User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: rod03801 
 Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321   > >>
31. March 2003, 09:27:20
Rabbits2 
Subject: DB Just for Complaints Of Games Goofing Up
Fencer how about a DB just for complaints of games goofing up!

I know about The webtv White Screen Bug but this is a new one for me I got the Dreaded Webtv White Screen Bug on my Anti Backgammon Game but after it came back it said Corner Checkers with the Anti Backgammon Board.

This is what I mean do I put this on The Backgammon DB or The Checkers DB?

30. March 2003, 15:05:01
macbann 
Subject: abalone.
this is one of my favorite games, but the only place to play online seems to be abalonegames.com,
any chance of adding this?

29. March 2003, 08:48:48
tonyh 
Subject: Re: Tournaments on Profiles Analysed
Harley, yes, it's great; just what the doctor ordered. Fencer is a superman! Possibly, THE Superman.

29. March 2003, 06:59:36
Dave392 
Subject: Yahtzee
and this game too?? :-)

29. March 2003, 06:58:33
Dave392 
Subject: Zilch!
Hey Fencer... any chance of adding this game? :-)

28. March 2003, 20:54:17
Dmitri King 
Subject: unification of boards.
Fencer, Blazinshore had an idea that he wished to be expressed on this board. This idea is to merge the Pente and Keryo pente message boards into one board. The two are so similar that one board shold suffice for the two games, and this would prevent the need to double post when there is a matter affecting both boards.

It was also suggested that the go moku board also be part of this merger, becasue of its similarities to pente.

It probably couldn't hurt, but still, I think the go-moku message board should remain separate, just because the play and strategy are so different.

--Dmitri

28. March 2003, 16:15:18
Zucan 
Subject: Waiting Games
There seems to be a large repition of games listed in the "Waiting Games" section. Since it is now easier to create multiple instances of a single game (whether it be all the same color or of alternating colors), there seems to be a lot more games listed now.

My suggestion is to collapse similar games into a single line and specify how many of that type is available as the first column. For instance, we might see the following:

GAME EVENT OPPONENT COLOR TIME
Line4 Normal_game eddie_spaghetti white 7_days
Line4 Normal_game eddie_spaghetti black 7_days
Line4 Normal_game eddie_spaghetti white 7_days
Line4 Normal_game eddie_spaghetti black 7_days
Line4 Normal_game eddie_spaghetti black 7_days
Line4 Normal_game eddie_spaghetti black 7_days

I propose that it should look like the following:

# GAME EVENT OPPONENT COLOR TIME
2 Line4 Normal_game eddie_spaghetti white 7_days
4 Line4 Normal_game eddie_spaghetti black 7_days

In addition to that, when you click on one of those games and taken to the "Game Invitation" page, you should have an additional option that allows you to choose how many of the games of that type you would like to accept. So, if there were 4 games with the black color available, you should be able to choose whether you want to accept 1, 2, 3 or 4 of those games.

Thinking even further down the road, I guess when you are creating these games to begin with and you specify you want 10 games of that type created, you should have an option that says "[x] Allow people to accept more than 1 game at a time?" to prevent people from accepting more than one game if you want to play lots of people...

Anyways, just thinking about things... Maybe it is worth putting on your TODO list? I know you must have a lot there already :)

Zucan

28. March 2003, 15:17:39
coan.net 
Subject: New Games
As a general comment / suggestion - I would love to see more games here that is not found on ItsYourTurn (Other then Battleboats... I would love to see that here!)

But as I look at the features in development - I'm very interested in Jungle because 1) I never played it 2) I don't know what it is 3) I have not seen it on other sites.

One of the reasons I like Littlegolem.net is because they have a few games that are not on other sites - like DVONN, Hex, Word Game, and Twist.

So as a general request - I would love to see new and different games here. (plus Battleboats!) :-)

BBW (BIG BAD WOLF)

28. March 2003, 13:19:28
TTjazzberry 
Thanks alot fencer, looking forward to it, but no rush. You already do so much and if you never added another game this site would still be tops.

28. March 2003, 13:08:14
Fencer 
I plan to add Chinese Chess. But first I have to 1) finish current tasks, 2) learn how to play it ;-)

28. March 2003, 12:36:58
TTjazzberry 
Subject: Re: Chinese Chess
Agreed Maxxina, I dont know how he does so much as it is, amazing really. My posting was more of an an inquiry as to whether chinese chess/xiangqi was in his plans, rather than asking him to create yet another game for us. If not, there are still a wide variety of games to enjoy on here, probably more than anywhere else, I think its great.

28. March 2003, 05:59:22
Maxxina 
TTjazzberry : Everythink is about time , Fencer is doing everythink alone - i mean programing .
And his priority is now working on battleboats . Its me opinion :)

28. March 2003, 03:11:49
TTjazzberry 
Subject: Chinese Chess
Seen the posting about chinese chess/xiangqi, any chance that game might be coming here? Hate to add to your list of requests but just curious as I used to like playing this. Thanks

27. March 2003, 13:01:27
MagisterLudi 
Subject: Re:
Harley: I had in mind the model where you would see all topics, and when you choose one, you would see all the replies to the chosen topic.

