User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199   > >>
14. December 2007, 04:20:30
Kunoichi 
ugh... I think I made a mistake... before I made the BrainRook payment it was really fun playing, even though it was only 20 or less games... but then as soon as I could I joined as many games as possible and instead of being more fun, I found that it actually became a chore being in far too many games... I don't blame this on BrainKing or anyone running BrainKing, I just made this mistake on my own, as apparently too much of a formerly good thing can make it start to be not feel so good anymore...

I wish there was a better option than just letting my games timeout though, but I really don't feel like playing anymore...

9. December 2007, 17:14:27
trohat 
Subject: Re:
Puckish: yes I have it the same ... it happens when you have some pond that has less than one hour till deadline ... I guess it is because of some bracket or apostrophe missing in the code ...
I considered it such a dribblet that I did not write about it ... (people who play their ponds early do never see this )

9. December 2007, 16:11:45
Czuch 
Notice the top left corner under games, where it has "waiting games"...

http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/06628ceab8.jpg

8. December 2007, 12:38:20
Hrqls 
Subject: Re:
hoky: please post messages about tournaments on the tournament board ... there it will be read by anyone who is looking for a tournament :)

8. December 2007, 11:33:03
hoky 

8. December 2007, 11:13:43
hoky 
Modified by hoky (9. December 2007, 00:04:03)
Succession nation after 10 finished tournament in championship world brainkingu 2007:

1. Uganda 1 - 2 - 0
2. Poland 1 - 1 - 1
3. Czech Republic 1 - 1 - 0
4. Serbia 1 - 0 - 1
5. - 12. Dominika, Turkey, Bavorsko (GER), Lotish, South Korea, Rusko, Argentina and Sweden 1 - 0 - 0
13. Slovakia 0 - 2 - 4
14. - 16. Germany, USA and Guatemala 0 - 1 - 0
17. - 19. Belgium, Wales and Portugalsko 0 - 0 - 1

6. December 2007, 23:51:12
jryden 
Subject: Re:
hoky:
Google Translation?

6. December 2007, 22:55:32
alanback 
Subject: Re:
hoky:  Huh?

6. December 2007, 21:49:38
hoky 
How with get on championship world BKR 2008?

- take-off is scheduling among 10. - 15. January 2008

1.) Be fee-paying full member and be laid games best from its country in ladders

2.) Defender title from last form

3.) Pawn only the, which win qualification on championship world

- for pawn will along of the year 2008 done 4 qualification from with qualifies only winner
- qualification will always on January, April, July and in October

6. December 2007, 19:09:59
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: Fellowship game invitations
alanback: I aggree with you there
But it would still be nice to be able to check what the malfunction was

6. December 2007, 18:43:07
alanback 
Subject: Re: Fellowship game invitations
pauloaguia:  If I had to guess whether it was the server or your memory that malfunctioned, I know which one I would pick ;-)

6. December 2007, 11:10:48
pauloaguia 
Subject: Fellowship game invitations
How can I see on the invitations I created (normal games) if they were set for members of a particular fellowship or for everyone in general? Or even for some BKR range, for that matter...
One of my invitations was accepted by a pawn (that is not a member of a fellowship, I checked) and I was almost certain I had created that particular game for members of a fellowship. Thing is I don't know how to check the settings I had made (I still have another invitation pending that was made at the same time but can't see anything in there). This way I can't be sure if it's a bug or not.

Does anybody know how to check the parameters of an invitation we created?

6. December 2007, 07:11:37
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Fencer:  

6. December 2007, 07:08:32
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Animal: I'll remind you after 10 years.

6. December 2007, 07:08:04
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Puckish: A little less than code red.

6. December 2007, 04:38:08
Herlock Sholmes 
Subject: Re: Needed help with Cheversi !
MadMonkey: ok, thanks

6. December 2007, 04:36:41
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re: Needed help with Cheversi !
dicepro: Always willing to help

Very boring at work lol

6. December 2007, 04:34:51
Herlock Sholmes 
Subject: Needed help with Cheversi !

Hi to everybody, I am the author of Cheversi and would like to ask you to help me to test the new rules. All of you who tried Cheversi know, that this game wasn't nicely balanced . So, this is my attempt to correct this obvious weakness of the game. Please accept ONLY if you would like to follow the new rules and help me testing this game. The games posted in waiting room are unrated and not counted.
Here are the rules:
Pieces can be put on the board ONLY when they touch any other piece(s) previously put on the board, regardless of their color ... pieces can be touched vertically, horizontally or diagonally ... so there will be an unbroken body or chain of mixed pieces of both players ...
Please help me to try this new version of Cheversi rules...
Thanks in advance,
Andy.

