My interpretation of the Brains page is that you have to be a Rook to get anything for referring a new Rook. So tell your friends to choose Knight instead. :)

wellywales: it looks like 100....for one year rook

If you are a Brian Knight and you refer somebody to join BK and they take out a Brain Rook, how many brain points do you get?

Beren the 32nd: It depends on what you mean by "aid". If you mean to help you plan and play your moves then you should only do it with the express permission of your opponent (most will probably say no but a really strong player may not mind). If you mean using a program to explore a game that you've finished playing then there can be no reasonable objection. If you want to analyse moves during a game (but after you play each move, of course) then you must ask yourself whether it helps further your strategy. In Chess (ie. your game area) I would suggest that it does.

If you mean can you find a book or website and study up on an interesting stratagem then again it's a question of conscience: Is it materially helping you in a current game and could mean a win or draw that you would otherwise not have had? Then perhaps it's gaining an unfair advantage. I say "perhaps" because there will be times when you gain some knowledge "inadvertantly" (eg. while learning about a different idea) and you shouldn't be having agonies over it being unfair. There are other reasons for that "perhaps" but I can't express them properly at the moment. I'm for bed!

Have fun!
:-)


Others may disagree. ;-)

Beren the 32nd: Game Guidelines:

NO CHEATING. This includes using outside programs to help play and losing on purpose for the goal of boosting ratings. Your account may be banned, and ratings will be removed.

Can anyone point me in the direction of any guidelines concerning the use of computers, books, websites etc.. to aid playing games here?

Chessmaster1000: If your browser shows a cached version of the game page instead on the fresh one from the server, it can be the cause of the problem [because some browsers do it under some strange circumstances, like IE on Windows, for example]. Clear its cache.

This is for Fencer only as i suppose he is the only one who can see the game......
In this game -+click here+-, i played the 12-move before 4-5 hours. But in my surprise when i opened the game again now, i had to play again the 12-move.

But this is not the only bizarre thing......This game it's a Dark Chess game. And when i played my 12-move the first time, i saw that my opponent didn't have any piece at c3 and b4 squares......But now i have played it again i see he has a Knight on c3!!!!!!!
What the hell is going on.........?!?!?!?!

Any suggestions.........?

PS: I'm not 99.999999999% sure that all the aforementioned happened, i'm 100% sure!

Fencer:

NOT a floosie: Then you missed a few dear. ;)

Fencer: guess I could draw up a few more id's!!!

I've seen 283 online users a while ago. Not bad for a Sunday.

I'm clearing out a few posts here so we can try and stay on topic.....Brainking, it's structure, features, and future.

I wonder.....if someone manages to get themselves removed from this site....and was involved in a prize tourny.....knowing full well that if they win, they'll never be able to use it......wouldnt the sportsman/gentleman just resign?

SSSsshshhhhhHsHHhhhhhhh *puts index finger up to lips as to show them locking shut.. then tapers hands down and gives a horizontal "CUT" like hand sign*..

I am playing in a BrainKing tournament to win a free Rook membership for one year. The tournament is here:

http://brainking.com/en/Tournaments?tri=6089#3

I am about to win game #2 of the 3 wins match. I must prepare for game #3 as my opponent will be fighting hard. I have already dedicated hundreds of hours of my time to this match, so I cannot be distracted by questions such as those posed by Wizard II below.

Grim Reaper:

By so many goodies do you mean you going to sue?

Bry:

Grim Reaper: I doubt that Ed. But you're simply showing us all that having Gothic chess here isn't worth having to deal with this side of you. I've seen it ever since the Expose Dano days through the KM days and on and on. It's always something.

Grim Reaper: Who cares? No one. Cut your losses and dont make a fool of yourself.

Pioneer54:

If you want to debate me, do it in private.

But for the record, I am not upset, I am elated. By breeching the contract, I will be entitled to sooo many goodies

Bry: good point!!!!!!!

Who Cares? It's not like we are losing Backgammon.....

Grim Reaper:

Grand Chess is too unlike contemporary chess.

You wrote this as if to suggest that it is some kind of drawback. Why should grandchess, or any variant for that matter, be more like chess? Furthermore, your point cannot survive scrutiny; grandchess is like chess in some ways, different in others. There are opening, middlegame, and (sometimes) endgame phases, as in chess, but obviously the play is more complex, and more tactical, due to the larger board and extra pieces.

The setup lacks symmetry,

HUH??? Each side's position is a mirror of the other, as in chess and many variants (including your beloved gothic), so you are just plain wrong there; besides, this point is meaningless.

there is no castling, and the starting position is mildly chaotic.

Yes, castling is forbidden. As the inventor himself says, "It is a battle. Why should the King be safe?"

The BrainKing community does not represent our target market, as we target consumers. We sold perhaps a couple dozen Gothic Chess sets on here, but over 63,000 worldwide since December 2000 (thanks mostly to large drop-ship orders to QVC and, oddly, correctional facilities in the United States.)

Then, why are you so upset?! Most of us would be elated with just a small portion of your success.

Each variant has their own lovers and haters, as was before Gothic, and will be after Gothic.
If you don't like it, don't play it, simple enough.

Finally, we agree!!!!!!
;))

Just don't try to tell me it is not popular. I walked away from a $75/hour consulting job in the year 2000 because I was making more with Gothic Chess on the side.

I'd never tell you it is not popular, and I never said nor suggested that; I just said it won't be much missed here. If you had read my previous post carefully, you would have observed that it read, in part:
although I recognize that gothicchess has a large following

Come to Bartell Hall in Kansas City next August. Watch over 4,000 high school kids play for the prize of having free college tuition for one year. The entrance fee is only $125.

Tell them how much you like Grand Chess, how much you dislike Gothic, and pay close attention to their reaction.

Sorry, can't make it, too far out of my way! Besides, if I don't even like playing gothic for free, why on earth do you think I'd want to PAY for it? .... So, tell me: Is the attraction the game concept or the prize money offered?

sorry rose

Fencer: Dang, I may not belong in this conversation because it vacillates back and forth so much, but Fencer, in 30 seconds I can rearrange the starting pieces and call it a variant but I just don't get the point? That's exactly why I do not care for them.

Sumerian: I meant it's very similar for an ordinary Chess player who doesn't go to a deep analysis. The same board, the same set of pieces, almost the same start position.

Fencer:

... and replaced by Capablanca Random Chess which is very similar to the Gothic ...

Let me place a correction here: there are more differences between CRC and GC than between Bird's and Ed Trice's starting array.

The main difference is the fact that each starting array will be selected randomly just before a game will be started (very similar to Chess960 / Fischer Random Chess).

A second difference is the intended target group. CRC originally has been created to establish a testing field for 10x8 chess programs avoiding huge opening libraries. GC already has big opening knowledge in some applications.

Thus CRC might fit better to the needs of creative players (from the very beginning) compared to more reproducing, opening book experienced players.

Regards, Reinhard.

First of all, if half of you had a sense of humor, you would have read some of my posts and realized my "Archmoderator" posts were a joke, with a hidden message in some of them.

Read one of my posts on General Chat recently, where I was rather cryptic. Then read the first letter of every sentence, and you have the message that is hidden

My second Archmoderator post contained this nugget to those who paid attention:

"He's a programmer, part yogi and part recluse, impressively liberated from our oppulent life style"

or...

Happy April Fools

ClayNashvilleTn: it's ok - it's just that people are posting on the subject there too - may as well be on one board than over 2 boards...

Bry:OOPS sorry, I am a slow typer. LOL

Rose: It hurts to see someone of Ed's Intelligence be soooooooo ignorant of other peoples feelings. He dumb founds me. I have tried to explain that to him in PM's when I have tangled with him, and it is the TRUTH.

If he would just try to convert his arrogance into tact, he could and would have accomplish far greater things than what he has. He has failed to reach his full potential which could be extraordinary beyond description, "if ' he would just listen and LEARN.

I hope he does. I know he can, surely he will..

Why dont we take the General Chat about the subject to the....... General Chat Board.... ?

.. Yeah he was supposed to be the "Arch Moderator"

ClayNashvilleTn: Not to mention a year or two ago when there was the talk of a deal in place to have Ed co-own or co-run the site that he came on boards threatening to toss out anyone he felt like. That really went over well.

What Ed doesn't understand and we have talked via several PM's is when you refuse to use TACT in your communications and your only strong card is threats, you LOSE, "period" "end of story"

I suspect if Ed had treated the owner of this site with respect and used even a little TACT he would not find himself to the point of the owner and practically everyone else listening to his whinnying "no one likes me." sick of hearing it.

It isn't no one likes you Ed, it's your 2 year old temper tantrums and your disrespect for "ANYONE" that dares disagree with you or that doesn't bow and scrape to you.IMHO

Chessmaster1000:
you wrote:

So if these are the ONLY reasons for this "fight" to start (i guess Fencer has other reasons behind it.....),

it is mainly the behaviour of ONE which caused all the problems.

Grim Reaper:

If you are making more than $75/hour on Gothic Chess. I can understand why its best for brainking to get rid of Gothic Chess. You must be raking in $$ over your patent, and your message reflects that your gunning for more.
This site up until now has probably help you make more money on Boards, etc... than you would have made without it.

I wish Ed accepted the fact that his name, patent-number,...etc would not be on the short-game-description, but only to the complete rules description. It seems of zero importance for me if it isn't on the short one.....

I wish Fencer would include Ed's name at the short-game-description. It seems of zero importance for me if it included it......

So if these are the ONLY reasons for this "fight" to start (i guess Fencer has other reasons behind it.....), then i see that it would be extremely easy with a tiny good will from both to have an agreement.....But unfortunatelly no one wants to retreat.....

