Käyttäjätunnus: Salasana:
Uuden käyttäjän rekisteröinti
Valvoja(t): Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Viestejä per sivu:
Lista keskustelualueista
Sinulla ei ole oikeutta kirjoittaa tälle alueelle. Tälle alueelle kirjoittamiseen vaadittu minimi jäsenyystaso on Brain-Ratsu.
Moodi: Kaikki voivat lähettää viestejä
Etsi viesteistä:  

<< <   402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411   > >>
25. Elokuu 2005, 03:32:39
ScarletRose 
Otsikko: Re:
nobleheart: OMG!!!

Whereever did you find that?? That is too funny!! .. Oh man.. I gotta look more into that site.. haha..

25. Elokuu 2005, 03:25:49
nobleheart 

25. Elokuu 2005, 03:19:18
ScarletRose 
Otsikko: Re:
nobleheart: LOL.. haha.. I am not that interesting.. *runs away flinging arms in the air*..

25. Elokuu 2005, 03:17:47
nobleheart 
oops typo meant :

ScarletRose: re:
who is the next victim..?? I mean hehe.. player selected to be interviewed??

it should be you unless it has been done I will check

25. Elokuu 2005, 03:15:14
ScarletRose 
Otsikko: Re: Hi Harley!!
nobleheart: who is use?

25. Elokuu 2005, 03:11:02
nobleheart 
Otsikko: Re: Hi Harley!!
ScarletRose: re:
who is the next victim..?? I mean hehe.. player selected to be interviewed??

it should be use unless it has been done I will check

25. Elokuu 2005, 01:01:53
harley 
Otsikko: Re:
Marfitalu: I don't actually think that is possible. At the very most you could only have it displayed until the next new item anyway.

25. Elokuu 2005, 00:56:03
harley 
Marfitalu, only new news appears on your main page. You can see all old news items by clicking 'what is new' on your menu;

http://brainking.com/en/News

25. Elokuu 2005, 00:54:50
harley 
rtv, put simply, your rating depends on your opponents rating too. If you win 10 games with players who have ratings of 1000 or less, your rating will likely be lower than if you'd won games against players with 1800+ ratings.
Its quite a bit more complicated, but thats a very basic idea of it.

24. Elokuu 2005, 23:48:07
Chessmaster1000 
Otsikko: Re: ratings question
playBunny: That was yesterday. Today many things changed......

24. Elokuu 2005, 23:41:54
playBunny 
Otsikko: Re: ratings question
rtv: Hi rtv, You've already asked this same question and received an answer a couple of hours ago. ;-)

24. Elokuu 2005, 23:18:41
rtv 
Otsikko: ratings question
I am new to this site and wondering can someone tell me how the ratings are arrived at? I'm primarily interested in how for the extinction chess. I see players with better won/loss ratios that have lower ratings than
someone with a worse won/loss ratio.
Is there anywhere on this site that explains how the ratings are arrived at etc?
Thanks

24. Elokuu 2005, 22:58:32
harley 
You have to push down the lid to open them.

OK not really! Go to 'settings' and tick 'show smileys'.

24. Elokuu 2005, 22:53:58
WellyWales 
Otsikko: Smileys
Why can't I get all the smileys on my computer? is there a child lock

24. Elokuu 2005, 21:48:44
playBunny 
Otsikko: Re: Ratings
Welcome rtv. :-)

The wins/losses ratio is useful in conjunction with the rating but is not directly comparable. It depends on the ratings of your opponents, so, for example, a high win count against weak players will not achieve a high rating.

Here's the brief BrainKing explanation.

And here are two in depth articles on the formula. It's a chess formula but is used for all games. [so far, hint hint, Filip, lol]
USCF Rating System and Chess ratings.

They're a bit mathematical but have a read of them and see how much sense they make.

