User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator:  Hrqls , , rod03801

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer the question whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   > >>
29. December 2014, 17:30:00
Subject: Re: Strange tournament bug
rod03801: I looked at the running tournament list, and it is indeed on there twice. (I only purposefully created one of them). I have NO idea how I'd be on it twice though, because the only link I used was on the Tournaments discussion board.

Wait. I take that back. I MIGHT have used a link from a message I got when the tournament started, and maybe one of the times, it was the one for the mystery 2nd one.
No big deal I guess. Other than I did not create 2. Maybe it had something to do with using the template I had saved?

29. December 2014, 16:42:23
Subject: Re: Strange tournament bug
beach: I don't know. I know I only signed up on one link, and I personally seem to be in 2 tournaments on some of the games. (Definitely not all of them!).

EDIT : I just checked my own list, and for me, it's only 3 of the games that seemed to "Double up". Dice Chess, Dice Chess 10x10 and Frog Finder.
I don't know how many others had this happen. (Obviously at least in these 3 listed).


29. December 2014, 14:48:33
Subject: Strange tournament bug
I created a single elimination tournament that was set to begin Dec 26. It allowed for 2 extra days before being deleted. For some reason, it seems to have created "double" tournaments in some of the games. For example, Frog Finder. There is one version that has 4 people. Then there seems to be another version that has 5 people. When you go to it's main tournament page, where it lists all of the games of the tournament, it is only listed once of course, and if you click on it, you see the version with 4 people. (Not the "extra" one with 5 people)
BAH HUMBUG!! #3 is the 4 person one
BAH HUMBUG!! #3 is the 5 person one.

EDIT : Oh, it seems to have created at least 2 tournaments with the same name, but different tournament #'s of course
BAH HUMBUG!! #3 (#46532)
BAH HUMBUG!! #3 (#46491)

28. November 2014, 15:44:43
Subject: Re: yeah!
Modified by rod03801 (28. November 2014, 15:51:28)
speachless: S-B has nothing to do with ratings. I may not be wording it quite right, but it is based on the points of each person's opponent's whom they won against.

I know what I mean...

But yes, those are obviously wrong, in that tournament.

Here is an example of a correct one : Championship world BK 2013
If you scroll down to section 3 of round 1. It was a section that needed the S-B. It correctly made Schoffi the winner. He beat players 3, 4 & 5. Their points added up to 6. Whereas eefke (who tied him in points) beat players 1, 3 & 5. Their points only added up to 4.
Nothing to do with either person's BKR.

25. November 2014, 05:48:13
Subject: Re: back to brainking
Modified by rod03801 (25. November 2014, 05:48:29)
mal4inara: I hear you. I've been participating in this same debate for years now. Unfortunately, some people won't accept the reality of a turn based game site, and will attack people who don't play the way they would like. It's just the reality of it. It is really better to just let it pass, because some won't accept that its on them TOO for joining games that don't meet the ideal time constraints.
And I don't mean anyone who is participating in THIS current, civil, conversation.

25. November 2014, 05:09:26
Subject: Re: back to brainking
mal4inara: Please don't take offense. Gabriel Almeida is a good guy, and I am sure he really didn't mean to offend you.

I don't take offense by the comments. My response would really be the same as yours. I play in order of time out. If a tourney has crazy long time constraints, then they do take longer with me. As with you, if anyone looks at my profile, they would see I've BARELY touched MY vacation time too.

I've stopped joining new tournies, (unless they realllllly interest me), in an effort to get my number of games down enough to the point that I can hopefully make a move in every game, every day.

Like you, it is NOT my plan to hold things up, but I have seemingly done so. I don't join tournies with long time constraints anymore. I am also more than happy to concentrate on the older tournies, but it isn't always possible.

My main point is that I hope you won't be offended. There may be SOME people who purposefully hold things up, but I know it's not me, and I'm sure it's not you either.

I don't want to be in long, never ending tournies either. That's why I only join ones with VERY short time constraints, to FORCE me to keep up. As my # of games get down further, it will be less of an issue anyway.

