 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 > >> 23. January 2008, 02:40:51 Subject: Re: Talk  TarantinoFan: Sorry to hear you're still having issues with slowness. As usual Its fine on my side, I'm lucky for living on top of the world? Maybe it makes a difference LOL Maybe that BIG island you live on has a bad connection? hehe  Did you purchase that system mechanic I mentioned? It does a lot of good for the PC Well worth the $$$ and will come in handy for years to come. I been using it for about 4 years and already got my moneys worth  23. January 2008, 01:41:28 Subject: Re: Talk redfrog: It has been degrees of slow for a number of weeks,sometimes faster than the day before,but still slow for a quite awhile.Apparently some users aren't experiencing these issues,that may be fact,but it is also fact that many have been have been experiencing varying levels of slow for some time.I can deal with slow,if I know it is in the midst of being corrected,but if this is the present and future................ 23. January 2008, 01:32:43 Subject: Re: Talk Jim Dandy: if one were to check out my profile - there is proof that its different per user.... it seems pretty common to hear that some users are experiencing vastly different connection speeds than other - maybe im used to a slow connection - im not sure - but it seemed pretty fast to me this afternoon.... 23. January 2008, 00:34:34 Subject: Re: Talk TarantinoFan: Regardless of the site being fixed,fixed,or in the process of being fixed,it is unmanagable for ME to play more than a dozen or so games daily presently. 23. January 2008, 00:11:13 Subject: Re: Talk Modified by TarantinoFan (23. January 2008, 00:11:41) Uninvited: No-one has posted because they are all finally resigned to crawling through their games at a snails pace. Why bother asking for something to be done when time and again the request is ignored. The site is still running slow for me and others I have spoken to as well but there seems absolutely no point in talking about it anymore. I have one question for Fencer though. It was talked about a while ago that the site slowed down when Liquid was collecting data. Is there a possibility that this has happened again? 22. January 2008, 13:44:25  Well, I would suppose that a post saying 'Am I banned on this board' would technically be on topic. New topic - General question to everyone: How are the new Team tourneys coming along? Are you signing up for any? Is there any you'd like to see? 22. January 2008, 07:12:26 Two whole days without an off topic post. Thanks for breaking the silence Uninvited. Lets see how many more days we can go without any off topic posts. 22. January 2008, 01:45:13 Subject: Re: Talk srnity: Thanks I know now I'm not banned. I'll stop talking about this because I know it's off topic. 22. January 2008, 01:42:48 Subject: Re: Talk Uninvited:  & just a word of advice, you might get "invited" more often without the scary cape thing  22. January 2008, 01:39:12 Subject: Talk It has been about three days since anyone has posted here. I'm just checking to see if I been banned from here and don't know it. 19. January 2008, 08:35:36 Subject: posted moved to General Chat the last 4 posts from dicepro and Jim Dandy have been moved to General Chat 18. January 2008, 19:50:33 Subject: Re: Red numbers in lightweight mode  Fencer: Actually, I never said I'd be able to check it in an hour... seems to be fixed now, anyway :) 18. January 2008, 14:22:36 Subject: Re: Red numbers in lightweight mode Fencer: now, you know we all want it NOW!!!!  18. January 2008, 14:13:46 Subject: Re: Red numbers in lightweight mode  pauloaguia: So you suggest that I should fix it within an hour. 18. January 2008, 14:04:28 Subject: Re: Red numbers in lightweight mode Fencer: That's what I thought, but I did see a red 9 for my waiting ponds on my main page... I should have another pond waiting in the next hour, I'll check it again by then. 18. January 2008, 13:57:34 Subject: Re: Red numbers in lightweight mode pauloaguia: It's supposed to show no red numbers (except the one next to the Message box link). 18. January 2008, 11:25:15 Subject: Red numbers in lightweight mode When in the MainPage I could see the red numbers for my ponds but not for my games (something changed since yesterday when I could see neither). Yet, when on the pond page, I could see none. Is this supposed to be like that? It doesn't look very consistent to me... 18. January 2008, 10:20:27 Subject: Re: lightweight version on the setting page or2ak.com: I see them now  ... but I think I switch back to normal mode ... I don*t like that I do not see my opponents BKR ... and I think it*s good to know how strong player stands against me 18. January 2008, 08:52:02 Subject: Re: "Action points" P-G: Looks like I forgot to remove that option.  Action points are no longer used.18. January 2008, 08:44:42 Subject: "Action points" Modified by P-G (18. January 2008, 08:45:02) I didn't found a single clue about "action points" in Help or FAQ. I am curious to learn what are they. This option is in "Settings --> General", near the bottom of the page. 18. January 2008, 07:42:59 Subject: Lightweight Who still cannot see the pond list? 18. January 2008, 07:36:41 Subject: Re: MadMonkey: It shows a list of all team tournaments where your fellowship is (or was) participating. 