BuilderQ: And that surprises you? microsoft.com claims to be an HTML 4 site (didn't validate that claim though), which could mean it's not XHTML compliant Idem for apple.com. I checked google, and I quickly saw why it was neither valid HTML (any version) or XHTML (due to an unquoted attribute value containing a slash). yahoo.com misses a required attribute for a STYLE element. ibm.com is the only site I didn't spot an error within 10 seconds, and I don't want to bother running it through a validator. But a mistake in its 20k document could be present.
(gem) Brug Notesblok til at se hvordan din profil vil se ud med html attributter før du tilføjer den. (kun for betalende medlemmer) (rednaz23) (vis alle tips)