User Name: Password:
New User Registration
Moderator: Hrqls , coan.net , rod03801 
 BrainKing.com

Board for everybody who is interested in BrainKing itself, its structure, features and future.

If you experience connection or speed problems with BrainKing, please visit Host Tracker and check "BrainKing.com" accessibility from various sites around the world. It may answer whether an issue is caused by BrainKing itself or your local network (or ISP provider).

World Of Chess And Variants (videos from BrainKing): YouTube
Chess blog: LookIntoChess.com


Messages per page:
List of discussion boards
You are not allowed to post messages to this board. Minimum level of membership required for posting on this board is Brain Pawn.
Mode: Everyone can post
Search in posts:  

<< <   386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395   > >>
2. October 2005, 09:02:57
Eriisa 
Subject: Re: Brainking payment
naughtypawn: Rhi is correct, but I wanted to add that in March you will need to renew manually. Renewal is not automatic.

2. October 2005, 02:20:50
rhiannon 
Subject: Re: Brainking payment
naughtypawn: You're a rook until March next year. You don't have to do anything more.

2. October 2005, 02:04:47
inpassant 
Subject: Brainking payment
I have a question: I made a payment to be a Brain Rook. Do I have to go to the subscription page and do it again or the periods are renewed automatically?

1. October 2005, 21:39:23
coan.net 
Subject: Re: ratings?
Nothingness: It is still 4 games. But remember that the 4 games have to be rated games -AND- last more then 4 moves. Otherwise unrated games & games with less then 4 moves will not count toward the ratings.

1. October 2005, 21:36:57
Nothingness 
Subject: ratings?
I was noticing that you have to play more than 4 gmaes now to get a provisional rating. How many games are required now?

1. October 2005, 10:02:01
harley 
I hardly think this is the board to discuss scrabble! It isn't a feature of brainking.

1. October 2005, 04:03:16
chupacabraVS2 
oh god not another ranter,dont people have anything more constructive to do?

1. October 2005, 03:04:09
nobleheart 
if you follow the conversation,we were talking about scrabble.
did u have anything relevant to add? or just pointless baiting?lol

1. October 2005, 02:56:19
nobleheart 
also re:
http://www.isc.ro/

it is user friendly for many languages & has many scrabble dictionaries in many languages.

1. October 2005, 02:53:16
nobleheart 
mac I dont know,but it is a great site..many features...great players

1. October 2005, 02:23:57
plaintiger 
Subject: Re:
Modified by plaintiger (1. October 2005, 02:24:36)
nobleheart: i don't know...a command-line interface is pretty 1980's. and it appears to rely on a software install. will that Java thingy run on a Mac?

1. October 2005, 02:20:57
plaintiger 
Subject: Re: which is the Archbishop and which is the Chancellor?
Pythagoras: beauty is in the eye of the beholder. i like them - especially the crossed-swords one. that, to me, is a symbol just *begging* to be made into some funky auxiliary chess piece. :)

1. October 2005, 01:19:07
nobleheart 
Subject: Re:
plaintiger: I miss e-scrabble..the BEST scrabble site,BEST features is unquestionably:

http://www.isc.ro/
you have to get familiar with the command syntax:
http://www.isc.ro/en/help/commands.html
but it really not hard.

30. September 2005, 12:50:07
harley 
LOL I just went to get the link for that board!

http://brainking.com/en/Board?bc=45

30. September 2005, 12:49:40
Fencer 
Please, this discussion belongs to the Chess Variants (10x8) board.

30. September 2005, 12:45:52
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re: which is the Archbishop and which is the Chancellor?
SMIRF Engine:
Unterstandable yes, beautiful no........

30. September 2005, 12:43:42
SMIRF Engine 
Subject: Re: which is the Archbishop and which is the Chancellor?
Pythagoras: ... and I have invested so much time to find intuitively unterstandable new symbols ...

30. September 2005, 12:05:48
Chicago Bulls 
Subject: Re: which is the Archbishop and which is the Chancellor?
SMIRF Engine:
Aaaaa no, the _only_ thing i don't like about Smirf is its Archbishop and Chancellor pieces.....