:-)

24. Elokuu 2005, 21:38:12
rtv 
Otsikko: ratings question
I am new to this site and wondering can someone tell me how the ratings are arrived at? I'm primarily interested in how for the extinction chess. I see players with better won/loss ratios that have lower ratings than
someone with a worse won/loss ratio.
Is there anywhere on this site that explains how the ratings are arrived at etc?
Thanks

24. Elokuu 2005, 21:12:17
Artful Dodger 
Otsikko: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: k

24. Elokuu 2005, 20:41:13
Walter Montego 
Otsikko: Re: A switch for inactive players shown list
Fencer: Yes, I'd like that too. That's make four options, right? Active Provisional, Active Established, Inactive Provisional, and Inactive Established?

24. Elokuu 2005, 20:33:21
ClayNashvilleTN 
I must exert my roving Mod skills again and tactfully ask you guys to CHAT idle stuff on General. PLEASEEEEEEE

24. Elokuu 2005, 20:30:29
Artful Dodger 
Otsikko: Re:Chuckles
playBunny: It cost me a bundle so don't pick. ;)

24. Elokuu 2005, 20:16:11
playBunny 
Otsikko: Re:Chuckles
ArtfulDodger: "Raving Mad" and that hair!!

24. Elokuu 2005, 19:37:16
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re:
BIG BAD WOLF: A bug. Will be fixed.

24. Elokuu 2005, 19:27:08
coan.net 
Not sure if it's a bug or if it is suppose to be this way.

In the games which I have not completed a game for awhile (lets take Maharajah Chess for example), even though I do have a rating, it shows me as "unrated" while playing a game.

I would still think it should show my rating during a game, but just keep me off the "high ratings" list.

Example game: http://brainking.com/en/ShowGame?g=999430

So is it suppose to be like that, or is it a bug?

24. Elokuu 2005, 18:59:15
Artful Dodger 
Otsikko: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: You spelled it wrong

it's Raving Mad

24. Elokuu 2005, 18:20:32
ClayNashvilleTN 
Otsikko: Re:
ArtfulDodger: I have been ANOITED Roving MOD. I will consider your request.

24. Elokuu 2005, 18:16:50
Artful Dodger 
Otsikko: Re:
harley: just make me a temp mod. I'll keep things in order in here for ya!

24. Elokuu 2005, 18:12:56
ClayNashvilleTN 
Otsikko: Re:
harley: "WOMEN" SHOPPING WITH MENS MONEY" Must I say more?

24. Elokuu 2005, 18:12:18
ScarletRose 
Otsikko: Re:
Muokannut ScarletRose (24. Elokuu 2005, 18:13:20)
Yes.. Grim, A good way to weed out the players who no longer are here and playing..

24. Elokuu 2005, 18:11:39
Grim Reaper 
I, for one, am happy to see that "Nellaf" is finally gone from the Gothic Chess rating list So thanks for that.

There seems to have been a lot of "dead wood" on the lists, in some cases 40% - 50% of the players were pawns clinging to the posts. Has anyone else noticed that?

24. Elokuu 2005, 18:11:09
ScarletRose 
Otsikko: Re: Shopping?? Why.. did someone say shopping??
harley: Grabs sweater and purse.. let's go.. HMmm.. LQQks around.. and snatches CC's from all the males on the boards.. Come on Harley.. whoo hoo.. lotsa moola here.. :)

24. Elokuu 2005, 18:08:52
harley 
Can I ban everyone so I can get my shopping done without wondering what I'll come back to?!

24. Elokuu 2005, 18:06:37
Artful Dodger 
Otsikko: Re:
ClayNashvilleTn: Please make me a temp mod of this board so i can ban clay!!! He's making fun of my hair.

24. Elokuu 2005, 18:02:50
ClayNashvilleTN 
Otsikko: Re:
harley: Let me BAN Fencer Harley if it becomes necessary!

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:59:09
harley 
Scarlet do keep up dear Its reza - I've been posting about it for a while!

