User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627   > >>
26. December 2003, 12:17:19
zenit 
Subject: final note to case cheaters
This is the complete truth:
1) They are 2 people, a couple, man and his current girlfriend (alan & hana)
2) They are both pretty good players, especially at not gomoku-specialized server like this, at vinagames they are about the better average, with jokings opening analysis and many games played they really made nice progress
3) They are rating addicted, selective when using opponents depending not upon quality but more upon rating, I know what I mean because at vinagames often 1700-1800 are very good players, pretty all gomoku openings have sure wins so if someone wants to hold his high rating this is really tough task and only exceptional players with lots of games played and hard work invested can reach this
4) On lots of servers they used some cheating method with multiple accounts to gain rating, sometimes letting other players playing with some account, and gaining this way rating and "fame" with much less work.
(well the last point used alan alone mostly, because at that times he had different girlfriend, but it was not me :) )

So the things I would expect from them would be:
If using more than 2 accounts, at least not playing one against another and giving free points and not using other people as rating sources for further transfer.
And not logging into other ones account for thansferring purposes, nor letting other people playing the other one (this is mostly about online playing sites).
Everyone should have a fair chance, because if all good players would respond with the same approach, this would lead to disaster.
And if they all entered one tournament, that was pretty unfair and they should really think about it a bit, because they are not bad people in fact and they probably could understand they are not the only people here, so they should try to imagine how they would feel in other people's place.

Hope this was the closing word and we will see only fair play everywhere (yes, I can dream :o) )

26. December 2003, 11:17:23
Fencer 
Interview with Liquid. Sorry for the delay.
You might have to reload that page to see the current version.

26. December 2003, 11:04:58
ughaibu 
Subject: VikingX
That really is hilarious. Can someone explain what the so called cheaters gain in return for undertaking this outrageously boring and embarrassing charade? A completely new level of nutcase to me, anthropologists are going to have a field day when they get round to cataloguing these idiots.

26. December 2003, 09:30:20
Caissus 
Subject: Re: Cheaters
First thing ,which is necessary is to have a commandment,that allows people to play only with one account. Without such a commandment there is no cheating!
Perhaps it could be a button at the registration?But then players,who are cheating with several accounts should be excluded from playing.

26. December 2003, 08:43:51
coan.net 
Subject: Cheaters
A suggestion I made a long time ago (and I know some do not like it), but to list in a persons profile the IP address of where they logged on from last. I believe people did not like it since it would give up privacy or something, but heck - if a "hacker" wanted to try to hurt someone, he would have a much better way to get that sort of information then to sign up on a game site to see it. (Maybe make it so only Krights/Rooks can see the IP address)

How will this help: Well I know there are ways around it, but it will help stop some of the cheaters. Other players will also be able to "investigate" other users to try to help find cheaters. Fencer already does a lot, and to try add dealing with cheaters and investigating things himself - this would let others do some work for him!

26. December 2003, 08:30:33
VikingX 
Subject: Cheaters in 5-in-line
I have to agree with niicegiirii.
Since Joking, Renjuplayer, Blade and niicegiirll all signed into my tournament at practically the same time I decided to look into their games to see if the claims of cheating were true.
I found the following:
1) They all have played each other making moves within less than a minute after the other.
2) They all really do usually log out within a minute.
3) And the games :)...playing oneself must be boring because some of the games really suck: In their game ending 24.12 with his almost 2700 rating Joking (playing as white) gave a surewin position to Blade VERY early in the game and Blade (with 2600+ rating also) responded by resigning :). Enough said. There are also many other unexplainably stupid moves made in other games played between those 4.
I have removed Renjuplayer, niicegiirll and Blade2004 from my tournament. Joking can play and defend his Number 1 status :). No account established after 24.12 will be allowed in the tournament, if I am not sure of who they are. Playing oneself is quite harmless (although rather funny and pointless) but entering the same tournament with at least 4 userIDs is pretty heavy cheating.