30. September 2005, 07:43:32
SMIRF Engine 
Subject: Re: which is the Archbishop and which is the Chancellor?
Kipling: Well, I recommend symbols like those I have invented myself. You could have a look on them at the right side at http://www.chessbox.de/Compu/schachveri1_e.html

30. September 2005, 03:14:14
Walter Montego 
Subject: Re: which is the Archbishop and which is the Chancellor?
plaintiger: On this site the icon that represents the Chancellor is the one that has the horse's head on top of the upside down Rook's top. The Archbishop is the icon that has the strange fill up the square tassled thing. These icons are also used to represent the Cardinal and Marshall of Grand Chess. Though the pieces have different names, they move the same way. Henry Bird made up the modern version of these 8 X 10 games circa 1874. He named the two pieces Guard and Equerry. I'm not sure if Capablanca had firmed up the names to his version of Bird's Chess around 1920, which is called Capablanca Chess. It's identical to Bird's Chess except the Bishops and Guard/Chancellor and Equerry/Archbishop are in different places. Grand Chess was made up in 1972. It uses the same pieces, but has a 10 X 10 board and some different rules.

Guard = Marshall = Chancellor = (Rook+Knight)
Equerry = Cardinal = Archbishop = Janus = (Bishop+Knight)

You have a point in the rules not clearly saying which icon represent which piece. Perhaps a little diagram added to the CRC rules description would clarify it for new players. Janus Chess has its own icon. As for Capablanca Random Chess, I'm not sure why it uses those icons since the inventor of it has his own icons. Perhaps it is easier for Fencer to use the old ones. Fencer still has the notation using A and C in Grand Chess. He said he was going to change them to C and M so that they would fit the game.

30. September 2005, 03:03:18
plaintiger 
Subject: Re: which is the Archbishop and which is the Chancellor?
Modified by plaintiger (30. September 2005, 03:03:37)
Kipling: that does indeed help *me*. thank you. :)

but it doesn't fix the problem to which i referred: that information needs to be presented in the rules for the game, so new players don't have to hunt it down elsewhere.

30. September 2005, 03:01:28
Bwild 
Subject: Re: which is the Archbishop and which is the Chancellor?
plaintiger: The Archbishop looks like a bishop and the Chancelor looks like a knight.
I hope that helps.

30. September 2005, 02:59:32
plaintiger 
Subject: Re:
Modified by plaintiger (30. September 2005, 03:01:59)
nobleheart: don't quote me on this, but i think you can put just about any old game online as long as you don't use any trademarked or copyrighted terms to refer to it. like battleboats: if Fencer called it "Battleship", he would have been served with a cease-and-desist order by now, and had to remove it from the site - if he didn't have to take the whole site down as a result. but because he didn't call it "Battleship," it is (as far as i know) fully legal. bugcafe.net refers to their word game that bears an uncanny resemblance to Scrabble as "bugwords" and they continue to chug along fine, while e-scrabble.com met with a rather different fate...and a damn shame, too, because e-scrabble.com was the best form of that game ever available online.

i think if you never refer to a game by its trademarked name or any other protected reference, and maybe if you change one minor rule or two just a little to be on the safe side, you should be alright. but i'm no lawyer...

30. September 2005, 02:49:03
plaintiger 
Subject: which is the Archbishop and which is the Chancellor?
i was just reading the rules for Capblanca Thingamajiggy Chess and they say the Archbishop and Chancellor have been added to the usual lineup of chess pieces, but they don't say which of the two new pieces is the Archbishop and which is the Chancellor.

they should say this. the rules for one game shouldn't presuppose knowledge of the rules of some other game (least of all a game that's no longer available on brainking).

thanks. :)

30. September 2005, 00:03:25
nobleheart 
upwords love that too..but I bet hasbro wont allow it anywhere online

29. September 2005, 23:56:06
alanback 
Subject: BKR - Nackgammon
Modified by alanback (30. September 2005, 00:10:23)
In the midst of all this turmoil, I have achieved an adjusted all-time high in my personal Nackgammon BKR (i.e., highest on my current BK ratings chart). This is not an all-time high in adjusted ratings, however, as nstre apparently rated 2036 after his first game (compared to my current 2033 after 375 games).

