ユーザー名: パスワード:
新ユーザー登録
管理人: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


1ページあたりのメッセージ件数:
掲示板表
この掲示板でメッセージを作成にはナイト会員以上の会員レベルが必要となりますので、あなたは作成権限が有りません。
モード: 誰でも投稿可能
メールの内容の検索:  

13. 5月 2003, 02:50:18
coan.net 
So are the Admin's looking to change what Pawn/Rooks get, or is this just a "what-if" type of thing?

If I had to choose, for Pawn i would allow them to enter 1 tournament a month. Even if the games are over, just let them start a new tournament every 30 days. And then give them say 5-10 non-tournament games. This would solve the problem of pawn trying to join tournaments, and then finding out they don't have enough free space (since it can be as many as 14 games, or smaller - it is hard to guess). No move limit - which I think most people don't like. (Heck if you limit them to 15 like someone suggested, that would mean only 1 non-tournament game!)

For Rooks - Please don't limit them to only 100 games. 200 games maybe, but I would prefer no limit. (One of the main reasons I'm a rook and not a knight)

... those are my thoughts

BBW (BIG BAD WOLF)

13. 5月 2003, 02:55:16
BlazinBrian 
件名: Re:
Right now BBW it is a what-if thing. However being realistic with all the work that is being put into making the site better limits will be soon I am sure. I think however everyone here should have a say in the potential limits and then some kind of compromise can be reached. Right now it appears that game limits as opposed to move limits seem to be better.

日時
オンライン友達
気に入り掲示板
同好会
今日のアドバイス
著作権 © 2002 - 2025 Filip Rachunek.
上へ