26. December 2003, 07:01:01
The Listener 
Subject: Whatever happened to that interview with Liquid?
Any closer to completion, Harley? Happy Holidays, btw :·)

     ~ MS

26. December 2003, 03:45:51
zenit 
Subject: cheaters
yeah, at least the cheaters became more cautious
some points:
- there are not only 2 accounts, but at least 4, not counting the others 2 suspicious ones.
- you dont work at night, so games what were lately used to transfer, though then the resuls vere bidirectional, perhaps to stabilize both ratings a bit you didnt play from work

At least the accounts dont log in grouped together like before, but fencer perhaps has some logs of login times and even can look up ip addresses so he can identify cheaters easily this way hopefully, hope its not in the same shape like it was with backups :P

I dont have logs, just the latest for illustration:

joking 23. December 2003, 14:53:43 logging out
renjuplayer 23. December 2003, 14:53:22 logging out
blade2004 23. December 2003, 14:52:03 logging out
niicegiirll 23. December 2003, 14:50:20 logging out

niicegiirll 24. December 2003, 13:09:28 viewing on-line players
blade2004 24. December 2003, 13:08:33 logging out
renjuplayer 24. December 2003, 13:08:13 logging out

so at least dont pretend u dont cheat!

25. December 2003, 21:31:30
niicegiirll 
:-)very interesting ,so my name is Hana I¨m girlfriend of Joking and I dont see any reason why I cannt play him if Im at work and cannot join kurnik.pl or vinagames.com because of firewall to play him online regards to niicegiirii(why you dont use your own nicks hmm? are you still cry for Alan your 4 years big love ?bye bye

25. December 2003, 19:39:12
rabbitoid 
yes, especially in screen chess and corner checkers! :)))

25. December 2003, 18:59:55
Czuch 
Subject: Re:
If you want to take 2 months to finish a game
;)

25. December 2003, 18:53:55
Fencer 
If you go to Ratings page, you will see a list of top rated players of each game type. Playing with some of them is ALMOST like playing against a computer :-D

25. December 2003, 09:02:37
harley 
MattJeffrey, you can't play against a computer here, they're all real live opponents! Either go to 'waiting games' and choose a game & opponent, or put your own game in with 'waiting games' by clicking on 'new game' and following the instructions there.

25. December 2003, 06:45:14
MattJeffrey 
How can I play a game against the computer?

24. December 2003, 23:15:14
bwildman 

24. December 2003, 23:13:03
harley 
Ahh yes, sorry, Steve is right! It does include vacation days! So if you were playing a one day per move game, and it was friday, it would show 3 days remaining - because of Saturday and Sunday being normal vacation days.
Go to 'settings' and 'calendar' and it shows site holidays, like Xmas day etc. You can't time out on these days so it adds it to the time remaining for your opponent :o)

24. December 2003, 22:42:57
Stevie 
their 3 days and vacation days, 2 weekends and public holidays, look at your own calendar :o) p/h xmas day etc

24. December 2003, 22:41:33
Czuch 
Subject: Re: Harley...
I'm not sure if I'm missing something here.... I am playing one game that is 3 days per move. After I completed my turn, my game sheet shows 11 days 23 hours before time out. Why so long? Even if it counts my opponents 3 days, and then my three days and 2 days for each of us for a weekend, it doesn't add up.
Also, I see my opponents weekend days listed, both on the game page and their profile page, but cannot find their vacation time listed. Is it only listed if they are presently using it? Thanks again.

24. December 2003, 22:30:08
harley 
Unbeatable, do you mean a tournament just for your team members? If so, see the big boss, they can arrange it.

IMupChucKing - I think the 15 days left are not including vacation days, if you look on your opponents profile it will show you when they have set their vacation for, and I have also seen it on the game board notes (under the board).

24. December 2003, 22:25:27
Czuch 
Subject: "Time left in game" Question...
When my game page states that there are 15 days left in a game (For example), What does that time include? Ie, Weekends? Holidays? My opponents time to move? Total time before my next turn ends? (This is when it shows my list of opponents turn to move) hanks.
Also, How do I find out an opponents vacation schedule?

24. December 2003, 22:08:42
unbeatableking 
Subject: hi
how can you arrange games for your fellowship team?

24. December 2003, 19:17:13
pattey 
Subject: Re:
Merry christmas.

24. December 2003, 17:27:56
sLaMdAnCe13 
lol

24. December 2003, 17:10:42
sLaMdAnCe13 
lol.

24. December 2003, 11:28:38
harley 
Come and add your birthday to the Birthday Board!! I have just bought a birthday diary that needs filling up with BK birthdays so I will remember to wish you a great birthday/nameday/anniversary etc each year :oD But please write the month in full since a birthday on January 2nd could be wrote 2-1-03 or 1-2-03, depending which country you are in!

