Nombre de Usuario: Contraseña:
Registro de un Nuevo Usuario
Moderador: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Mensajes por página:
Lista de boletines
No tienes autorización para escribir mensajes en este boletín. Para escribir mensajes en este boletín se require un nivel mínimo de membresía de Brain Caballo.
Modo: Todo el mundo puede escribir
Buscar entre los mensajes:  

<< <   380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389   > >>
4. Noviembre 2005, 21:04:52
coan.net 
Asunto: Re: Stairs................
Do not forget, we have a public discussion board dedicated just to talking about stairs here:

http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=108

I like the idea of "compressing" the stairs every once and awhile - a lot of people like to play, and if they end up getting so far ahead where they can no longer be challenged, or are playing the same 1 or 2 people over and over again, that gets boring fast. I have seen on some other sites on ladders where the top player will quit & start over at the bottom just so they can play games (point of a game site) - so hopefully the compression of steps will keep players active.

4. Noviembre 2005, 20:49:21
Pioneer54 
Asunto: Re: Stairs................
Luke Skywalker: I agree; I do not like the compression idea either, as it merely serves to punish those who have worked to achieve status. With large numbers of players, it may not even happen, but what would be wrong with an empty stair or two?

Meanwhile, those on the first stair risk nothing by losing matches, since they cannot fall any lower.

Just observations here, not criticism; no doubt many players are enjoying these new events.

4. Noviembre 2005, 18:53:13
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: Stairs - Making progress
Modificado por playBunny (4. Noviembre 2005, 18:55:12)
Walter: There's no looking ahead or upwards. It's a game of climbing up by pushing your peers off the step you're on and stomping on those below.

It's an interesting point of view. Rather than playing the weaker of those players above (as on a Ladder), you initially make the best progress by playing the weakest of the weak below you! (at least to the degree that your playing ethics permit such choices) and also by knocking off rivals as they come up to your level. Hopefully for those reaching the higher levels of the Stair that latter becomes the prime reason for choosing an opponent.

4. Noviembre 2005, 18:48:55
Pedro Martínez 
Asunto: Re:
Walter Montego: You can't challenge people that are higher than you on the stairs.

4. Noviembre 2005, 18:46:05
Walter Montego 
Asunto: Re:
Fencer: You say you can challenge people three or less stairs beneath you. How far ahead of yourself can someone be for you to challenge?

4. Noviembre 2005, 13:00:27
Mort 
Asunto: Re: memberships
Pioneer54: I've set a max to how many games I'll start so I don't run into that problem.

My players don't usually have to wait for anymore then 2 days for me to move.

4. Noviembre 2005, 12:13:31
Fencer 
Yes, it includes the empty Steps. But the compression once a month would remove them.

4. Noviembre 2005, 12:11:30
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: Stairway to heaven....
Modificado por playBunny (4. Noviembre 2005, 12:11:49)
Pythagoras: You can only challenge those on your step or the three below** - which places a limit on how magic your carpet is. In the case that the people below get pulled down by those below them and the gap widens, the empties will be whipped away by an angel.

** Fencer: Is that 3 below numerically, ie. including empty Steps or three occupied Steps below?

4. Noviembre 2005, 12:08:37
Luke Skywalker 
Asunto: Re: Stairs................
Fencer: when there are three empty stairs behind the player, he can't challenge anybody, until someone else climbs up. (I don't like the idea of compressing the stairs, if a player is at the top, others will try to reach him, thereby closing the gap.)

4. Noviembre 2005, 12:04:36
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Stairs................
Pythagoras: There is no top stair. You can advance as high as you can.

4. Noviembre 2005, 12:03:13
Chicago Bulls 
Asunto: Stairs................
Without following the discussions about stairs, i have a question......
What will happen if someone advances to the top stair and wins X games from there? I guess he won't start floating in the air but he will remain in the top stair But what if he loses 1 game(after he won X games, being already on the top stair)? He will lose one position or not? Or since he won X games being at the top stair already, he has to lose X games also, in order to be removed from the top stair...............?

4. Noviembre 2005, 11:54:09
Fencer 
Asunto: Re:

4. Noviembre 2005, 11:41:08
Jason 
can pawns use auto vacation ?

4. Noviembre 2005, 09:59:17
plaintiger 
Asunto: Re:
Modificado por plaintiger (4. Noviembre 2005, 09:59:44)
Fencer: ah, so! i think that actually works! i could argue that i'd like to be able to see it before i signed up, but that's not that big a deal. thanks, F. :)

4. Noviembre 2005, 09:04:44
Fencer 
Asunto: Re:
plaintiger: Just find yourself in the Steps and you'll see it.

4. Noviembre 2005, 08:59:37
plaintiger 
i'd like to be able to see my BKR in the game in question when i'm on the Stairs pages, so that when i'm choosing an opponent i can see how their BKR compares to mine.

i don't have all my BKRs memorized yet.