27. September 2014, 00:06:24
Subject: Re:
Bernice: That's how it works. This is the "public" friends list. It is different than your regular friends list. This is a list where you are publicly showing you are friends. Anyone who clicked on your profile would see that he was a public friend. If you want to add Hrqls to your public friends list, you would first have to have him on your regular friends list. Then, next to his name, you would see a tiny lock. If you click that lock, it would send Hrqls a request. If he approves it, then he would be shown on your public friends list, on your profile.

21. August 2014, 15:59:40
The inappropriate spam was taken care of, and banned.

14. August 2014, 21:00:20
Subject: Re:
El Cid: It seems to be pretty routine at other sites though. For example GT definitely does it. I'm not sure it would need to be once an hour. Heck, once a day would be plenty and would help move tournaments along. Even not THAT often, would be an improvement.

14. August 2014, 00:34:54
Subject: Re:
BGBedlam: THe game isn't ended early. THe BKR would be figured as always. It's the tourney being moved to the next round or ended, etc, when it is mathematically known.

14. August 2014, 00:30:10
Subject: Re:
happyjuggler0: That is a MUCH needed feature.

13. August 2014, 14:40:00
Subject: Re:
Vikings: Yes. That was my concern when the stairs were created. Too many draws, due to 2 game matches. Thats why I like the "Very Fast" stairs. Those are just one game. I understand the reasoning on the other ones, due to games that one color has an advantage. Probably there is a better solution though.

13. August 2014, 03:48:36
Subject: Re:
Marshmud: I haven't experienced it either. But I don't use fischer that much here. Our user created tournaments are awesome.

I personally hated IYT's ladder system. But I ended up hating about everything about IYT. (And that was my full time game site before I discovered Brainking. I was obsessed with IYT. I bought all their merchandise too lol)
I think ours is decent. But seems to have lost interest. At least none of the ladders I'm in here are as active as they used to be. Err. I mean stairs. LOL...

13. August 2014, 03:37:42
Subject: Re:
Marshmud: Oh, no, all tournaments are site made or Club made. (some automatic, some wiki-based) Definitely not like here. I was only mentioning the similar time control opportunity

13. August 2014, 01:33:59
Subject: Re:
Marshmud: Goldtoken uses SOMETHING like it. Not exactly the same. Not as good probably. But it's something to help some games from "going on forever" for those who want that. I haven't used it much over there, so maybe it's more similar than I think. They also have tournaments with a "total length" too. (Their "Olympics" for example)

11. August 2014, 04:26:38
Subject: Re: time controls

13. June 2014, 22:44:38
Modified by rod03801 (13. June 2014, 22:45:24)
Let's please refrain from name calling.
He has definitely gone on and on about this stuff, and "quit" the site several years ago when he was asked to stop spamming discussion boards with the SAME rants over and over again. Then he came back under another name, and proceeded to do the same thing, and was given the same request. You may recognize another name that has more recently given the same complaints as this name. (Unless his posts were removed, I don't recall now) I have sent him a PM and reminded him that he has been given plenty of notice about "spamming" and it won't be tolerated this time either. (Not that he has done exactly that yet)

We should all remember, as Roberto said, that this sort of issue will always come up with turn based sites. It is just a "fact of life" that we all have to deal with different playing styles/habits.
For some reason, this person has never quite gotten over the fact that this is NOT real time and over the board playing.

6. June 2014, 14:44:11
Subject: Re: Freeloaders?
JerNYC: That was a pretty "snooty" post coming from someone complaining of a "snooty" membership base.
And sorry, but EVERY turn based site has people complaining of "the slower players". Even at the sites you list.

I, along with most of the paid membership base, certainly do appreciate the free players as well. It's only common sense that the base of available opponents would be pretty small if only paid members could play here.

17. May 2014, 04:04:06
Subject: Re: mixed games in round robin tournament
Aganju: I think it's a "bug".. but it's a bug i personally like.

