15pc more than 'conventional' one, allowes sustainable farming and the worker a better life.

So no, I rather use this board for personal purpose. Down with the UBs, arguing should do it IMO.

7. May 2009, 06:38:49
gogul 
Amazing

7. May 2009, 03:54:24
Bernice 
Subject: Re: Czuch
Pedro Martínez: that is just too funny ..........

7. May 2009, 02:50:54
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re: Czuch
Artful Dodger: Actually, there's more. The "Youth in Asia" was only a part of a discussion on medical ethics. Diapers on!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UST26RjBXvo&feature=related

7. May 2009, 02:27:17
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: Czuch
Bernice: I'll never be able to go to an Asian doctor again!

7. May 2009, 02:20:19
Bernice 
Subject: Re: Czuch
Artful Dodger: ROFL........so did I....so nice to have a bit of levity hahahahahha

7. May 2009, 02:16:41
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re: Czuch
Pedro Martínez: Please don't post anymore links like that. I peed my pants!

7. May 2009, 01:04:42
Bernice 
Subject: Re: Czuch
Pedro Martínez: hahahaha...........youth in asia ROFLMBO

7. May 2009, 01:02:28
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Re: Czuch

6. May 2009, 23:52:01
Bernice 
Subject: Czuch
your thoughts on Euthanasia?

6. May 2009, 22:22:58
gogul 
Dear Americans! Stop using obscene Delaware trusts and hide your money in good old Switzerland!

Let me recommend the UBS, this ssolid bank with exellent connections to the Republicans.


(kill it pls, a matter of entertainment

6. May 2009, 12:09:19
Mort 
Subject: Re: Look at the commenbts after this as well
Czuch: Yep. I saw those anti-gay Christians on the news yesterday along with the news of the list.

Their website is so crazy... baroque, inaccurate...

And they reserve the right to not respond to emails from those they consider "not learned".

I'll see if they reply to my polite but frank point on that they seem to have forgotten certain core elements from the Bible.

6. May 2009, 12:04:56
Mort 
Subject: Re:I don't think the government is the problem.. It's the politics involved that are causing the problem. Too much bickering, worrying about getting re-elected, etc, etc....
Artful Dodger: It's not only them.. it's the civil servants as well that help keep it going.

6. May 2009, 12:02:56
Mort 
Subject: Re:Thats exactly what you will get when the government runs our autos and our health and anything else they run
Czuch: No, that's what we've allowed it to become. It's time our Governments were fully audited.

And I want Alan Sugar to go over and re-organise the Government here.

As recently reported over here, our 'leaders' have been taking the mickey (again another word is better but PG rating. ) over expenses. It makes me sick that they have been living on the gravy train whilst people are struggling ... But a full report is in place.. Something certain politicians don't want, but the opposition parties as well as members of the Labour party are behind the review.

I mean, an MP rips off the country for over £200k and only has to pay back less then £50k... That's not right!!

5. May 2009, 23:02:05
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:I don't think the government is the problem.. It's the politics involved that are causing the problem. Too much bickering, worrying about getting re-elected, etc, etc....
(V): In both parties. I'm sick of the Republicans as much as the Democrats.

5. May 2009, 22:00:54
Czuch 
Subject: Look at the commenbts after this as well

5. May 2009, 21:29:53
Czuch 
Subject: Re:come on..most don't have fathers in the house and the mothers have children by different men
(V): I don't think the government is the problem.. It's the politics involved that are causing the problem. Too much bickering, worrying about getting re-elected, etc, etc....

I'm sorry, but your emergency response system seems to have too much red tape.




Government is politics, and the red tape intertwined into the emergency response system, that is also systemic of the government. The whole government has too much red tape and other pitfalls..... look at our IRS tax codes etc.... Thats exactly what you will get when the government runs our autos and our health and anything else they run

There is no reason for me to believe they will be any better at doing these things than they are at the FEMA (federal emergency management agency) or most anything else they currently run right now.

5. May 2009, 18:25:06
Mort 
Subject: Re:come on..most don't have fathers in the house and the mothers have children by different men
Czuch: I think a lot of government systems need..... .... tweaking. And I'm being very understated there!!

As to Katrina... I'm sorry, but your emergency response system seems to have too much red tape. If I get the gist of the delay right.

I don't think the government is the problem.. It's the politics involved that are causing the problem. Too much bickering, worrying about getting re-elected, etc, etc....

As to in 50 years time... it'll be part of history.. as you say.. it will be talked about

<< <   301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top