BrainKing - Discussion boards (BrainKing.com)

Subject: Public friends

What is the difference between that and regular friends and how do you put people on it?

15. October 2016, 15:09:51

Gabriel Almeida

Subject: Re: Smileys

Mélusine: Now you had! :)

14. October 2016, 12:02:02

Subject: Re: Smileys

Mélusine:

14. October 2016, 11:39:16

Mélusine

Subject: Smileys

I love these smileys :

but no opportunity to put them !

13. October 2016, 17:48:58

hirilego

show this user posts | link

nice

15. September 2016, 11:09:29

Subject: Re: Smileys

MadMonkey:

I love these smileys.

15. September 2016, 11:08:54

Subject: Re: Smileys

Aganju: Thank you for that information.

15. September 2016, 01:32:30

MadMonkey

Subject: Re: Smileys

crosseyed: Happy Days

15. September 2016, 00:49:42

Subject: Re: Smileys

crosseyed: I guess it was your local cache or cache server or the ISP's cache server. Sometimes CTRL+F5 helps (but sometimes not). For me, it was always ok.

14. September 2016, 23:02:57

Subject: Re: Smileys

Modified by crosseyed_uk (14. September 2016, 23:49:34)

MadMonkey: If that is the clapping hands I can't see them lol. I can a see three pink somethings that I can't tell what they are.
Wow guess what it has come back to normal now. I can see the three clapping hands now. There were several other square boxes that I could see what they were.
No I have not been drinking, I don't drink alcohol.

14. September 2016, 20:05:38

MadMonkey

Subject: Re: Smileys

crosseyed: Seems ok, well the clapping hands are here

Can't see any gaps, but then inormally only use the same few all the time

14. September 2016, 18:13:47

Subject: Smileys

Modified by crosseyed_uk (14. September 2016, 18:14:53)

What has happened to the smileys? Some are missing eg the fast clapping hands on row 6. Some I can't see what they are.

4. August 2016, 01:10:55

Subject: Re: Is there a nasty bug in the evaluation of multi-game matches?

Modified by Aganju (4. August 2016, 01:11:08)

happyjuggler0: good point! I didn't even know there is a 'trash' there... yes, it was in there. It says:

Game ID: 7461994
Doris is the winner.

Doris: old BKR = 2100, new BKR = 2109 (+9)
Aganju: old BKR = 2049, new BKR = 2038 (-11)

But as Carpe Diem predicted, the names are switched - I checked her stats, and she was not anywhere near the 2100 in the last week (and I was not anywhere near 2050).

So, thanks all, everything is good, just the names switched.

4. August 2016, 00:54:29

happyjuggler0

Subject: Re: Is there a nasty bug in the evaluation of multi-game matches?

Aganju: You can check your "trash" on the events page to see if your message might be there. I am curious to see what actually happened.

3. August 2016, 23:28:31

Subject: Re: Is there a nasty bug in the evaluation of multi-game matches?

Carpe Diem: I know that display error, but that was under different circumstances (I think when you tie or so). of course it could be the same effect here. Unfortunately, I tossed the event message; I'll check the next time.

3. August 2016, 22:54:38

Carpe Diem

Subject: Re: Is there a nasty bug in the evaluation of multi-game matches?

Modified by Carpe Diem (3. August 2016, 22:58:51)

Aganju: I think what you'll find is that although it claims that you lost and shows rating points going down for you, if you look closer you'll find that the names don't match the rating points, and that your points actually go up.

So it works something like this. Let's say you and I played, and you won the match but I won the last game. Let's also say your rating was 2100 and mine was 1900 before the game. It will say something like Carpe Diem won, 2100 (+13), and Aganju lost 1900 (-11). I actually lost the 11 I should have, and you gained the 13, it just gives the wrong names in the message.

This bug's been there since I started playing here. It's simply a display error, not a problem with rating points.

3. August 2016, 21:11:38

Subject: Is there a nasty bug in the evaluation of multi-game matches?

Modified by Aganju (3. August 2016, 21:15:09)

I think I found a nasty bug in the evaluation of matches that are set up for a fixed amount of games.
Here is a match that was for 5 games, and I won it 3:2: Fevga (Aganju vs. Doris)
However, the fifth/last game of the match went to my opponent (so I lead 3:1, and then it ended 3:2 - still a win for me).
The event message I got, however, declared that *I lost*, and deducted some points from my rating (and gave rating points to my opponent).

I would guess that the code uses the result from the last game for its decisions, as - typically - the winner of the last game is the winner of the match - but not for this type of match.

Did anybody experience this too?

31. July 2016, 19:33:42

Subject: Re:

DeaD man WalkiN: Glad to see you back..:}

31. July 2016, 19:21:57

DeaD man WalkiN

Yea, after 8 days waiting on cable. We have everything back on and in the NEW house. And the move only 5 blocks...

16. July 2016, 13:55:43

Subject: Re: Slow site.

