 |
|
 Chess variants (10x8)Sam has closed his piano and gone to bed ... now we can talk about the real stuff of life ... love, liberty and games such as Janus, Capablanca Random, Embassy Chess & the odd mention of other 10x8 variants is welcome too For posting: - invitations to games (you can also use the New Game menu or for particular games: Janus; Capablanca Random; or Embassy) - information about upcoming tournaments - disussion of games (please limit this to completed games or discussion on how a game has arrived at a certain position ... speculation on who has an advantage or the benefits of potential moves is not permitted while that particular game is in progress) - links to interesting related sites (non-promotional) Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Sotilas. Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
26. Maaliskuu 2006, 13:13:01 Muokannut Chicago Bulls (26. Maaliskuu 2006, 13:13:47) They were very interesting and i wanted to attack to Smirf's King.....  26. Maaliskuu 2006, 14:14:33 Otsikko: Re: Pythagoras: That must have been a very tired wish ... facing SMIRF's huge advantage. 26. Maaliskuu 2006, 18:24:07 Otsikko: Re: SMIRF Engine:
Huge advantage????? In what game are you refering to? Black one or white one? In white game i would win clearly. In black game i had the small advantage although the game was definitely complicated....! If you say huge advantage due to Smirf's evalutions i have proven before that Smirf's evaluations and generally computer's evaluations in that kind of games i create in 10x8 Chess variations, are worthless. Remember that in our first black game Smirf believed it had even a +5.000 or more points advantage, but i knew clearly that i will win like i did.... 26. Maaliskuu 2006, 18:27:23 Otsikko: Re: Pythagoras: If you really would be able to clearly win as you claim, you should do it in a fair way. Else nobody will understand your strange behaviour. 26. Maaliskuu 2006, 18:30:11 Otsikko: Re: SMIRF Engine: If you really would be able to clearly win as you claim, you should do it in a fair way. Else nobody will understand your strange behaviour.
1st: I don't understand the "fair way". Why i wasn't fair? 2nd: Also it was not my fault that we would not know the result of these games as it was not me that resigned..... 3nd: Why my behaviour is strange....? 26. Maaliskuu 2006, 18:32:25 Otsikko: Re: Pythagoras: Well, I am almost tired to repeat myself. You should actually know, what turns me down. 26. Maaliskuu 2006, 18:24:53 Otsikko: Re: Muokannut Fwiffo (26. Maaliskuu 2006, 18:25:14) Hey, the Gothic Chess board is getting interesting again! 26. Maaliskuu 2006, 18:27:24 Otsikko: Re: Fwiffo: Yeah, but don't hope for a fight to start between Reinhard and me! I'm a huge fan of Smirf and i fully support Reinhard in what he does(at computer game programming) and there is not even a tiny chance to start fighting with him.....
I just disagree with him sometimes.... 26. Maaliskuu 2006, 18:50:16 Otsikko: Re: Fwiffo: There is no such board in BrainKing. The current regime doesn't like retrograding :) 26. Maaliskuu 2006, 18:58:58 Otsikko: Re:  WhiteTower: That's what I was thinking too. |
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
|
|
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään. Takaisin alkuun |