Also, please send in questions for BUMBLES interview! I'll be giving you a bit longer to get questions in because its Xmas, but be thinking of what you would like to know about this fine man!

And lastly, MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!!!

24. December 2003, 09:07:15
Bernice 
Subject: Merry Xmas and take care of yourselves.....

24. December 2003, 00:57:29
zenit 
<hehe, I was partially wrong, blade2004 is just another source account, just now 2 games blade2004->joking appeared :)

23. December 2003, 13:24:00
noholdsbarred 
I do have an ego...
Yes I like to win...
and yes I expect to be in the top third of any chess club I join...
But chess is the sort of game where total mismatches are no fun...
BKR within limits tells me where I am...

23. December 2003, 13:20:55
zenit 
noholds: in your case, dont bother about such things then, you are the best kind of a player, like everyone should be, the third one
(or whether he just loves the game and doesnt bother about ratings so he plays the weakest in the chain and is happy) + in addition he bothers about the quality of the game and is happy when he plays a good game

23. December 2003, 13:17:45
noholdsbarred 
Subject: ratings
Apart from the top positions...
Again I ask oes it make any real difference?
Often I will get beaten by a new player who is finding his level...
But a consolidated rating is a useful tool to find my peers... And some very good games are the result..

23. December 2003, 13:01:50
zenit 
Just a side note to those who want to understand how I started to be pissed. Joking stated in some interview during renju WC, he is a "famous free renju player". So he didt behave very modestly how a real champ should. And he forgot to add he is a very good player, but in addition a famous cheater :)

23. December 2003, 12:55:20
zenit 
ughaibu: there is another bad effect, imagine someone is playing with the weakest (regarding to rating) account in that chain, then its rather unfair, because he can be playing a 2400 instead of 1500.
joking is an interesting exception, because usually weak players use this and he is quite good, he would gain top 10 rank using his normal play, just it would take a bit longer time.
But people should learn to be patient rather than cheat :) If a good player who would also belong to top 10 would constantly play against "the weakest in the chain", he would get there much harder. If he would see that player as marked a cheater, he can choose whether he want to challenge the main account of the cheater, whether he doesnt want to play cheaters at all, or whether he just loves the game and doesnt bother about ratings so he plays the weakest in the chain and is happy

23. December 2003, 12:47:57
zenit 
hehe, looks like I like to use the word just (or like :) ) and sorry about this little messages package, didnt want to spam the board, but this is really an important point in brainking features IMHO.

23. December 2003, 12:46:58
noholdsbarred 
Subject: Re:
OK ..
point taken...
People in the top 10 then should be obliged to accept challenges from say the top 20... (like a ladder) then they will have to earn their places or have their BKR capped...

23. December 2003, 12:46:17
ughaibu 
Subject: Noholdsbarred
The same problem existed to an exaggerated extent at Netchess. It did in effect do some harm as one was constantly being paired up with unsuitably weak opponents who had boosted their ratings. If the ratings have no meaning they may as well be done away with altogether.

23. December 2003, 12:44:47
zenit 
now it sounds really cool :) just imagine this feature:
Such players would be just marked as cheaters in database.
Then there would be just as a default filter
Show Cheaters: off

If someone or themselves desperately needs to see them, (s)he can turn it on :)

23. December 2003, 12:40:40
zenit 
NoHold: nice point :) But what if someone gets a bad feeling in result instead. For example, P257 used to see nice #1 in his profile/main page, played lots of games, put lots of effort there, and suddenly there is a #3 instead, with #1 joking and #2 blade2004 :)) Thats why at least invisibility is requested :)))

23. December 2003, 12:35:30
zenit 
Therefore an human observer is needed who can judge such cases whether its cheating or not.
And public can observe, and when someone is suspicious, the case is just forwarded to the responsible person in staff.