The reason is that if you simply want to see the discussion on one subject, in the thread system it is easier to find all the relevant messages.

In the current system you must browse through many irrelevant messages, and this takes time that could be better used playing games:-)

27. March 2003, 12:40:11
harley 
Hey Tony, have you seen the tournament options on our profiles? Fencer does it again!! Nice one, that makes things loads easier.. I hadn't realised I've signed for so many tourneys that are yet to start!!

27. March 2003, 09:23:00
harley 
Frodo, I think the message boards here are fine, you know what they say.. "If its not broke, dont fix it"!!!

27. March 2003, 08:06:20
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Fencer, How Far.....
I didn't forget about that :-)

27. March 2003, 08:02:09
Mystery Man 
Subject: Fencer, How Far.....
Just curious to see how far away implementing "Sabotage" and it's variants are to the site.. or do you have any clue..? :-))

27. March 2003, 00:40:10
Frodo Hobbit 
Subject: Re: Messages
Fencer might not like it because it's an easy way to start spamming people or start chain letters

27. March 2003, 00:39:32
Frodo Hobbit 
Subject: Re: Discussion Board
I think that we should have threads

example:


Like that.

I'm saying that (Stupid realignment) a reply to a message goes under a message and tabbed.

I'm sure you all know what threads are

*I had to remove the example bexause it doesn't work*

27. March 2003, 00:37:27
Frodo Hobbit 
Subject: Re: Messages
goldtoken.com used to be slow untill they upgraded their server. I'm faced with a moral dilemma

26. March 2003, 20:01:42
harley 
Subject: Re: Messages
No, lwmc, theres no way to do that yet. Its been suggested before and hopefully it wont be too long before we can send messages to multiple people, but for now its good old cut and paste!

26. March 2003, 19:54:17
ouspensky 
Subject: Re: Go
i know some good players who might be helpful. should i have them contact you?

26. March 2003, 18:02:13
lwmc 
Subject: Messages
Is there a way to send a message to all of your friends that are online, in one message. Without having to send each and every one the same massage. For example there have been times when I had to leave for a little bit. And I try to be polite and let them know. And maybe give them an idea of when I'll be back.

Fencer I think your site is the best because it has the most games and it isn't slow poke like itsyourturn.

26. March 2003, 15:26:26
Dmitri King 
Subject: Re: Discussion Board
The message boards at DSG (www.pente.org) are like this also (the way they are on little golem.net as described by Big Bad Wolf). It works fairly well.

26. March 2003, 15:20:55
coan.net 
Subject: Re: Discussion Board
As for how the Discussion board is setup on IYT, I also do not like that much.

If I was to set up a discussion board, the only example on a game site that I can think of is LittleGolem.net - that is you see just see all the subjects - and how many replies are in the subject. Once you click on the message thread that you want to read - ALL messages in the thread are displayed. That way if you want to read about a certain topic, you can - and if you want to not read about a topic, you don't have to!

But again, I would rather see new games fixed then have the time spent on the discusion board.... this is a game site, not a chat site anyway... :-)

26. March 2003, 13:33:09
Fencer 
I would like to add Go but I still have problems with correct implementation. I need more time.

26. March 2003, 13:31:04
ouspensky 
Subject: Go
are there any plans to add go, or 13x13 go? a reason for asking is that a site that has a number of go players has a problem with miscoring games and you probably would attract a fair number of players.

26. March 2003, 10:25:59
rod03801 
Subject: Re:
I also prefer how the discussion boards are set up here.. I HATE the boards at IYT

26. March 2003, 05:08:34
dream 
Subject: How about a ladder for members
Ok I see a lot of whining about top players not accepting games.
I would like to suggest a ladder system for members only, where players can challenge a higher rated player, subject to certain guidelines of course (ie. must be 5 day moves, may only challenge once per week). I have played in several different leagues at Cases leagues..www.igl.net, where top 20 ladder players must defend their position every week, (this may be to short a time for a dailymove site) they must also play a certain amount of games outside of the top 20 to retain their status, tournament games are included in these numbers. GT also offers something basic along these lines in its club format, where a lower rated player may challenge a higher rated, only 1 challenge per player is allowed at one time, it has its faults but could be the basis for a working ladder system here.
-----
It would be easy to set up a cases league for this site however it does mean accessing another site for stats and to enter losses which some people may find a pain in the butt.

26. March 2003, 05:03:31
Vikings 
Subject: Re: Discussion Board
threads take longer to read since you have to click to see each message

25. March 2003, 22:24:07
harley 
Subject: Re: Discussion Board
I guess its each to their own in this case BBW! I'm used to this type of board now, I guess you're more used to threads.
I just hope Fencer is never so short of things to do he has to change these boards! LOL! :o)

25. March 2003, 22:16:05
Maxxina 
Subject: Big Bad Wolf
Battleboats have now big priority .
Biggest priority for fencer is sleeping :)

25. March 2003, 22:04:41
coan.net 
Subject: Discussion Board
I personally do not like how the discussion boards are set up because it is hard to know what messages someone is repling to (Except if they are good about doing something like: Reply to Fencer: ...).