18. January 2008, 07:34:49  When we click on the new Fellowship team tournaments in Fellowships, what exactly is it meant to show  The default is set to ALL, but it does not show all when you get there. By process of Elimination, it seems to show the Tournaments we have signed for already. After having a little play, by clicking Show when set to all, it does show all Team Tournaments. Nothing major, just a little anomaly  18. January 2008, 06:39:54 Subject: Re: lightweight version on the setting page It's moving the pages much faster for me also...thank you! 18. January 2008, 04:04:32 Subject: Re: lightweight version on the setting page Modified by Bernice (18. January 2008, 04:09:30)  MadMonkey:will look next time I play...maybe I have to set it for that....will look anyway :) **edit** it takes me to the next "time" game...I like to play my normal games first and leave the tournaments for last........no worries at least for the moment it is slightly improved, but isnt as fast as it used to be....but an improvement never-the-less 18. January 2008, 03:20:10 Subject: Re: Antje: "Settings"  18. January 2008, 03:18:02 Modified by Antje (18. January 2008, 03:20:42)  curious about lightweight.. i cant find it? what is it and where is it?  nevermind, i found it after all  18. January 2008, 03:17:37 Subject: Much better ... for me anyway ... Still a little choppy, but no white pages, loading MUCH quicker, and almost two glorious hours without getting the proverbial "boot" My two cents & Night All ...  18. January 2008, 03:14:25 Subject: Re: lightweight version on the setting page Bernice: I've still got the "go to" boxes (with my choices still intact), but not the box of my "listed" games , maybe you need to change the settings on that one, maybe? 18. January 2008, 03:12:13 Subject: Re: lightweight version on the setting page Bernice: is there no drop box then, i tried lightweight out and i had a drop box to goto next game , or do you mean in ponds ?18. January 2008, 03:04:24 Subject: Re: lightweight version on the setting page or2ak.com: im using lightweight, I can see my ponds, but am getting sick of going back to the main page everytime to play the next game....seems like a waste to me 18. January 2008, 01:26:49 Subject: Re: lightweight version on the setting page trohat: Yep, lightwieght mode is awesome, except I dont see my ponds either :( 18. January 2008, 00:58:50 Subject: Lightweight Mode :) It's almost 7pm here, 148 people on BK & I am seeing a difference - Thank You Fencer  18. January 2008, 00:58:49 Subject: Re: lightweight version on the setting page  trohat: What do you mean you can't see your ponds in light mode? On the main page, my ponds show up. 18. January 2008, 00:46:08 Subject: Re: lightweight version on the setting page AbigailII: I found one missing feature in lightweight mode ... I don*t see my ponds  18. January 2008, 00:43:45 Subject: Re: Re Slow site pauloaguia: I am sorry to say that, but I tried yesterday BrainKing from IE7 and FF together, and when BrainKing was offline for some time, like half a minute or so (as you write), after that time IE7 got online much faster then FF ... (I was refreshing the page, and FF still said something like "page unavailable" but I was already playing in IE7 ...) so I prefer IE7 again and again ... 18. January 2008, 00:06:11 Subject: Re:  AbigailII: awesome, thanks 18. January 2008, 00:02:16 Subject: Re: nodnarbo: external stylesheets work in lightweight mode. 18. January 2008, 00:00:09 Fencer: do external style sheets work with the 'lightweight mode' or do they act in place of it? 17. January 2008, 23:58:34 Subject: Re: lightweight version on the setting page redfrog: I tried it, but it's fast right now without it so I'm not noticing anything different 17. January 2008, 23:58:31 Subject: Re: lightweight version on the setting page redfrog: I switched 10 minutes ago or so, and it seems to be noticable faster. But it's too early to say for sure that it's the setting. And the data transfer is still a bit "jerky". And I haven't found a missing feature yet. 17. January 2008, 23:51:50 Subject: lightweight version on the setting page Has anyone tried it yet? My connection is running good without it - but i wonder about those that could benefit.... 17. January 2008, 23:21:32 Subject: Re: Re Slow site pauloaguia: I find it odd that it only happens in Brainking and not the other sites I use. Oh well too late to catch up on my games because this site is so slow at the moment, so I will be wasting another vacation day because it bedtime for me. 17. January 2008, 22:53:30 Subject: Re: Re Slow site crosseyed: timeout doesn't necessarily mean slow. it can mean the site was unavailable at the time. I noticed that sometimes BrainKing goes offline for about a minute (most people have come to associate that with upgrades to the site or posts on BrainKing.info, though Fencer never admited any of that afaik). If you're using IE7 you will most likelly notice a difference between IE and Firefox (in FF's favor), so you should definitelly repeat the test at another time... 17. January 2008, 22:42:52 Subject: Re: Re Slow site  crosseyed: Im using firefox , a little slow at times but working ok for me 17. January 2008, 22:40:10 Subject: Re Slow site <dir> I decided to try using firefox to see if it would be any faster than IE this what happend: The connection has timed out The server at brainking.com is taking too long to respond. * The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments. So it is Brainking that is too slow. </dir>17. January 2008, 17:34:50 Subject: Re: Liquid: i just went down and have been moving slow all morning not just gammonator 17. January 2008, 17:19:27 Subject: Re:  Gammonator: ... we have no performance trouble, at this time. Must be something wrong on the way from our servers to your computer. 17. January 2008, 13:58:33 Subject: Re: Fencer: 6:54am my time now 239 online and this site is slow. I know you know more about computers on your little finger than I do, but I do play some online games such as Ghost Recon,,GRAW Call of Duty and such and it seems the more players we have ,,more more likely we will lag. Yes those aare CD games and this is WWW but its still on a servorI remember a post to where you were putting more ram in your servor. Seems to me it was a couple of months ago. Maybe I am wrong and it was another site. But just maybe you received a bad stick.Thats terminology I use ,,,lol Your servor may not be anything like our home computers, Just a suggestion. << < 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |