 |
|
 Feature requestsDo you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board! If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board. For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 > >> 4. September 2005, 11:50:59 Subject: Re:  WhiteTower: I used to be an active chess player for more than 10 years before BrainKing and I am aware of all possible tie-breaking and other systems. I would never introduce anything which is totally unknown to me. 4. September 2005, 11:12:02 I use the name I am used to it. There is no reason to rename it. 1. September 2005, 21:08:04 Subject: Re: Game list in Profile WhiteTower: Nothing but a missing row in one table :-) 1. September 2005, 20:37:32 Subject: Re: Game list in Profile WhiteTower: And now? 31. August 2005, 23:03:20 Subject: Re: Tournament play and available slots to sign up Walter Montego: The games always count to the total slots. But in case of second or next round, the max value can be exceeded. 31. August 2005, 21:07:05 Subject: Re: Tournament play Pioneer54: Thanks for the suggestions. 27. August 2005, 17:42:40 Subject: Re: Antje: It's for a RSS feed reader.
I will write a FAQ entry for that. 27. August 2005, 13:34:15 Subject: Re: Tournamentlist Andersp: What about this? See the Tournaments page [search form] and Profile / Tournaments page (show tournaments created by this user). 27. August 2005, 11:02:02 Subject: Re: Random Chess playBunny: Yes, it would be possible. 26. August 2005, 13:37:46 Subject: Re: Tournamentlist Andersp: If I am online and don't have any more important things to do, yes. 26. August 2005, 13:21:09 Subject: Re: Tournamentlist Andersp: I read everything :-) But if I give no answer, it means that I am still thinking about it or I am not sure what to decide. 26. August 2005, 13:15:36 Subject: Re: Tournamentlist Andersp: Is it so difficult to be more patient? Of course it would be possible. Everything is possible. But I cannot promise any exact date. 25. August 2005, 06:30:14 Subject: Re: Discussion board links. BIG BAD WOLF: What about http://brainking.com/cz/Board?bc=3&ngi=383873 instead?  24. August 2005, 20:15:36 Subject: Re: Spanish discussion board Marfitalu: Of course, when the Spanish translation is finished. 24. August 2005, 13:33:23 Subject: Re: Rating range for new game WhiteTower: Yes, it's already filed in the Bug Tracker :-) 22. August 2005, 22:30:46 Subject: Re: grenv: That's a simple game, not a match. 22. August 2005, 22:20:55 Subject: Re: pgt: That's strange. Please give me the game ID. 22. August 2005, 11:01:55 Subject: Re: Amazons and replacing the arrows. AbigailII: Try it now. 21. August 2005, 20:23:50 Subject: Re: reza: I don't know because I see nothing unusual on your games or settings. Try to change the board size on the Settings / Five in Line page. 21. August 2005, 20:11:57 Subject: Re: reza: There were no changes applied to those games for a very loooooooong time. 21. August 2005, 19:50:57 Subject: Re: grenv: I think you paid your subscription fees to play more games and use other extra features for paying members, didn't you? The Paid Membership page says nothing about discussion boards. 