But I would rather see Fencer's time developing new games like Battleboats (which hopefully will come soon) then to see his time improving the discussion board. (Maybe something to look at once he runs out of other things to do...)

BBW (BIG BAD WOLF)

25. March 2003, 21:39:04
harley 
Oh no, I much prefer this type of board. those threads are easy to miss subjects and I doubt I'd bother going through different threads like that. What a pain they are!! And time consuming! I'm here to play games, I like to browse the boards when theres no games going on... but those 'threads' are for serious chat board users.. not just gamers passing their time and finding out useful stuff! This seems to be a far easier way of discussing things, or is it just me being old fashioned?!

25. March 2003, 21:32:20
Emma 
Subject: Re: Dictionary??
thanks....danoschek...I will give it a try:)

25. March 2003, 21:24:48
Dmitri King 
Subject: Re:
Messages grouped by thread means one could click on "previous message in thread" and "next message in thread" and under each message, it would have a liunk to the replies to that specific message. This is how it works at IYT. ALso, at DSG, there is a alightly different system that is also effective. Each new thread is listed on a list of topics, and replies to that thread are found by clicking on the main thread.

Iti s hard to explain exactly. CHeck out www.pente.org to see what I mean. BOth ways are useful.

25. March 2003, 21:14:48
Kevin 
Subject: Re: Some ideas...
Yes, many people have suggested this automatic passing in reversi, and every time the same reply - Fencer doesn't want to implement this. It does slow the play down, but not considerably - passes occur quite infrequently especially against evenly matched players. And to beginning players, having the board completely different could be unexpected and confusing.

25. March 2003, 20:54:44
Rose 
Subject: Re:
Me three!! er I mean me too harley.. I like em how they are!

25. March 2003, 20:52:51
harley 
MagisterLudi, how do you mean a board with threads? I like our boards how they are, they're easy to use and easy to read, theres the 'new!' sign so you can immediately see what hasn't been read by you. I'd hate to see these boards go the way of the 'Wiki Web' where nobody knows how to read anything, much less reply!!!

25. March 2003, 19:44:01
Zucan 
Subject: "Favorite Games" section?
I would suggest a new section to be listed under the "Friends on-line", "Favourite boards" and "Felloships" sections... I would call it "Favourite Games" or something like that...

The idea is that I like to play Atomic Chess, for instance... I may not want to start a bunch of new games and wait for people to accept them, but I might want to play other people who may create new games themselves...

Instead of checking "Waiting games" section all the time to see what is there, it would be nice to see them listed automatically under the "Favourite Games" section when they get created and I could choose to immediately accept them or not.

What do you think?

25. March 2003, 19:30:37
danoschek 
Subject: Re: Shogi
http://www.shogi.net/shogi.html
http://www.gnu.cz/czlist/app/Shogi.html

a freeware proggy including variants ...
http://www.netspace.net.au/~trout/

but I have to warn you - won't be easy to implement ...
I could figure, as the pieces change their 'meanings'/power
when crossing certain lines ... the game is a bit static,
compared to the chinese chess but worth a look ... :) ~*~

25. March 2003, 18:43:16
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Some ideas...
1) BrainKing.com is mostly a site to play games, that's why I didn't spend much time implementing the discussion boards. Maybe later.
2) Cool :-) But I've never heard about it. Where can I find more info?
3) No. I am open to any discussion except this one. Ask Kevin ;-)

25. March 2003, 13:17:47
MagisterLudi 
Subject: Some ideas...
(1) Discussion boards based on threads would be more readable that the present system.

(2) Shogi would be nice.

(3) Reversi could be more customizable. For experienced players non-automatic passes are a nuisance. If you want to keep the game beginner-friendly and also serve experienced players, you could make automatic passes optional, so that when starting a game you could decide which alternative to use.

25. March 2003, 03:43:15
danoschek 
Subject: Re: Dictionary??
http://www.bohemica.com/index.php?m=catalog&s=3
http://dictionaries.travlang.com/EnglishCzech/

25. March 2003, 03:39:52
Emma 
Subject: Dictionary??
Fencer...don't know if anyone else has requested something like this before...I am getting some requests for games from Czech players and want to be able to say good luck or thank you...is it possible to have a basic dictionary so I can communicate a bit or can you suggest a website that has Czech dictionary or conversion???

24. March 2003, 20:28:01
blazeinshore 
Subject: Chinese Chess?
Fencer, would it be possible to impliment chinese chess/xiangqi here? You have some really good variations of chess on this site already but I believe Chinese Chess would also be popular; would be great if you could put that on your TODO list.

Thanks for providing us with this wonderful site and all the hard work you put in day in and day out!

Blaze

24. March 2003, 17:25:14
Fencer 
Okay, I'll try to add some marks of difference ;-)

24. March 2003, 17:23:31
harley 
Tony, yes, I see what you mean, I'm all for that as long as its on our profiles and not the main page! LOL! I lose track of tourneys I've joined too!

24. March 2003, 16:43:24
Fencer 
Nope, we use our approach. It would be really confusing for unexperienced players after multiple opponent's move.

<< <   312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top