User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Vikings 
 Run around the Pond

Discuss about this new multiplayer game or comment current runs. (includes all versions of the game)

Game link..... Ponds
Ratings link..... Regular Pond Ratings -and- Dark Pond Ratings -and- Run in the Rain Ratings
Winners link..... All Winners - (Regular Ponds Only) - (Dark Ponds Only) - (Run in the Rain Only)


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14   > >>
10. January 2008, 03:46:25
Cougar727 
Subject: Re: 488 ?
Very interesting. Thanks for the info!

8. January 2008, 05:54:26
rod03801 
Subject: Re: 488 ?
Cougar727: I assume you are talking about this pond: Hyper Mega Pond

If you notice, the person who dropped out this past round was a pawn. Once a member turns back into a pawn, they cannot play the ponds. So, their last bid as a member, is the forced bid, until they drop out as the lowest bid. People just looked for that, and knew that anything over 487 would be safe. So, many bid 488.

21. December 2007, 23:13:46
TJ 
Subject: Please sign up

14. December 2007, 01:41:05
Universal Eyes 

3. December 2007, 09:40:36
HelenaTanein 

13. November 2007, 21:41:07
Papa Zoom 

Pond: Silence Is Golden

Your pond is finished. (winner: Bernice)


 



11. November 2007, 18:38:33
Czuch 

11. November 2007, 18:28:52
Czuch 
For Anyone With 10+ Pond wins only!

For anyone with 10 or more wins only please!

31. October 2007, 11:32:33
ScrambledEggs 
Subject: 3 more needed

29. October 2007, 01:08:11
ScrambledEggs 
Pond: shame you dont know who else is playing 4

Your pond is finished. (winner: Vikings)

25. October 2007, 21:44:14
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re:
Kunoichi: I'd lift my hat to you if only rabbits wore one. I hope you won't ever be tempted by the dark side of the force...

25. October 2007, 21:27:24
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Kunoichi: Fixing some I can understand, but some of them are things that we members have asked for for a long time now, including having ponds smaller than 16 people!

25. October 2007, 21:22:57
Kunoichi 
Modified by Kunoichi (25. October 2007, 21:23:35)
oh, that was me actually. I didn't know whether or not a chess type pond would actually effect people's chess ratings, and I didn't want to be responsible for you losing a bunch of points in chess since you were way higher rated than everyone else. How I did that is irrelevant now since that appears to be fixed.

It would a nice feature though if ponds could be unrated though. If I could have, I would have made all ponds for finding and reporting bugs unrated so we wouldn't have to worry about that to begin with.

Well, anyway, I tried all the bugs I found before, and it looks like all pond bugs are fixed now, as I can't find any more.

25. October 2007, 21:21:56
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
rabbitoid: Fencer must have felt bad for you and your chess rating? he can be very sneaky sometimes

25. October 2007, 21:20:25
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re:
Czuch: I'm no longer in the list of players

25. October 2007, 21:18:39
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
rabbitoid: what???? really?

25. October 2007, 21:16:41
rabbitoid 
oops, no, the pond is still there, but it seems it's ME who has done a disappearing act from it. Spooky

25. October 2007, 21:12:45
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re:
Czuch: Looks like the chess pond made a poof noise before pulling a disappearing act. Magic...

25. October 2007, 20:55:04
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: What about the running games????

25. October 2007, 19:57:04
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: I dont know why you would not let us create ponds with less than 16 people???
Ponds are only for paying members, why not give us what we want?

25. October 2007, 19:55:52
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: Not since the past 5 minutes anyway!!!

25. October 2007, 19:53:25
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
joshi tm: Nobody can do that.

25. October 2007, 16:30:11
joshi tm 
Why some players can define a very small pond and I can't?

25. October 2007, 16:29:21
Czuch 
Well, we have been asking fencer for the ability to make ponds with fewer players and some with faster time limits, so maybe he gave us the ability by not blocking them?

I would like to try one with 1 minute limits, lets say a quick 8 person pond?

25. October 2007, 15:52:48
Kunoichi 
I've found a bunch of stuff already that needs safegaurds and it's all reported in the bug tracker thing. Editting bounds for ponds and making ponds for other game types like Chess included.

25. October 2007, 15:46:45
coan.net 
Subject: Re: stranger and stranger
Vikings: no special testing ability - just some interesting URL hacks and such which Fencer did not put safe guards in.

There use to be other similar bugs awhile back that allowed people to read private fellowships, pawn to get more then their allowed games, allowing tournaments created in other fellowships, plus other things which I helped track down a long time ago for Fencer to put a block on.... but I never spent much time to see what game hacks I could do - since most are obvious when done - except for possible a few new ones they found, which hopefully they sent the details to Fencer so they can block those.