17. May 2014, 03:34:37
Subject: Re: mixed games in round robin tournament
Marshmud: Maybe it's different for team tournaments. I'm not a programmer, by any stretch of the imagination. But I have noticed it only recently, in another regular random tournament I'm in. Not Team. And I'm POSITIVE, it wasn't that way before

17. May 2014, 03:30:25
Subject: Re: mixed games in round robin tournament
Marshmud: I think it is something that recently changed. Because I don't ever remember playing 2 different games with the same player in a random tournament, and I think it is tied to "random position for each game" as Aganju says.

I love the random tournaments and have played a lot. This "phenomenon" is something I have only recently noticed.

20. February 2014, 03:46:04
Subject: Re: Friends of Barb Peterson
Bernice: Is that pbarb2? great GREAT lady. I've wondered what became of her, if it was her. Sweet person.

18. February 2014, 20:33:04
Subject: Re:
Modified by rod03801 (18. February 2014, 20:33:57)
KasperNymand: Hmm. That's interesting. Of course I've been a rook for over 10 years lol. And I do always see bishops IN fellowships. (But that is possibly because they were already in there when they had a higher membership, and may not be able to actually participate) Someone else may have to confirm if I have given you incorrect information. If so, I apologize.

Have you tried actually joining? (Instead of just viewing)

18. February 2014, 20:18:48
Subject: Re:I just submitted again
The Col: I just wrote to him on your behalf, and mentioned it in Glob fellowship. We will see.

18. February 2014, 16:33:43
Subject: Re:
KasperNymand: Yes

29. January 2014, 16:33:13
Subject: Re: stairs
Modified by rod03801 (29. January 2014, 16:34:23)
winterangels: Your subject says "Stairs", yet you talk about being kicked out of a Tournament. So, I'm not sure what your issue is exactly. On your profile, I see you are indeed in one set of stairs, and were not kicked out. As a Pawn, you are only allowed in one set of Stairs. So that seems to be fine.

You currently have 19 games going. As a pawn, your limit is 20. To join a tournament, as a pawn, you DO have to have a certain number of free slots. I honestly don't remember how many that is. (4 or 5? I would imagine if it's "Single Elimination" that one slot would be fine) But I bet someone else does recall the exact requirement, and will say so. If you do not have enough slots, you will indeed not be allowed to start the tournament.

15. January 2014, 15:59:42
Subject: Re: game
winterangels: Someone might be able to help if you say which game it is. Your Finished Games tab in your profile only shows one game ending last night, and that was anti-reversi, and you actually did not win that game.

10. January 2014, 03:47:20
Subject: Re: automove ...
Modified by rod03801 (10. January 2014, 03:47:44)
JerNYC: "Uh yeah". I am simply pointing out that it is NOT a forced loss. (as you said it was) And that is still the appropriate board for it. Thanks.

10. January 2014, 01:03:22
Subject: Re: automove ...
Modified by rod03801 (10. January 2014, 01:05:02)
JerNYC: It isn't the best situation to get out of, but it is NOT a forced loss. I've won in that position before.

And the Frog Finder discussion board would be a bit better for this. If you go there you will see it has actually been discussed many times.

5. January 2014, 01:15:27
Subject: Re:
Modified by rod03801 (5. January 2014, 01:16:34)
MadMonkey: That can't be completely true. AD posted a video on the Music board shortly after your original post here.

The last time I tried adding a video to my profile, I couldn't get it to work too.

EDIT : Oops. Well your post I was responding to, disappeared before I finished typing this.
(The one where you said neither old nor new work at all anymore)

4. January 2014, 23:13:40
Subject: Re: egg
winterangels: It was a limited time offer. It is around this time that it always ends.

21. December 2013, 01:51:27
Subject: Re: My opponent just rolled a 1-9 (in Backgammon)
Artful Dodger:

8. December 2013, 20:07:01
Subject: COLORS
Modified by rod03801 (8. December 2013, 20:10:41)
In case you haven't notice, the codes for discounts are now active.

EDIT : Hmm.. well, I saw the lightbulb for a minute. But now I don't? Maybe they aren't yet? When I go to my shopping cart, it does say purple code right now though.

24. November 2013, 01:18:49
Subject: Re: Winter scene.
Artful Dodger: Lol, she's in UK, she is heading into winter like us. Well unless she moved lol.