4. Noviembre 2005, 07:28:21
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: playing on stairs
Pioneer54: Such players are listed in the "Select one free player to play" combo box. Players which cannot be challenged are filtered out.

4. Noviembre 2005, 07:25:50
Pioneer54 
Asunto: playing on stairs
When you get into a group, how do you know which players have openings and are eligible to accept a challenge? Must you scour the game list to see?

4. Noviembre 2005, 07:09:29
Pioneer54 
Asunto: Re: memberships
BIG BAD WOLF: How?? It does not seem likely that many Rooks would become Ns. I did it, to place a restriction on myself and my time, but I'm probably perhaps one of a handful.

4. Noviembre 2005, 03:44:23
rod03801 
Asunto: Re: Stairs down
Or, a warning message sent when there is one week left of knight membership saying, "In one week you will be limited to one stair. Please resign from the ladders of your choice. If you haven't done that in the week, the system will choose to keep you on the stairs where you are on the highest step".. or something like that..

4. Noviembre 2005, 03:30:40
coan.net 
Asunto: Re: memberships
Pioneer54: ... but at the same time, it might entice some rooks to become knights (read: less euros in BK coffers!!)

4. Noviembre 2005, 03:26:47
Pioneer54 
Asunto: Re: memberships
Jules: That's a wonderful idea, and actually I once tried it, but invariably started more games than I could play comfortablly, and found myself rushing moves in a lot of them.

However, I would think it a great improvement if the 'one tournament per game type' restriction were removed, and I wonder if that change might entice some pawns to become Knights (read: more euros in BK coffers!!), especially players who are mainly only interested in one game type.

3. Noviembre 2005, 21:24:18
Mort 
Asunto: Re: Stairs games
Pioneer54: Buy Rook membership, you don't have to worry about limitations then.

3. Noviembre 2005, 21:06:48
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Stairs games
Pioneer54: Yes.

3. Noviembre 2005, 21:04:54
Pioneer54 
Asunto: Stairs games
Do the games played on the 'Stairs' count against the total limitations of 20 for pawns and 50 for knights?

3. Noviembre 2005, 16:45:12
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Stairs down even deeper!
playBunny: I think a trap door would be more effective :-)

3. Noviembre 2005, 16:39:27
Mirjam 
PlayBunny: lol:)

3. Noviembre 2005, 16:36:38
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: Stairs down even deeper!
Modificado por playBunny (3. Noviembre 2005, 16:37:01)
BIG BAD WOLF: Perhaps there could be four steps into the "cellar" (0, -1, -2, -3). You'd only go down to one of these steps if you timeout on Step 1. So the inactive players would go down a step each time they lost until they were unreachable by the live players above. The cellar could be where the dead bodies are kept.

3. Noviembre 2005, 16:18:28
coan.net 
Asunto: Re: Stairs again...
Modificado por coan.net (3. Noviembre 2005, 16:19:03)
Eriisa: I'm talking about someone who leaves the site and no longer plays on BrainKing - if they are in a stair, then everyone would just challenge them and get a "free" time-out win against them.

Oh - just found the stairs discussion board - http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=108

3. Noviembre 2005, 16:17:01
Eriisa 
Asunto: Re: Stairs again...
BIG BAD WOLF: It looked to me like there is no option to decline a game. Won't that work the same way as keeping them from being inactive?

3. Noviembre 2005, 16:15:30
coan.net 
Asunto: Re: Stairs down
playBunny: That is a good idea - I was going to say "random", but keeping the "highest" would probable be best. Then again, if the person does not like it, they can always switch it around.

Another thing that needs to be thought of are inactive players. It would be unfair to keep an inactive player in a stair - since everyone would just challenge them to get an easy time-out win.

Maybe some sort of process that runs monthly to remove (retire) players who have been gone for more then a month - or something similar.

3. Noviembre 2005, 15:56:17
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: Stairs down
BBW: And keeping the one which they've reached the highest in would be the kindest choice, or the top 7 if a Rook becomes a Knight.

3. Noviembre 2005, 15:50:09
coan.net 
Asunto: Re: Stairs again...
Fencer: Maybe it would be best to "force" the player into "retirement" for all but one of the stairs - that way they can complete their games, but not start anything new. (And if they are just a couple of weeks behind in getting a new membership, they will not lose a lot.)

3. Noviembre 2005, 14:24:46
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Stairs again...
pauloaguia: Nothing happens. But I plan to add some restrictions for expired memberships. For example, if you don't renew within a week, all started games over the limit would be forfeited (for example, 10 games every day).

