User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: rod03801 
 Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   > >>
25. May 2014, 21:19:33
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Bug Tracker
Marshmud: Yes, it is OK. Thank you.

24. May 2014, 13:02:54
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Bug Tracker
Marshmud: BK can be deployed anywhere. The migration would take some time (especially the database) but we did it several times in the past.

21. May 2014, 07:34:18
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Bug Tracker
Gabriel Almeida: Thanks for your response and offer.
In fact, I've been thinking of posting a long response about "everything what happened here happened for a good reason", but I think it's not necessary because it would only start another endless flame war.

20. May 2014, 20:16:10
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Bug Tracker
Aganju: Actually 35000 USD is close to reasonable. But I agree that the methods used to calculate that are doubtful.

20. May 2014, 19:30:49
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Bug Tracker
diogenysos: Of course. Whoever offers a reasonable price, can own this site. I have no problem with it (and, honestly, it would be a great relief for me).

19. May 2014, 12:54:53
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Bug Tracker
diogenysos: Lack of time and enthusiasm.

19. May 2014, 09:12:13
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Bug Tracker
diogenysos: Yes.

1. May 2013, 11:21:54
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Fencer (1. May 2013, 11:22:03)
diogenysos: Well, it's still a snow somewhere, isn't it? Antarctica, for instance.
I'll change it soon.

2. December 2012, 14:42:09
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: Not a bad idea.

12. November 2012, 09:00:23
Fencer 
Subject: Re: New games to play on andriod
Jason: Yes, I think we can find a free space for one line with the game name.

7. November 2012, 16:13:57
Fencer 
Subject: Re: New games to play?
joshi tm: I am quite busy developing the Android application so until is it finished, new games are not very likely. After that, there is a good chance because I've already received some very nice tips.

5. November 2012, 16:19:35
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Finished games with one player
diogenysos: Doesn't the score show "2:0 (=1)" instead?

26. August 2012, 19:42:21
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Time Out
diogenysos: You know, the timeout system had been created a long time before introducing 1 hour games, so it is possible that it is not the best suitable solution for this specific time control. I'll look at it.

9. July 2012, 11:33:48
Fencer 
Subject: Re: request : new backgammon game type : No Chance Backgammon
Hrqls: Never heard of it before. Sounds interesting.

4. May 2012, 16:37:44
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Running games
coan.net: Very well. Sounds easy.

4. May 2012, 09:27:05
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Running games
coan.net: If you roll a six and another number, would it be taken as 2 separate moves? What if you roll 66? Or would sixes be nothing special in this variant?

3. May 2012, 08:56:42
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Running games
El Cid: Yes. It is done.

21. April 2012, 20:12:15
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Events part deux
happyjuggler0: The third one will definitely break our record of the longest option description. But yes, that's what I meant, generally.

21. April 2012, 19:03:29
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Events part deux
rednaz23: Actually I think it is a good idea. The less system messages BrainKing generates (and stores in the database) the better.

17. April 2012, 07:47:02
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Events
rednaz23: That's how it worked 10 years ago, system messages had been sent only if your opponent made the final move. But a lot of people has asked to be informed each time a game is finished, so I had changed it. Nobody complained about it since then.

13. March 2012, 22:04:53
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
rabbitoid: Am I missing something? Works for me.

13. March 2012, 19:31:21
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
rednaz23: Well, if your employer blocks only domain names containing "brainking.com", maybe it could be solved by using IP address instead. The only problem is that images should be loaded from IP (instead of i.brainking.com) as well but it might be easy to implement. I will look at it when I have some time.

10. March 2012, 08:39:45
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
pgt: What about now?

6. March 2012, 17:36:49
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
rednaz23: I think the reason is that images are loaded from i.brainking.com which is probably blocked by your employer as well.

12. February 2012, 16:59:24
Fencer 
Subject: Re: draw offer
Thom27: Just check "Offer draw with this move" before submitting the move.

5. January 2012, 16:10:31
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Tournament sign-up - Favourites
MadMonkey: Actually, that would be quite easy to do.

7. July 2011, 15:19:34
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
pgt: Ummmm. Hmmmmm. Ehm ehm. Mmmmm. Nope. Waste of time.