Moreover, Rod and Bry are right in one thing - this board is called Feature Requests, not Feature Discussions. Any detailed discussion among users should be redirected to the correct game board. 20. August 2005, 11:29:54 Subject: Re: New clock request rabbitoid: pauloaguia is right. When the second parameter [bonus] is set to zero, the third parameter [limit] can be set to anything because it will never be used. And you have the standard chess clock as you wanted to, with the time for the whole game for each player [the first parameter]. 16. August 2005, 16:56:43 Easy, guys. I am preparing an improved system of charts and ratings, which will 1) remove inactive players from charts, 2) remove marked cheaters from charts, 3) remove the useless 2700 max value for ratings. When it's done, all BKRs will be recalculated from the beginning. 16. August 2005, 15:06:20 Subject: Re: Game notation 15. August 2005, 21:11:47 Subject: Re: chinese chess - rows from 1.10 instead of 0-9 chessmec: I am just following the official notation rules for this game. Have a look at Shogi notation, it's even more changed. 13. August 2005, 20:13:05 Subject: Re: Walter Montego: Computers board is fine. 13. August 2005, 20:06:38 Please, don't discuss features of third party applications here. 12. August 2005, 10:18:23 Subject: Re: Discussion Board for chinese and japanese chess? chessmec: To Xiangqi and Shogi boards, Chess category. 11. August 2005, 13:35:49 Subject: Re: Bravo Fencer rabbitoid: Then you are in a guest mode. 11. August 2005, 08:04:30 Subject: Re: Bravo Fencer rabbitoid: How should it work? I know you were talking about it before but I cannot recall a single detail of your former idea.  11. August 2005, 08:03:19 Subject: Re: stuff nobleheart: Xiangqi and Shogi are almost finished, I am just doing final tests or the models. Of course, when I release them, there will be definitely some bugs left but it's nothing unexpected.
Of yes, of course, I have to write the rules as well :-) 10. August 2005, 19:02:50 Subject: Re: Chapablanca-Chess; 10x10 Chess Variants chessmec: Grand Chess. 9. August 2005, 19:14:32 Subject: Re: Multi-game matches - Previous games list playBunny: The bright yellow marks the winner. 7. August 2005, 15:42:35 Subject: Re: Automatic Invitation wekke: If you create a tournament through your fellowship page, only the fellowship members can participate. It won't be even displayed on the Tournaments page. 7. August 2005, 15:41:41 Subject: Re: Automatic Invitation wekke: What DBs do you want to threaten?
Eek, I know what you mean. Not in the development at the moment. 7. August 2005, 15:38:47 Subject: Re: Automatic Invitation wekke: You can use the "Stuur een bericht naar alle leden van het genootschap" link on your fellowship page and post the tournament URL to the message. 3. August 2005, 09:11:01 A simple circle doesn't look nice. I mean a stone. A real stone. 2. August 2005, 17:54:03 Subject: Re: Amazons board changes miuek: Can you provide a nice looking stone in four sizes? [to fit into squares of 35x35, 50x50, 65x65 and 90x90 points]
:-) 30. July 2005, 11:25:26 Subject: Re: Privacy of Fellowships chessmec: A non-member has no access to the fellowship boards at all, regardless whether he was a moderator before or not. It applies to the global moderators as well.
On the other hand, the real admins - Liquid and me - have a full access everywhere. But that's what everyone must accept. 29. July 2005, 15:02:44 Subject: Re: delete game WhiteTower: Even paying idiots can support our site :-D 29. July 2005, 12:27:41 Subject: Re: delete game WhiteTower: Let's also mention it was available to everyone until several idiots started to accept public invitations and delete them right after it, probably as a great fun. That's why this restriction was applied. Who doesn't like it, can spend several Euros for a higher level. 29. July 2005, 07:36:15 Subject: Re: delete game ArtfulDodger: It's available for paying members only. 26. July 2005, 23:27:21 Please stop this argument. The request was placed and acknowledged, no further discussion can make the process faster. 24. July 2005, 19:03:55 Subject: Re: One Only? Purple: Obviously it wasn't the exact same link. 17. July 2005, 16:30:07 Subject: Re: Online Players Purple: It signifies I forgot to add a description to that action. 15. July 2005, 14:56:15 I prepare a new system of Brains which is more important at the moment. 15. July 2005, 14:55:37 Subject: Re: I'll improve the BKR formula by adding some penalties for repeated games between the same players. Andersp: I was waiting for your reaction, as usually. I don't have time to make such changes anyway.15. July 2005, 09:13:06 Subject: Re: Walter Montego: If you just want to play the games, why don't you like this idea? It should not affect you. And, from my point of view, it would make the rating more accurate because who wants to get a higher BKR, will be forced to play with more different opponents. Which is exactly what the rating should be based on. << < 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |