 |
|
 BrainKing.comBoard for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future. If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider). World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn. Mode: Everyone can post
<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 29. August 2005, 22:00:24 Subject: Re: Brain points Fencer: I am soooo slooooo 29. August 2005, 21:57:47 Subject: Re: Brain points playBunny: I've always been a Rook,so never gave it much thought. But the wording in the "brains" discription,is a little unclear. 29. August 2005, 21:43:40 Subject: Re: Brain points Fencer: since Knights"qualify for the referral program" why wouldnt they recieve brain points? 29. August 2005, 19:05:59 Subject: Re: Brain points wellywales: it looks like 100....for one year rook 28. August 2005, 20:30:58 Subject: Re: I want 300! Fencer: guess I could draw up a few more id's!!!  28. August 2005, 19:18:37 I wonder.....if someone manages to get themselves removed from this site....and was involved in a prize tourny.....knowing full well that if they win, they'll never be able to use it......wouldnt the sportsman/gentleman just resign? 27. August 2005, 00:58:10 Subject: Re: AbigailII: CRC and grand chess are both great replacements. 7. August 2005, 03:19:49 Subject: Re: naggin.... bumble: LOL...imagine the royalties!!
Floose: how many times did you have to re-type that?? 
great interview! 1. August 2005, 15:29:14 Subject: Re: Jules: good point.Its not the same since Nightstorm left. 1. August 2005, 15:27:56 Subject: Re: ClayNashvilleTn: lets vote on it?
all those in favor of Clay going on and on and on and on and on...say yeah! LOL  1. August 2005, 14:44:16 Subject: Re: ClayNashvilleTn: maybe the 1st step would be to "stop bringing it up"?
1. August 2005, 14:09:20 its called life....some have one.Dont mean that as any kind of insult...but things change in our lives and sometimes so does memberships at BrainKing.Sure...in a perfect world,we'd be able to keep everone...but thats how it is. 1. August 2005, 13:43:47 Subject: on the lighter side.. I think its great that we are seeing so many new members!
Welcome to BrainKing! 1. August 2005, 13:31:20 Subject: Re: ClayNashvilleTn: Fencer could do an "auto-request"after the red reminder stops on their main page.then his data base would record the individuals reason for not renewwing.
1. August 2005, 13:22:14 Subject: Re: ClayNashvilleTn: that is a great idea!!!
how does everyone like their crow? 1. August 2005, 01:30:27 well....that was the only good reason I could think of.
1. August 2005, 01:22:09 if you start a tourny and join it...and your membershp expires....are you stil in? 19. July 2005, 03:08:03 Subject: Re: baddessi: the"take a number"has my wheels turnin!!LOL  17. July 2005, 14:42:51 Subject: Re:UA, PMs and DBs playBunny: 2questions....
1)if they were deleted on another board...what makes it ok for this one? 2)does the UA only apply to some? 17. July 2005, 14:03:52 Subject: Re: Chessmaster1000: I understand your complaint,however,its against the user agreement to post pm's,on public discussion boards. 14. June 2005, 15:40:41 I see alot of new features...but will webtv users ever be able to play sabatoge? 11. June 2005, 13:44:00 Subject: spam messages can we be able to elect to recieve these "group" messages? 7. June 2005, 18:39:59 Subject: Re: Machines and programs making the moves Walter Montego: I played SMURF as well. it was a good game,and SMURF beat me no worse than you have,Walter 6. June 2005, 17:03:47 Subject: Re: harley: some words are worse han others.
the woird you pounced on was borderline at best. this site would not have crashed if you left that post period. its my opinion its your dislike of him that promted you to jump in and put him on hide...which is a secondary moderation tool. 6. June 2005, 16:54:47 the fact that you two dislike each other is exactly my point.in cases like this...a global mod who has personal issues with an individual,should not be allowed to moderate that person.any moderatio is ultimatly considered a personal attack and language is sure to follow. 6. June 2005, 16:43:46 Subject: Re: ClayNashvilleTn: casting the first stone?
you try to keep me from voicing my concern by saying I'm stirring trouble,and should take this conversation to a fellowship where only a few would see my concerns. you highlight one rule. when I wrote the code of honor...BBW changed the wording to allow grey areas.after the code was implemented by Fencer....the mods then voted to bend the code.its a joke. 6. June 2005, 16:14:45 cloak and daggers....lets hide what REALLY goes on around hre,huh? 6. June 2005, 16:13:00 Subject: Re: Andre Faria: it was a review,as I recall...and not one of yours.
my point is...the global mods feel it is their job to ride herd on certain individuals....and to the point of being biased in their opiions and moderating towards these individuals. 6. June 2005, 16:07:24 Subject: Re: BIG BAD WOLF: if BK rules were followed...we would not be having this discussion.(which by the way..Fencer can read and put in input if neccesary)
who determines if a word(used reglarly by 70%of all adults) is to be considered profanity? 6. June 2005, 16:02:14 Subject: Re: ClayNashvilleTn: my experience with f/s that are intended to help make changes keeps me from wasting my time with them.
this is an issue that concerns all members...not just the "click" that joins certain fellowships. 6. June 2005, 15:55:32 more huffing and puffing in my opinion.
how long will it be before every discussion board is anned by global mods? there are rules and regulations for discussion board mods...yet global mods run unchecked. will I be removed as a moderator for posing this issue? 6. June 2005, 15:45:17 Subject: Re: BIG BAD WOLF: that doesnt answer my question.
why then....if you "discussed it" did the one global mod that this person has a bad history with...be selected to take action against this individual? the board history shows the global that 1st took action.That action was biased,and unfair...especially since it was the boards main moderator that that action was used against. are you tryng to tell me that the nitial action taken was 1s discussed by all global mods? or are you merely trying to justify yet another example of biased moderating by global mods. 6. June 2005, 15:26:26 Subject: Re: ClayNashvilleTn: you as well as me...are entitled to opinions.
global mods are important to BrainKing.com....and as such,members need to kow what they can expect of these individuals. Last time I checked...this board is for issues concernig BrainKing.com 6. June 2005, 15:07:09 the reason I ask this...some monthes ago,a member used un appropriate language on the Music board.the word was edited by a global mod.
yet...on the Motor board...instad of using this same procedure...this same global mod hide a user for using a SINGLE word...many do not find offensive. is it coincedence this gobal mod seems to dislike this person? how can global mods be "unbiased" if thy allow their personal feelings color thier moderation? if a global mod has issues with an individual...shouldnt they refrain from any moderation of a particular individual...and let an UNBIASED moderator do the RIGHT thing? 6. June 2005, 14:53:24 what is the use in having global moderators,if they weild justuce unfairly? 4. June 2005, 13:54:10 cloak is a perfect name....now all we need is daggers 29. January 2005, 17:10:26 Subject: Re: Maxxina: so that could be 7 or 9 depending on where it timed out in the week...thanks 27. January 2005, 20:11:12 Subject: Re: Big Bad Wolf Fencer: did you use a spreadsheet? 27. January 2005, 20:00:03 Subject: Re: Big Bad Wolf Fencer: I really didnt want to use my Czech board....but now its open.
Does this mean there will no longer be 2 fellowship discussion boards? 27. January 2005, 03:25:51 Subject: Re: Re: mrloupcity: LOL...multi-national hello/goodbye 27. January 2005, 00:48:37 Subject: Re: Re: Fiona: ummmmmm...to better see you with?
LOL...there great arent they? 17. January 2005, 23:04:32 Subject: Re: Re: Brian1971: LOL...seems it has to do with computers....I think! << < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> |
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
|
|
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved. Back to the top |