25. May 2011, 19:31:17
Fencer 
Subject: Re: move notice emails
Thad: I don't know. A typo, most likely. However, since everybody has BrainKing in bookmarks, there is no point to click on email links anyway.

16. May 2011, 08:02:37
Fencer 
Subject: Re: move notice emails
Thad: Funny. BrainKing.pl domain was never registered.

19. April 2011, 10:52:26
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Sorting Games
tonyh: Looks like you turned it off in the past. Please find "Show game filter on the main page" option at the Settings page.

19. April 2011, 08:50:10
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Sorting Games

15. April 2011, 15:41:46
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Please restore a "New Game Feature"
rod03801: Yes.

15. April 2011, 11:02:28
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Please restore a "New Game Feature"
pedestrian: It was removed because I did some changes to the game structure database and the algorithm of determining visible public invitations had been negatively affected by the mentioned feature. It is possible that I will reactivate it in the future but the overall performance is always the most important thing.

14. April 2011, 13:39:34
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: It does not work on team tournament signups because it would require some more complex changes in the code, so I better think it over before messing with the current structure.

14. April 2011, 11:13:39
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: I think I've found it. It will be fixed soon (or later today).

14. April 2011, 11:06:33
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
Pedro Martínez: Which one, for instance? Give me a link please.

14. April 2011, 10:45:47
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: Is it working now?

6. April 2011, 10:44:34
Fencer 
Subject: Re: timeouts
aaru: As long as you can handle them, there is no problem with it.

6. April 2011, 08:27:08
Fencer 
Subject: Re: timeouts
pedestrian: Actually, there used to be a 1000 games limit when the site had been launched. However, some active player had complained that "it says that Brain Rook can play unlimited number of games, so I want to have 10000 of them!" and I had been too naive to try to address every single request, no matter how absurd it was. Now I really regret it.

In other words, I am seriously thinking of reapplying the 1000 games limit again. At least for players who have serious problems to play more games than they can handle.

6. April 2011, 07:40:15
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
coan.net: Good idea. I was looking for a compromise and that could be it.

4. April 2011, 14:57:01
Fencer 
Subject: Re: integration
carlscott33: Yes, in the future.

3. April 2011, 17:59:38
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Started games layout
Modified by Fencer (3. April 2011, 17:59:57)
El Cid: It was a joke. The 100 max limit solution will be implemented.

3. April 2011, 17:50:23
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Started games layout
El Cid: I want to limit the number of games shown anyway (100 max would be good). That should solve it.
"Don't use Opera!" would be another workaround.

1. April 2011, 18:44:28
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: OK, you can preview board description changes now.

1. April 2011, 18:44:05
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Rolling Dice and Auto-pass
I've just uploaded a patch that could (hopefully) solve the dice issue. We'll see soon. I don't promise anything, it needs to be tested.

30. March 2011, 15:58:01
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Rolling Dice and Auto-pass
Pedro Martínez: Hmmm, maybe I have found a possible source of the problem. Maybe. I'll try to upload a patch soon and we'll see.

30. March 2011, 15:46:59
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Rolling Dice and Auto-pass
Pedro Martínez: Is there a game without autopass that would suffer of the same problem?

30. March 2011, 15:44:03
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Rolling Dice and Auto-pass
tonyh: Actually I don't take it seriously as much as 10 years ago. Since some people are never satisfied, it's not worth the effort. Don't take it personally.
I mean that I have many other interests and BrainKing is just one of them. Not the only one.

30. March 2011, 15:38:48
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Rolling Dice and Auto-pass
Thom27: I don't know. I won't pretend that backgammon is my favorite game (because it is not).
Instead of a thread full of theories, can you give me some IDs of games that were affected by it?

30. March 2011, 09:52:30
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
MadMonkey: All right, it is ready and when I finish some other minor things, it will be uploaded and activated.
Regarding changes to this version of BrainKing, I think I will actually do some of them, in order to make the upgrade process (to 3.0) more convenient. The only thing that cannot be easily modified is the game model, it is safer to rewrite it from the scratch.

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top