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:58:05
ScarletRose 
Otsikko: Hi Harley!!
who is the next victim..?? I mean hehe.. player selected to be interviewed??

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:57:48
harley 
ROFL will do!!

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:56:54
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re:
harley: Feel free to ban me if I follow up.

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:56:31
Fencer 
End of discussion.

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:56:03
harley 
Thanks Clay, I just sent personal messages saying just that :o)

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:55:56
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re:
Grim Reaper: You re-read the contract, Edward. It uses the words "description of the rules of the game". And I am the one to decide which pages fulfil these conditions.

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:55:28
Grim Reaper 
It was going on via PM, and Fencer was not answering me.

Thanks for butting in Clay, as usual.

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:54:18
ClayNashvilleTN 
This sounds like a personal matter best handled in private, gentlemen.

Please delete your post and continue your conversation through PM.

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:51:25
Grim Reaper 
Muokannut Grim Reaper (24. Elokuu 2005, 17:52:02)
Re-read the contract Filip. It uses the words "game description".

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:46:10
Fencer 
Muokannut Fencer (24. Elokuu 2005, 19:06:04)
Bull. The only place I am supposed to show this information is the game rules page [where it actually appears]. Please stop spreading the nonsenses.

24. Elokuu 2005, 17:35:28
Grim Reaper 
Gothic Chess is my intellectual property. I have your signature on a document stating that my name will appear with ALL descriptions of that intellectual property being represented on BrainKing.

24. Elokuu 2005, 14:21:19
FilsdeTycho 
Otsikko: Re: "Inactive players" removed
AbigailII: Thank you Fencer and AbigailII for your kind explanations. I had the false impression that the BKR were erased since I've just started a new Janus Chess game (ID: 999199) and no BKR appears around the board as usual ("not ranked" message, only).

Again, if BKR remain unchanged there is no problem at all!

Thank you... and let's play!

24. Elokuu 2005, 14:04:39
AbigailII 
Otsikko: Re: "Inactive players" removed
tycho: Your BKR for Janus Chess is not unknown - it's 1238. You are, however, no longer listed in the charts. I didn't get the impression that inactivity (or activity) is taken in account when calculating the ratings. Only the fact whether or you you're in the list matters. So, for paying members, one quick draws against someone with a similar rating twice a year is enough to keep you in the charts.

This is unlike say, the rating system on FICS, where they, beside keeping the rating, also keep a stat that measures activity - it's an indication how good established your rating is. The more you play, the less your rating will fluctuate (but the more it can fluctuate the rating of your opponent). If you play less, your rating fluctuates more after a win or loss. So, on FICS, having played 400 games way back means a new win or loss can change your rating a loss (just like you have only played a few games here), much more so than if you have only played 20, but all of the recently. And the same statistic is used to determine whether your rating is established or not. So if you have played 400 games the past month, you can be inactive for a lot longer before your drop of the charts than when you have played 20 games in the past month.

While I prefer to have a system like FICS, I think this new system (dropping of the charts if you haven't finished a game in the past 6 months) is better than the old one.

24. Elokuu 2005, 14:00:25
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re: "Inactive players" removed
tycho: Have a look at your Profile, Finished Games tab. The only difference is in the Position column, where some values are replaced by "-". Nothing else changes.

24. Elokuu 2005, 13:58:31
Fencer 
Otsikko: Re: "Inactive players" removed
tycho: Who's talking about erasing some scores? Nothing is being erased, BKRs stay as they are, only some of them don't appear on the chart pages.

24. Elokuu 2005, 13:45:51
furbster 
Are the red things on our profiles the games we have to play in to get back on the ratings chart?

<< <   402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411   > >>
Päivämäärä ja aika
Ystävät palvelimella
Suosikki keskustelut
Yhteisöt
Päivän vinkki
Tekijänoikeudet - Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachunek, kaikki oikeudet pidätetään.
Takaisin alkuun