Grim Reaper: I believe way back in February or March of this year, he changed all mention of you in the rules and description. A few weeks later he put your name back in the rules. No later than April as I recall. Now it's August and you're just now complaining about it? Isn't there something about speed being important in all these laws you keep quoting? I certainly do recall a lot of discussion about your leaving this site at the end of March of this year. Ain't it a bit pass that now? Whatever it is between you and him, has not improved in that time. Perhaps you should just cut your losses and be gratefull for how well things are going for you now.

ScarletRose: Er, are you sure that was addressed to me? If so, what on Earth are you talking about?

redsales: Because you cannot make a lunatic happy unless you do everything he wants, no matter how absurd it is. I am simply sick of it and any further discussion with people who fanatically argue about every single detail and continuously threaten with lawsuits not only you but many other people on this site as well is a total waste of time.
Anyway, it's a valuable experience for the future.

Filip changed what was already agreed upon. It was fine the way it was. It is not a matter of my feelings of happiness, which has nothing to do with it. He removed my name, removed the patent number, impugned the game by calling it a variant of Capablanca's (amazing how Capa is never considered a variant of Bird from 1874, nor Bird a variant of Carrera from 1617, isn't it?)

All I did was ask the question: Why?

His response was basically: Because.

This would never be an acceptable response to a request for an explanation of a change of status quo regarding anything of significance.

I took the discussion public only when 3 personal messages, one each day for 3 days, were totally ignored.

I took it private again once Fencer responded publically.

The result indicates premeditation on his part.

Grim Reaper: I checked, and you are listed as the inventor in the game rules, your due. Before you say that, ipse idem, the game summary is the same as the rules, think about this: one cannot, by definition, learn to play a game as complex as Gothic Chess by reading a 2 sentence blurb, therefore, ipso facto, the summary is independent from the rules. Ipso facto looks a tad more important than the semantics of ipse idem. Everyone on the site, upon reading the rules, knows you are the inventor of Gothic Chess. Why not be happy with that?

Walter Montego:

In the current setup package of SMIRF beta there is a file "Variants.pgn" included containing that mirrored MBC. You can store a lot of other variant starting positions that way as long as they are using the Capablanca or traditional chess rules.

Like in Chess960 / Fischer Random Chess in CRC castling is defined by the END POSITIONS of involved King and Rook instead of the steps done by the King. Without that interpretation it would not be able to supply every CRC position with a castling ability. CRC uses only about 1/2 of those 48000 different setups to secure all paws to be covered, to remove some initial "traps".

Reinhard.

Sumerian: Welcome back!

The castling is the same, the King moves three squares towards the Rook and the Rook is placed on the other side of the King. Maybe for your program it is a problem since your Capablanca Random Chess set up will pretend the Kings are on the "f" file so that in CRC the castlings will go as defined by that game. I suppose your mirror image game is the same as far as that goes. Perhaps you could just add Embassy Chess to your program as you did for Janus, Bird's, and Capablanca Chess?

Walter Montego:

About CRC: CRC has been "invented" primarily targeting to create a new drosophila for computer - computer games. I am not sure, whether it would be too difficult to be played by human beings. But it is free to everybody who likes it.

About the Embassy array: as far as I know the castling rules of Embassy are different to all other 10x8 Capablanca piece set variants. Because of that circumstance I supplied SMIRF with an MBC related position, which is mirrored from the right to the left. That way it would be represented by the CRC array 25932 and it would be playable obeying the usual 10x8 castling rules.

[FEN "rnbackqbnr/pppppppppp/10/10/10/10/ PPPPPPPPPP/RNBACKQBNR w KQkq - 0 1"]

Regards, Reinhard.

playBunny: the blame doesn't just fit on one foot.. it fits on all.. No one man should take full blame.. perhaps a bit of maturity and reasoning as well as respect towards another would best be needed.. but, then we all have cultural differences.. don't we.. WE aren't all raised with the same parents.. and while one country disapproves of a smile linking it to mean something more lustrious.. another merely means it in a friendly way..

My point is this.. Instead of reacting right off.. sit back and evaluate what all is said.. and try to see it from the other persons view.. realize also that heated arguments do get carried away.. more so with the male gender.. :)

have a nice evening..

Pioneer54:

Grand Chess is too unlike contemporary chess. The setup lacks symmetry, there is no castling, and the starting position is mildly chaotic.

The BrainKing community does not represent our target market, as we target consumers. We sold perhaps a couple dozen Gothic Chess sets on here, but over 63,000 worldwide since December 2000 (thanks mostly to large drop-ship orders to QVC and, oddly, correctional facilities in the United States.)

Each variant has their own lovers and haters, as was before Gothic, and will be after Gothic.

If you don't like it, don't play it, simple enough.

Just don't try to tell me it is not popular. I walked away from a $75/hour consulting job in the year 2000 because I was making more with Gothic Chess on the side.

Come to Bartell Hall in Kansas City next August. Watch over 4,000 high school kids play for the prize of having free college tuition for one year. The entrance fee is only $125.

Tell them how much you like Grand Chess, how much you dislike Gothic, and pay close attention to their reaction.