BrainKing - Diskussionsforum (Feature requests)

Moderator: rod03801

Feature requests

Do you miss something on BrainKing.com and would you like to see it here? Post your request into this board!
If there is a more specific board for the request, (i.e. game rule changes etc) then it should be posted and discussed on that specific board.

For further information about Feature Requests, please visit this link on the Brainking.Info site : http://brainking.info/archives/20-About-feature-requests.html

Förteckning över diskussionsforum
Du har inte tillstånd att skriva på denna sida. Lägsta nivå på medlemskap för att kunna skriva i detta forum är Brain Springare.

Läge: Alla kan skriva

22. februari 2007, 05:53:13

goodbyebking

visa denna användares inlägg | visa tidigare inlägg | länk

Ämne: finished matches

At the bottom of a fellowship page there is a list of finished matches. Scrolling down it, there is no way to tell who won or lost.

I request that we have a red dot next to an opposing team name if they won on the list of finished matches on the fellowship page. That, or something more explicit, would be helpful to establish successes and failures at a glance.

22. februari 2007, 14:24:24

MadMonkey

visa denna användares inlägg | visa tidigare inlägg | länk

Ämne: Re: finished matches

Ändrat av MadMonkey (22. februari 2007, 14:25:25)

emmett: I did mention this before when Fencer sorted out the order of Team Matches. I thought that in the finished list the 'Match Type' & 'Time Control' could be replaced with 'Match Winner' & 'Match Score'.
Either that or have the hover work on those links so they could be seen easily rather than having to open each one all the time.

22. februari 2007, 18:27:59

goodbyebking

visa denna användares inlägg | visa tidigare inlägg | länk

Ämne: Re: finished matches

MadMonkey: I've suggested replacing "Match Type" and "Time Control" too. Looking at a long list of finished matches, that information isn't as pertinent as who actually won. I suggested the red dot this time because I thought it was another way to approach the problem.

Thanks for your support.