16. November 2013, 19:25:22
Subject: Re:
DeaD man WalkiN: As Fencer suggested, you really should do a malware etc scan.

14. August 2013, 05:14:20
Subject: Re: Ludo. Or that group game you suggested a while back. I think that would be fun.

19. July 2013, 19:15:03
Subject: Re: This site's current estimated worth is...
Pedro Martínez: Funny. You can Google : "What is worth?" and you find figures that are quite different from each other. Wonder who determines which is "correct".

21. June 2013, 17:49:25
Subject: Re:
furbster: Taken care of.

2. June 2013, 01:17:47
Subject: Re: Brain distribution in knockout tournaments
Aganju: Yes, here is the thread.

14. April 2013, 03:09:53
Subject: Re:
chessmate.home: An account can't be deleted, as there are games attached to the account, of course. (and all games can be looked back at, etc.). The best thing to do is just make the new account and stop using this one.

21. February 2013, 00:41:30
Subject: Re: Longest match
Roberto Silva: He means it wasn't even a readily available option. Who ever created the match "went around" things to create a match that long.

*I think thats what he meant anyway.

28. December 2012, 01:54:32
Subject: Re: Vacation
Carpe Diem: Without looking, I'm not even sure the help area has the correct answer. Fencer changed the vacation system, um, a year ago maybe? Or maybe longer. Time flies. Vacation time is now used hourly. So when your games get to the "time out" time, you aren't using a whole day. You could come online an hour after one of your games would have timed out, and see you have 34 days 23 hours of vacation left.

Now, as far the more technical aspects, I'm not positive of the smaller details of it. But yes, right now you actually have more than enough vacation time, because on Jan 1st, everyone's vacation time refills to whatever their membership entitles them to.

12. December 2012, 01:17:45
Subject: Re: Bonus conquerer
Carpe Diem: Yes

11. December 2012, 02:11:41
Subject: Re:
Chimera: I sent you a message. Your code wasn't quite right. Try pasting the code from my message into your profile.

3. November 2012, 01:49:43
Subject: Re: Settings help?
likewowman2cool: That's the one I was kind of thinking might help him a little, too.

I'm STILL hanging on to hope that someday one more option will be added.
Move and Go to next flagged game

Where you can flag certain games. Prize tournament games might be something one might like to flag, for that option. Or if you have a lot of games, and you know of people who would like you to move fast with them, you could flag that game.

I can think of a few other good applications for that feature!

2. November 2012, 20:35:10
Subject: Re: Settings help?
Modified by rod03801 (2. November 2012, 20:36:23)
Carpe Diem: Have you checked out the options on the first page of your settings? I mean the part where you can choose which options are in the menu when you "Submit move and .... "

I swore there was an option in that list that might be appropriate for what you are asking. Maybe I'm wrong.

EDIT : Eh, I looked, I guess not. But there are some good options there if you haven't seen them.

24. August 2012, 20:31:23
Subject: Re:
Iamon lyme:
From the FAQ's :
3.1.2) I play a game with no time control and my opponent stopped moving, so it seems that the game will never finish. What can I do now?

If it is really clear that your opponent will not play the game anymore (for instance, he stopped logging in BrainKing 2 months ago), please send a message to the administrators and the game will be deleted. However, it is recommended to think twice before accepting a game invitation with no time limit and that's why a warning in bold red letters is displayed at the game invitation page, so you always play such a game at your own risk.

16. July 2012, 00:54:18
Subject: Re: Email
Rabbits2: CHeck now. Admin checks all changes. I just accepted your change.

8. June 2012, 21:03:32
Subject: Re: plakoto
speachless: As someone else said, I think this is something new. As though the image recently disappeared. I haven't noticed it up until now. But I know I'll be looking more carefully on my few current plakato games.

It is being discussed further on the Backgammon discussion board.

2. June 2012, 01:17:16
Subject: Re: 10,000 move achievement
Papounet: These are of course 2 completely different things. And numbers.

Yes, the 10,000 one is indeed in one day. (Server time - which is of course important)

The other is 100,000 - and that is in general, over time.

I think there was some confusion, earlier in the thread between these 2.
You pointed it out nicely.

<< <   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2015 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top