6. December 2007, 03:36:39
Czuch 
Hey Fencer, how many code green memberships sold so far?

6. December 2007, 02:24:41
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Fencer  I'll have to work ten extra years to cover it.  ;)

4. December 2007, 23:14:14
alanback 
Subject: Re:
Fencer:  If only the dollar weren't so weak ...

4. December 2007, 21:54:32
Mort 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: No 'buy me now' price like on ebay?

4. December 2007, 21:30:19
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: Is that for a mini me membership, or is that for a Fencer is on permanent vacation membership?

4. December 2007, 21:15:52
coan.net 
Subject: Re: Vacation
puupia: That is correct. Every January 1, your vacation days are reset to the max. So you could have fun and set the rest of December as vacation days since they will be reset to 35. (and of course you can still be here and play your games)

And as noted, vacation days do not work with Fischer clock game, or fixed weekend only games (games with red dot next to time).

4. December 2007, 21:11:51
Bernice 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: now there is a possibility......how about pin the tail on the donkey....

4. December 2007, 21:06:38
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Bernice: Maybe if we had a new game or 2 just for Xmas , we will let him off

4. December 2007, 21:01:34
Bernice 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: as I said....you can hear hands being rubbed together ROFL........

4. December 2007, 20:57:03
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
Fencer 1,000,000

4. December 2007, 20:50:20
puupia 
Subject: Re: Vacation
pauloaguia: Ok. Letting your opponents know about not playing seems like a good idea. I'll put some vacation in my calendar.

I thought my vacation days would not be reset to maximum when the year changes. There no reason to save the vacation then if they do reset..

4. December 2007, 20:21:54
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
alanback: The bidding starts at 1 million Euro.

4. December 2007, 20:04:35
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re: Vacation
puupia: if you set vacation days, when your opponents play the game will immediatelly assume those days and include them in the time left (assuming it's not a Fischer clock game or without vacations).
Also your opponents will be able to see on your profile that you're on vacations and for how long instead of expecting you to move every day.
On certain occasions you can even "waste" less vacation days if you set them than if you let autovacations kick in (not that it matters much - we're at the end of the year and you still have 35 days!)

4. December 2007, 20:00:09
puupia 
Subject: Vacation
I'll be out of town for a few days starting thursday. Most likely i won't be able to make any moves then.

I have automatic vacation on. Is there any reason to set vacation days to my calendar also?

4. December 2007, 19:58:19
alanback 
Subject: Time flies
Looking at my BKR graph, I realized I've been playing here continuously for over 4 years now.  (I started earlier, but took a break for about 6 months).  Gosh, it doesn't seem that long.  It's been fun!

4. December 2007, 19:52:17
alanback 
Subject: Re:
Fencer:  There should be open bidding.  But if I'm going to bid, I want exclusivity and book rights ;-)

4. December 2007, 12:57:58
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: If every registered member gave you a dollar, would you make Animal the little boss of us? (exchanged in Euros, of course!)

4. December 2007, 10:51:24
Bernice 
Subject: Re:
Animal: money, money money....I can here hands being rubbed together ROFLMBO

4. December 2007, 10:14:25
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Animal: You know the price.

4. December 2007, 07:50:22
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Re:
Fencer:  Hey, can you make me little boss of BrainKing? 

3. December 2007, 22:03:43
Bernice 
Subject: Re:Little Boss
Christoph Daum: okies :)....my bad ROFL

3. December 2007, 21:28:53
toedder 
Subject: Re:Little Boss
Bernice: There is no limit in how many f/s one person can be the little boss. But there is a limit on how many little bosses one f/s can have: only one

3. December 2007, 21:15:26
Bernice 
Subject: Re:Little Boss
Fencer: OMG...I can see certain f/s with 18-20 mods making all little bosses...what a mess.....one big boss and one little boss should suffice

3. December 2007, 15:19:05
Fencer 
Subject: Re:Little Boss
WellyWales: No, there is no limit.

3. December 2007, 15:18:25
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re:
YES! that's what was always missing on BK! a mini me!

3. December 2007, 14:38:50
WellyWales 
Subject: Re:Little Boss
Fencer: Is there a limit to how many little bosses a person can be ? i.e. 2 Big Bosses for a rook

3. December 2007, 14:28:23
Fencer 
Subject: Re:

3. December 2007, 14:28:12
TarantinoFan 
And now it is at Brainking.info as well.

3. December 2007, 14:26:35
TarantinoFan 
Subject: Re:
furbster:Check out the fellowships board. That is where they talking bout it.

http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=24

3. December 2007, 13:55:40
furbster 
Whats the difference between big boss and little boss, i just saw it in one fellowship. The little boss has slightly fewer things s/he allowed to do?

30. November 2007, 21:43:47
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: so I must pick a payment and hit continue then? And do it this time when the red light comes back on again?

30. November 2007, 21:40:46
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Puckish: I don't see any orders placed by you. Putting it to a shopping cart is not enough, the order must be placed.

<< <   190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top