Doris:

16. July 2016, 02:51:08

Subject: Re: Slow site.

crosseyed: Wonderful! I know you must be relieved that it wasn't something more serious.

15. July 2016, 19:19:39

Subject: Re: Slow site.

Modified by crosseyed_uk (15. July 2016, 19:44:55)

Doris: I have just gone back to my old computer and since doing so the speed it back to normal. Long may it last. It must have been my internet provider.

14. July 2016, 12:10:42

Subject: Re: Slow site.

Modified by crosseyed_uk (14. July 2016, 17:56:02)

ellieoop: Okay thanks. I have download Chrome now and it still very slow.

14. July 2016, 12:09:13

Subject: Re: Slow site.

Doris: Thanks. I have set up a new computer and it is still slow. However I might have to blame my internet provider as it has been slow when I am in some other sites.

14. July 2016, 05:24:48

ellieoop

Subject: Re: Slow site.

crosseyed: try the chrome browser. it's usually the fastest browser.

14. July 2016, 05:09:18

Subject: Re: Slow site.

crosseyed: Hope you get it figured out. I know it can get frustrating at times.

14. July 2016, 00:39:26

Carpe Diem

show this user posts | link

"it's perfectly fine here, all the time."

Same for me.

13. July 2016, 19:50:58

moistfinger

Subject: Re: Slow site.

Aganju: Fast on all platforms.

13. July 2016, 19:34:23

Subject: Re: Slow site.

crosseyed: it's perfectly fine here, all the time.

13. July 2016, 17:13:17

Subject: Re: Slow site.

Modified by crosseyed_uk (13. July 2016, 17:23:11)

Doris: Okay I have just set up another computer and see if things go faster.
It is still slow and I keep getting the white pages for a few minutes.

13. July 2016, 16:17:24

Subject: Re: Slow site.

crosseyed: Not slow for me.

13. July 2016, 14:02:42

Subject: Re: Slow site.

beach: It has been like this for some time with me. I have no problems in the other game sites I play in. It is not my internet provider.

13. July 2016, 13:58:36

beach

Subject: Re: Slow site.

crosseyed : this morning I find it slow, but I am finding that all sites I am on are slow

13. July 2016, 12:14:22

Subject: Slow site.

Is anyone else having problems with this site being slow? I have used Firefox and Internet Explorer and in both browsers it is very slow playing in this site.

25. June 2016, 02:26:38

rod03801

Subject: Re: Should brainking.com leave or stay on the internet?

SL-Mark: AHH I get it. I'm slow sometimes.

24. June 2016, 21:03:08

SL-Mark

Subject: Re: Should brainking.com leave or stay on the internet?

I believe it was a proposal for an alternative referendum to Brexit.
However one is a democracy whilst the other is an autocracy. Which is which is your guess!

24. June 2016, 19:23:55

rod03801

Subject: Re: Should brainking.com leave or stay on the internet?

ketchuplover: Why would you care if it stays or leaves? If you DO care, the easiest is for yourself to stay or leave. No?

24. June 2016, 18:57:15

Gabriel Almeida

Subject: Re: Should brainking.com leave or stay on the internet?

Aganju: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cLQJVKP3YlM

24. June 2016, 15:26:18

Subject: Re: Should brainking.com leave or stay on the internet?

ThunderGr: i guess he was kidding.

24. June 2016, 15:23:11

ThunderGr

Subject: Re: Should brainking.com leave or stay on the internet?

ketchuplover: The fate of one's possessions is not decided by public vote but by the will of the owner. Asking for a public vote for brainking.com to leave the internet is like me asking for a public vote for your PC to leave the physical World.

So, some people have to learn to recognize their limits and the rights of others, in my opinion.

24. June 2016, 14:28:18

Subject: Re: Should brainking.com leave or stay on the internet?

ketchuplover: You've got to be kidding...definitely STAY!

24. June 2016, 13:43:55

ketchuplover

Subject: Should brainking.com leave or stay on the internet?

I vote LEAVE

15. June 2016, 20:18:12

Hrqls

Subject: Re: 10 years +

chessik: congrats! :-)

15. June 2016, 19:13:57

chessik

Subject: 10 years +

random 4liner open

31. May 2016, 19:03:44

Subject: Re: bug

badgerboy78: no such bug here. Try to clear your cache.

31. May 2016, 17:55:00

badgerboy78

Subject: bug

I wish the "missing dice number " bug would be fixed. It's been four days now

25. May 2016, 10:04:21

Hrqls

people .. please be nice .. i am glad you are stopping this discussion .. if you want to continue it anyway, please do it in private

25. May 2016, 01:32:25

show this user posts | link

Good.

24. May 2016, 23:15:50

Subject: Re:

Modified by crosseyed_uk (24. May 2016, 23:40:34)

Bernice: You made an assumption by stating " it was nearly sold but Flip wanted way too much money." Surely the price would have been mentioned long before it was "nearly" sold? So how do you know that Flip wanted way too much money? Someone must have told you?

24. May 2016, 23:01:58