3. Noviembre 2005, 14:24:19
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: Stairs again...
Modificado por playBunny (3. Noviembre 2005, 14:24:50)
pauloaguia: If it's like the similar situation with regard to tournaments, you'll be able to continue playing games that have been started but not start any new ones.

That still leaves the question of how the system will determine which Stairs have to be dropped when reducing to the lower membership's 7 or 1.

3. Noviembre 2005, 14:20:18
pauloaguia 
Asunto: Stairs again...
1) Stairs can be created for all types of games on BrainKing. Your membership level determines how many Stairs you can enter:

Brain Pawn - 1 Stairs
Brain Knight - 7 Stairs
Brain Rook or higher - unlimited


So, what happens when a knight becomes a pawn, for instance? And what happens to the stairs games (s)he's playing?

3. Noviembre 2005, 14:19:54
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: BKR in 2-games matches
gringo: The BKR changes at the end of a match according to the result of the match as a whole. The results of the individual games don't matter as far as the BKR is concerned.

3. Noviembre 2005, 14:16:52
gringo 
Asunto: BKR in 2-games matches
Modificado por gringo (3. Noviembre 2005, 14:17:05)
One question: Does is make a difference in relation to my BKR, if I win a 2-games match 2:0 or 1,5:0,5?

3. Noviembre 2005, 14:09:15
Eriisa 
I'm afraid I've been sucked into the 'discussion board zone'.

Either that or I have the 'discussion board syndrome' I have this terrible walleye to the right, and can't see a darn thing straight in front of me!

grin

3. Noviembre 2005, 13:59:21
furbster 
lol the bright green goes past unnoticable? tis the first thing i see when they appear!

3. Noviembre 2005, 13:57:35
Eriisa 
Asunto: Stairs!
LOL. I am so terrible about reading Fencer's announcements !!!! LOL. Seems I always find out from the boards, as I scratch my head, thinking 'eh?? whut??? what stairs?'

LOL, now this sounds like FUN!

3. Noviembre 2005, 12:41:24
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: Pushin' the buzzards down/Stompin' the ants
Fencer: Lol. Okay. Hmmmm, I'll have a ponder on that one.

3. Noviembre 2005, 12:29:40
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Steppin' up
playBunny: It means "if you want to play the best, you must deserve it first" :-)

3. Noviembre 2005, 11:59:18
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: Steppin' up
Modificado por playBunny (3. Noviembre 2005, 12:41:12)
Fencer: Thanks.

Another qustion, about Rule 5:
You can only challenge another player (who is not already challenged by someone else) on the same Step or within 3 lower as you. For example, if you stay on the Step 6, you send challenge players from Step 6, 5, 4 or 3.

That means you can only challenge those equal or weaker than yourself stairswise? No challenges to those above? I understand the opposite, namely where you can challenge those equal to or upto three steps above oneself. I'm not saying it's wrong, but I can't figure out the reasoning behind only being able to challenge those under you.

3. Noviembre 2005, 11:44:12
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Steppin' up
playBunny: Er, yes, BKR.

3. Noviembre 2005, 11:42:24
playBunny 
Asunto: Re: Steppin' up
Fencer: I was going to reply 1) Super and 2) Super, but on reflection it's 1) Er, "Yes, BKR" or "Yes, outside BKR"? and 2) Super.

3. Noviembre 2005, 11:38:26
Fencer 
Asunto: Re: Steppin' up
playBunny: 1) Yes. 2) Yes.

3. Noviembre 2005, 11:35:14
playBunny 
Asunto: Steppin' up
Fencer: Cooool. I like.

Couple of questions:
1) Do Stairs games count towards BKR or are they outside that system completely?
2) Can we have Backgammon with cube stairs please? I'd prefer 5-point matches myself. 3-pointers would be nice as well.

1. Noviembre 2005, 21:04:14
alanback 
Asunto: Re: Timing out in multiple-game matches
BIG BAD WOLF: Second forfeit recorded, 5 to go :)

1. Noviembre 2005, 21:01:09
alanback 
Asunto: Re: BKR-Ratings
fismoluni: I appreciate your points, but I think that the rankings on this site should reflect players who are active on this site. We don't include all the world's chess grandmasters in our chess rankings, nor all the backgammon champions in the world in our backgammon rankings. Just being a good player shouldn't be enough -- the player should have earned the ranking in games played on this site, and should be required to maintain a certain minimum level of activity on this site in order to retain that ranking. This is not disrespectful of anyone's ability. It just reflects the fair principle that a high ranking player should defend his status regularly.

<< <   380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389   > >>
Fecha y hora
Amigos conectados
Foros favoritos
Comunidades
Consejo del día
Copyright © 2002 - 2026 Filip Rachunek, todos los derechos reservados.
Volver a arriba