23. December 2003, 12:33:38
zenit 
Like I said, as soon as they dont play toghether frequently and clearly letting the other one win, this is no danger. Perhaps they can play at home
together as well :)

About the IP changing I wrote before, like I said, they will never get the feeling they are really great players if they will need to be cautious and always ensure themselves this way how poor they in fact are :-)

23. December 2003, 12:32:10
noholdsbarred 
Subject: Re: Ratings and Cheaters
They only cheat themselves.... It is not illegal since they gain no advantage.

A high BKR earns nothing, no cash and only respect if they can back it up byt beating you.

There are some people who while not going to those lengths nurse their BKR.

Let them... they do no harm and if it makes them feel better .. fine...

23. December 2003, 12:29:48
MadMonkey 
Subject: Re:
The trouble of monitoring things like that is that anyone that knows enough about computers and systems can change IP address's so it is not very easy at all. Fencer has found a few though. Then of course there is also that more than one person in a house could be signed up for BrainKing or they could be using a public computer.

23. December 2003, 12:23:03
ughaibu 
Couldn't a feature be added whereby all accounts stemming from the same source appear parenthetical to any account being viewed?

23. December 2003, 12:20:30
zenit 
Subject: Little Addition
Perhaps someone from the staff should be watching such abuses. Plain multiples arent that bad thing, but if someone uses them to spam boards (sorry Dano) or creating artificial ratings (Joking or someone in chess mentioned earlier), they should be coped with.

As their opponent I would probably resign games with them and add them to my noplay (enemies?) list, perhaps an invisible list would be even better, for such bloody cheaters dont distract me in rating lists :-).

And I am sorry I brought it up so close to Christmas. Merry Christmas to everybody!

23. December 2003, 12:09:45
zenit 
Subject: Ratings and Cheaters
<What do you think about players like joking, who are artificially creating high ratings using multiple accounts? This one is a special case though, because he is also a pretty good player (five in line).
But what he does really [edited] more and more. Just look at it: there were created accounts like renjuplayer, niicegiirll; perhaps others used to collect rating points from various opponents, and transferring rating renjuplayer -> niicegiirll occassionally. Then there were created target accounts like joking and blade2004.
Those pick mostly weaker opponents or opponents tested before and again transfer rating renjuplayer, niicegiirll -> joking, blade2004.
I think their rating should be reset and they should be allowed to gain it by fair play rather.
Of course, this is perhaps thought for a start, perhaps he plans to play strong opponents further and this he only uses to get good starting position.

If you dont believe, just watch their game times when they "played together".
And watch their login times by adding them to friends or looking to database.
As most of the accounts log in pretty close together, its pretty clear to see.
Measures to prevent such cheating behaviour are hard to create...
Perhaps players with same IP address shouldnt be allowed to play together.
Of course IP can be framed, but at least they will see they need to put more effort
into it, and they will never forget they are really cheating.
Or people should report such abuses when they spot it, and warn opponents of such
players they are only helping someone to create rating base.

Such behaviour might cause some players to lose appetite of playing.

Excuse, if I cause some bad atmosphere but I cannot keep it for myself any longer.

23. December 2003, 06:28:46
Bernice 
Subject: 8950:)
have searched the entire membership, all 8950 of us :) for Australians, Kiwis, Poms (all varieties) hehehe and have sent invites to the fellowship for all of us Prisoners and ex-prisoners...If i have missed anybody please just ask to be invited :)
Sorry Harley, I didnt know where to post this :)

23. December 2003, 05:22:50
Bernice 
Subject: thank you
Harley and Ughaibu :)
Harley your idea was good but it doesnt have flags next to names :(

Ughaibu your idea was brilliant
http://brainking.com/game/PlayerList?bms=50&a=ap
and i changed it to
http://brainking.com/game/PlayerList?bms=2500&a=ap

voila.....page 51....thanks so much :)

23. December 2003, 01:33:34
Pedro Martínez 
Subject: Rose
Try www.translator.cz.

Or try me...;-)

22. December 2003, 16:55:01
Stevie 
Bwild has been in the BK wine cellar ;oÞ

22. December 2003, 16:53:26
bwildman 
ooopps...billion dollar baby

22. December 2003, 16:50:01
bwildman 
Subject: Re: Czech to english translation site
"rats in battalions..clogging up the mainstream" ;)

<< <   618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top