29. September 2005, 23:53:53
Carl 
Subject: Re:
alanback: Hm upwords perhaps?

29. September 2005, 23:52:43
alanback 
Subject: Re:Hm, Scrabble variant perhaps? ;-)
nobleheart: Just a totally unfair dig at furbster's spelling :-)

29. September 2005, 23:41:56
nobleheart 
Subject: Re:Hm, Scrabble variant perhaps? ;-)
alanback: alan,can I ask,what was that about?I love scrabble?
this is a cool unique word game:
http://www.littlegolem.net/jsp/games/gamedetail.jsp?gtid=gwg

29. September 2005, 22:36:41
furbster 
Subject: Re:
furbster: Shh i was in a rush when i typed that lol, my fingers move faster than my brain. WAIT! does my brain move? :-?

29. September 2005, 22:35:27
harley 
Absolutely last call for questions for REZA's interview! If you have any please send them me in the next 24 hours because I'll be putting all the questions togethe rtomorrow ready for sending to reza. If you have anything to ask him, don't miss out!

29. September 2005, 18:23:22
alanback 
Subject: Re:
furbster: Hm, Scrabble variant perhaps? ;-)

29. September 2005, 18:11:36
furbster 
Yeh more vairents of other games, would be cool, especially as i'm not much of a chess player hehe!

29. September 2005, 14:27:41
Fencer 
Subject: Re:
pauloaguia: That was a guess only.

29. September 2005, 12:10:25
pauloaguia 
Subject: Re:
Fencer: still 40 or more chess variants? I hope some other game variants show up before those 40, especially original variants.
Chess is starting to take over.

But at this rate, the 100 game barrier will be broken sometime early next year. Then my dream of being rated in all of them will finally be impossible, and I'll stop worrying about that

29. September 2005, 04:17:45
sUbLiMe13 
yUp

29. September 2005, 03:57:21
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
Gotta piccie?? LOL

29. September 2005, 01:40:54
sUbLiMe13 
sLaM hAs MohAWk nOw.

29. September 2005, 01:40:00
ScarletRose 
Subject: Re:
sUbLiMe: Awww how can anyone not forgive a cute face like that.. awwwww

Hey Slammerz!

29. September 2005, 01:19:51
sUbLiMe13 
yOm KiPpUr iZ nEXt MoNth.
MaYbe iF i rEpEnT 4 My sIn 'gAiNst bK, i WiLL Be pErMiTted By 'LoRe bACk iNTo tHa pRoMiSed LaNd.

29. September 2005, 01:17:18
sUbLiMe13 
lol....nOw

29. September 2005, 01:17:06
sUbLiMe13 
Am gOOd sLaM nOPw.

29. September 2005, 01:16:44
sUbLiMe13 
wAs rEtRo.

29. September 2005, 01:14:51
Rose 
Subject: Re:
sUbLiMe: ??? After only one day back?

29. September 2005, 01:14:40
harley 
Subject: Re:
sUbLiMe: Already?! ok, PM then!

29. September 2005, 01:13:36
sUbLiMe13 
SoRRy...Am bAnNed.

29. September 2005, 01:10:57
harley 
Subject: Re:
sUbLiMe: missed you too but you should still do this on general chat ;oD

29. September 2005, 00:50:15
sUbLiMe13 
hi hOn.
MiSsEd yOu.

29. September 2005, 00:49:27
harley 
Subject: Re:
sUbLiMe: hiya sUbLiMe :O)

29. September 2005, 00:47:23
sUbLiMe13 
hArLEy?

<< <   386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395   > >>
Date and time
Friends online
Favourite boards
Fellowships
Tip of the day
Copyright © 2002 - 2024 Filip Rachunek, all rights reserved.
Back to the top