25. October 2007, 14:57:16
Czuch 
Subject: Re: stranger and stranger
rabbitoid: If you would have accepted your invite to the ponds plus fellowship, you would have already known all about the chess pond, including the fact that your chess rating would take a beating too

25. October 2007, 13:04:12
Vikings 
Subject: Re: stranger and stranger
rabbitoid: she must have some other testing abilities, she has one pond for 3 players and another for a minimum of 4 players

25. October 2007, 13:00:42
rabbitoid 
Subject: stranger and stranger
concerning Kunoichi's Strange Test Pond...
have you noted that the BKR's posted are the ones for chess? aaaargh, I hope mine doesn't suffer too much when I go splash in this thing

25. October 2007, 12:54:45
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re: only 195 more players needed to start
Vikings: very funny. I don't know why I even bother

25. October 2007, 12:51:32
Vikings 
Subject: only 195 more players needed to start
I think this pond will need a little advertising
Large Pond

23. October 2007, 11:14:06
rabbitoid 
Subject: Re:
Kunoichi: weird. how did you define a "pond type: chess"? the definition page still offers only the 3 usual types run, dark and rain.

23. October 2007, 02:18:39
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
Modified by Czuch (23. October 2007, 02:19:23)
Kunoichi: what are the rules and how are they implimented?

want to talk about this in the ponds fellowship?

23. October 2007, 02:07:13
Kunoichi 
Kunoichi's Strange Test Pond...

Started a chess pond... probably not supposed to be possible, so I wonder what would happen if we tried it.

18. October 2007, 16:30:46
ScrambledEggs 

17. October 2007, 12:33:11
MadMonkey 
Subject: Congratulations
Modified by MadMonkey (17. October 2007, 12:34:19)

14. October 2007, 02:07:20
coan.net 
Subject: Re: wah
Kunoichi: It happens.

My personal opinion - for the first few rounds, to possible save 10-20 points - there is no point in bidding too low. That is if I think the low bids will be between 70-80, I will bid probable closer to 100. Again, 10-20 points in my opinion is not that important. Much more important to be around at the end. (That is in later rounds, there will be bids with over 1,000 between them - so what is 10-20 points? not much)

For new users, some general tips (everyone plays different so feel free to follow or ignore):

Check recent ponds - see what bids fell in the first few rounds - make sure you are higher then that.

Keep an eye out for players whose membership drops to pawn status. After they chance to a pawn, they can no longer bid - so their last bid will continue until they fall.

Keep an eye out for the lowest player. If they only have 1 point left, it is funny to still see people bid 1,000+, since they would just need to bid 2 to stay in.

The 500 point bonus can be good - BUT if you have to bid more then 500 points higher then what you normally bid - they it is not really very good. (Except for the times when your goal is to keep others from getting it.)

14. October 2007, 01:34:23
Kunoichi 
Subject: wah
Modified by Kunoichi (14. October 2007, 01:35:14)
my first pond game that I try, in round one I pick 79 and I fall out of the pond when 3 others pick 80...
And then there were none...

I feel dumb... : (
Or does this usually happen to people on their first try?

11. October 2007, 21:46:10
Fencer 
Subject: Re: Reversal of removal of a player from a pond?
rod03801: Only me.

11. October 2007, 18:59:07
rod03801 
Subject: Reversal of removal of a player from a pond?
I somehow removed a player from one of my fellowship ponds. (Had to be a clicking mistake of some sort, because it was definitely not intentional.. I have to BEG people to sign up for the pond, lol) They tried to sign back up to the pond, but it won't let them. Does anyone know how I can let that person back into the Pond? Or is this something only Fencer can do?

11. October 2007, 12:29:33
Vikings 
Subject: New Feature
Everyone should check out the new feature that Fencer just implemented on the pond page, you might just be sup prized to see how many fellowship ponds are over due to start due to lack of players, I found one that only needed one player to start but was 586 days over due

10. October 2007, 07:15:56
Papa Zoom 
Subject: Join the pond!

10. October 2007, 07:10:11
Papa Zoom 
congratulations to Bernice for winning the Save The Whale pond!!!  woooo hooooo

26. September 2007, 23:19:40
Czuch 
Any pond player interested in a ponds fellowship, here is your chance.....

To entice new members, we have a 6 month rook membership on the line in a fellowship pond.

Come join us before its too late!

PONDS PLUS

25. September 2007, 20:39:48
Papa Zoom 
Subject: New pond 1 day moves :)

22. September 2007, 13:59:27
Vikings 
lol, an unrated pawns wins a pond, lol
http://brainking.com/en/Pond?bms=13&g=4000

22. September 2007, 04:59:09
Vikings 
Subject: Re: this is BS
BadBoy7: my advice is to pay attention to who those people are, learn their habits and then use that information to your benefit

22. September 2007, 02:57:13
coan.net 
Subject: Re: this is BS
BadBoy7: The higher you end up, the most ratings you will win. So if someone signs up, and then falls in by either not playing or something, the higher you end up and the better you do. Sometimes there is a tie and there is no winner - happens a lot with Rain Ponds, but rarely in the others.

22. September 2007, 02:54:00
BadBoy7 
Subject: this is BS
players sign up for ponds then dont make moves or finish them and I lose points....cause it ends up no winner

29. August 2007, 00:42:39
rod03801 
Subject: Re: Gotta love rain ponds!
Vikings: Yeah, after round 2 I figured something of the sort would happen. I really didn't think it would be a 17 way tie though! LOL

<< <   5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top